LOFAR Measures the Hotspot Advance Speed of the High-Redshift Blazar S5 0836+710

Alexander Kappes; Laura Vega-Garc\'ia; Manel Perucho; Marcus Br\"uggen; Matthias Kadler; Paul Ray Burd

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 30 references

LOFAR Measures the Hotspot Advance Speed of the High-Redshift Blazar S5 0836+710

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the arcsecond-scale radio structure of the high-redshift blazar S5 0836+710 is an FR II-like radio galaxy seen almost end-on, with the southern radio component as the approaching hotspot and a newly detected halo as…

desk verdict Careful LOFAR imaging, but the hotspot advance speed is an interpretation, not a measurement; the halo's position at the core contradicts the counter-hotspot geometry. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02412 v1 pith:TZP5WEQ3 submitted 2019-09-05 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Alexander Kappes , Manel Perucho , Matthias Kadler , Paul Ray Burd , Laura Vega-García , Marcus Brüggen This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA

keywords AGNjetshotspotadvancespeedDopplerboostingFRIIradiogalaxyblazarLOFARintergalacticmediumdensityS50836+710

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses 120–160 MHz LOFAR observations to image the arcsecond-scale structure of the high-redshift blazar S5 0836+710 and argues that the source is an FR II-like radio galaxy seen almost end-on. The southern radio component is interpreted as the hotspot of the approaching jet, and a newly detected steep-spectrum halo around the core is interpreted as the counter-hotspot. From the brightness ratio of these two features under differential Doppler boosting, the paper derives a hotspot advance speed of 0.01–0.036 c. If this is right, the jet terminus of this distant source is moving slowly today, must have moved faster in the past, and is plowing through an intergalactic medium denser than is typical for lower-redshift FR II radio galaxies — making blazar hotspots a new probe of the young universe.

What carries the argument

The central object is the brightness ratio of the approaching hotspot to the receding counter-hotspot, Fh/Fch = ((1 + βh cos θ)/(1 − βh cos(θ − ϕ)))^(3−α), where βh is the hotspot advance speed in units of c, θ is the viewing angle of the approaching jet, ϕ is the misalignment angle of the counterjet, and α is the spectral index. This identity converts a measured brightness asymmetry into a velocity under the assumption that the two hotspot regions are intrinsically identical apart from Doppler boosting. The new observational ingredient is the detection of the halo near the core, which provides the previously missing counter-hotspot flux that makes the ratio measurable.

What would settle it

A deep 120–160 MHz image at roughly 0.1-arcsecond resolution that resolves the halo into a one-sided lobe on the counterjet side, or a spectral-age map showing the halo is not systematically younger than the southern hotspot, would break the counter-hotspot identification and with it the derived advance-speed range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At an effective frequency of 143 MHz, LOFAR resolves S5 0836+710 into an unresolved flat-spectrum core, a resolved steep-spectrum component about 1.5 arcseconds southwest of the core, and a newly detected resolved steep-spectrum halo surrounding the core. The paper interprets the southern component as the hotspot of the approaching jet and the halo as the counter-hotspot of a highly projected double-sided source. Using the measured flux ratio Fh/Fch = (1.19 ± 0.11), a spectral index of α = −0.7, a viewing angle of θ = 3.2°, and the differential Doppler-boosting relation, it constrains the hotspot advance speed to 0.010–0.036 c. Because a constant advance speed at this value would imply a source age of 2 × $10^{7}$ to 8 × $10^{8}$ years — exceeding the plausible lifetime of a powerful FR II source by a factor of 2 to 80 — the paper concludes that the hotspot must have advanced faster in the past, consistent with a jet that was originally highly relativistic and has since decollimated into a mildly relativistic flow. The implied ambient densities are one to two orders of magnitude above those found in less distant FR II radio galaxies, favoring the upper end of the advance-speed range.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the identification of the newly detected halo as the counter-hotspot, intrinsically identical to the southern hotspot apart from Doppler boosting, so that the entire measured flux ratio of 1.19 ± 0.11 is a beaming effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The southern component of S5 0836+710 is not a relic of a disrupted jet but an active hotspot of the approaching jet, making the source a strongly projected FR II-like radio galaxy.
At an advance speed of 0.01–0.036 c, a constant-speed age would exceed the lifetime of a powerful FR II source, so the jet head must have been advancing faster in the past.
The ambient density around this z = 2.22 source is one to two orders of magnitude higher than values found in lower-redshift FR II galaxies, which favors the upper part of the derived speed range.
The jet flow near the hotspot is only mildly relativistic, with βj,h up to 0.54, and is likely proton-dominated on large scales, requiring proton entrainment along the jet.
The same flux-ratio method can be applied to samples of high-power blazars to measure intergalactic-medium density as a function of redshift out to very early epochs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If other blazars show the same two-sided pattern, many one-sided kiloparsec-scale radio morphologies now attributed to jet disruption may instead be FR II-like sources seen at small angles, with the counter-side hidden by beaming and projection.
A sample extension of the same flux-ratio method, using VLBI-derived viewing angles, could map intergalactic-medium density versus redshift beyond z ≈ 2, an epoch where classical radio-galaxy samples run thin.
The implied deceleration of the jet head is naturally connected to jet stability theory: the same instability growth invoked to decollimate the flow would predict a head speed that decreases with time, which is testable in numerical jet-propagation simulations.
Re-measuring the hotspot-to-counter-hotspot flux ratio at a second frequency would test the (3−α) boosting exponent directly; a mismatch would expose intrinsic asymmetry between the two regions rather than beaming.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a carefully executed LOFAR VLBI observation that genuinely resolves new structure in S5 0836+710, but the headline number—the hotspot advance speed of 0.01–0.036 c—is not a measurement in the usual sense. It is a parameter inferred from a morphological identification that the authors themselves flag as interpretive, and the residual image undercuts that identification.

The imaging work is solid. The data reduction follows standard VLBI practice for international LOFAR stations, and the spectral index maps produced from the 11 bands, cross-checked against MERLIN at 1.6 GHz, are plausible. The detection of a resolved, steep-spectrum halo around the core is genuinely new, and the argument that the southern component's spectral index of about −1 and circumferential polarization do not fit a disrupted-jet relic is reasonable. If the source is indeed a small-angle FR II, that would change the physical picture.

The weak point is the counter-hotspot identification, and the paper's own figure makes it worse than the text lets on. Equation (1) converts the flux ratio Fh/Fch = 1.19 into a speed under the assumption that the halo and the southern component are intrinsically identical, Doppler-boosted hotspot and counter-hotspot. But the residual image (Fig. 6) shows the diffuse halo centroid at ≲0.01 arcsec from the core. The geometry in Sec. 4.2 and Appendix A—θ = 3.2°, φ ≥ 2.5°, Dch ≈ 229 kpc—would put the counter-hotspot at a projected separation of roughly 0.3–0.75 arcsec, well outside the beam and clearly visible. A component centered on the core is much more naturally a cocoon, backflow, or lobe associated with the core, whose Doppler factor would be unrelated to the hotspot advance. If that is the case, the speed range has no basis. The authors do say the interpretation is provisional, but the abstract presents 0.01–0.036 c as a derived speed, which overstates the certainty.

There are also a couple of numeric slip-ups (the '17.88 Mpc' in Sec. 4.1 and the source-age range) that should have been caught in editing.

This paper is for AGN and radio-galaxy people, especially those interested in using LOFAR to probe high-redshift jet environments. The method itself is not new—differential hotspot boosting has been applied to radio galaxies—but the application to a z=2.22 blazar is. The paper deserves peer review because the observations are worth publishing; it needs revision to separate the detection from the interpretation and to acknowledge that the halo position contradicts the proposed geometry.

Send it to referees, but expect the central claim to be challenged.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents LOFAR international-baseline observations of the high-redshift blazar S5 0836+710 at 120-160 MHz. The data reveal a compact core, a resolved component about 1.5 arcsec to the southwest, and a newly detected steep-spectrum halo surrounding the core. The authors interpret the morphology as an FR II-like radio galaxy seen at small inclination, identify the southern component with the approaching hotspot and the halo with the counter-hotspot, and use the measured flux ratio of 1.19±0.11 in Eq. (1) to derive a hotspot advance speed of 0.01-0.036 c. Based on this speed they derive jet parameters and conclude that the ambient IGM at z=2.22 is denser than typical lower-redshift FR II environments.

Significance. If the identification holds, the paper provides a rare direct measurement of a hotspot advance speed at z>2 and demonstrates the power of LOFAR international-baseline observations for studying arcsecond-scale structures of high-redshift blazars. The observational work is careful: calibration, imaging, spectral-index mapping, and Gaussian model fitting are described in sufficient detail, and the new halo detection is an interesting result. The central speed claim, however, is model-dependent rather than an independent measurement. It rests on the identification of the halo as the counter-hotspot and on the assumption that the two regions are intrinsically identical and differ only by Doppler boosting. These assumptions are acknowledged in the text but are not secured by the imaging data; the manuscript's own Fig. 6 shows the halo centroid at the core position, which is difficult to reconcile with the adopted geometry.

major comments (3)

[Section 3 / Fig. 6 and Section 4.2 / Eq. (1)] The identification of the halo as the counter-hotspot is not supported by the image. The residual image in Fig. 6 places the diffuse halo centroid at ≲0.01 arcsec from the core, while the geometry adopted in Sect. 4.2 and Appendix A (θ=3.2°, ϕ≥2.5°, Dch=229 kpc) puts the counter-hotspot at a projected separation of order 0.3-0.8 arcsec from the core. A component centered on the core is more naturally described as a core-associated cocoon, backflow, or lobe; if that is the case, the flux ratio Fh/Fch in Eq. (1) is not a differential Doppler ratio between two identical hotspots, and the derived βh range has no basis. This is the load-bearing assumption of the advance-speed measurement and must be either independently justified (e.g., by polarization, spectral-index, or morphology arguments specific to the halo) or the result must be reframed as a conditional model estimate.
[Section 4.2 / Eq. (1)] The derivation also assumes that the two regions are intrinsically identical, including the same spectral index. The paper uses α=-0.7 in the exponent, but the measured halo spectral index is about -1, while the southern component is about -0.7. If this difference is intrinsic, then the frequency-dependent flux ratio is not described by the single-α Doppler formula. Moreover, because the exponent is 3-α≈3.7, an intrinsic asymmetry of only about 20% between the two regions changes the inferred βh substantially. The paper should provide a sensitivity analysis and clearly state that the 0.01-0.036 c range is conditional on intrinsic symmetry.
[Section 4.3-4.4 / Table 1] The subsequent jet-power and IGM-density estimates propagate the uncertain βh and the adopted Rj,h. Table 1 shows that the derived ambient density ranges over nearly two orders of magnitude (0.5-1.5×10^-24 to 1.5-5×10^-26 g cm^-3) between the βh=0.01 and βh=0.036 cases, so the conclusion that the IGM is denser than typical lower-redshift FR II environments is not robust unless the advance speed is pinned down. The authors do note the dependence, but the abstract's statement that the IGM density 'could be substantially higher' should be softened or explicitly tied to the upper end of the βh range.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2] The four discarded frequency bands and the flux-density correction factor derived from LOFAR core stations should be documented; as written, the calibration procedure cannot be fully reproduced.
[Section 4.1] The text 'At a distance of 17.88 Mpc' is inconsistent with the source redshift z=2.22 and appears to be an error; the physical scale should be expressed in kiloparsecs or the sentence rephrased.
[Section 4.2] There is a typo: 'S5 0836 +714' should be 'S5 0836+710'.
[Section 5] The words 'occurance' and 'intraluster' should be 'occurrence' and 'intracluster', respectively.
[Section 4.2 / Fig. 8] The caption of Fig. 8 is difficult to parse; please define β, the meaning of the lines, and the shaded region in the caption rather than only in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the hotspot advance speed is solved from the Doppler-boosting equation using measured flux ratio, spectral index, and an external viewing angle.

full rationale

The derivation chain in Sect. 4.2 takes the LOFAR-measured flux ratio Fh/Fch = (1.19 ± 0.11), the measured spectral index α ≈ −0.7, and the externally estimated viewing angle θ = 3.2° and inverts Eq. (1) for βh. This is a standard inversion, not a tautology: βh is not defined to equal the flux ratio, and the halo component has independent imaging and spectral-index support. The counter-hotspot identification is explicitly presented as an interpretation ('can be interpreted as the counter-hotspot region'; 'circumstantial evidence'), and the paper acknowledges the conditional nature in Sect. 4.4 and the Conclusion; an assumption being interpretation-dependent is a robustness concern, not a circularity. Self-citations to Perucho et al. (2012a,b) and Vega-García (2018) are used for the broader jet-evolution narrative and for jet-parameter inputs, but the advance-speed result itself does not reduce to those citations. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore, under the hard rules requiring a quoted reduction, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central speed result depends on a chain of modeling choices: the halo must be the counter-hotspot, the two hotspots must be intrinsically identical, the viewing angle must be 3.2 degrees, and the advance speed must be equal on both sides. These are reasonable but not independently verified, and they jointly determine the quoted 0.01-0.036 c range. The jet power and ambient density estimates add more assumptions (cold jet, equipartition, flux conservation) and have broad ranges. No new physical entity is introduced; the only new object is an interpretation of observed emission.

free parameters (3)

Inclination angle theta = 3.2 degrees (from Pushkarev et al. 2009)
Used in Eq. (1) to convert the flux ratio into the hotspot advance speed; the derived beta_h range depends on this external VLBI-based estimate.
Misalignment angle phi = 2.5 to 5 degrees
Free geometric parameter in Eq. (1); constrained only by the requirement that the counter-hotspot blend into the core at the LOFAR beam. The allowed phi range partly sets the beta_h range.
Hotspot or jet radius at the reverse shock Rj,h = 2.5 or 4.5 kpc
Chosen by hand in Sect. 4.3 to represent either hotspot-only or hotspot-plus-lobe; directly controls the jet power, pressure, magnetic field, and ambient density estimates in Table 1, though not the central beta_h value.

assumptions (8)

ad hoc to paper The flux ratio of the two hotspot regions is determined solely by differential Doppler boosting of identical emitting regions (Eq. 1).
This is the central modeling assumption; no intrinsic asymmetry between jet and counter-jet hotspots is considered. Introduced in Sect. 4.2 before Eq. (1).
ad hoc to paper The newly detected steep-spectrum halo near the core is the counter-hotspot (or counter-hotspot/lobe) of the receding jet.
This identification is the premise on which the flux-ratio speed derivation rests; the halo is centered on the core rather than at the geometric counter-hotspot position, so the identification is uncertain. Stated in Sect. 4.2.
domain assumption The hotspot advance speed is the same for the approaching and receding jets.
Assumed in Sect. 4.2: 'the advance speed beta_h of the jet head, which we assume to be the same for both hotspots.' Standard in FR II hotspot models but not independently verified.
domain assumption The inclination angle to the line of sight is 3.2 degrees.
Taken from Pushkarev et al. (2009) VLBI observations; the derived beta_h range would shift for other viewing angles.
domain assumption The jet is kinetically dominated, cold, and in the high-Mach regime at the hotspot, so Lj = 0.5 rho v^3 A (Eq. 3).
Assumed in Sect. 4.3 based on Appendix B and a stability analysis; used for all jet parameter and ambient density estimates.
domain assumption Equipartition between non-thermal particles and magnetic field holds in the hotspot.
Invoked in Sect. 4.3 to derive magnetic field and pressure; standard for FR II hotspots but an assumption.
domain assumption Magnetic flux is conserved from the 1.6 GHz jet to the interaction site and the MHD jump conditions apply at the reverse shock.
Used in Sect. 4.3, Eqs. (5) and (C.4), to close the iterative jet parameter derivation.
domain assumption The source age is estimated assuming constant hotspot advance speed over the source lifetime.
Used in Sect. 4.2 to derive the age range and conclude the speed must have been higher in the past; the authors then reject this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LOFAR Measures the Hotspot Advance Speed of the High-Redshift Blazar S5 0836+710." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TZP5WEQ3

@misc{pith2026190902412,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LOFAR Measures the Hotspot Advance Speed of the High-Redshift Blazar S5 0836+710},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TZP5WEQ3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02412}
}

abstract

Our goal is to study the termination of an AGN jet in the young universe and to deduce physical parameters of the jet and the intergalactic medium. We use LOFAR to image the long-wavelength radio emission of the high-redshift blazar S5 0836+710 on arcsecond scales between 120 MHz and 160 MHz. The LOFAR image shows a compact unresolved core and a resolved emission region about 1.5 arcsec to the southwest of the radio core. This structure is in general agreement with previous higher-frequency radio observations with MERLIN and the VLA. The southern component shows a moderately steep spectrum with a spectral index of about $\gtrsim -1$ while the spectral index of the core is flat to slightly inverted. In addition, we detect for the first time a resolved steep-spectrum halo with a spectral index of about $-1$ surrounding the core. The arcsecond-scale radio structure of S5 0836+710 can be understood as an FR II-like radio galaxy observed at a small viewing angle. The southern component can be interpreted as the region of the approaching jet's terminal hotspot and the halo-like diffuse component near the core can be interpreted as the counter-hotspot region. From the differential Doppler boosting of both features, we can derive the hotspot advance speed to $(0.01-0.036)$ c. At a constant advance speed, the derived age of the source would exceed the total lifetime of such a powerful FR II-like radio galaxy substantially. Thus, the hotspot advance speed must have been higher in the past in agreement with a scenario in which the originally highly relativistic jet has lost collimation due to the growth of instabilities and has transformed into an only mildly relativistic flow. Our data suggest that the density of the intergalactic medium around this distant ($z=2.22$) AGN could be substantially higher than the values typically found in less distant FR II radio galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02412 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** (uv)-coverage of the international-LOFAR data set at 135 MHz. 3. Results 3 shows a stacked image of the 11 bands (see online material for the images of the individual bands) corresponding to a central frequency of 143 MHz and a bandwidth of 34 MHz. The general structure is in agreement with previous higherfrequency observations of S5 0836+710 on comparable scales and angular resolution (see especially [PITH_FULL_I… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Measured visibilities in the 135 MHz LOFAR data set as a function of (u,v)-radius. Blue dots represent visibilities, while red dots show the model developed in the hybrid imaging process. core is known to contain a southward-directed compact VLBI jet with an extent of about 200 mas or 1.5 kpc (Perucho et al. 2012a), that shows signs of growing instabilities with distance downstream. These were thought to lead to a… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Spectral index map of eleven frequency bands model-fitted pixelwise. The contour levels are obtained from the 129 MHz image drawn at (−2, 2, 4, 8, ... ) times 15 mJy beam−1 . See online material for images of the individual-bands from which this map has been produced. age domain. We represented the core with an unresolved bright Gaussian component and modeled the halo with a broader and fainter Gaussian component. … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Spectral index image between 1.6 GHz (MERLIN) and 138 MHz (LOFAR). The contour levels are obtained from the MERLIN image and are drawn at (−2, 2, 4, 8, ... ) times 30 mJy beam−1 . component and (1.2 ± 0.2) Jy in flux density, translating to an intrinsic luminosity of (…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Residual LOFAR image after subtraction of the 2D-Gaussian modeled core component. The lowest contour is at 3σ significance. Contour levels are shown at (−2, 2, 4, 8, ... ) times 2.7 mJy beam−1 . The RMS is 3.1 mJy beam−1 . The beam size (shown in the bottom left) is 0.…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Model of the source geometry in S5 0836+710 as an FR II radio galaxy observed at a small inclination angle θ. HS denotes the hotspot region closer to the observer, and CHS denotes the counter-hotspot region. The different arm lengths are due to the different light tra…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: ϕ lines show the misalignment needed to explain the measured flux ratio with respect to a certain β. β values are represented by the drawn arcs, and increase from 0.02339 (leftmost arc) up to 0.02348 (rightmost arc) in increments of 3.4 · 10−6 . ϕ 0 is the minimum need…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The minimum energy assumption, see Pyrzas et al. (2015), yields magnetic field strengths in the range 0.7 ≤ B mG ≤ 1.8 within the southern hotspot. MHD jump conditions at the reverse shock giving rise to the hotspot: vj,hB φ j,h = vhB φ h , (5) allows us to derive a ne…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

Anile, A. M. 1989, Relativistic ﬂuids and magneto-ﬂuids: With applications in astrophysics and plasma physics

work page 1989
[2]

1993, Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 31, 473

Antonucci, R. 1993, Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 31, 473

1993
[3]

2018, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1812.06025] Article number, page 8 of 9 A

Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. 2018, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1812.06025] Article number, page 8 of 9 A. Kappes et. al: LOFAR Measures the Hotspot Advance Speed of S5 0836+710 Table B.1. Jet parameters at VLBI scales. Bφ 1.6 GHz βj,1.6 GHz Rj,1.6 GHz L178 MHz Lp Lj [mG] [pc] [10 36 erg s−1 Hz−1] [10 45 erg s−1] [10 45 erg s−1] 10 0.9965 20 1.7 2.8 100

arXiv 2018
[4]

C., Mol, J

Broekema, P. C., Mol, J. J. D., Nijboer, R., et al. 2018, Astronomy and Comput- ing, 23, 180

work page 2018
[5]

J., Lister, M

Cooper, N. J., Lister, M. L., & Kochanczyk, M. D. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 171, 376

work page 2007
[6]

A., Sprinkle, T

Daly, R. A., Sprinkle, T. B., O’Dea, C. P., Kharb, P., & Baum, S. A. 2012, MN- RAS, 423, 2498 Fanaroﬀ, B. & Riley, J. 1974, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety, 167, 31P

work page 2012
[7]

Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 285, In- formation Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, 109

2003
[8]

Hardcastle, M. J. & Worrall, D. M. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 562

work page 2000

Show all 30 references

[9]

1992, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 266, 93

Hummel, C., Muxlow, T., Krichbaum, T., et al. 1992, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 266, 93

1992
[10]

& Saikia, D

Jeyakumar, S. & Saikia, D. 2000, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 311, 397

2000
[11]

& Kino, M

Kawakatu, N. & Kino, M. 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 370, 1513

2006
[12]

2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 710, 764

Kharb, P., Lister, M., & Cooper, N. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 710, 764

2010
[13]

P., Baum, S

Kharb, P., O’Dea, C. P., Baum, S. A., et al. 2008, ApJS, 174, 74

2008
[14]

2012, Central Engines: Acceleration, Collimation and Conﬁne- ment of Jets (John Wiley and Sons), 81–114

Komissarov, S. 2012, Central Engines: Acceleration, Collimation and Conﬁne- ment of Jets (John Wiley and Sons), 81–114

2012
[15]

Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1987, Fluid Mechanics, Second Edition: V olume 6 (Course of Theoretical Physics), 2nd edn., Course of theoretical physics / by L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, V ol. 6 (Butterworth-Heinemann)

1987
[16]

& Williams, A

Leahy, J. & Williams, A. 1984, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety, 210, 929

1984
[17]

Marti, J. M. & Muller, E. 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 258, 317

1994
[18]

1989, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 219, 63

Meisenheimer, K., Roser, H.-J., Hiltner, P., et al. 1989, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 219, 63

1989
[19]

G., & Roeser, H

Meisenheimer, K., Yates, M. G., & Roeser, H. J. 1997, A&A, 325, 57

1997
[20]

Moran, J. M. & Dhawan, V . 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Paciﬁc Confer- ence Series, V ol. 82, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, ed. J. A. Zensus, P. J. Diamond, & P. J. Napier, 161 O’Dea, C. P., Barvainis, R., & Challis, P. M. 1988, The Astronomical Journ...

1995
[21]

2016, in SF2A-2016: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed

Pandey-Pommier, M., Intema, H., & Heald, G. 2016, in SF2A-2016: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. C. Reylé, J. Richard, L. Cambrésy, M. Deleuil, E. Pécontal, L. Tresse, & I. Vauglin, 379–383

2016
[22]

& Martí, J

Perucho, M. & Martí, J. M. 2003, PASA, 20, 94

2003
[23]

2019, MNRAS, 482, 3718

Perucho, M., Martí, J.-M., & Quilis, V . 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3718

2019
[24]

2017, MNRAS, 471, L120

Perucho, M., Martí, J.-M., Quilis, V ., & Borja-Lloret, M. 2017, MNRAS, 471, L120

2017
[25]

2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 507, L33

Pushkarev, A., Kovalev, Y ., Lister, M., & Savolainen, T. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 507, L33

2009
[26]

2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 574, A30

Pyrzas, S., Steenbrugge, K., & Blundell, K. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 574, A30

2015
[27]

Shepherd, M. C. 1997, in Astronomical Society of the Paciﬁc Conference Series, V ol. 125, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VI, ed. G. Hunt & H. Payne, 77

1997
[28]

P., & Hilldrup, K

Swarup, G., Sinha, R. P., & Hilldrup, K. 1984, MNRAS, 208, 813

1984
[29]

Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. 1995, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Paciﬁc, 107, 803 van Haarlem, M. á., Wise, M., Gunst, A., et al. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 556, A2 Vega-García, L. 2018, PhD thesis, University of Cologne

1995
[30]

Zensus, J. A. 1997, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 35, 607 Article number, page 9 of 9

1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Anile, A. M. 1989, Relativistic ﬂuids and magneto-ﬂuids: With applications in astrophysics and plasma physics

work page 1989

[2] [2]

1993, Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 31, 473

Antonucci, R. 1993, Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 31, 473

1993

[3] [3]

2018, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1812.06025] Article number, page 8 of 9 A

Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. 2018, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1812.06025] Article number, page 8 of 9 A. Kappes et. al: LOFAR Measures the Hotspot Advance Speed of S5 0836+710 Table B.1. Jet parameters at VLBI scales. Bφ 1.6 GHz βj,1.6 GHz Rj,1.6 GHz L178 MHz Lp Lj [mG] [pc] [10 36 erg s−1 Hz−1] [10 45 erg s−1] [10 45 erg s−1] 10 0.9965 20 1.7 2.8 100

arXiv 2018

[4] [4]

C., Mol, J

Broekema, P. C., Mol, J. J. D., Nijboer, R., et al. 2018, Astronomy and Comput- ing, 23, 180

work page 2018

[5] [5]

J., Lister, M

Cooper, N. J., Lister, M. L., & Kochanczyk, M. D. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 171, 376

work page 2007

[6] [6]

A., Sprinkle, T

Daly, R. A., Sprinkle, T. B., O’Dea, C. P., Kharb, P., & Baum, S. A. 2012, MN- RAS, 423, 2498 Fanaroﬀ, B. & Riley, J. 1974, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety, 167, 31P

work page 2012

[7] [7]

Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 285, In- formation Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, 109

2003

[8] [8]

Hardcastle, M. J. & Worrall, D. M. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 562

work page 2000