Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Study Between a Classical and Optimal Controller for a Quadrotor

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.13175 v1 pith:V5REV4YS submitted 2020-09-28 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

A Comparative Study Between a Classical and Optimal Controller for a Quadrotor

classification eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC
keywords quadrotormodelcontrolcontrolleroptimalclassicalcontrollersframe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a simulation-based comparison between the two controllers, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), a classical controller and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an optimal controller, for a linearized quadrotor model. To simplify an otherwise complicated dynamic model of a quadrotor, we derive a linear mathematical model using Newtonian and Euler's laws and applying basic principles of physics. This derivation gives the equations that govern the motion of a quadrotor, both concerning the body frame and the inertial frame. A state-space model is developed, which is then used to simulate the control algorithms for the quadrotor. Apart from the classic PID control algorithm, LQR is an optimal control regulator, and it is more robust for a quadrotor. Both the controllers are simulated in Simulink under the same initial conditions and show a satisfactory response.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.