From Network Automation to Trustworthy Autonomous Networking in the LLM Era: A Network Control Intelligence Perspective

Changgang Zheng; Lina Shi; Meikang Qiu; Shanshan Wang; Tianzhu Zhang; Xiaofei Wang; Yarui Zhang; Yue Jin

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 220 references

From Network Automation to Trustworthy Autonomous Networking in the LLM Era: A Network Control Intelligence Perspective

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that trustworthy network autonomy is a governed alignment of what a system can infer, verify, and execute, and that LLM-enabled agents should not be granted direct authority over operational networks.

desk verdict Useful five-axis framework, but the 'available evidence' claim is a curated-sample interpretation dressed as a study finding. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01538 v1 pith:V6OEJVNB submitted 2026-08-02 cs.NI cs.SYeess.SY

Tianzhu Zhang , Changgang Zheng , Shanshan Wang , Yarui Zhang , Lina Shi , Yue Jin , Xiaofei Wang , Meikang Qiu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.NIcs.SYeess.SY

keywords autonomousnetworkingNetworkControlIntelligencelargelanguagemodelsproposalgenerationgovernedexecutiondelegationautomationtrustworthyautonomy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the history of network automation cannot be captured by a single maturity ladder: capabilities for observation, decision support, execution, and operator interaction have advanced unevenly, so the degree of automation is not a reliable proxy for whether a system may be trusted to change network state. It proposes Network Control Intelligence (NCI), a five-axis profiling lens, and uses it to organize three eras of network control, culminating in LLM-enabled operations. Within that era, it argues that LLM components should generate proposals and coordinate workflows, while commit authority remains with human approvals, policy engines, and domain controllers. The central claim, read sympathetically, is that trustworthy autonomy is a governed alignment between what a system can infer, what it can verify, and what it is authorized to execute. This matters because it replaces the question 'how much automation?' with the question 'under what conditions may the system actuate?'

What carries the argument

The central machinery is Network Control Intelligence (NCI), a five-axis profiling space—Decision Logic, Adaptability, Knowledge, Control Delegation, and Interface—with ordinal rungs on each axis, used to compare any network-control function across eras. The paper couples this with a reference architecture that separates a proposal-generation side from a governed-execution side, connected by validation, authorization, staged rollout, rollback, and audit records. The five axes expose the recurring asymmetry; the architecture makes the commit-authority boundary the load-bearing design decision.

What would settle it

A production LLM-enabled system granted direct, end-to-end commit authority over operational network changes that, over many change windows and incident scenarios, demonstrates safe validation, execution, monitoring, and rollback at scale would falsify the paper's claim that available evidence does not support such authority.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that network autonomy is not obtained by inserting a more intelligent component into an otherwise unchanged control stack. It defines trustworthy autonomy as governed alignment between inference, verification, and authorized execution, and it surveys three eras—rule-based and scripted automation, programmable and data-driven control, and LLM-enabled operations—to show a persistent asymmetry: interface and knowledge capabilities advance quickly, while control delegation and adaptability lag. From this it concludes that available evidence does not yet support assigning LLM-enabled agents direct, end-to-end authority over operational networks. The practical design r

Load-bearing premise

The framework's five axes are assumed to be a complete and minimal decomposition of network control intelligence, but the paper gives no formal proof or empirical validation that these five dimensions suffice for characterizing trustworthy autonomy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

LLM-enabled network tools should be deployed as proposal generators and workflow coordinators, not as autonomous agents with direct commit authority, until evidence of validation and recovery is shown.
Evaluations of LLM-enabled operations should state the authority boundary and test the NCI capability being exercised, rather than reporting task success or linguistic plausibility alone.
Increases in control delegation require coordinated maturation across all five axes, because higher autonomy is limited by the weakest relationship among them.
Adaptability should be reserved for governed updates to models, policies, or parameters with regression control, not routine maintenance of prompts, retrieval corpora, or workflow definitions.
The proposal/execution separation provides a concrete integration pattern: validation pipelines, authorization gates, controller-mediated execution, monitoring, rollback, and audit records can be built once and reused across assistants, workflow agents, and controller-centered systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The authors leave implicit that the five-axis profile could be operationalized as a measurable maturity instrument; if each axis were reduced to checkable criteria, one could empirically test whether the claimed asymmetry between interface/knowledge and delegation/adaptability predicts operational incidents or rollout failures.
The proposal/commit boundary generalizes beyond LLMs: any generative or learned component, including future foundation-model agents, could be gated by the same architecture, potentially unifying safe-ML practice with network-automation design.
A testable extension of the paper's claim is that production LLM systems without a governed validation pipeline will show a higher frequency of unsafe or rolled-back changes than otherwise comparable systems with one; the paper's own evidence base would be strengthened by such a direct comparison.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the NCI framework is a genuinely useful lens, and the historical synthesis is well done. But the paper's central negative claim about LLM authority is presented as an empirical result when it is really a curated-sample interpretation. Worth reading, but referees should push on that gap.

What's new: the five-axis profiling space (Decision Logic, Adaptability, Knowledge, Control Delegation, Interface) gives a common vocabulary for comparing systems that are usually just assigned a maturity level. The three-era organization—rule-based, programmable/data-driven, LLM-enabled—is a legitimate organizing contribution. The reference architecture that separates proposal generation from governed execution is clear and practically sensible. The authors show judgment: they do not oversell LLM autonomy, and they define Adaptability sharply enough to avoid calling routine prompt maintenance 'self-adaptation.' The roadmap in Section VI is thoughtful, especially the evidence standard it proposes.

Where I part ways: the abstract and Section V claim that 'according to our study, available evidence does not yet support assigning LLM-enabled agents direct, end-to-end authority.' That is a reasonable design position, but it is not what the study demonstrates. Supporting Table IV is built from 18 systems selected by qualitative criteria, with axis scores assigned by the authors and no independent coding or search protocol. The paper itself concedes the evidence is uneven. So the asymmetry story—Control Delegation and Adaptability lag behind Interface and Knowledge—is a plausible reading of the sample, not an established finding. A broader or more systematic survey could find counterexamples, including systems that sit near C3 under explicit constraints.

Also, the framework's own foundation is asserted rather than argued. The claim that five axes follow from the 'minimal functional path' is plausible but unvalidated; the axes are not shown to be complete or minimal. That is okay for a proposal, but it means the whole paper is a position piece, not a measurement study. In that light, the central claim should be reframed as a risk-averse engineering judgment, not a result.

Who is this for? Researchers entering LLM-for-networking, and operators who want a shared vocabulary for comparing automation proposals. I would bring it to a reading group and would cite it for the framework.

Recommendation: send to peer review. It deserves referees, but they should require the authors to either soften the empirical generalization or back it with a systematic evidence review. As is, it is a strong position paper with an overreaching sentence.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Network Control Intelligence (NCI), a five-axis framework (Decision Logic, Adaptability, Knowledge, Control Delegation, Interface) for profiling network-control systems. It applies this framework to organize the history of network automation into three eras: rule-based/scripted automation, programmable/data-driven control, and LLM-enabled network operations. The paper argues that progress across the five axes has been persistently asymmetric: Interface and Knowledge advance quickly, while Control Delegation and Adaptability lag. Its central practical claim is that available evidence does not yet support assigning LLM-enabled agents direct, end-to-end authority over operational networks. On this basis, the paper develops a reference architecture that separates proposal generation from governed execution, identifies three integration patterns for LLM-enabled systems, and proposes a research roadmap centered on the Adaptability–Control Delegation pair.

Significance. The paper is a broad, well-structured synthesis that gives the LLM-for-networking discussion a useful conceptual vocabulary. The central design rule—keep LLM components on the proposal side, enforce deterministic validation, authorization, staged rollout, and rollback before any network change—is pragmatic and actionable, and the paper is notably measured about current capabilities. The historical survey is informative, and the explicit distinction among proposal artifacts, commit authority, and governed execution is a genuinely clarifying contribution. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, but it offers a falsifiable architectural claim and a concrete evidence standard for future evaluations. Its main weaknesses are that the five-axis decomposition is introduced as an axiom rather than validated, and the empirical grounding of the central negative claim rests on a curated, single-team qualitative coding of eighteen systems. If the survey methodology is strengthened or the claim is appropriately scoped, the paper could become a reference point for research and design in LLM-based network operations.

major comments (3)

[Section V (before V-A) and Section V-D/Table IV] The central negative claim, 'available evidence does not yet support assigning LLM-enabled agents direct, end-to-end authority over operational networks,' is asserted as a finding of the study, but the evidence base is a curated set of 18 systems in Table IV. Section I gives broad, qualitative inclusion criteria; no search protocol, database list, time window, or inter-coder reliability is reported. Systems with LLM components operating at C3/C4 under explicit constraints would be excluded if they are unpublished, proprietary, or lack 'sufficient public technical detail.' Section V-D itself acknowledges that 'the evidence behind these patterns is uneven,' and Section VI-A proposes an evidence standard (state the authority boundary, validation, recovery) that is not applied to the survey itself. The asymmetry conclusion—Control Delegation and Adaptability are slower-moving—is therefore pl
[Section II-A] The five-axis NCI framework is presented as following from the 'minimal functional path of a network-control process,' but no formal derivation, expert validation, or sensitivity analysis is provided. The three-era asymmetry narratives in Sections III–V are expressed as positions in this five-dimensional space, so the conclusion that 'Control Delegation and Adaptability are slower-moving' depends on the completeness and measurement validity of this specific decomposition. A different but equally defensible decomposition—for example, treating assurance as a separate axis—could change the profiles and hence the asymmetry claim. This is not circular reasoning, but it is an unvalidated axiom. I recommend that Section II-A or VI explicitly state that all comparative conclusions are relative to the NCI lens, and ideally add a small validation exercise (e.g., multiple raters coding a subset of
[Table IV and Section V-D] Within the selected sample, the axis scores are not auditable. Several entries use unresolved ranges, e.g., Matryoshka is scored D1–D2/C1–C2 and NetKeeper D2–D3/A2/K2–K3/C1–C2, with no stated rule for when the lower or higher value applies. The evidence column distinguishes production reports, research prototypes, and benchmarks, but it is not tied to the score decisions. Because the paper's key empirical claim is essentially a summary of Table IV's distribution, the reader cannot verify that a plausible rescoring would preserve the asymmetry. Please provide a per-system scoring rationale or a detailed rubric with examples, and resolve or justify the ranges.

minor comments (5)

[Section V] Typo: 'wide-area network (W AN)' contains an extra space; should be 'WAN'.
[Fig. 2] The interface-level labels are split across lines ('Conversation-al / explainable interfaces') and the heading 'LevelsForEachDimension' lacks spacing. Please clean up the figure text.
[Section V-C] The text mentions 'Matryoshka and Hoyan show that intent compilation and verification can become production-grade...' but Hoyan is not discussed as an LLM-era system in the integration-pattern taxonomy and is not listed in Table IV. Clarify whether it belongs to this section or is cited only as an example of production verification infrastructure.
[Section III-D] The Netcool/Impact 3.1 reference points to a general IBM documentation URL with no explicit version or access date. For reproducibility, please provide a stable citation with the document identifier and retrieval date.
[Section VI-A] The proposed evidence standard is well motivated, but the paper does not say how it would apply to retrospective survey evidence. A one-paragraph note on how the standard relates to Table IV's categorical 'Evidence' column would strengthen the self-consistency of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a conceptual survey whose conclusions are drawn from reviewed systems and industry evidence, not from its own definitions.

full rationale

The paper is a conceptual survey and position piece rather than a formal derivation. It introduces the five-axis NCI framework as a profiling vocabulary, applies it to representative network-control systems, and draws historical/conceptual conclusions about uneven progress. The central negative claim—'available evidence does not yet support assigning LLM-enabled agents direct, end-to-end authority over operational networks'—is presented as an empirical summary of Table IV and the integration-pattern analysis, not as a logical consequence of the framework's definitions. Although the paper loosely defines the LLM-enabled era as one in which 'authoritative execution remains outside the model' (Section I), it does not rest the conclusion on that definition alone; it surveys production and research systems (Confucius, OSS-GPT, NetAssistant, etc.), standards, and industry guidance. The sample is curated and the axis scores are qualitative, but that is a limitation on external validity and generalizability, not circularity: no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from prior work is invoked to force the choice. Several cited references are self-authored (e.g., NetAssistant [18], the NFV taxonomy [65], and in-network classification work [120]), but they function as examples or background, not as load-bearing premises that determine the conclusions. The 'derivation chain' therefore does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces one conceptual entity (the NCI framework) and relies on two domain assumptions about periodization and representativeness. No free parameters are fitted to data. The absence of empirical validation for the framework's completeness is the main burden.

assumptions (3)

ad hoc to paper The five-axis NCI space is a sufficient diagnostic decomposition for comparing network control systems.
Introduced in Section II-A as following from the minimal functional path, but no formal or empirical justification is given for exhaustiveness.
domain assumption The three-era periodization (rule-based/scripted, programmable/data-driven, LLM-enabled) captures the dominant shifts in NCI realization.
The eras are defined by changes in control properties; the paper acknowledges earlier mechanisms persist, so the periodization is an analytical choice rather than a forced chronology.
domain assumption The selected representative systems are representative of their eras.
Selection criteria are stated in Section I, but the review is not systematic, and coverage may be biased toward publicly documented systems and the authors' own research network.

invented entities (1)

NCI five-axis profiling space
purpose: Analytical lens to profile network control systems across Decision Logic, Adaptability, Knowledge, Control Delegation, and Interface.
It is a conceptual construct with no external falsifiable handle beyond its usefulness in the paper's own analyses; its validity is asserted, not measured.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Network Automation to Trustworthy Autonomous Networking in the LLM Era: A Network Control Intelligence Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V6OEJVNB

@misc{pith2026260801538,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Network Automation to Trustworthy Autonomous Networking in the LLM Era: A Network Control Intelligence Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V6OEJVNB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01538}
}

read the original abstract

Since the inception of modern communication networks, the quest for operations automation has never ceased. Yet the evolution of network automation is difficult to characterize with a single maturity ladder. Throughout this history, network control systems have expanded their capabilities for observation, decision support, routine execution, and operator interaction, but these capabilities have not advanced uniformly. Such uneven progress makes the degree of automation an unreliable proxy for trustworthy network-side actuation. The unresolved question is not simply how much automation a system provides, but under what conditions it can be entrusted to change the network state. This paper examines that question through Network Control Intelligence (NCI), a five-axis framework spanning Decision Logic, Adaptability, Knowledge, Control Delegation, and Interface. We use NCI to organize the evolution of network-control systems into three eras: rule-based and scripted automation, programmable and data-driven control, and Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled network operations. Viewed through this framework, the three eras reveal a persistent asymmetry. None of these gains, however, automatically determines when network control should be trusted to change the network state. We frame trustworthy autonomy as a governed alignment between what a system can infer, what it can verify, and what it is authorized to execute. On that basis, the paper develops a reference architecture that separates proposal generation from governed execution, identifies recurring integration patterns for LLM-enabled operations, and derives a research agenda for higher network autonomy under explicit assurance, safety, and governance constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01538 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Organization of the paper. The paper first introduces the Network Control Intelligence (NCI) framework, then uses its five axes to analyze three stages [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The five-axis framework for Network Control Intelligence. The axes describe complementary control properties: how decisions are formed, how [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Era-I progression from centralized monitoring to rule-based operational execution. The dominant advances were along the Interface and Knowledge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Era-II progression from programmable actuation to data-driven closed-loop control. Network softwarization and virtualization exposed controller and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Reference architecture for LLM-enabled governed network operations. The critical architectural boundary is between proposal generation and commit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Placement of the three integration patterns over the common operational pipeline. Their main architectural difference is not merely whether an LLM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: This era transitions toward LLM-enabled network operations. Cross-domain operational pressure from network slicing, cloud-native functions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Roadmap toward trustworthy autonomous networking through the five-axis NCI lens. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

220 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

[1]

Overview of the 2002 iab network management workshop,

J. Schoenwaelder, “Overview of the 2002 iab network management workshop,” Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 3535, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3535

2002
[2]

Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,

D. Kreutz, F. M. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodol- molky, and S. Uhlig, “Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, 2014

2014
[3]

Network Functions Virtualisation: An Introduction, Benefits, Enablers, Challenges and Call for Action,

ETSI Network Functions Virtualisation Industry Specification Group (NFV ISG), “Network Functions Virtualisation: An Introduction, Benefits, Enablers, Challenges and Call for Action,” ETSI, White Paper, Oct. 2012. [Online]. Available: https://portal.etsi.org/NFV/NF V White Paper.pdf

2012
[4]

Openflow: enabling innova- tion in campus networks,

N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner, “Openflow: enabling innova- tion in campus networks,”ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2008

2008
[5]

P4: Pro- gramming protocol-independent packet processors,

P. Bosshart, D. Daly, G. Gibb, M. Izzard, N. McKeown, J. Rexford, C. Schlesinger, D. Talayco, A. Vahdat, G. Vargheseet al., “P4: Pro- gramming protocol-independent packet processors,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 87–95, 2014. 24

2014
[6]

A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities,

R. Boutaba, M. A. Salahuddin, N. Limam, S. Ayoubi, N. Shahriar, F. Estrada-Solano, and O. M. Caicedo, “A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities,”Journal of Internet Services and Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–99, 2018

2018
[7]

Machine learning for cognitive network management,

S. Ayoubi, N. Limam, M. A. Salahuddin, N. Shahriar, R. Boutaba, F. Estrada-Solano, and O. M. Caicedo, “Machine learning for cognitive network management,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 158–165, 2018

2018
[8]

The vision of autonomic computing,

J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, “The vision of autonomic computing,” Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2003

2003

Show all 220 references

[9]

Why (and how) networks should run themselves,

N. Feamster and J. Rexford, “Why (and how) networks should run themselves,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.11583, 2017

2017 arXiv
[10]

Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Reference Architecture,

ETSI, “Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Reference Architecture,” ETSI, ETSI GS ZSM 002 V1.1.1, Aug. 2019, published 2019-08; accessed 2025-09-01. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi gs/ZSM/001 099/002/01.01.01 60/gs ZSM002v010101p.pdf

2019
[11]

A Regional Guide to Autonomous Networks Progress,

R. Webb, “A Regional Guide to Autonomous Networks Progress,” http s://inform.tmforum.org/research-and-analysis/reports/a-regional-guide -to-autonomous-networks-progress, Jun. 2025, accessed 2026-02-14

2025
[12]

Five facets of 6g: Research challenges and opportunities,

L.-H. Shen, K.-T. Feng, and L. Hanzo, “Five facets of 6g: Research challenges and opportunities,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1–39, 2023

2023
[13]

Networks with intelligence,

Capgemini Research Institute, “Networks with intelligence,” https:// www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CRI Autonomou s-Network.pdf, 2024, accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2024
[14]

Zero-touch network and service management (zsm); intent- driven closed loops,

ETSI, “Zero-touch network and service management (zsm); intent- driven closed loops,” ETSI, ETSI GS ZSM 016 V1.1.1, Oct. 2024, accessed 2026-02-14. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver /etsi gs/ZSM/001 099/016/01.01.01 60/gs ZSM016v010101p.pdf

2024
[15]

Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Closed- Loop Automation; Part 1: Enablers,

——, “Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Closed- Loop Automation; Part 1: Enablers,” ETSI, ETSI GS ZSM 009-1 V1.1.1, Jun. 2021, accessed 2026-02-14. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi gs/ZSM/001 099/00901/01.01.01 60/ gs ZSM00901v010101p.pdf

2021
[16]

IG1251E Multi-Agent Architectures v1.1.0,

TM Forum, “IG1251E Multi-Agent Architectures v1.1.0,” https://ww w.tmforum.org/resources/introductory-guide/ig1251e-multi-agent-arc hitectures-v1-1-0/, Nov. 2025, accessed 2026-02-14

2025
[17]

IG1414 Agentic AI Closed Loops v1.1.0,

——, “IG1414 Agentic AI Closed Loops v1.1.0,” https://www.tmfo rum.org/resources/standard/ig1414-agentic-ai-closed-loops-v1-1-0/, Sep. 2025, accessed 2025-09-22

2025
[18]

NetAssistant: Dialogue based network diagnosis in data center networks,

H. Wang, A. Abhashkumar, C. Lin, T. Zhang, X. Gu, N. Ma, C. Wu, S. Liu, W. Zhou, Y . Dong, W. Jiang, and Y . Wang, “NetAssistant: Dialogue based network diagnosis in data center networks,” in21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24). Santa ...

2024
[20]

Oss-gpt: An llm- powered intent-driven operations support system for 6g networks,

A. Mekrache, A. Ksentini, and C. Verikoukis, “Oss-gpt: An llm- powered intent-driven operations support system for 6g networks,” in 2025 IEEE 11th International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), 2025, pp. 155–163

2025
[21]

Netconfeval: Can llms facilitate network configuration?

C. Wang, M. Scazzariello, A. Farshin, S. Ferlin, D. Kosti ´c, and M. Chiesa, “Netconfeval: Can llms facilitate network configuration?” Proc. ACM Netw., vol. 2, no. CoNEXT2, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3656296

2024 doi
[22]

Inta: Intent-based translation for network configuration with llm agents,

Y . Wei, X. Xie, T. Hu, Y . Zuo, X. Chen, K. Chi, and Y . Cui, “Inta: Intent-based translation for network configuration with llm agents,” in2025 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), 2025, pp. 1–16

2025
[23]

Vision language models for optimization-driven intent processing in autonomous networks,

T. Ahmed, Y . Zhu, and S. Choudhury, “Vision language models for optimization-driven intent processing in autonomous networks,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12744

2026
[25]

Technical Publication Department,Engi- neering and Operations in the Bell System, 2nd ed

AT&T Bell Laboratories. Technical Publication Department,Engi- neering and Operations in the Bell System, 2nd ed. AT&T Bell Laboratories, 1983

1983
[26]

Large language models for networking: Applications, enabling techniques, and challenges,

Y . Huang, H. Du, X. Zhang, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Wang, and T. Huang, “Large language models for networking: Applications, enabling techniques, and challenges,”IEEE Network, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2025

2025
[27]

Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis,

Y . Qin, S. Liang, Y . Ye, K. Zhu, L. Yan, Y . Lu, Y . Lin, X. Cong, X. Tang, B. Qianet al., “Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, vol. 2024, 2024, pp. 9695–9717

2024
[28]

React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,

S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, and Y . Cao, “React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629, 2022

2022 arXiv
[29]

Effective context engineering for AI agents,

Anthropic, “Effective context engineering for AI agents,” https://www. anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agent s/, Sep. 2025, accessed 2026-04-17

2025
[30]

Demystifying evals for AI agents,

——, “Demystifying evals for AI agents,” https://www.anthropic.co m/engineering/demystifying-evals-for-ai-agents, Jan. 2026, accessed 2026-04-17

2026
[31]

Effective harnesses for long-running agents,

——, “Effective harnesses for long-running agents,” https://www.anth ropic.com/engineering/effective-harnesses-for-long-running-agents, Nov. 2025, accessed 2026-04-17

2025
[32]

Harness engineering: leveraging Codex in an agent-first world,

OpenAI, “Harness engineering: leveraging Codex in an agent-first world,” https://openai.com/index/harness-engineering/, Feb. 2026, accessed 2026-04-17

2026
[33]

Sannet: A semantic-aware agentic ai networking framework for multi-agent cross- layer coordination,

Y . Xiao, H. Zhou, X. Li, Y . Gao, G. Shi, and P. Zhang, “Sannet: A semantic-aware agentic ai networking framework for multi-agent cross- layer coordination,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18946, 2025

2025 arXiv
[34]

Blue Planet Showcases Agentic AI Framework at DTW25,

“Blue Planet Showcases Agentic AI Framework at DTW25,” https: //www.ciena.com/about/newsroom/press-releases/blue-planet-showcas es-agentic-ai-framework-at-dtw25, 2025, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[35]

The Agentic Network: Why Multi-Agent Systems Will Define Telecom Autonomy,

K. McDonnell, “The Agentic Network: Why Multi-Agent Systems Will Define Telecom Autonomy,” https://blog.huawei.com/en/post/2025/8 /14/agentic-network-multi-agent-systems-telecom-autonomy, Aug. 2025, accessed 2025-09-01

2025
[36]

Netcracker Agentic AI Solution,

“Netcracker Agentic AI Solution,” https://www.netcracker.com/portfol io/products/agentic-ai-solution.html, accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[37]

Deutsche Telekom and Google Cloud Partner on Agentic AI for Autonomous Networks,

Deutsche Telekom, “Deutsche Telekom and Google Cloud Partner on Agentic AI for Autonomous Networks,” https://www.telekom.com/en /media/media-information/archive/deutsche-telekom-and-google-c loud-partner-on-agentic-ai-for-autonomous-networks-1088504, Feb. 2025, accessed 2025-09-01

2025
[38]

W. R. Ashby,An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, 1956

1956
[39]

K. J. ˚Astr¨om and R. Murray,Feedback systems: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton university press, 2021

2021
[40]

Russell and P

S. Russell and P. Norvig,Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4/E.Pearson, 2021

2021
[41]

Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems,

M. R. Endsley, “Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems,” inSituational awareness. Routledge, 2017, pp. 9–42

2017
[42]

R. S. Sutton, A. G. Bartoet al.,Reinforcement learning: An introduc- tion. MIT press Cambridge, 1998, vol. 1, no. 1

1998
[43]

A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation,

R. Parasuraman, T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens, “A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation,”IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 286–297, 2000

2000
[44]

N. G. Leveson,Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT press, 2016

2016
[45]

IG1392 Autonomous Networks Levels Assessment and Certification Whitepaper v2.0.0,

TM Forum, “IG1392 Autonomous Networks Levels Assessment and Certification Whitepaper v2.0.0,” https://www.tmforum.org/resources/ standard/ig1392-autonomous-networks-levels-assessment-and-certific ation-whitepaper-v2-0-0/, Nov. 2025, accessed 2026-02-14

2025
[46]

AN manifesto - TM Forum,

“AN manifesto - TM Forum,” https://www.tmforum.org/autonomous -networks-manifesto/, accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[47]

ETSI Experiential Networked Intelligence group releases 5 specifica- tions,

“ETSI Experiential Networked Intelligence group releases 5 specifica- tions,” https://www.etsi.org/newsroom/press-releases/1308-2018-06-p ress-etsi-experiential-networked-intelligence-group-releases-5-speci fications/, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2018
[48]

TS 32.500, 2022, accessed 2025-09-01

3GPP,Telecommunication management; Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Concepts and requirements, 3rd Generation Partnership Project Std. TS 32.500, 2022, accessed 2025-09-01. [Online]. Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/Speci ficationDetails.aspx?spe...

2022
[49]

O-RAN: Towards an Open and Smart RAN,

O-RAN Alliance, “O-RAN: Towards an Open and Smart RAN,” https: //mediastorage.o-ran.org/white-papers/O-RAN.White-Paper-2018-10. pdf, Oct. 2018, accessed on Sep 1, 2025. 25

2018
[50]

3GPP TS 29.520: 5g system; network data analytics services (nwdaf); stage 3,

3GPP, “3GPP TS 29.520: 5g system; network data analytics services (nwdaf); stage 3,” https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specific ations/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3355, accessed: 2025-09-25

2025
[51]

Focus Group on Autonomous Networks (FG-AN),

ITU-T, “Focus Group on Autonomous Networks (FG-AN),” https:// www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/an/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 2026-04-17

2026
[52]

Architectural framework for machine learning in future networks including IMT-2020,

——, “Architectural framework for machine learning in future networks including IMT-2020,” International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation Y .3172, Jun. 2019, approved 2019-06-22. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/itu-t/recommendations/rec.asp x?rec=13894

2020
[53]

Network configuration protocol (netconf),

R. Enns, M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, and A. Bierman, “Network configuration protocol (netconf),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 6241, Jun. 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241

2011
[54]

Restconf protocol,

A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, and K. Watsen, “Restconf protocol,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 8040, Jan. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040

2017
[55]

The yang 1.1 data modeling language,

M. Bjorklund, “The yang 1.1 data modeling language,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 7950, Aug
[56]

Claise, J

B. Claise, J. Clarke, and J. Lindblad,Network programmability with YANG: the structure of network automation with YANG, NETCONF , RESTCONF , and gNMI. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2019

2019
[57]

OpenConfig: Vendor-neutral, model-driven network management designed by users,

OpenConfig, “OpenConfig: Vendor-neutral, model-driven network management designed by users,” https://www.openconfig.net/, accessed 2026-06-01

2026
[58]

Intent-based networking - concepts and definitions,

A. Clemm, L. Ciavaglia, L. Z. Granville, and J. Tantsura, “Intent-based networking - concepts and definitions,” RFC Editor, RFC 9315, Oct
[59]

Intent classification,

C. Li, O. Havel, A. Olariu, P. Martinez-Julia, J. Nobre, and D. Lopez, “Intent classification,” Internet Research Task Force (IRTF), Request for Comments 9316, Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9316

2022
[60]

An autonomic control plane (acp),

T. Eckert, M. Behringer, and S. Bjarnason, “An autonomic control plane (acp),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 8994, May 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8994

2021
[61]

Bootstrapping remote secure key infrastructure (brski),

M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, and K. Watsen, “Bootstrapping remote secure key infrastructure (brski),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 8995, May
[62]

Open Network Operating System (ONOS) SDN Controller for SDN/NFV Solutions,

“Open Network Operating System (ONOS) SDN Controller for SDN/NFV Solutions,” https://opennetworking.org/onos/, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[63]

Central office re-architected as a data center,

L. Peterson, A. Al-Shabibi, T. Anshutz, S. Baker, A. Bavier, S. Das, J. Hart, G. Palukar, and W. Snow, “Central office re-architected as a data center,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 96–101, 2016

2016
[64]

SDN Enabled Broadband Access (SEBA) Reference Design v2.0 (ONF TS-103),

Open Networking Foundation, “SDN Enabled Broadband Access (SEBA) Reference Design v2.0 (ONF TS-103),” Open Networking Foundation, Technical Specification, Mar. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://lfbroadband.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2024/03/ONF-Refer ence-Design-SEBAv2.0F...

2021
[65]

Nfv platforms: Taxonomy, design choices and future challenges,

T. Zhang, H. Qiu, L. Linguaglossa, W. Cerroni, and P. Giaccone, “Nfv platforms: Taxonomy, design choices and future challenges,”IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30–48, 2020

2020
[66]

Network digital twin: Context, enabling technologies, and opportu- nities,

P. Almasan, M. Ferriol-Galm ´es, J. Paillisse, J. Su´arez-Varela, D. Perino, D. L ´opez, A. A. P. Perales, P. Harvey, L. Ciavaglia, L. Wonget al., “Network digital twin: Context, enabling technologies, and opportu- nities,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 22–27, 2022

2022
[67]

Digital twin networks: A survey,

Y . Wu, K. Zhang, and Y . Zhang, “Digital twin networks: A survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 13 789–13 804, 2021

2021
[68]

Operations research at bell laboratories through the 1970s: Part i,

C. S. Dawson, C. J. McCallum Jr, R. B. Murphy, and E. Wolman, “Operations research at bell laboratories through the 1970s: Part i,” Operations Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 205–215, 2000

2000
[69]

History of Network Management,

AT&T, “History of Network Management,” https://web.archive.org/we b/20131102111637/http://www.corp.att.com/history/nethistory/manage ment.html, accessed 2026-04-24

2026
[70]

Framework for Use of ECA (Event Condition Action) in Network Self Management,

M. Boucadair, Q. Wu, Z. Wang, D. King, and C. Xie, “Framework for Use of ECA (Event Condition Action) in Network Self Management,” IETF Internet-Draft draft-bwd-netmod-eca-framework-00, 2020

2020
[71]

Total network data system: network management,

G. C. Ebner and D. G. Haenschke, “Total network data system: network management,”The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 2239–2260, 1983

1983
[72]

Development of the AXE system - Ericsson History,

“Development of the AXE system - Ericsson History,” https://www.er icsson.com/en/about-us/history/products/the-switches/development-o f-the-axe-system, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[73]

Simple network management protocol,

J. D. Case, M. Fedor, M. L. Schoffstall, and J. Davin, “Simple network management protocol,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 1067, Aug. 1988. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1067

1988
[74]

Simple network management protocol (snmp),

——, “Simple network management protocol (snmp),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 1157, May
[75]

Perkins and E

D. Perkins and E. McGinnis,Understanding SNMP MIBs. Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1997

1997
[76]

Using a clips expert system to automatically manage tcp/ip networks and their components,

B. M. Faul, “Using a clips expert system to automatically manage tcp/ip networks and their components,” inNASA. Johnson Space Center, Second CLIPS Conference Proceedings, Volume 1, 1991

1991
[77]

Mrtg: The multi router traffic grapher,

T. Oetiker and D. Rand, “Mrtg: The multi router traffic grapher,” in LISA, vol. 98, 1998, pp. 141–148

1998
[78]

Linux gazette: Big brother monitoring system,

P. M. Sittler, “Linux gazette: Big brother monitoring system,”Linux Journal, vol. 1997, no. 40es, pp. 20–es, 1997

1997
[79]

Principles for a telecommunications management network,

ITU-T, “Principles for a telecommunications management network,” International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation M.3010, Feb. 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-M.3010

2000
[80]

TMN management functions,

——, “TMN management functions,” International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation M.3400. [Online]. Available: https://www.it u.int/rec/T-REC-M.3400-200002-I/en
[81]

IBM Tivoli NetView - IBM Documentation,

“IBM Tivoli NetView - IBM Documentation,” https://www.ibm.com/ docs/en/netcoolomnibus/8.0.0?topic=integrations-tivoli-netview, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[82]

Managing Your Network with HP Open- View Network Node Manager,

Hewlett-Packard Company, “Managing Your Network with HP Open- View Network Node Manager,” May 2002, manual J1240-90080

2002
[83]

A Guide to Scalability and Distribution for Network Node Man- ager,

——, “A Guide to Scalability and Distribution for Network Node Man- ager,” https://community.opentext.com/cfs-file/ key/telligent-evolu tion-components-attachments/00-470-01-00-00-49-10-29/12227.pdf, Apr. 1997, HP OpenView; Edition 1, J1136-90001; accessed 2026-04- 24

1997
[84]

Configuring IP Routing [Cisco IOS Software Releases 11.0],

Cisco Systems, “Configuring IP Routing [Cisco IOS Software Releases 11.0],” https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/11 0/access/configurat ion/guide/aciprout.html, 1994, documents policy routing in Cisco IOS Release 11.0; accessed 2026-04-17

1994
[85]

Netcool/OMNIbus Administration Guide,

“Netcool/OMNIbus Administration Guide,” https://www.ibm.com/do cs/en/SSSHTQ 8.1.0/pdf/omn pdf adm master.pdf, IBM, 2005, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2005
[86]

Towards an active network architecture,

D. L. Tennenhouse and D. J. Wetherall, “Towards an active network architecture,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 5–17, 1996

1996
[87]

The road to sdn: an intellec- tual history of programmable networks,

N. Feamster, J. Rexford, and E. Zegura, “The road to sdn: an intellec- tual history of programmable networks,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 2014

2014
[88]

Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise,

M. Casado, M. J. Freedman, J. Pettit, J. Luo, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker, “Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise,”ACM SIG- COMM computer communication review, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2007

2007
[89]

Nox: towards an operating system for networks,

N. Gude, T. Koponen, J. Pettit, B. Pfaff, M. Casado, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker, “Nox: towards an operating system for networks,”ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 105– 110, 2008

2008
[90]

Flowvisor: A network virtualization layer,

R. Sherwood, G. Gibb, K.-K. Yap, G. Appenzeller, M. Casado, N. McKeown, and G. Parulkar, “Flowvisor: A network virtualization layer,”OpenFlow Switch Consortium, Tech. Rep, vol. 1, p. 132, 2009

2009
[91]

A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks,

B. Lantz, B. Heller, and N. McKeown, “A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks,” inProceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 2010, pp. 1–6

2010
[92]

Frenetic: A network programming language,

N. Foster, R. Harrison, M. J. Freedman, C. Monsanto, J. Rexford, A. Story, and D. Walker, “Frenetic: A network programming language,” ACM Sigplan Notices, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 279–291, 2011

2011
[93]

VMware to Acquire Nicira,

“VMware to Acquire Nicira,” https://www.globenewswire.com/news -release/2012/07/23/1327218/0/en/VMware-to-Acquire-Nicira.html, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2012
[94]

B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan,

S. Jain, A. Kumar, S. Mandal, J. Ong, L. Poutievski, A. Singh, S. Venkata, J. Wanderer, J. Zhou, M. Zhuet al., “B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 3–14, 2013

2013
[95]

Open Networking Foundation Formed to Speed Network Innovation,

Open Networking Foundation, “Open Networking Foundation Formed to Speed Network Innovation,” https://opennetworking.org/news-and 26 -events/press-releases/onf-formed-to-speed-network-innovation/, Mar. 2011, press release, 2011-03-21

2011
[96]

OpenDaylight - The Open Source SDN Platform,

“OpenDaylight - The Open Source SDN Platform,” https://www.open daylight.org/, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[97]

The design and implementation of open{vSwitch},

B. Pfaff, J. Pettit, T. Koponen, E. Jackson, A. Zhou, J. Rajahalme, J. Gross, A. Wang, J. Stringer, P. Shelaret al., “The design and implementation of open{vSwitch},” in12th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI 15), 2015, pp. 117–130

2015
[98]

Sonic foundation - linux foundation project,

“Sonic foundation - linux foundation project,” 2017, accessed: 2025- 09-25

2017
[99]

Why Operators Will Deploy Virtualized CPE,

“Why Operators Will Deploy Virtualized CPE,” https://www.sdxcentr al.com/opinions/why-operators-will-deploy-virtualized-cpe, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[100]

Network Functions Virtualization Product Guide — Red Hat Open- Stack Platform,

“Network Functions Virtualization Product Guide — Red Hat Open- Stack Platform,” https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red hat o penstack platform/10/html-single/network functions virtualization p roduct guide/index, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[101]

ISG NFV,

“ISG NFV,” https://www.etsi.org/technical-groups/nfv/, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[102]

Open Source MANO (OSM),

ETSI, “Open Source MANO (OSM),” https://osm.etsi.org/, accessed 2025-09-01

2025
[103]

ansible/ansible: Ansible is a radically simple it automation system,

Ansible Project, “ansible/ansible: Ansible is a radically simple it automation system,” GitHub repository, 2026, accessed: 2026-03-22. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ansible/ansible

2026
[104]

netmap: A Novel Framework for Fast Packet I/O,

L. Rizzo, “netmap: A Novel Framework for Fast Packet I/O,” inPro- ceedings of the 2012 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC), 2012

2012
[105]

Intel ® DPDK,

“Intel ® DPDK,” https://www.dpdk.org/, accessed: 2025-09-25

2025
[106]

The express data path: Fast programmable packet processing in the operating system kernel,

T. Høiland-Jørgensen, J. D. Brouer, D. Borkmann, J. Fastabend, T. Herbert, D. Ahern, and D. Miller, “The express data path: Fast programmable packet processing in the operating system kernel,” in Proceedings of the 14th international conference on emerging network- ing experim...

2018
[107]

Comparing user space and in-kernel packet processing for edge data centers,

F. Parola, R. Procopio, R. Querio, and F. Risso, “Comparing user space and in-kernel packet processing for edge data centers,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 14– 29, 2023

2023
[108]

At&t domain 2.0 vision white paper,

AT&T Inc., “At&t domain 2.0 vision white paper,” https://www.att.co m/Common/about us/pdf/AT&T%20Domain%202.0%20Vision%20W hite%20Paper.pdf?msockid=194a0776ef646e21319a11d8eb646ca5, 2014, accessed: 2025-09-25

2014
[109]

Telef ´onica’s unica architecture strat- egy for network virtualisation,

D. Cooperson and C. Chappell, “Telef ´onica’s unica architecture strat- egy for network virtualisation,” https://www.telefonica.com/es/wp-con tent/uploads/sites/4/2021/03/Telefonica Virtualisation gCTO FINAL .pdf, 2017, accessed: 2025-09-25

2021
[110]

Network slicing in 5g: Survey and challenges,

X. Foukas, G. Patounas, A. Elmokashfi, and M. K. Marina, “Network slicing in 5g: Survey and challenges,”IEEE Communications Maga- zine, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 94–100, 2017

2017
[111]

Specification of the ip flow in- formation export (ipfix) protocol for the exchange of flow information,

B. Claise, B. Trammell, and P. Aitken, “Specification of the ip flow in- formation export (ipfix) protocol for the exchange of flow information,” Tech. Rep., 2013

2013
[112]

Inmon corporation’s sflow: A method for monitoring traffic in switched and routed networks,

P. Phaal, S. Panchen, and N. McKee, “Inmon corporation’s sflow: A method for monitoring traffic in switched and routed networks,” Tech. Rep., 2001

2001
[113]

Flowatcher-dpdk: Lightweight line-rate flow-level monitoring in soft- ware,

T. Zhang, L. Linguaglossa, M. Gallo, P. Giaccone, and D. Rossi, “Flowatcher-dpdk: Lightweight line-rate flow-level monitoring in soft- ware,”IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1143–1156, 2019

2019
[114]

Packet classification using tuple space search,

V . Srinivasan, S. Suri, and G. Varghese, “Packet classification using tuple space search,” inProceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, 1999, pp. 135–146

1999
[115]

Packet classification using hierarchical intelligent cuttings,

P. Gupta and N. McKeown, “Packet classification using hierarchical intelligent cuttings,” inHot Interconnects VII, vol. 40, 1999, pp. 34– 41

1999
[116]

Packet classifi- cation using multidimensional cutting,

S. Singh, F. Baboescu, G. Varghese, and J. Wang, “Packet classifi- cation using multidimensional cutting,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM ’03), 2003, pp. 213–224

2003
[117]

Scalable packet classification,

F. Baboescu and G. Varghese, “Scalable packet classification,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 199– 210, 2001

2001
[118]

Tuplemerge: Fast software packet processing for online packet classification,

J. Daly, V . Bruschi, L. Linguaglossa, S. Pontarelli, D. Rossi, J. Tollet, E. Torng, and A. Yourtchenko, “Tuplemerge: Fast software packet processing for online packet classification,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1417–1431, 2019

2019
[120]

Iisy: Hybrid in-network classification using programmable switches,

C. Zheng, Z. Xiong, T. T. Bui, S. Kaupmees, R. Bensoussane, A. Bern- abeu, S. Vargaftik, Y . Ben-Itzhak, and N. Zilberman, “Iisy: Hybrid in-network classification using programmable switches,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2555–2570, 2024

2024
[121]

Planter: seeding trees within switches,

C. Zheng and N. Zilberman, “Planter: seeding trees within switches,” inProceedings of the SIGCOMM ’21 Poster and Demo Sessions, ser. SIGCOMM ’21. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 12–14. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3472716.3472846

2021
[122]

Homunculus: Auto-generating efficient data-plane ml pipelines for datacenter networks,

T. Swamy, A. Zulfiqar, L. Nardi, M. Shahbaz, and K. Olukotun, “Homunculus: Auto-generating efficient data-plane ml pipelines for datacenter networks,” inProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating System...

2023
[123]

Hyperloglog: the analysis of a near-optimal cardinality estimation algorithm,

P. Flajolet, ´E. Fusy, O. Gandouet, and F. Meunier, “Hyperloglog: the analysis of a near-optimal cardinality estimation algorithm,”Discrete mathematics & theoretical computer science, no. Proceedings, 2007

2007
[124]

Software{Defined}{Traffic}measure- ment with{OpenSketch},

M. Yu, L. Jose, and R. Miao, “Software{Defined}{Traffic}measure- ment with{OpenSketch},” in10th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI 13), 2013, pp. 29–42

2013
[125]

One sketch to rule them all: Rethinking network flow monitoring with univmon,

Z. Liu, A. Manousis, G. V orsanger, V . Sekar, and V . Braverman, “One sketch to rule them all: Rethinking network flow monitoring with univmon,” inProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference, 2016, pp. 101–114

2016
[126]

Sketchlearn: Relieving user burdens in approximate measurement with automated statistical inference,

Q. Huang, P. P. Lee, and Y . Bao, “Sketchlearn: Relieving user burdens in approximate measurement with automated statistical inference,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, 2018, pp. 576–590

2018
[127]

{SketchLib}: Enabling efficient sketch-based monitoring on pro- grammable switches,

H. Namkung, Z. Liu, D. Kim, V . Sekar, and P. Steenkiste, “{SketchLib}: Enabling efficient sketch-based monitoring on pro- grammable switches,” in19th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 22), 2022, pp. 743–759

2022
[128]

Sketchguide: Reconfiguring sketch- based measurement on programmable switches,

Z. Zhou, J. Lv, L. Cheng, X. Chen, T. Zhang, Q. Huang, J. Luo, L. Zhu, D. Zhang, and C. Wu, “Sketchguide: Reconfiguring sketch- based measurement on programmable switches,” in2022 IEEE 30th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–11

2022
[129]

In-band network telemetry via programmable dataplanes,

C. Kim, A. Sivaraman, N. Katta, A. Bas, A. Dixit, L. J. Wobker, and N. McKeown, “In-band network telemetry via programmable dataplanes,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, 2015, pp. 117– 122

2015
[130]

I know what your packet did last hop: Using packet histories to trou- bleshoot networks,

N. Handigol, B. Heller, V . Jeyakumar, D. Mazi `eres, and N. McKeown, “I know what your packet did last hop: Using packet histories to trou- bleshoot networks,” inProceedings of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’14). USENIX Associa...

2014
[131]

Distributed network monitoring and debugging with switchpointer,

P. Tammana, R. Agarwal, and M. Lee, “Distributed network monitoring and debugging with switchpointer,” inProceedings of the 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’18), 2018, pp. 453–456

2018
[132]

Packet transac- tions: High-level programming for line-rate switches,

A. Sivaraman, A. Cheung, M. Budiu, C. Kim, M. Alizadeh, H. Balakr- ishnan, G. Varghese, N. McKeown, and S. Licking, “Packet transac- tions: High-level programming for line-rate switches,” inProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference, 2016, pp. 15–28

2016
[133]

Pint: Probabilistic in-band network telemetry,

R. B. Basat, S. Ramanathan, Y . Li, G. Antichi, M. Yu, and M. Mitzen- macher, “Pint: Probabilistic in-band network telemetry,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM ’20), 2020, pp. 662– 680

2020
[134]

Toward predictable per- formance in software{Packet-Processing}platforms,

M. Dobrescu, K. Argyraki, and S. Ratnasamy, “Toward predictable per- formance in software{Packet-Processing}platforms,” in9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 12), 2012, pp. 141–154

2012
[135]

{ResQ}: Enabling{SLOs}in network function virtualization,

A. Tootoonchian, A. Panda, C. Lan, M. Walls, K. Argyraki, S. Rat- nasamy, and S. Shenker, “{ResQ}: Enabling{SLOs}in network function virtualization,” in15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18), 2018, pp. 283–297

2018
[136]

Contention- aware performance prediction for virtualized network functions,

A. Manousis, R. A. Sharma, V . Sekar, and J. Sherry, “Contention- aware performance prediction for virtualized network functions,” in Proceedings of the Annual conference of the ACM Special Interest 27 Group on Data Communication on the applications, technologies, architecture...

2020
[137]

Internet traffic classification using bayesian analysis techniques,

A. W. Moore and D. Zuev, “Internet traffic classification using bayesian analysis techniques,” inProceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, 2005, pp. 50–60

2005
[138]

Towards the deployment of machine learning solutions in network traffic classification: A systematic survey,

F. Pacheco, E. Exposito, M. Gineste, C. Baudoin, and J. Aguilar, “Towards the deployment of machine learning solutions in network traffic classification: A systematic survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1988–2014, 2018

1988
[139]

Characterization of network- wide anomalies in traffic flows,

A. Lakhina, M. Crovella, and C. Diot, “Characterization of network- wide anomalies in traffic flows,” inProceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, 2004, pp. 201–206

2004
[140]

Machine learning for encrypted malware traffic classification: accounting for noisy labels and non- stationarity,

B. Anderson and D. McGrew, “Machine learning for encrypted malware traffic classification: accounting for noisy labels and non- stationarity,” inProceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2017, pp. 1723– 1732

2017
[141]

Deep packet: A novel approach for encrypted traffic classification using deep learning,

M. Lotfollahi, M. Jafari Siavoshani, R. Shirali Hossein Zade, and M. Saberian, “Deep packet: A novel approach for encrypted traffic classification using deep learning,”Soft Computing, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1999–2012, 2020

1999
[142]

Neural packet classification,

E. Liang, H. Zhu, X. Jin, and I. Stoica, “Neural packet classification,” inProceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, ser. SIGCOMM ’19. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 256–269. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10....

2019
[143]

Kitsune: an ensemble of autoencoders for online network intrusion detection,

Y . Mirsky, T. Doitshman, Y . Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Kitsune: an ensemble of autoencoders for online network intrusion detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.09089, 2018

2018 arXiv
[144]

Congestion avoidance and control,

V . Jacobson, “Congestion avoidance and control,” inACM SIGCOMM, 1988

1988
[145]

Cubic: a new tcp-friendly high-speed tcp variant,

S. Ha, I. Rhee, and L. Xu, “Cubic: a new tcp-friendly high-speed tcp variant,” vol. 42, no. 5. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Jul. 2008, p. 64–74. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1400097.1400105

2008
[146]

Tcp ex machina: computer- generated congestion control,

K. Winstein and H. Balakrishnan, “Tcp ex machina: computer- generated congestion control,” vol. 43, no. 4. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Aug. 2013, p. 123–134. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2534169.2486020

2013
[147]

Pcc vivace: Online-learning congestion control,

M. Dong, T. Meng, D. Zarchy, E. Arslan, Y . Gilad, B. Godfrey, and M. Schapira, “Pcc vivace: Online-learning congestion control,” in15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2018, pp. 343–356

2018
[148]

A deep reinforcement learning perspective on internet congestion control,

N. Jay, N. Rotman, B. Godfrey, M. Schapira, and A. Tamar, “A deep reinforcement learning perspective on internet congestion control,” inProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Chaudhuri and R. Sala...

2019
[149]

Learning to route,

A. Valadarsky, M. Schapira, D. Shahaf, and A. Tamar, “Learning to route,” inProceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, ser. HotNets ’17. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, p. 185–191. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145...

2017
[150]

Routenet: Leveraging graph neural networks for network modeling and optimization in sdn,

K. Rusek, J. Su ´arez-Varela, P. Almasan, P. Barlet-Ros, and A. Cabellos- Aparicio, “Routenet: Leveraging graph neural networks for network modeling and optimization in sdn,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2260–2270, 2020

2020
[151]

Auto: scaling deep reinforcement learning for datacenter-scale automatic traffic optimization,

L. Chen, J. Lingys, K. Chen, and F. Liu, “Auto: scaling deep reinforcement learning for datacenter-scale automatic traffic optimization,” inProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, ser. SIGCOMM ’18. New York, NY , USA: Associa...

2018
[152]

Is machine learning ready for traffic engineering optimization?

G. Bern ´ardez, J. Su ´arez-Varela, A. L ´opez, B. Wu, S. Xiao, X. Cheng, P. Barlet-Ros, and A. Cabellos-Aparicio, “Is machine learning ready for traffic engineering optimization?” in2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–11

2021
[153]

Teal: Learning-accelerated optimization of wan traffic engineering,

Z. Xu, F. Y . Yan, R. Singh, J. T. Chiu, A. M. Rush, and M. Yu, “Teal: Learning-accelerated optimization of wan traffic engineering,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2023 Conference, 2023, pp. 378–393

2023
[154]

Redte: Mitigating subsecond traffic bursts with real-time and distributed traffic engineering,

F. Gui, S. Wang, D. Li, L. Chen, K. Gao, C. Min, and Y . Wang, “Redte: Mitigating subsecond traffic bursts with real-time and distributed traffic engineering,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference. ACM, 2024, pp. 71–85

2024
[155]

Shooting large- scale traffic engineering by combining deep learning and optimiza- tion approach,

C. Liu, H. Deng, V . Aggarwal, Y . Yang, and M. Xu, “Shooting large- scale traffic engineering by combining deep learning and optimiza- tion approach,”Proceedings of the ACM on Networking, vol. 3, no. CoNEXT1, pp. 1–21, 2025

2025
[156]

Learning scheduling algorithms for data processing clusters,

H. Mao, M. Schwarzkopf, S. B. Venkatakrishnan, Z. Meng, and M. Alizadeh, “Learning scheduling algorithms for data processing clusters,” inProceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, ser. SIGCOMM ’19. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machin...

2019
[157]

Graph neural networks for scalable radio resource management: Architecture design and theo- retical analysis,

Y . Shen, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Graph neural networks for scalable radio resource management: Architecture design and theo- retical analysis,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2021

2021
[158]

A gnn approach for cell-free massive mimo,

L. Sala ¨un, H. Yang, S. Mishra, and C. S. Chen, “A gnn approach for cell-free massive mimo,” inGLOBECOM 2022-2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 2022, pp. 3053–3058

2022
[159]

Measuring video qoe from encrypted traffic,

G. Dimopoulos, I. Leontiadis, P. Barlet-Ros, and K. Papagiannaki, “Measuring video qoe from encrypted traffic,” inProceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference, 2016, pp. 513–526

2016
[160]

Neural adaptive video streaming with pensieve,

H. Mao, R. Netravali, and M. Alizadeh, “Neural adaptive video streaming with pensieve,” inProceedings of the conference of the ACM special interest group on data communication, 2017, pp. 197–210

2017
[161]

Towards highly reliable enterprise network services via inference of multi-level dependencies,

P. Bahl, R. Chandra, A. Greenberg, S. Kandula, D. A. Maltz, and M. Zhang, “Towards highly reliable enterprise network services via inference of multi-level dependencies,” vol. 37, no. 4. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Aug. 2007, p. 13–24. [Online]. Av...

2007
[162]

Taking the blame game out of data centers operations with netpoirot,

B. Arzani, S. Ciraci, B. T. Loo, A. Schuster, and G. Outhred, “Taking the blame game out of data centers operations with netpoirot,” inProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference, ser. SIGCOMM ’16. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, p. 440–453. [...

2016
[163]

Netbouncer: Active device and link failure localization in data center networks,

C. Tan, Z. Jin, C. Guo, T. Zhang, H. Wu, K. Deng, D. Bi, and D. Xiang, “Netbouncer: Active device and link failure localization in data center networks,” inUSENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2019

2019
[164]

Mimicnet: fast performance estimates for data center networks with machine learning,

Q. Zhang, K. K. W. Ng, C. Kazer, S. Yan, J. a. Sedoc, and V . Liu, “Mimicnet: fast performance estimates for data center networks with machine learning,” inProceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference, ser. SIGCOMM ’21. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Mach...

2021
[167]

A knowledge plane for the internet,

D. D. Clark, C. Partridge, J. C. Ramming, and J. T. Wroclawski, “A knowledge plane for the internet,” inProceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, 2003, pp. 3–10

2003
[168]

The design of an autonomic element for managing emerging networks and services,

J. Strassner, J. W.-K. Hong, and S. van der Meer, “The design of an autonomic element for managing emerging networks and services,” in 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–8

2009
[169]

Self-organizing networks (son) in 3gpp long term evolution,

S. Feng and E. Seidel, “Self-organizing networks (son) in 3gpp long term evolution,”Nomor Research GmbH, Munich, Germany, vol. 20, pp. 1–15, 2008

2008
[170]

5g network slicing using sdn and nfv: A survey of taxonomy, architectures and future challenges,

A. A. Barakabitze, A. Ahmad, R. Mijumbi, and A. Hines, “5g network slicing using sdn and nfv: A survey of taxonomy, architectures and future challenges,”Computer Networks, vol. 167, p. 106984, 2020. 28

2020
[171]

Gb1524a wireless network change management questionnaire v1.0.0,

TM Forum Autonomous Networks Project, “Gb1524a wireless network change management questionnaire v1.0.0,” https://www.tmforum.org/ resources/guidebook/gb1524a-wireless-network-change-managemen t-questionnaire-v1-0-0/, Sep. 2025, accessed 2026-02-16

2025
[172]

Attention is all you need,

A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

2017
[173]

Language mod- els are few-shot learners,

T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askellet al., “Language mod- els are few-shot learners,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020

1901
[174]

ChatGPT,

“ChatGPT,” https://chatgpt.com/, Accessed on Sep 1, 2025

2025
[175]

Gem- ini: a family of highly capable multimodal models,

G. Team, R. Anil, S. Borgeaud, J.-B. Alayrac, J. Yu, R. Soricut, J. Schalkwyk, A. M. Dai, A. Hauth, K. Millicanet al., “Gem- ini: a family of highly capable multimodal models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

2023 arXiv
[176]

From large ai models to agentic ai: A tutorial on future intelligent communications,

F. Jiang, C. Pan, K. Wang, P. Michiardi, O. A. Dobre, and M. Debbah, “From large ai models to agentic ai: A tutorial on future intelligent communications,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 44, pp. 3507–3540, 2026

2026
[177]

Large language models for zero touch network configuration management,

O. G. Lira, O. M. Caicedo, and N. L. da Fonseca, “Large language models for zero touch network configuration management,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 146–153, 2024

2024
[178]

Autonomous networks — nokia,

Nokia, “Autonomous networks — nokia,” https://www.nokia.com/auto nomous-networks/, 2024, accessed: 2025-09-24

2024
[179]

Agentic AI for RAN Optimization: Pathway to Autonomous Network Level 5,

C. Finelli, A. Sharaf, B. Lo, and M. Sierra Marco, “Agentic AI for RAN Optimization: Pathway to Autonomous Network Level 5,” https: //aws.amazon.com/blogs/industries/agentic-ai-for-ran-optimizat ion-pathway-to-autonomous-network-level-5/, Jul. 2025, accessed 2025-09-01

2025
[180]

One more step towards autonomous networks: self-healing in Brazil’s 5G Core,

F. Barreros and A. Lucchesi, “One more step towards autonomous networks: self-healing in Brazil’s 5G Core,” https://www.telefonica.c om/en/communication-room/blog/self-healing-in-the-core-5g-brazil/, Jul. 2025, published 2025-07-17; accessed 2025-09-01

2025
[181]

Agentic AI in the Autonomous Networks Control Loop,

G. Lenahan, “Agentic AI in the Autonomous Networks Control Loop,” https://appledoreresearch.com/report/agentic-ai-autonomous-network s-control-loop/, Jun. 2025, published 15 June 2025

2025
[182]

CrossCheck: Input validation for W AN control systems,

A. Krentsel, R. Iyer, I. Keslassy, B. Modhipalli, S. Ratnasamy, A. Shaikh, and R. Shakir, “CrossCheck: Input validation for W AN control systems,” in23rd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 26). Renton, W A: USENIX Association, May 2026, pp. 6...

2026
[185]

EPVerifier: Accelerating update storms verification with Edge-Predicate,

C. Zhao, Y . Guo, J. Wang, Q. Qi, Z. Zhuang, H. Sun, L. Guo, Y . Xie, and J. Liao, “EPVerifier: Accelerating update storms verification with Edge-Predicate,” in21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24). Santa Clara, CA: USENIX Association, ...

2024
[186]

NDD: A decision diagram for network verification,

Z. Li, P. Zhang, Y . Zhang, and H. Yang, “NDD: A decision diagram for network verification,” in22nd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 25). Philadelphia, PA: USENIX Association, Apr. 2025, pp. 237–258. [Online]. Available: https://www.usenix....

2025
[188]

Diagnosing and repairing distributed routing configurations using selective symbolic simulation,

R. Yang, G. Han, H. Shao, X. Zheng, X. Fang, Z. Wang, L. You, R. Zhou, L. Kong, E. Zhai, Q. Xiang, and J. Shu, “Diagnosing and repairing distributed routing configurations using selective symbolic simulation,” in23rd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementat...

2026
[189]

New evolution of hoyan: Enhancing scalability, usability, and accuracy for alibaba’s global wan verification,

Y . Yuan, F. Ye, Y . Li, J. Zhang, M. Liu, Y . Sang, R. Yang, D. She, Z. Ye, T. Guo, X. Zhu, X. Tang, L. Jia, Z. Guan, L. Su, C. Wang, R. Feng, S. Wu, Z. Xie, C. Jin, P. Zhang, Q. Ma, X. Zeng, D. Cai, and E. Zhai, “New evolution of hoyan: Enhancing scalability, usability, and ...

2025
[190]

Verifying maximum link loads in a changing world,

T. Schneider, S. Vissicchio, and L. Vanbever, “Verifying maximum link loads in a changing world,” in22nd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 25). Philadelphia, PA: USENIX Association, Apr. 2025, pp. 1269–1287. [Online]. Available: https://www....

2025
[191]

Abstractions for network update,

M. Reitblatt, N. Foster, J. Rexford, C. Schlesinger, and D. Walker, “Abstractions for network update,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Com- munication Review, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 323–334, 2012

2012
[192]

Network configuration access control model,

A. Bierman and M. Bjorklund, “Network configuration access control model,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments 8341, Mar. 2018. [Online]. Available: https: //www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341

2018
[193]

Enabling AI network Cross-Layer design and operations with arcadia: A simulation platform at scale,

Z. Wang, S. S. Ahuja, X. Zhang, M. Noormohammadpour, G. R. Steinbrecher, T. Fuller, X. Liu, K. Quirk, M. J. Fernandez, A. Triguna, Y . Cai, S. Politis, P. Lapukhov, N. Hasani, and Y . Zhang, “Enabling AI network Cross-Layer design and operations with arcadia: A simulation plat...

2026
[194]

Incident Re- sponse Recommendations and Considerations for Cybersecurity Risk Management: A CSF 2.0 Community Profile,

A. Nelson, S. Rekhi, M. Souppaya, and K. Scarfone, “Incident Re- sponse Recommendations and Considerations for Cybersecurity Risk Management: A CSF 2.0 Community Profile,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Tech. Rep. NIST Special Publication 800- 61 Rev. 3, 2025

2025
[195]

Towards llm-based failure localization in production-scale networks,

C. Wang, X. Zhang, R. Lu, X. Lin, X. Zeng, X. Zhang, Z. An, G. Wu, J. Gao, C. Tian, G. Chen, G. Liu, Y . Liao, T. Lin, D. Cai, and E. Zhai, “Towards llm-based failure localization in production-scale networks,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2025 Conference, ser. SIGCOMM ’25...

2025
[196]

Automatic root cause analysis via large language models for cloud incidents,

Y . Chen, H. Xie, M. Ma, Y . Kang, X. Gao, L. Shi, Y . Cao, X. Gao, H. Fan, M. Wen, J. Zeng, S. Ghosh, X. Zhang, C. Zhang, Q. Lin, S. Rajmohan, D. Zhang, and T. Xu, “Automatic root cause analysis via large language models for cloud incidents,” in Proceedings of the Nineteenth ...

2024
[198]

CEGS: Configuration example generalizing synthesizer,

J. Liu, L. Chen, D. Li, and Y . Miao, “CEGS: Configuration example generalizing synthesizer,” in22nd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 25). Philadelphia, PA: USENIX Association, Apr. 2025, pp. 1327–1347. [Online]. Available: https://www.usen...

2025
[199]

Eywa: Automating Model-Based testing using LLMs,

R. Mondal, R. Singha, T. Millstein, G. Varghese, R. Beckett, and S. K. R. Kakarla, “Eywa: Automating Model-Based testing using LLMs,” in23rd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 26). Renton, W A: USENIX Association, May 2026, pp. 777–800. [Onli...

2026
[200]

Towards an agentic workflow for internet measurement research,

A. Ramanathan, E. Kang, D. Han, and S. Abdu Jyothi, “Towards an agentic workflow for internet measurement research,” inProceedings of the 24th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, ser. HotNets ’25. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, p. 61–68. [On...

2025
[201]

Constrained network slice assignment via large language models,

S. Sudhakara and P. Rajak, “Constrained network slice assignment via large language models,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2512.00040 29

2025
[202]

Making logic a First-Class citizen in generative ML for networking,

H. H `e, M. Jin, and M. Apostolaki, “Making logic a First-Class citizen in generative ML for networking,” in23rd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 26). Renton, W A: USENIX Association, May 2026, pp. 801–824. [Online]. Available: https://www....

2026
[203]

Matryoshka: Realizing hyperscale data center network design for the AI era,

Y . Cai, J. Li, K. Akpinar, T. Li, H. Morsy, J. Wilson, S. Khaunte, Y . Xia, and Y . Zhang, “Matryoshka: Realizing hyperscale data center network design for the AI era,” in23rd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 26). Renton, W A: USENIX Assoc...

2026
[204]

NetKeeper: Enhancing network resilience with autonomous network configuration update on traffic patterns and anomalies,

Z. Wan, R. Han, H. Sun, Q. Qi, Z. Zhuang, B. He, L. Zhang, J. Liao, and J. Wang, “NetKeeper: Enhancing network resilience with autonomous network configuration update on traffic patterns and anomalies,” in2025 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 25). Boston, MA: USE...

2025
[205]

Bridging the Network Autonomy Chasm,

F. Haysom, “Bridging the Network Autonomy Chasm,” Appledore Research white paper, Dec. 2024, accessed 2026-02-14. [Online]. Available: https://appledoreresearch.com/report/bridging-the-network -autonomy-chasm/

2024
[206]

Lessons from the evolution of the batfish configuration analysis tool,

M. Brown, A. Fogel, D. Halperin, V . Heorhiadi, R. Mahajan, and T. Millstein, “Lessons from the evolution of the batfish configuration analysis tool,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2023 Conference, ser. ACM SIGCOMM ’23. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machiner...

2023
[207]

Crescent: Emulating heterogeneous production network at scale,

Z. Gao, A. Abhashkumar, Z. Sun, W. Jiang, and Y . Wang, “Crescent: Emulating heterogeneous production network at scale,” in21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24). Santa Clara, CA: USENIX Association, Apr. 2024, pp. 1045–1062. [Online]. A...

2024
[208]

CellReplay: Towards accurate record-and-replay for cellular networks,

W. Sentosa, B. Chandrasekaran, P. B. Godfrey, and H. Hassanieh, “CellReplay: Towards accurate record-and-replay for cellular networks,” in22nd USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 25). Philadelphia, PA: USENIX Association, Apr. 2025, pp. 1169–1...

2025
[209]

Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Network Digital Twin,

ETSI, “Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Network Digital Twin,” https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi gr/ZSM/001 099/015 /01.01.01 60/gr ZSM015v010101p.pdf, ETSI, ETSI GR ZSM 015 V1.1.1, Feb. 2024, accessed 2025-09-01

2024
[210]

Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Network Digital Twin for enhanced zero-touch network and service management,

——, “Zero-touch network and Service Management (ZSM); Network Digital Twin for enhanced zero-touch network and service management,” ETSI, ETSI GS ZSM 018 V1.1.1, Dec. 2024, accessed 2026-02-14. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi gs/ ZSM/001 099/018/01.01.01...

2024
[211]

Provenance for intent- based networking,

B. E. Ujcich, A. Bates, and W. H. Sanders, “Provenance for intent- based networking,” in2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Soft- warization (NetSoft), 2020, pp. 195–199

2020
[212]

Flash: fast, consistent data plane verification for large-scale network settings,

D. Guo, S. Chen, K. Gao, Q. Xiang, Y . Zhang, and Y . R. Yang, “Flash: fast, consistent data plane verification for large-scale network settings,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference, ser. SIGCOMM ’22. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022,...

2022
[213]

Relational network verification,

X. Xu, Y . Yuan, Z. Kincaid, A. Krishnamurthy, R. Mahajan, D. Walker, and E. Zhai, “Relational network verification,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference, ser. ACM SIGCOMM ’24. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 213–227. [Online]. Av...

2024
[214]

Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks,

J. Kirkpatrick, R. Pascanu, N. Rabinowitz, J. Veness, G. Desjardins, A. A. Rusu, K. Milan, J. Quan, T. Ramalho, A. Grabska-Barwinska, D. Hassabis, C. Clopath, D. Kumaran, and R. Hadsell, “Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks,”Proceedings of the National Academ...

2017 doi
[215]

A survey of constraint formulations in safe reinforcement learning,

A. Wachi, X. Shen, and Y . Sui, “A survey of constraint formulations in safe reinforcement learning,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02025

2024 arXiv
[216]

Deep rein- forcement learning for online resource allocation in network slicing,

Y . Cai, P. Cheng, Z. Chen, M. Ding, B. Vucetic, and Y . Li, “Deep rein- forcement learning for online resource allocation in network slicing,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 7099– 7116, 2023

2023
[217]

A general approach to network configuration analysis,

A. Fogel, S. Fung, L. Pedrosa, M. Walraed-Sullivan, R. Govindan, R. Mahajan, and T. Millstein, “A general approach to network configuration analysis,” in12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 15). Oakland, CA: USENIX Association, May 2015, p...

2015
[218]

A general approach to network configuration verification,

R. Beckett, A. Gupta, R. Mahajan, and D. Walker, “A general approach to network configuration verification,” inProceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, ser. SIGCOMM ’17. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017...

2017
[219]

InjecAgent: Benchmarking indirect prompt injections in tool-integrated large language model agents,

Q. Zhan, Z. Liang, Z. Ying, and D. Kang, “InjecAgent: Benchmarking indirect prompt injections in tool-integrated large language model agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, L.-W. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikumar, Eds. Bangkok, Thailand:...

2024
[220]

IG1453 Agent to Agent Protocol for Telecoms (A2A-T) v1.0.0,

TM Forum, “IG1453 Agent to Agent Protocol for Telecoms (A2A-T) v1.0.0,” https://www.tmforum.org/resources/introductory-guide/ig1 453-agent-to-agent-protocol-for-telecoms-a2a-t-v1-0-0/, Nov. 2025, accessed 2026-02-14

2025
[221]

Zero trust architecture,

S. Rose, O. Borchert, S. Mitchell, and S. Connelly, “Zero trust architecture,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-207, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207

2020 doi
[222]

Intent-driven autonomous network and service management in future cellular networks: A structured literature review,

K. Mehmood, K. Kralevska, and D. Palma, “Intent-driven autonomous network and service management in future cellular networks: A structured literature review,”Computer Networks, vol. 220, p. 109477,
[223]

Autonomous conflict handling in intent-based management,

E. Dehghan Biyar, M. D’Angelo, J. C. n. Cisneros, A. Nascimento, M. Orlic, A. Likhyani, A. Zahemszky, A. C. Baktir, D. A. Temesgene, and D. Roeland, “Autonomous conflict handling in intent-based management,”Comput. Netw., vol. 271, no. C, Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: https:...

2025
[229]

He is an ACM Distinguished Member
[1990]

Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1157

[Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1157
[2016]

Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950

[Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950
[2021]

Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8995

[Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8995
[2022]

Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9315

[Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9315
[2023]

Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti cle/pii/S1389128622005114

[Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti cle/pii/S1389128622005114

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Overview of the 2002 iab network management workshop,

J. Schoenwaelder, “Overview of the 2002 iab network management workshop,” Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 3535, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3535

2002

[2] [2]

Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,

D. Kreutz, F. M. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodol- molky, and S. Uhlig, “Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, 2014

2014

[3] [3]

Network Functions Virtualisation: An Introduction, Benefits, Enablers, Challenges and Call for Action,

ETSI Network Functions Virtualisation Industry Specification Group (NFV ISG), “Network Functions Virtualisation: An Introduction, Benefits, Enablers, Challenges and Call for Action,” ETSI, White Paper, Oct. 2012. [Online]. Available: https://portal.etsi.org/NFV/NF V White Paper.pdf

2012

[4] [4]

Openflow: enabling innova- tion in campus networks,

N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner, “Openflow: enabling innova- tion in campus networks,”ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2008

2008

[5] [5]

P4: Pro- gramming protocol-independent packet processors,

P. Bosshart, D. Daly, G. Gibb, M. Izzard, N. McKeown, J. Rexford, C. Schlesinger, D. Talayco, A. Vahdat, G. Vargheseet al., “P4: Pro- gramming protocol-independent packet processors,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 87–95, 2014. 24

2014

[6] [6]

A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities,

R. Boutaba, M. A. Salahuddin, N. Limam, S. Ayoubi, N. Shahriar, F. Estrada-Solano, and O. M. Caicedo, “A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities,”Journal of Internet Services and Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–99, 2018

2018

[7] [7]

Machine learning for cognitive network management,

S. Ayoubi, N. Limam, M. A. Salahuddin, N. Shahriar, R. Boutaba, F. Estrada-Solano, and O. M. Caicedo, “Machine learning for cognitive network management,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 158–165, 2018

2018

[8] [8]

The vision of autonomic computing,

J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, “The vision of autonomic computing,” Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2003

2003