Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Automated Evaluation of Personalized Text Generation using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11593 v1 pith:TZ6XHAGZ submitted 2023-10-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords evaluationpersonalizedtextgenerationaspectsaupelllmsmetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Personalized text generation presents a specialized mechanism for delivering content that is specific to a user's personal context. While the research progress in this area has been rapid, evaluation still presents a challenge. Traditional automated metrics such as BLEU and ROUGE primarily measure lexical similarity to human-written references, and are not able to distinguish personalization from other subtle semantic aspects, thus falling short of capturing the nuances of personalized generated content quality. On the other hand, human judgments are costly to obtain, especially in the realm of personalized evaluation. Inspired by these challenges, we explore the use of large language models (LLMs) for evaluating personalized text generation, and examine their ability to understand nuanced user context. We present AuPEL, a novel evaluation method that distills three major semantic aspects of the generated text: personalization, quality and relevance, and automatically measures these aspects. To validate the effectiveness of AuPEL, we design carefully controlled experiments and compare the accuracy of the evaluation judgments made by LLMs versus that of judgements made by human annotators, and conduct rigorous analyses of the consistency and sensitivity of the proposed metric. We find that, compared to existing evaluation metrics, AuPEL not only distinguishes and ranks models based on their personalization abilities more accurately, but also presents commendable consistency and efficiency for this task. Our work suggests that using LLMs as the evaluators of personalized text generation is superior to traditional text similarity metrics, even though interesting new challenges still remain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tailored untruths: How personalisation challenges LLM safeguards

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 1.6-million-text study of eight LLMs in four languages finds that adding demographic personae to disinformation prompts raises jailbreak rates from 78% to 82%.

  2. PREF: Reference-Free Evaluation of Personalised Text Generation in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PREF is a reference-free, two-stage LLM judge that personalizes a quality rubric with a user profile and scores candidates against it, beating reminder-only baselines on the PrefEval implicit preference subset.

Pith tools