Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Sampling and equidistribution theorems for elliptic second order operators, lifting of eigenvalues, and applications

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves scale-free sampling and equidistribution bounds for eigenfunctions of elliptic second-order operators with Lipschitz coefficients, with no smallness condition on the Lipschitz constant.

desk verdict A honest repair of a flawed proof: no new theorems, but the corrected chaining argument is a genuine contribution; referee it, with the imported NRT19 Carleman estimate as the point to check. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16655 v1 pith:UUD2NLIX submitted 2025-05-22 math.AP math-phmath.MPmath.OC

Martin Tautenhahn , Ivan Veselic This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MPmath.OC MSC 35J1535B6035P1581Q10
keywords uniquecontinuationequidistributionofeigenfunctionssamplinginequalityCarlemanestimatesellipticsecond-orderoperatorsliftingeigenvaluesWegnerscale-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a corrected version of a 2020 publication and proves scale-free quantitative sampling and equidistribution estimates for eigenfunctions of elliptic second-order operators whose leading coefficients are only Lipschitz continuous, on Euclidean space and on finite cubes. Scale-free means the $L^2$-norm on the whole domain is controlled by the norm on a fine grid of balls, with a constant that does not grow with the cube size. Earlier results of this kind required the leading coefficients to vary slowly; the correction removes that smallness condition. These bounds are then used to prove lifting of eigenvalues and of the infimum of the essential spectrum, uncertainty relations for spectral projectors on short energy intervals, and Wegner estimates for random potentials. This matters because such quantitative unique continuation is the mechanism behind eigenvalue lifting and Wegner estimates in random Schrödinger theory and behind spectral inequalities used in control theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a quantitative Carleman estimate, a weighted a-priori bound on solutions of the elliptic equation with explicit control of the weight's size in terms of the ellipticity and Lipschitz constants, imported from the paper's reference [NRT19]. From it the proof derives a three-annuli inequality, then an interpolation inequality, then a chaining argument that repeats the estimate across periodicity cells and replaces the covering bound that fails for large Lipschitz constants. For finite cubes, a reflection extension under the condition that off-diagonal coefficients vanish on the sides preserves ellipticity and Lipschitz bounds and supplies a buffer cube around $\Lambda_L$. The Cacciopoli inequality from [BTV17] and the explicit constants in the Carleman estimate are what make the final exponent $N$ depend only on dimension, ellipticity, and Lipschitz bounds rather than on the cube size.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to take $d=2$, $A(x)=(2+\cos(Nx_1))I$, $b=c=0$, choose a known eigenfunction on a large cube, and test the sampling inequality for a $(1,\delta)$-equidistributed set with $\delta$ just below the stated $\delta_0$; because $\delta_0$ shrinks as the Lipschitz constant grows, a failure for a finite $N$ would disprove the scale-free claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the sampling inequality $\|\psi\|^2_{S_{\delta,Z}} + \delta^2\|\zeta\|^2 \ge \delta^N(1+\|V\|_\infty^{2/3}+\|b\|_\infty^2+\|c\|_\infty^{2/3})\|\psi\|^2$, valid for every $\psi$ in the operator domain and every $\zeta$ satisfying $|H\psi| \le |V\psi|+|\zeta|$ almost everywhere, for all $(1,\delta)$-equidistributed sequences $Z$ and all small $\delta$. On a cube $\Lambda_L$ the same estimate holds with a constant independent of $L$, under the auxiliary condition that off-diagonal coefficients vanish on the sides of the cube. The paper states that the statements of the earlier publication's main theorems are unchanged; what is repaired are the proofs in the three-annuli and chaining sections. From these estimates follow concrete bounds on how far eigenvalues and the bottom of the essential spectrum move under potentials concentrated on the sampling set, and the advertised Wegner and uncertainty relations.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the imported quantitative Carleman estimate with explicit constants; for the cube results, the off-diagonal coefficients must also vanish on the sides of the cube so the reflection extension preserves ellipticity and Lipschitz bounds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every elliptic operator with Lipschitz leading coefficients, the $L^2$ norm of an eigenfunction is controlled by its norm on any sufficiently fine $(1,\delta)$-equidistributed set, with the same power-law constant on every scale.
  • Adding a nonnegative potential supported on such a sampling set lifts each eigenvalue below the essential spectrum by an amount proportional to the potential strength, and the same applies to the infimum of the essential spectrum.
  • For short energy intervals, the spectral projector inequality $\chi_I(H_L) W \chi_I(H_L) \ge \frac{3\kappa}{4}\chi_I(H_L)$ holds with $\kappa = \delta^N(1+|E_0|^{2/3}+\|c_L\|_\infty^{2/3}+\|b_L\|_\infty^2)$, and at low energies a coefficient-independent version holds without the Dirichlet side condition.
  • For random potentials of generalized alloy or breather type, a Wegner estimate with Hölder exponent $\kappa$ and volume dependence $L^{2d}$ follows; at low energies the volume dependence can be reduced to $L^d$ via the spectral-projector uncertainty relation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave open whether the Dirichlet side condition can be dropped for cubes; a boundary Carleman estimate would plausibly give the same sampling bound for general elliptic operators on cubes without reflection.
  • Because the low-energy spectral inequality in Theorem 3.8 is independent of the Lipschitz constant, a natural testable extension is to pass to bounded measurable coefficients by approximation, as the paper hints, and check whether homogenized limits retain the same uncertainty relation.
  • If the short-interval spectral inequality could be extended to arbitrary intervals $(-\infty,E]$, the same constants would give explicit null-controllability bounds for the heat equation associated with these elliptic operators, which the authors state as a research goal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript corrects an error in the previously published paper [TV20] and proves quantitative sampling and equidistribution theorems for elliptic second order operators with Lipschitz continuous leading coefficients. The two central results are Theorem 2.3 (sampling theorem on R^d) and Theorem 2.6 (equidistribution theorem on finite cubes under Assumption (Dir)), both with scale-free constants. The proof proceeds through a three-annuli inequality derived from a quantitative Carleman estimate of [NRT19], an interpolation inequality, and a chaining argument. Sections 3 and 5 present applications to eigenvalue lifting, spectral inequalities, Wegner estimates, and an auxiliary short proof in the Laplacian case. The paper explicitly states which sections were changed relative to [TV20] and acknowledges the prior error.

Significance. If the central theorems are correct, this is a substantial contribution: it removes the small-Lipschitz restriction of [BTV17] and establishes scale-free unique continuation estimates for general elliptic second order operators, with consequences for control theory, spectral theory, and random operators. The paper is careful with explicit constants and discloses the correction history, which is commendable. However, the main proof is long and depends in an essential way on the quantitative Carleman estimate of [NRT19]; the explicit dependence of the final constants on that estimate is load-bearing. Thus the significance is high but conditional on the imported Carleman estimate being exactly as quoted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Theorem 4.4 and Remark 4.5] The quantitative Carleman estimate from [NRT19] is the only externally imported load-bearing ingredient. The text itself states that a non-quantitative Carleman estimate would be insufficient, and the explicit upper bounds on C and alpha0 recalled in Remark 4.5 feed directly into Lemma 4.2, then into Assumption (25) in Lemma 6.2, and ultimately into the delta^N exponent in Theorem 2.3. Since this manuscript is a correction of a previously flawed proof, the correctness of the main theorems is contingent on the exact statement of Theorem 4.4. I recommend that the authors either include a complete proof of Theorem 4.4 in an appendix or reproduce the full statement from [NRT19] with all constants, and explicitly verify that the quoted forms of C and alpha0 satisfy every hypothesis used in Lemma 6.2.
  2. [Section 6, proof of Theorem 2.6] The proof applies Theorem 6.3 with Omega_- = Lambda_L and J = Z^d intersect Lambda_L. The covering condition Omega_- subset of union_{j in J} Lambda_1(j) is only true up to the half-integer boundary hyperplanes, which have measure zero; this is acceptable for L^2-norm inequalities, but it should be stated explicitly. In addition, the inequality (45) uses that Lambda_1(j) subset Lambda_L for every j in Z^d intersect Lambda_L, which holds because L is an integer; this point should be justified in the text. These are local clarifications, but they are needed to make the finite-cube proof fully rigorous as written.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equation (14)] The definition of mu_1 appears to have two identical branches: both read as exp(mu sqrt(vartheta_E)) or e^{mu sqrt(vartheta_E)}. The calculation in Lemma 6.2 uses mu_1 = e mu sqrt(vartheta_E), so the displayed definition should be corrected to match the intended formula.
  2. [Section 5, Ineq. (23)] The first covering inequality in (23) is not valid as stated for arbitrary (1,delta)-equidistributed sequences: the annuli B(R_2,z_j) \ B(r_2,z_j) with r_2 = 1 leave holes of radius 1 around each center, and centers in adjacent unit cubes may be arbitrarily close, so the union of these annuli need not cover R^d. This section is auxiliary and not used in the proofs of Theorems 2.3 and 2.6, but the proof of Theorem 5.1 should be repaired or the statement qualified.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typos and grammatical issues: 'Several application including random operators are discussed' should be 'Several applications including random operators are discussed', and in the introduction 'they reflects the state of the art' should be 'they reflect the state of the art'.
  4. [Throughout] The note that references and discussion have not been updated since 2019 is useful, but the reader should be told which of the cited preprints have since appeared in final form, if any.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the main theorems are derived from prior published Carleman and Cacciopoli estimates that are independent of the target sampling and equidistribution results.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. Section 4 proves the three-annuli inequality (Theorem 4.1) by quoting two external ingredients: the Cacciopoli inequality of [BTV17] (Lemma 4.3) and the quantitative Carleman estimate of [NRT19] (Theorem 4.4, with explicit constant bounds in Remark 4.5). Section 6 then proves the interpolation inequality (Theorem 6.1) from Theorem 4.1, verifies the needed radius condition (25) in Lemma 6.2, proves the chaining/covering theorem (Theorem 6.3), and finally derives the sampling theorem (Theorem 2.3). The finite-cube theorem (Theorem 2.6) uses the reflection extension of Appendix A together with the same Theorem 6.1 and Theorem 6.3. None of the imported results assumes or contains the target sampling or equidistribution conclusion: the NRT19 Carleman estimate is a parameter-free theorem with stated assumptions on d, ϑE, ϑL, ρ, μ, and the coefficient norms, and the BTV17 Cacciopoli inequality is likewise an independent a priori estimate. The heavy self-citation by the authors is real evidence rather than circularity: the cited results are published, have explicit constants, and do not include the present theorems among their hypotheses. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no uniqueness theorem invoked to force the authors' choice, no ansatz smuggled in only via citation, and no known result merely relabeled. The only potentially vulnerable link is the correctness of the imported NRT19 constants, which is a correctness risk external to the circularity question; it is explicitly acknowledged by the authors as 'crucial'. Since I found no equation or proof step that reduces to its own input by construction, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a theorem-proof paper. No entities are invented and no parameters are fitted to data. The auxiliary constants and radii are explicit functions of d, ϑE, ϑL and are introduced to satisfy the inequalities required by the chaining argument. The load-bearing imported inputs are the Carleman estimate of [NRT19] and the Cacciopoli inequality of [BTV17], both from the authors' own prior work.

free parameters (2)
  • δ0 (sampling/equidistribution threshold) = (330 d e^2 ϑE^{11/2} (ϑE+1)^{5/2} (ϑL+1))^{-1}
    Chosen in Theorems 2.3 and 2.6 to be small enough that δ ∈ (0, δ0) and δ0 ≤ r2 in the proof. It is an explicit function of the model parameters, not fitted to data.
  • Proof radii and ε = ε=1; r1=δ/2; R1=δ; r2=R2/5; r3=R3/(ϑE+1); R2=R3/(2e(ϑE+1)^{5/2}); R3=(33ed ϑE^{11/2}(ϑL+1))^{-1}
    Selected in the proof of Theorem 2.3 and Lemma 6.2 to satisfy condition (25) (µ1 < r3/(R2 ϑE) and (µ1 R2 ϑE)^2/(r1 r3) ≥ 1). These are auxiliary choices, not empirical fits.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Quantitative Carleman estimate of [NRT19] with explicit constants (Theorem 4.4)
    The paper states this estimate is 'crucial' (Section 4) and uses it to derive the three annuli inequality. It is imported from prior work with one overlapping author.
  • standard math Cacciopoli inequality from [BTV17] (Lemma 4.3)
    Cited and used to convert Carleman estimates into three annuli inequalities; from prior work with two overlapping authors.
  • standard math Friedrichs extension and first representation theorem (Kato [Kat80])
    Used throughout to define operators HL and H and their cores; standard spectral theory.
  • domain assumption Assumption (Dir): off-diagonal coefficients vanish on the sides of the cube
    Required for Theorem 2.6 and the reflection extension in Appendix A (Lemmas A.1 and A.2). It restricts the class of finite-volume operators.
  • standard math Operator core property of C∞_c (Rd) for H
    Established via [Ebe99, Theorem 1.2] and used in the approximation argument in the proof of Theorem 4.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sampling and equidistribution theorems for elliptic second order operators, lifting of eigenvalues, and applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UUD2NLIX

@misc{pith2026250516655,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sampling and equidistribution theorems for elliptic second order operators, lifting of eigenvalues, and applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UUD2NLIX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16655}
}
read the original abstract

We consider elliptic second order partial differential operators with Lipschitz continuous leading order coefficients on finite cubes and the whole Euclidean space. We prove quantitative sampling and equidistribution theorems for eigenfunctions. The estimates are scale-free, in the sense that for a sequence of growing cubes we obtain uniform estimates. These results are applied to prove lifting of eigenvalues as well as the infimum of the essential spectrum, and an uncertainty relation (aka spectral inequality) for short energy interval spectral projectors. Several application including random operators are discussed. In the proof we have to overcome several challenges posed by the variable coefficients of the leading term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.16655 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Within two steps we can reach any point in B(b − a, zk) Proof. Starting from z k , we observe that in two steps we can reach any point z k+2 inside the closed ball with radius b − a and center z k . This can be achieved by choosing z k+1 such that |z k+1 − z k | = a and |z k+2 − z k+1| ∈ [a, b], where in the first step we move away from z k+2, and in the second step we move back arriving at z k+2, see [PITH_FULL_IM… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of a sequence τ with µ = 8 construction we now have y ∈ B(b − a, zµ ), see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arendt, R

    W. Arendt, R. Chill, C. Seifert, H. Vogt, and J. Voigt. Form methods for evolution equations, and applications. 18th Internet Seminar on Evolution Equations, 2015. https://www.mat.tuhh.de/veranstaltungen/isem18/pdf/LectureNotes.pdf

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    H. W. Alt. Lineare F unktionalanalysis . Springer, Berlin, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    L. Bakri. Carleman estimates for the S chr\"odinger operator. A pplications to quantitative uniqueness. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 38(1):69--91, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Bourgain and C

    J. Bourgain and C. E. Kenig. On localization in the continuous A nderson- B ernoulli model in higher dimension. Invent. Math. , 161(2):389--426, 2005

    2005

  5. [5]

    Boutet de Monvel , D

    A. Boutet de Monvel , D. Lenz, and P. Stollmann. An uncertainty principle, W egner estimates and localization near fluctuation boundaries. Math. Z. , 269(1):663--670, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Beauchard and K

    K. Beauchard and K. Pravda-Starov. Null-controllability of hypoelliptic quadratic differential equations. J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. , 5:1--43, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    D. I. Borisov, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veseli\'c. Scale-free quantitative unique continuation and equidistribution estimates for solutions of elliptic differential equations. J. Math. Phys. , 58(12):121502 (19 pages), 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Combes, P

    J.-M. Combes, P. D. Hislop, and F. Klopp. An optimal Wegner estimate and its application to the global continuity of the integrated density of states for random Schr\"odinger operators. Duke Math. J. , 140(3):469--498, 2007

    work page 2007

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Combes, P

    J.-M. Combes, P. D. Hislop, F. Klopp, and G. D. Raikov. Global continuity of the integrated density of states for random L andau H amiltonians. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 29(7--8):1187--1213, 2004

    2004

  2. [10]

    J.-M. Coron. Control and nonlinearity , volume 136 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2007

    2007

  3. [11]

    Donnelly and C

    H. Donnelly and C. Fefferman. Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on R iemannian manifolds. Invent. Math. , 93(1):161--183, 1988

    1988

  4. [12]

    Dicke and I

    A. Dicke and I. Veseli\'c. Unique continuation for the gradient of eigenfunctions and W egner estimates for random divergence-type operators. arXiv:2003.09849 [math.FA]

    2003 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A. Eberle. Uniqueness and Non-Uniqueness of Semigroups Generated by Singular Diffusion Operators , volume 1718 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, 1999

    1999

  6. [14]

    A. Enblom. Hardy- C arleman type inequalities for D irac operators. J. Math. Phys. , 56(10):103503 (13 pages), 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Egidi, I

    M. Egidi, I. Naki \'c , A. Seelmann, M. T \"a ufer, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veseli \'c . Null controllability and control cost estimates for the heat equation on unbounded and large bounded domains. Accepted for publication in Operator Theory: Advances and Applications: Linear O...

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Egidi and I

    M. Egidi and I. Veseli\'c. Scale-free unique continuation estimates and L ogvi\-nenko- S ereda T heorems on the torus. arXiv:1609.07020 [math.CA]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Escauriaza and S

    L. Escauriaza and S. Vessella. Optimal three cylinder inequalities for solutions to parabolic equations with L ipschitz leading coefficients. In G. Alessandrini and G. Uhlmann, editors, Inverse Problems: Theory and Applications , volume 333 of Contemp. Math. , pages 79--87. Am...

    2003

  10. [18]

    Egidi and I

    M. Egidi and I. Veseli\'c. Sharp geometric condition for null-controllability of the heat equation on R ^d and consistent estimates on the control cost. Arch. Math. , 111(1):85--99, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    A. V. Fursikov and O. Y. Imanuvilov. Controllability of Evolution Equations , volume 34 of Suhak kang u irok . Seoul National University, Seoul, 1996

    1996

  12. [20]

    Figotin and A

    A. Figotin and A. Klein. Localization of classical waves II . E lectromagnetic waves. Comm. Math. Phys. , 184(2):411--441, 1997

    1997

  13. [21]

    Germinet, A

    F. Germinet, A. Klein, and J. H. Schenker. Dynamical delocalization in random L andau H amiltonians. Ann. of Math. , 166(1):215--244, 2007

    2007

  14. [22]

    Hundertmark, R

    D. Hundertmark, R. Killip, S. Nakamura, P. Stollmann, and I. Veseli\'c. Bounds on the spectral shift function and the density of states. Comm. Math. Phys. , 262(2):489--503, 2006

    2006

  15. [23]

    A. D. Ionescu and D. Jerison. On the absence of positive eigenvalues of S chr\"odinger operators with rough potentials. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 13(5):1029--1081, 2003

    2003

  16. [24]

    M. E. H. Ismail and R. Zhang. On the Hellmann-Feynman theorem and the variation of zeros of certain special functions. Adv. Appl. Math. , 9(4):439--446, 1988

    1988

  17. [25]

    Jerison and C

    D. Jerison and C. E. Kenig. Unique continuation and absence of positive eigenvalues for S chr\"odinger operators. Ann. of Math. , 121(3):463--494, 1985

    1985

  18. [26]

    T. Kato. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators . Springer, Berlin, 1980

    1980

  19. [27]

    o dinger operators and optimal W egner estimates for non-ergodic random S chr \

    A. Klein. Unique continuation principle for spectral projections of S chr \"o dinger operators and optimal W egner estimates for non-ergodic random S chr \"o dinger operators. Comm. Math. Phys. , 323(3):1229--1246, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Koch and D

    H. Koch and D. Tataru. Carleman estimates and absence of embedded eigenvalues. Comm. Math. Phys. , 267(2):419--449, 2006

    2006

  21. [29]

    Le Rousseau and G

    J. Le Rousseau and G. Lebeau. On C arleman estimates for elliptic and parabolic operators. A pplications to unique continuation and control of parabolic equations. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. , 18(3):712--747, 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Lebeau and I

    G. Lebeau and I. Moyano. Spectral inequalities for the S chr \"o dinger operator. arXiv: 1901.03513 [math.AP]

    1901 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Lebeau and L

    G. Lebeau and L. Robbiano. Contr\^ o le exact de l' \'e quation de la chaleur. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 20(1--2):335--356, 1995

    1995

  24. [32]

    Naki\'c, C

    I. Naki\'c, C. Rose, and M. Tautenhahn. A quantitative C arleman estimate for second order elliptic operators. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A , 149(4):915--938, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Naki \'c , M

    I. Naki \'c , M. T \"a ufer, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veselic. Sharp estimates and homogenization of the control cost of the heat equation on large domains. Accepted for publication in ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. , arXiv:1810.10975 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    aufer, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veseli\'c. Unique continuation and lifting of spectral band edges of S chr\

    I. Naki\'c, M. T\"aufer, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veseli\'c. Unique continuation and lifting of spectral band edges of S chr\"odinger operators on unbounded domains. Accepted for publication in J. Spectr. Theory , with an appendix by Albrecht Seelmann, arXiv:1804.07816[math.SP]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    aufer, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veseli\'c. Scale-free unique continuation principle, eigenvalue lifting and W egner estimates for random S chr\

    I. Naki\'c, M. T\"aufer, M. Tautenhahn, and I. Veseli\'c. Scale-free unique continuation principle, eigenvalue lifting and W egner estimates for random S chr\"odinger operators. Anal. PDE , 11(4):1049--1081, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Rojas-Molina

    C. Rojas-Molina . Characterization of the A nderson metal-insulator transition for non ergodic operators and application. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 13(7):1575--1611, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Rojas-Molina and I

    C. Rojas-Molina and I. Veseli \'c . Scale-free unique continuation estimates and applications to random S chr \"o dinger operators. Comm. Math. Phys. , 320(1):245--274, 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    G. D. Raikov and S. Warzel. Quasi-classical versus non-classical spectral asymptotics for magnetic S chr\"odinger operators with decreasing electric potentials. Rev. Math. Phys. , 14(10):1051--1072, 2002

    2002

  31. [39]

    Schm \"u dgen

    K. Schm \"u dgen. Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert space . Springer, Dordrecht, 2012

    2012

  32. [40]

    Stollmann and G

    P. Stollmann and G. Stolz. Lower bounds for D irichlet L aplacians and uncertainty principles. arXiv:1808.04202 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Stollmann

    P. Stollmann. Localization for random perturbations of anisotropic periodic media. Israel J. Math. , 107(1):125--139, 1998

    1998

  34. [42]

    a ufer. Quantitative unique continuation and applications . PhD thesis, Technische Universit\

    M. T \"a ufer. Quantitative unique continuation and applications . PhD thesis, Technische Universit\"at Dortmund, 2018. Eldorado, DOI: 10.17877/DE290R-19307

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Tenenbaum and M

    G. Tenenbaum and M. Tucsnak. On the null-controllability of diffusion equations. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. , 17(4):1088--1100, 2011

    2011

  36. [44]

    aufer and M. Tautenhahn. Scale-free and quantitative unique continuation for infinite dimensional spectral subspaces of S chr \

    M. T\"aufer and M. Tautenhahn. Scale-free and quantitative unique continuation for infinite dimensional spectral subspaces of S chr \"o dinger operators. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. , 16(5):1719--1730, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    T \"a ufer and M

    M. T \"a ufer and M. Tautenhahn. Wegner estimate and disorder dependence for alloy-type H amiltonians with bounded magnetic potential. Ann. Henri Poincar \'e , 19(4):1151--1165, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    T \"a ufer and I

    M. T \"a ufer and I. Veseli\'c. W egner estimate for L andau-breather H amiltonians. J. Math. Phys. , 57(7):072102 (8 pages), 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Tautenhahn and I

    M. Tautenhahn and I. Veseli\'c. Sampling inequality for L^2 -norms of eigenfunctions, spectral projectors, and W eyl sequences of S chr\"odinger operators. J. Stat. Phys. , 164(3):616--620, 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    Tautenhahn and I

    M. Tautenhahn and I. Veseli\'c. Sampling and equidistribution theorems for elliptic second order operators, lifting of eigenvalues, and applications. J. Differential Equations , 268(12):7669--7714, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    a user Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrb\

    M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss. Observation and control for operator semigroups . Birkh\" a user Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrb\" u cher. Birkh\" a user, Basel, 2009

    2009

  42. [50]

    Veseli \'c

    I. Veseli \'c . Existence and Regularity Properties of the Integrated Density of States of Random S chr \"o dinger Operators , volume 1917 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, 2008

    1917

  43. [51]

    Veseli \'c

    K. Veseli \'c . Spectral perturbation bounds for selfadjoint operators. I . Oper. Matrices , 2(3):307--339, 2008

    2008

  44. [52]

    G. Wang, M. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. Observable set, observability, interpolation inequality and spectral inequality for the heat equation in R ^n . J. Math. Pures Appl. , 126:144--194, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Zubeldia

    M. Zubeldia. Limiting absorption principle for the electromagnetic H elmholtz equation with singular potentials. P. Roy. Soc. Edinb. A , 144(4):857--890, 2014

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.