pith. sign in

arxiv: 2007.07399 · v1 · pith:UTYUOOK3new · submitted 2020-07-14 · 💻 cs.CY

Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning Datasets

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords datasetsdatalearningmachinebeenembeddedattentionback
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In response to algorithmic unfairness embedded in sociotechnical systems, significant attention has been focused on the contents of machine learning datasets which have revealed biases towards white, cisgender, male, and Western data subjects. In contrast, comparatively less attention has been paid to the histories, values, and norms embedded in such datasets. In this work, we outline a research program - a genealogy of machine learning data - for investigating how and why these datasets have been created, what and whose values influence the choices of data to collect, the contextual and contingent conditions of their creation. We describe the ways in which benchmark datasets in machine learning operate as infrastructure and pose four research questions for these datasets. This interrogation forces us to "bring the people back in" by aiding us in understanding the labor embedded in dataset construction, and thereby presenting new avenues of contestation for other researchers encountering the data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models

    cs.CL 2021-12 accept novelty 6.0

    The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...

  2. Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generative AI should be evaluated through computational hermeneutics using iterative, human-inclusive benchmarks that measure cultural context rather than isolated model outputs.