REVIEW
Towards declarative comparabilities: application to functional dependencies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards declarative comparabilities: application to functional dependencies
read the original abstract
In real life, data are often of poor quality as a result, for instance, of uncertainty, mismeasurements, missing values or bad inputs. This issue hampers an implicit yet crucial operation of every database management system: equality testing. Indeed, equality is, in the end, a context-dependent operation with a plethora of interpretations. In practice, the treatment of different types of equality is left to programmers, who have to struggle with those interpretations in their code. We propose a new lattice-based declarative framework to address this problem. It allows specification of numerous semantics for equality at a high level of abstraction. To go beyond tuple equality, we study functional dependencies (FDs) in the light of our framework. First, we define abstract FDs, generalizing classical FDs. These lead to the consideration of particular interpretations of equality: realities. Building upon realities and possible/certain answers, we introduce possible/certain FDs and give some related complexity results.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.