Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

ANAH-v2: Scaling Analytical Hallucination Annotation of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04693 v2 pith:UEX6YPOC submitted 2024-07-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords hallucinationannotatorannotationdatasetlanguagellmsdetectiondomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit hallucinations in long-form question-answering tasks across various domains and wide applications. Current hallucination detection and mitigation datasets are limited in domains and sizes, which struggle to scale due to prohibitive labor costs and insufficient reliability of existing hallucination annotators. To facilitate the scalable oversight of LLM hallucinations, this paper introduces an iterative self-training framework that simultaneously and progressively scales up the hallucination annotation dataset and improves the accuracy of the hallucination annotator. Based on the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm, in each iteration, the framework first applies a hallucination annotation pipeline to annotate a scaled dataset and then trains a more accurate hallucination annotator on the dataset. This new hallucination annotator is adopted in the hallucination annotation pipeline used for the next iteration. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the finally obtained hallucination annotator with only 7B parameters surpasses the performance of GPT-4 and obtains new state-of-the-art hallucination detection results on HaluEval and HalluQA by zero-shot inference. Such an annotator can not only evaluate the hallucination levels of various LLMs on the large-scale dataset but also help to mitigate the hallucination of LLMs generations, with the Natural Language Inference (NLI) metric increasing from 25% to 37% on HaluEval.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ReasoningTrack: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Long-term Vision-Language Tracking

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    FAITH masks numbers in real 10-K reports to test when financial LLMs hallucinate, and finds even top models err on 10-20% of multi-step calculations.

  2. Hallucination Detection and Mitigation with Diffusion in Multi-Variate Time-Series Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pre-trained multivariate time-series imputation models frequently return values that violate known relations between variables, and a diffusion-based score can detect and filter these errors.

  3. MIH-TCCT: Mitigating Inconsistent Hallucinations in LLMs via Event-Driven Text-Code Cyclic Training

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MIH-TCCT reduces inconsistent hallucinations by cyclically training LLMs to translate event-based text into structured code and back, without task-specific fine-tuning.

  4. A Survey of Automatic Evaluation Methods on Text, Visual and Speech Generations

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified taxonomy and comparative meta-evaluation of automatic evaluation methods across text, vision, and speech generation, concluding that LLM-based evaluators dominate current practice.

  5. Loki's Dance of Illusions: A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM hallucination research that formalizes hallucination types and argues, via incompleteness and undecidability arguments, that hallucinations cannot be fully eliminated.

Pith tools