REVIEW 1 cited by
Explainable AI does not provide the explanations end-users are asking for
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques are frequently required by users in many AI systems with the goal of understanding complex models, their associated predictions, and gaining trust. While suitable for some specific tasks during development, their adoption by organisations to enhance trust in machine learning systems has unintended consequences. In this paper we discuss XAI's limitations in deployment and conclude that transparency alongside with rigorous validation are better suited to gaining trust in AI systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Mind the XAI Gap: A Human-Centered LLM Framework for Democratizing Explainable AI
An in-context LLM framework that produces dual expert and non-expert explanations, evaluated on well-being clustering with a user study and LIME-alignment metrics.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.