Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Canonical forms of polytopes from adjoints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.07272 v1 pith:UZNJXYJB submitted 2025-04-09 math.CO hep-thmath.AG

classification math.COhep-thmath.AG
keywords adjointcanonicalformsnumeratorpolynomialpolytopeswilladjoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Projectivizations of pointed polyhedral cones $C$ are positive geometries in the sense of Arkani-Hamed, Bai, and Lam. Their canonical forms look like $$ \Omega_C(x)=\frac{A(x)}{B(x)} dx, $$ with $A,B$ polynomials. The denominator $B(x)$ is just the product of the linear equations defining the facets of $C$. We will see that the numerator $A(x)$ is given by the adjoint polynomial of the dual cone $C^{\vee}$. The adjoint was originally defined by Warren, who used it to construct barycentric coordinates in general polytopes. Confirming the intuition that the job of the numerator is to cancel unwanted poles outside the polytope, we will see that the adjoint is the unique polynomial of minimal degree whose hypersurface contains the residual arrangement of non-face intersections of supporting hyperplanes of $C$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Positive Geometry of Polytopes and Polypols

    math.AG 2025-06 unverdicted

    A self-described collection of known results explaining positive geometries and canonical forms for polytopes and quasi-regular rational polypols.

Pith tools