Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Safe LLM-Controlled Robots with Formal Guarantees via Reachability Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.03911 v1 pith:UOBNV3N4 submitted 2025-03-05 cs.RO cs.LGcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords formalsafetyframeworkguaranteesmodelssystemsystemsanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in robotic systems presents unique safety challenges, particularly in unpredictable environments. Although LLMs, leveraging zero-shot learning, enhance human-robot interaction and decision-making capabilities, their inherent probabilistic nature and lack of formal guarantees raise significant concerns for safety-critical applications. Traditional model-based verification approaches often rely on precise system models, which are difficult to obtain for real-world robotic systems and may not be fully trusted due to modeling inaccuracies, unmodeled dynamics, or environmental uncertainties. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a safety assurance framework for LLM-controlled robots based on data-driven reachability analysis, a formal verification technique that ensures all possible system trajectories remain within safe operational limits. Our framework specifically investigates the problem of instructing an LLM to navigate the robot to a specified goal and assesses its ability to generate low-level control actions that successfully guide the robot safely toward that goal. By leveraging historical data to construct reachable sets of states for the robot-LLM system, our approach provides rigorous safety guarantees against unsafe behaviors without relying on explicit analytical models. We validate the framework through experimental case studies in autonomous navigation and task planning, demonstrating its effectiveness in mitigating risks associated with LLM-generated commands. This work advances the integration of formal methods into LLM-based robotics, offering a principled and practical approach to ensuring safety in next-generation autonomous systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses

    cs.CR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The survey organizes over 400 papers on embodied AI safety into a multi-level taxonomy and flags overlooked issues such as fragile multimodal fusion and unstable planning under jailbreaks.

  2. Structured LLM Reasoning for Zero-Shot Human--Robot Coordination Under Hidden Goals

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Dec-POMDP-structured LLM architecture with theory-of-mind inference improved coordination steps and trust in a five-person pilot, though the evidence is limited.

  3. Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Integrated Robotic Systems: A Unified Approach to Security and Safety

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified framework of secure prompting, state memory, and rule-based safety validation improves LLM-driven robot navigation under prompt injection attacks and obstacle-heavy environments, with modest real-robot verification.

  4. A Red Teaming Roadmap Towards System-Level Safety

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper from Scale AI argues that red teaming research should prioritize product-level safety specifications, realistic attacker models, and system-level monitoring over abstract model-level harm benchmarks.

Pith tools