Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bertrand's paradox: a physical solution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1008.1878 v1 pith:UR6HU6SR submitted 2010-08-11 physics.data-an math.HO

classification physics.data-anmath.HO
keywords paradoxprobabilitybertrandchordcirclephysicalsolutionanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a conclusive answer to Bertrand's paradox, a long standing open issue in the basic physical interpretation of probability. The paradox deals with the existence of mutually inconsistent results when looking for the probability that a chord, drawn at random in a circle, is longer than the side of an inscribed equilateral triangle. We obtain a unique solution by substituting chord drawing with the throwing of a straw of finite length L on a circle of radius R, thus providing a satisfactory operative definition of the associated experiment. The obtained probability turns out to be a function of the ratio L/R, as intuitively expected.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probability and Ambiguity

    math.PR 2024-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper re-derives known answers to classic probability puzzles and claims the obtuse-triangle probability is 3/4, but that claim relies on an unstated uniform-largest-angle assumption.

Pith tools