pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09970 · v1 · pith:V2YDDC5Gnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Through the Veil: Lyα Illuminates the Host Galaxies of Little Red Dots

Zhiyuan Ji , Yang Sun , Mauro Giavalisco , Anna de Graaff , Christina C. Williams , Yongda Zhu , George H. Rieke , Marcia Rieke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Little Red DotsLyα emissionhost galaxieshigh-redshift galaxiesJWST observationsresonant scatteringtwo-component models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lyα emission in Little Red Dots traces the extended host galaxy rather than the compact red core.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies Lyα in a sample of 110 spectroscopically confirmed Little Red Dots at z ≥ 4. Lyα is detected in 32 sources with luminosities and equivalent widths matching normal star-forming galaxies at similar redshifts, but the Lyα/Hα ratios are systematically lower and Lyα luminosity correlates more tightly with [O III] luminosity than with [O III] equivalent width. Spatially resolved maps for 13 sources at z ≳ 5.5 show extended, asymmetric, and often offset Lyα emission relative to the rest-optical continuum. These patterns indicate that Lyα arises mainly from the larger host-galaxy gas rather than the compact component producing the broad Balmer lines and red continuum. The findings support a two-component structure in which the compact source sits inside an extended interstellar and circumgalactic medium that governs Lyα escape and redistribution.

Core claim

Lyα is primarily associated with the host-scale component rather than the compact component responsible for the broad Balmer lines and red continuum. This is inferred from lower Lyα/Hα ratios than in star-forming galaxies, closer tracking of Lyα luminosity with [O III] luminosity than equivalent width, and spatially extended, asymmetric Lyα maps that are offset from the rest-optical light, consistent with resonant scattering in clumpy gas.

What carries the argument

Lyα as a resonant tracer of neutral hydrogen that reveals the spatial distribution and kinematics of gas on host-galaxy scales.

If this is right

  • Lyα provides a direct probe of the gaseous environment surrounding the compact red source in LRDs.
  • The host galaxy's interstellar and circumgalactic gas shapes how Lyα escapes and is spatially redistributed.
  • LRDs are embedded in more extended structures whose properties resemble those of normal high-redshift star-forming galaxies.
  • The two-component picture separates the origin of the red continuum and broad lines from the origin of Lyα.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the host-scale association holds, Lyα maps could be used to measure the size and clumpiness of gas around LRDs at z > 5.
  • The offset and asymmetric Lyα emission suggests that orientation or gas geometry may influence which LRDs are detected in Lyα.
  • This separation of components could help test whether the compact source is an AGN or a dust-obscured starburst by comparing gas kinematics traced by Lyα versus Balmer lines.

Load-bearing premise

Differences in Lyα/Hα ratios and the closer tracking of Lyα luminosity with [O III] luminosity reliably indicate that the emission comes from the extended host rather than the compact source.

What would settle it

Finding that Lyα emission in most LRDs is spatially coincident with the compact rest-optical core and shows Lyα/Hα ratios matching those expected from the broad-line region alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09970 by Anna de Graaff, Christina C. Williams, George H. Rieke, Marcia Rieke, Mauro Giavalisco, Yang Sun, Yongda Zhu, Zhiyuan Ji.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The final sample of 110 LRDs at z ≥ 4 with NIRSpec/PRISM coverage of Lyα. Sources with Lyα detections at S/N ≥ 3 (see Section 3.1) are shown as circles with error bars, while the remaining sources are shown as upper limits on the Lyα flux. Sources are color-coded according to their Balmer-break strengths reported in A. de Graaff et al. (2025a). The LRDs at z ≥ 5.5 labeled by their source IDs in this plot a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Lyα luminosity as a function of UV absolute magnitude for the LRD sample. Sources with Lyα detections at S/N ≥ 3 are shown as circles with error bars, while non-detections are shown as upper limits. For comparison, the green triangles show MUSE-Wide+Deep Lyα emitters at z = 4.0–6.6 from J. Kerutt et al. (2022). Right: Lyα detection fraction, XLyα, as a function of MUV for the full LRD sample, shown b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Rest-frame Lyα equivalent-width (EW0 Lyα) distribution. The blue circles with error bars show the Lyα-detected LRDs in our sample. The uncertainties are estimated by bootstrapping the sample and resampling each EW measurement using its corresponding fitting uncertainty derived in Section 3.1. For comparison, the green shaded his￾tograms and curves show the EW0 Lyα distributions of MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Fi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Lyα luminosity as a function of Hα luminosity for the LRD sample. Sources with Lyα detections at S/N ≥ 3 are shown as circles with error bars, while non-detections are shown as upper limits. The green triangles show the comparison sample of normal star-forming galaxies from X. Lin et al. (2024). The black curves show the expected relation assuming Case B recombination with ne = 102 cm−3 and Te = 104 … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Balmer decrement, Hα/Hβ, as a function of spatial position for the Lyα-detected (left) and Lyα-undetected (right) LRD subsamples, measured from stacked 2D NIRSpec/PRISM spectra. Results from three different stacking weights are shown: mean (blue circles), median (green squares), and inverse-variance-weighted (IVW; purple diamonds). Error bars are estimated from bootstrap resamplings, as described in Sectio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Lyα luminosity as a function of [O III]λ5007 luminosity. The green triangles show the comparison sample of normal z ∼ 5–6 galaxies from S. Hashemi et al. (2025). Right: Lyα luminosity as a function of rest-frame [O III]λ5007 equivalent width. In each panel, the quoted Spearman rank correlation coefficient rs is estimated from bootstrap resampling; the quoted uncertainty corresponds to the dispersion … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of Lyα fluxes measured from spec￾troscopy (x-axis) and from our broadband imaging continu￾um-subtraction method (y-axis), where the latter are com￾puted by summing the Lyα maps within a circular aperture of radius r = 0. ′′16 centered on the F444W centroid. Filled symbols show the results obtained with pixel-by-pixel UV β fitting, while open symbols show those obtained using a global β. Circles … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spatially resolved Lyα maps for three LRDs in Abell 2744. The sources are identified by the IDs shown on the far left. For each source (row), the panels show: (1) the NIRCam/F444W image displayed with a logarithmic color scale, with the MSA slit overplotted in dark pink; (2) the PSF-matched broadband image containing Lyα + continuum; (3) the predicted UV continuum in the Lyα filter from the pixel-by-pixel … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Effective radius measured from the Lyα-sensitive image (y-axis) versus that measured from the adjacent UV-continuum image (x-axis) for the z ≥ 5.5 LRDs. Orange and green points show comparison samples of MUSE LAEs at z ∼ 3–6 and Green Peas at z ∼ 0.1–0.3, respectively, measured by H. Yang et al. (2017). We note that these com￾parison-sample measurements trace the Lyα size directly, as they are derived fro… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 1D and 2D spectra for LRDs with z ≥ 4 and Lyα S/N ≥ 3, sorted by decreasing redshift. For each source, the main panel shows the observed 1D spectrum (gray) with the best-fit total model (red), Lyα Gaussian component (blue shaded), and UV continuum (pink dashed). The bottom sub-panel shows the corresponding 2D spectrum. The inset displays the full-wavelength 1D spectrum, with the blue-shaded region marking… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the integrated Lyα fluxes measured with the DLA-augmented model against the fiducial (DLA-free, Section 3.1) values for the Lyα-detected LRDs. The solid line marks the 1:1 relation. The two measurements agree at the median level of ∼ 20%, comparable to or smaller than the typical measurement uncertainties. structure, particularly within the innermost resolution element, where the surface-bri… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Radial surface brightness profiles of our ePSFs constructed from isolated stars in the A2744 mosaic (solid colored lines) compared with the UNCOVER ePSFs (black dashed lines; J. R. Weaver et al. 2024) for the four NIRCam/SW filters used in this work. Our ePSFs are built at the native 0. ′′02 pixel scale using the DJA mosaics, while the UNCOVER ePSFs are sampled at 0. ′′04. Lower panels show the relative d… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The NIRSpec/PRISM spectrum for the southern clump in LRD 204851 in GOODS-S (second row of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Little Red Dots (LRDs) are enigmatic, compact red sources ubiquitous in JWST deep fields whose physical nature remains elusive. As one of the most sensitive tracers of neutral hydrogen in galaxy environments, Ly$\alpha$ is uniquely positioned to probe the gaseous structures proposed to explain LRDs' unusual properties. We present a systematic study of Ly$\alpha$ emission in LRDs, using a sample of 110 spectroscopically confirmed LRDs at $z \geq 4$ from the A. de Graaff et al. (2025) catalog, all with NIRSpec/PRISM coverage of the Ly$\alpha$ line. We detect Ly$\alpha$ at signal-to-noise S/N $\geq$ 3 in 32 LRDs, finding Ly$\alpha$ luminosities and the distribution of rest-frame equivalent widths consistent with normal star-forming galaxies at comparable redshifts. Yet the Ly$\alpha$/H$\alpha$ ratios fall systematically below those of star-forming galaxies, and the Ly$\alpha$ luminosity tracks [O III] luminosity more closely than [O III] equivalent width, together suggesting that Ly$\alpha$ is primarily associated with the host-scale component rather than the compact component responsible for the broad Balmer lines and red continuum. For 13 LRDs at $z \gtrsim 5.5$, we construct continuum-subtracted Ly$\alpha$ maps using broadband imaging from HST/ACS or JWST/NIRCam, revealing spatially extended, asymmetric, and often offset emission relative to the rest-optical light, consistent with resonant scattering through clumpy, anisotropic gas commonly observed in high-redshift Ly$\alpha$ emitters. These results support a two-component picture in which the compact rest-optical source is embedded within a more extended host-galaxy environment whose interstellar and circumgalactic gas shapes Ly$\alpha$ escape and spatial redistribution. Ly$\alpha$ opens a new window into the relation between the compact red component, the host galaxy, and the surrounding gas in LRDs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an observational study of Lyα emission in a sample of 110 spectroscopically confirmed Little Red Dots (LRDs) at z ≥ 4 using NIRSpec/PRISM data. Lyα is detected in 32 sources, with luminosities and rest-frame equivalent widths consistent with those of normal star-forming galaxies at similar redshifts. However, Lyα/Hα ratios are systematically lower, and Lyα luminosity correlates more strongly with [O III] luminosity than with [O III] equivalent width, leading the authors to conclude that Lyα originates primarily from the extended host galaxy component rather than the compact source responsible for broad Balmer lines and red continuum. For a subset of 13 sources at z ≳ 5.5, continuum-subtracted Lyα maps from HST/ACS or JWST/NIRCam reveal extended, asymmetric, and offset emission, consistent with resonant scattering in clumpy gas. The results support a two-component model for LRDs.

Significance. If the host-association interpretation holds, the work is significant for understanding the physical nature of LRDs by linking their Lyα properties to extended host environments and normal high-redshift star-forming galaxies. Strengths include the large sample of 110 sources with uniform NIRSpec coverage, direct S/N-based detections, and spatially resolved maps for 13 objects; the purely observational approach with comparisons to reference populations avoids circularity and provides falsifiable predictions for future modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results on line ratios/correlations] Abstract (final paragraph) and the section discussing Lyα/Hα ratios and [O III] correlations: the claim that systematically lower Lyα/Hα ratios and tighter correlation of L_Lyα with L_[O III] (rather than EW_[O III]) establish primary association with the host-scale component is not uniquely supported, as no radiative transfer calculations or photoionization grids are presented to test whether a compact source with plausible variations in dust geometry, covering fraction, or escape paths could reproduce the same observables.
  2. [Lyα mapping results] Section on continuum-subtracted Lyα maps for the 13 sources at z ≳ 5.5: while the maps show spatially extended, asymmetric, and offset emission, the resonant-scattering possibility that photons originating from the central compact component could appear extended is not quantitatively ruled out via escape-fraction modeling or comparison to simulated surface-brightness profiles, weakening the conclusion that this confirms host-scale origin.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Throughout] Notation for luminosities and equivalent widths is used inconsistently in places (e.g., L_Lyα vs. L(Lyα)); a uniform convention would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review, which has helped clarify the scope and limitations of our observational analysis. We respond to each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to address the points raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results on line ratios/correlations] Abstract (final paragraph) and the section discussing Lyα/Hα ratios and [O III] correlations: the claim that systematically lower Lyα/Hα ratios and tighter correlation of L_Lyα with L_[O III] (rather than EW_[O III]) establish primary association with the host-scale component is not uniquely supported, as no radiative transfer calculations or photoionization grids are presented to test whether a compact source with plausible variations in dust geometry, covering fraction, or escape paths could reproduce the same observables.

    Authors: We agree that the observational correlations and line ratios alone do not uniquely establish the host-scale association in the absence of radiative transfer or photoionization modeling. Our conclusions rest on empirical comparisons to star-forming galaxy populations and the relative strengths of the observed correlations. We have revised the abstract and the relevant discussion sections to use more cautious phrasing, describing the results as supporting rather than establishing the primary host-scale association, and we have added an explicit note that future modeling is required to test whether variations in the compact component could reproduce the same observables. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Lyα mapping results] Section on continuum-subtracted Lyα maps for the 13 sources at z ≳ 5.5: while the maps show spatially extended, asymmetric, and offset emission, the resonant-scattering possibility that photons originating from the central compact component could appear extended is not quantitatively ruled out via escape-fraction modeling or comparison to simulated surface-brightness profiles, weakening the conclusion that this confirms host-scale origin.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the maps alone do not quantitatively exclude resonant scattering from a central origin. The asymmetries and spatial offsets are qualitatively consistent with host-scale gas, but without escape-fraction modeling or simulated profiles we cannot rule out alternatives. We have revised the mapping section to include a discussion of this limitation and to frame the results as consistent with (rather than confirming) a host-scale origin within the two-component framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational comparisons with no derivations or load-bearing self-citations

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of Lyα detection rates, luminosities, equivalent widths, Lyα/Hα ratios, and spatial maps in a sample of 110 LRDs drawn from an external catalog. Conclusions follow from empirical comparisons to star-forming galaxy populations at similar redshifts and from visual inspection of continuum-subtracted maps; no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or ansatzes are present. The sole self-citation (de Graaff et al. 2025) supplies only the parent sample definition and is not invoked to justify any interpretive step. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits none of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard astrophysical interpretations of emission-line ratios and resonant scattering in high-redshift galaxies, with no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lyα serves as a tracer of neutral hydrogen gas in galaxy environments
    Invoked to link detected emission to gaseous structures around LRDs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5940 in / 1234 out tokens · 31327 ms · 2026-06-27T16:02:38.741153+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Compact Core, Extended Reach: A Bipolar kpc-Scale Elongation in a Little Red Dot at $z \approx 5.5$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LRD-204851 at z=5.482 shows a thin bipolar elongation several kpc long traced by UV and optical lines, with double-peaked Lyα and tentative N V supporting a biconical cavity from the central engine.

  2. TBD LBD: The nature of `little blue dots'

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LBDs are interpreted as lower-column analogues of LRDs in a gas-cocooned AGN sequence, with predicted spectral features including Balmer jumps and X-ray weakness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    arXiv , author =:2404.19010 , journal =

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  2. [2]

    Anderson, J., & King, I. R. 2000, PASP, 112, 1360, doi: 10.1086/316632

    work page doi:10.1086/316632 2000

  3. [3]

    Ando, M., Harikane, Y., Katz, H., Inayoshi, K., & Tanaka, T. S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.03522. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03522 23 Figure 16.Similar to Figure 8, but for the LRDs in COSMOS (first two rows) and UDS (remaining three rows). We note that the F090W imaging used here is from PRIMER and is relatively shallow, with a 5σdepth of 27.6 AB m...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10573 2026

  5. [5]

    Atek, H., Kunth, D., Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., & Mas-Hesse, J. M. 2008, A&A, 488, 491, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809527

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809527 2008

  6. [6]

    2017, A&A, 608, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730833

    Bacon, R., Conseil, S., Mary, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730833

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730833 2017

  7. [7]

    2023, A&A, 670, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244187

    Bacon, R., Brinchmann, J., Conseil, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244187

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244187 2023

  8. [8]

    D., Bolton, J

    Becker, G. D., Bolton, J. S., Madau, P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3402, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2646

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2646 2015

  9. [10]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026b, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

  10. [11]

    , keywords =

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1649, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x 2008

  11. [12]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf 2024

  12. [13]

    2007 , pages =

    Bolton, J. S., & Haehnelt, M. G. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 325, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12372.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12372.x 2007

  13. [14]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Fan, X., Jiang, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 1055, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1344

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1344 2018

  14. [15]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 55, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1046

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1046 2022

  15. [16]

    2016, A&A, 596, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    Boucaud, A., Bocchio, M., Abergel, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629080 2016

  16. [17]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  17. [18]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

    Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582, doi: 10.1086/174346

    work page doi:10.1086/174346 1994

  18. [19]

    arXiv , author =:2505.18873 , journal =

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L61, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91 2025

  19. [20]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2131 , eprint =

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2131 2026

  20. [21]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.24700 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681 de...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24700 2026

  21. [22]

    2024, The CANDELS-Area Prism Epoch of Reionization Survey (CAPERS),, JWST Proposal

    Dickinson, M., Amorin, R., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2024, The CANDELS-Area Prism Epoch of Reionization Survey (CAPERS),, JWST Proposal. Cycle 3, ID. #6368

    2024

  22. [23]

    2014, PASA, 31, e040, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2014.33

    Dijkstra, M. 2014, PASA, 31, e040, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2014.33

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.33 2014

  23. [24]

    T., McLure, R

    Donnan, C. T., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 3222, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2037 2024

  24. [25]

    B., & Hennawi, J

    Eilers, A.-C., Davies, F. B., & Hennawi, J. F. 2018, ApJ, 864, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4fd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad4fd 2018

  25. [26]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163 2026

  26. [27]

    1987, MNRAS, 225, 155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/225.1.155

    Fasano, G., & Franceschini, A. 1987, MNRAS, 225, 155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/225.1.155

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/225.1.155 1987

  27. [28]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, ApJL, 983, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3 2025

  28. [29]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  29. [30]

    arXiv , author =:2212.10531 , journal =

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 952, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d

  30. [31]

    J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 523, 4568, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1627 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1627 2021

  31. [32]

    2025, A&A, 699, A343, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555504

    Genin, A., Shuntov, M., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A343, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555504

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555504 2025

  32. [33]

    C., Koekemoer, A

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93, doi: 10.1086/379232

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/379232 2004

  33. [34]

    arXiv , author =:2309.05714 , journal =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  34. [35]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836 2026

  35. [36]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35 2011

  36. [37]

    Gronke, M., Dijkstra, M., McCourt, M., & Oh, S. P. 2017, A&A, 607, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731013

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731013 2017

  37. [38]

    E., & Peterson, B

    Gunn, J. E., & Peterson, B. A. 1965, ApJ, 142, 1633, doi: 10.1086/148444

    work page doi:10.1086/148444 1965

  38. [39]

    D., Zhu, Y., & Hong, H

    Hashemi, S., Becker, G. D., Zhu, Y., & Hong, H. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 104, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1225

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1225 2025

  39. [40]

    2017, A&A, 608, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731579

    Hashimoto, T., Garel, T., Guiderdoni, B., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731579

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731579 2017

  40. [41]

    2015, PASA, 32, e027, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2015.25

    Hayes, M. 2015, PASA, 32, e027, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2015.25

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.25 2015

  41. [42]

    M., et al

    Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Mas-Hesse, J. M., et al. 2005, A&A, 438, 71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052702

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052702 2005

  42. [43]

    2013, ApJL, 765, L27, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L27

    Hayes, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 765, L27, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L27

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/l27 2013

  43. [44]

    , keywords =

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450243

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450243 2025

  44. [45]

    C., Urrutia, T., Wisotzki, L., et al

    Herenz, E. C., Urrutia, T., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731055

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731055 2017

  45. [46]

    1986, PASP, 98, 609, doi: 10.1086/131801

    Horne, K. 1986, PASP, 98, 609, doi: 10.1086/131801

    work page doi:10.1086/131801 1986

  46. [47]

    J., & Gazagnes, S

    Huberty, M., Scarlata, C., Hayes, M. J., & Gazagnes, S. 2025, ApJ, 987, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add5e7 26

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add5e7 2025

  47. [48]

    arXiv , author =:2506.05459 , journal =

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555816 2025

  48. [49]

    I., et al

    Iani, E., Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade5a6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade5a6 2025

  49. [50]

    2017, A&A, 608, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731195

    Inami, H., Bacon, R., Brinchmann, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731195

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731195 2017

  50. [51]

    2024, ApJL, 973, L49, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad74e2

    Inayoshi, K., & Ichikawa, K. 2024, ApJL, 973, L49, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad74e2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad74e2 2024

  51. [52]

    arXiv , author =:2409.07805 , journal =

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  52. [53]

    K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M

    Inoue, A. K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu936

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu936 2014

  53. [54]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  54. [55]

    Holes in the BH$^\star$? AGN signatures in the FUV spectrum of a black-hole dominated Little Red Dot at $z=7.04$

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.03370

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03370 2026

  55. [56]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L69, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf194

    Ji, Z., Alberts, S., Zhu, Y., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L69, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf194

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf194 2025

  56. [57]

    , keywords =

    Jones, G. C., Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A238, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347099

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347099 2024

  57. [58]

    2022, A&A, 659, A183, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141900

    Kerutt, J., Wisotzki, L., Verhamme, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A183, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141900

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141900 2022

  58. [59]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  59. [60]

    arXiv , author =:2312.03065 , journal =

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348857 2024

  60. [61]

    arXiv , author =:2404.03576 , journal =

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  61. [62]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 36, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 2011

  62. [63]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551 2025

  63. [64]

    The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line AGN during the first billion years

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R., Garofali, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.13047 2024

  64. [65]

    Laursen, P., Sommer-Larsen, J., & Andersen, A. C. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1640, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1640

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/2/1640 2009

  65. [66]

    2017, A&A, 608, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731480

    Leclercq, F., Bacon, R., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731480

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731480 2017

  66. [67]

    2024, ApJS, 272, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e7d

    Lin, X., Cai, Z., Wu, Y., et al. 2024, ApJS, 272, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e7d 2024

  67. [68]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y. 2025, ApJ, 994, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19 2025

  68. [69]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 191, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada613

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada613 2025

  69. [70]

    1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    work page doi:10.1086/175332 1995

  70. [71]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.22386, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.22386

    Madau, P., & Maiolino, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.22386, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.22386

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.22386 2026

  71. [72]

    V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al

    Maseda, M. V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449914

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449914 2024

  72. [73]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 57, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addf4e

    Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., Iwasawa, K., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 57, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addf4e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addf4e 2025

  73. [74]

    arXiv , author =:2306.05448 , journal =

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  74. [75]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  75. [76]

    P., Oesch, P

    Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., et al. 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 56033, doi: 10.33232/001c.156033

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.156033 2026

  76. [77]

    Evidence of violation of Case B recombination in Little Red Dots

    Nikopoulos, G. P., Watson, D., Sneppen, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.06362, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.06362

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.06362 2025

  77. [78]

    , keywords =

    Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2411

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2411 2023

  78. [79]

    2012, ApJ, 744, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/83

    Ono, Y., Ouchi, M., Mobasher, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/83 2012

  79. [80]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei ¨Ostlin, G., Hayes, M., Kunth, D., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 923, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/923

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/923 2006

  80. [81]

    arXiv , author =:2407.15915 , journal =

    Pacucci, F., & Narayan, R. 2024, ApJ, 976, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7 2024

Showing first 80 references.