Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Approximability of Steiner Tree in $\ell_p$-metrics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.02189 v3 pith:U5MTWSKE submitted 2023-06-03 cs.CC cs.CGcs.DS

classification cs.CCcs.CGcs.DS
keywords metricsteinertreeapx-hardpointsterminalscalledchleb
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In the Continuous Steiner Tree problem (CST), we are given as input a set of points (called terminals) in a metric space and ask for the minimum-cost tree connecting them. Additional points (called Steiner points) from the metric space can be introduced as nodes in the solution. In the Discrete Steiner Tree problem (DST), we are given in addition to the terminals, a set of facilities, and any solution tree connecting the terminals can only contain the Steiner points from this set of facilities. Trevisan [SICOMP'00] showed that CST and DST are APX-hard when the input lies in the $\ell_1$-metric (and Hamming metric). Chleb\'ik and Chleb\'ikov\'a [TCS'08] showed that DST is NP-hard to approximate to factor of $96/95\approx 1.01$ in the graph metric (and consequently $\ell_\infty$-metric). Prior to this work, it was unclear if CST and DST are APX-hard in essentially every other popular metric. In this work, we prove that DST is APX-hard in every $\ell_p$-metric. We also prove that CST is APX-hard in the $\ell_{\infty}$-metric. Finally, we relate CST and DST, showing a general reduction from CST to DST in $\ell_p$-metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TCS-BENCH: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Generative AI Theoretical Computer Science Research Ability

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper introduces TCS-Bench, a 300-task proof-generation benchmark from top TCS papers, and reports frontier LLM accuracies from 30% to 68% using an automated verifier.

Pith tools