Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Development and Testing of Retrieval Augmented Generation in Large Language Models -- A Case Study Report

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01733 v1 pith:V5N7NI3I submitted 2024-01-29 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelllm-ragretrievalaccuracycasehealthcarehuman-generatedllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Purpose: Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise for medical applications. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) emerges as a promising approach for customizing domain knowledge in LLMs. This case study presents the development and evaluation of an LLM-RAG pipeline tailored for healthcare, focusing specifically on preoperative medicine. Methods: We developed an LLM-RAG model using 35 preoperative guidelines and tested it against human-generated responses, with a total of 1260 responses evaluated. The RAG process involved converting clinical documents into text using Python-based frameworks like LangChain and Llamaindex, and processing these texts into chunks for embedding and retrieval. Vector storage techniques and selected embedding models to optimize data retrieval, using Pinecone for vector storage with a dimensionality of 1536 and cosine similarity for loss metrics. Human-generated answers, provided by junior doctors, were used as a comparison. Results: The LLM-RAG model generated answers within an average of 15-20 seconds, significantly faster than the 10 minutes typically required by humans. Among the basic LLMs, GPT4.0 exhibited the best accuracy of 80.1%. This accuracy was further increased to 91.4% when the model was enhanced with RAG. Compared to the human-generated instructions, which had an accuracy of 86.3%, the performance of the GPT4.0 RAG model demonstrated non-inferiority (p=0.610). Conclusions: In this case study, we demonstrated a LLM-RAG model for healthcare implementation. The pipeline shows the advantages of grounded knowledge, upgradability, and scalability as important aspects of healthcare LLM deployment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Large Language Models Match the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On 284 medical questions derived from Cochrane systematic reviews, the best of 24 LLMs, DeepSeek V3, matches expert conclusions 62.40% of the time, and all tested models struggle with uncertain or low-quality evidence.

  2. FHIR-RAG-MEDS: Integrating HL7 FHIR with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models for Enhanced Medical Decision Support

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    FHIR-RAG-MEDS integrates HL7 FHIR patient summaries into a RAG system and reports improved guideline-based recommendation quality over bare medical LLMs across four clinical domains.

  3. RAG-based Architectures for Drug Side Effect Retrieval in LLMs

    cs.IR 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A graph-based retrieval system for drug side effects achieves 99.99 percent accuracy, but it does so by querying the same database used to create the test labels.

  4. Improving TCM Question Answering through Tree-Organized Self-Reflective Retrieval with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A tree-organized, self-reflective retrieval framework over a TCM knowledge base lifts GPT-4 accuracy on a 600-question licensing-exam sample by 19.85 absolute percentage points.

Pith tools