REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal Regularized Online Allocation by Adaptive Re-Solving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper introduces a dual-based algorithm framework for solving the regularized online resource allocation problems, which have potentially non-concave cumulative rewards, hard resource constraints, and a non-separable regularizer. Under a strategy of adaptively updating the resource constraints, the proposed framework only requests approximate solutions to the empirical dual problems up to a certain accuracy and yet delivers an optimal logarithmic regret under a locally second-order growth condition. Surprisingly, a delicate analysis of the dual objective function enables us to eliminate the notorious log-log factor in regret bound. The flexible framework renders renowned and computationally fast algorithms immediately applicable, e.g., dual stochastic gradient descent. Additionally, an infrequent re-solving scheme is proposed, which significantly reduces computational demands without compromising the optimal regret performance. A worst-case square-root regret lower bound is established if the resource constraints are not adaptively updated during dual optimization, which underscores the critical role of adaptive dual variable update. Comprehensive numerical experiments demonstrate the merits of the proposed algorithm framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Adaptive Resolving Methods for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximations
An LP-based RL algorithm that identifies a small optimal basis and then resolves the corresponding linear equations adaptively, achieving an instance-dependent ~O(1/N) suboptimality gap for favorable instances.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.