Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison

Androniki Dimitriou; Bryan Zaldivar; Daniel G. Figueroa; Peera Simakachorn

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read LISA can reconstruct the cosmic-string tension to within a few percent over a wide parameter range, and can confidently distinguish the two standard cosmic-string network models once the tension exceeds 5×10^-13.

desk verdict Promising abstract for a cosmic-string GWB template survey, but the supplied full text is an unrelated random-laser intro, so none of the quantitative claims can be verified. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05395 v2 pith:VASAQD3Z submitted 2025-08-07 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Androniki Dimitriou , Daniel G. Figueroa , Peera Simakachorn , Bryan Zaldivar This is my paper

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph PACS 04.30.-w11.27.+d

keywords cosmicstringsgravitationalwavebackgroundLISAstochasticsimulation-basedinferencetemplatereconstructionmodelcomparisonstringtension

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a signal survey and parameter-reconstruction forecast for the stochastic gravitational-wave background produced by cosmic-string networks, targeting the LISA detector. The authors build a large catalog of spectral templates for both standard cosmic strings (with VOS and BOS loop-production models) and a range of beyond-standard scenarios (exotic string types, modified expansion histories, altered loop properties). Using simulation-based inference, they show that LISA can reconstruct the string tension Gμ with an error of at most 10% for Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-15}$, improving to 2-3% for Gμ ≳ $10^{-12}$, and can distinguish the BOS and VOS models confidently for Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-13}$. The paper matters because a precise measurement of the tension would probe physics at energy scales far beyond the reach of particle colliders, and model discrimination would reveal how string loops are produced.

What carries the argument

The central object is the template catalog of gravitational-wave background spectra Ω_GW(f) for cosmic strings, classified as conventional (standard expansion history plus VOS or BOS loop production) or beyond-conventional (modified loop number density, exotic string types, non-standard cosmologies, altered loop properties). The load-bearing mechanism is the paper's simulation-based inference package, GWBackFinder: it simulates synthetic LISA data across the parameter space of each template and learns the posterior distribution of the signal parameters. This turns each spectral template into a quantitative prediction about measurement uncertainty and model distinguishability.

What would settle it

Generate synthetic LISA observations that include a cosmic-string signal with Gμ ≈ $10^{-14}$ superimposed on the expected galactic white-dwarf binary foreground, run the same simulation-based reconstruction, and check whether the tension error remains ≤10% and whether the BOS-vs-VOS discrimination still holds at Gμ ≈ 5×$10^{-13}$; if either fails, the optimistic foreground-free claims are not valid in the real noise environment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: LISA, observing in isolation a stochastic background from cosmic strings, can measure the string tension Gμ with percent-level precision across a wide range of signal amplitudes. In particular, the reconstruction error is ≲10% for Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-15}$, dropping to 2-3% for Gμ ≳ $10^{-12}$, for both conventional Nambu-Goto network descriptions (VOS and BOS). Furthermore, the two competing descriptions of loop formation become distinguishable with confidence once Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-13}$. For beyond-conventional scenarios, the paper provides SNR and error thresholds for each parameter and, for selected cases, identifies the regions where such exotic signals can be told apart from conventio

Load-bearing premise

Every quoted reconstruction error and model-discrimination threshold assumes that LISA observes the cosmic-string background in isolation, with no overlapping astrophysical foreground; if unresolved foregrounds (such as white-dwarf binaries) contribute to the same frequency band, the achievable precision will be worse than the paper reports.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If a cosmic-string background is detected by LISA and no astrophysical foreground contaminates it, the string tension Gμ can be measured to a few percent, turning a detection into a precision early-universe measurement.
A confident BOS-vs-VOS discrimination at Gμ > 5×10^-13 would select between two different descriptions of the loop-formation process in Nambu-Goto networks, with direct consequences for the small-scale structure of string loops and their gravitational-wave emission.
For beyond-conventional models (metastable, superconducting or super-heavy strings, non-standard expansion histories), the reported error and SNR thresholds define which regions of parameter space LISA can actually constrain or exclude.
The template catalog and the error-floor curves establish a baseline for the LISA search, against which any future foreground-inclusive analysis can be compared to see how much precision is lost by the universe's other stochastic sources.
If no cosmic-string background is seen, the reconstruction-error curves translate, at given detection thresholds, into upper limits on Gμ that depend on the assumed network model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Note on the input: the full-text section supplied with this abstract covers an unrelated article on random lasers; this extraction is consequently anchored to the abstract alone, and the paper's internal derivations were not checked independently.
Because the quoted precision assumes a foreground-free observation, the real LISA measurement will likely sit under unresolved white-dwarf binary and compact-binary backgrounds; a direct forecast of the degraded precision would be a natural follow-up, and the present numbers should be read as best-case floors.
The model-discrimination threshold Gμ ≈ 5×10^-13 may correspond to the scale at which the two standard loop-production descriptions produce differing high-frequency spectral features; below this tension their spectra are effectively degenerate in the LISA band, meaning a detection alone will not identify the loop-formation mechanism.
The catalog's classification of beyond-conventional scenarios can be reused as a test suite for other gravitational-wave detectors (e.g., future space interferometers or pulsar timing arrays) whose frequency bands overlap with the cosmic-string background.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The abstract promises a genuinely useful resource: a systematic catalog of gravitational wave background templates from cosmic-string models, split into conventional and beyond-conventional, with simulation-based inference via GWBackFinder to produce LISA reconstruction errors and model-discrimination thresholds. The headline numbers are concrete and practical: Gμ errors ≤10% for Gμ ≳ 5×10^-15, dropping to 2–3% for Gμ ≳ 10^-12, and BOS/VOS distinguishability for Gμ ≳ 5×10^-13. If backed by the right machinery, this is exactly what the LISA data-analysis and cosmic-string communities need.

The problem is that the full text we have is a random-laser introduction. No method, no equations, no noise model, no injection procedure, no dataset. The abstract's claims are unsupported as submitted. I assume this is a submission error, but on the record we must treat the supplied text as the manuscript, so there is no paper to evaluate.

Even if the correct body were provided, two caveats would need attention. First, the quoted reconstruction errors assume an isolated signal with no astrophysical foregrounds; the abstract explicitly defers the foreground-superposition case to follow-up papers. That is a real limitation, though not disqualifying if stated clearly. Second, the reconstruction study injects simulated signals drawn from the same template families it then reconstructs, so the error thresholds measure self-consistency of the pipeline, not its ability to find something genuinely unexpected. That is structural to the design, but it should be acknowledged.

Bottom line: I cannot recommend sending this to a referee in its current form. The right move is to send it back to the authors or desk-reject with a request for the correct manuscript. If a corrected version matches the abstract's description, then yes, it deserves serious peer review. I would not cite the abstract's numbers until the method is visible.

Recommendation: do not review as-is; ask for the actual paper.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to present a catalog of cosmic-string gravitational wave background templates, an SBI-based reconstruction of their parameters with LISA using the GWBackFinder package, and model-comparison thresholds. The abstract reports quantitative results: tension errors ≲10% for Gμ ≳ 5×10⁻¹⁵, decreasing to 2–3% for Gμ ≳ 10⁻¹², and confident BOS/VOS distinguishability for Gμ ≳ 5×10⁻¹³. However, the supplied full text is an unrelated introduction to random lasers (RGB lasing, electrospinning), containing no cosmological or gravitational-wave content. No equations, noise model, injection procedure, template definitions, or analysis results appear anywhere in the body. The abstract's claims are therefore entirely unsupported by the manuscript text.

Significance. If the claimed quantitative results were established, they would be of considerable importance: they would quantify LISA's reach for measuring cosmic-string tension and for distinguishing competing network models, with direct relevance to fundamental physics and cosmology. The concrete threshold numbers in the abstract are falsifiable predictions that a complete paper could test. However, in its current form the manuscript provides no evidence whatsoever for these claims. The presented body text is unrelated to the abstract, so the significance of the work cannot be assessed: there is no method to evaluate, no code to check, and no data to scrutinize.

major comments (3)

[Full text (Introduction) vs. Abstract] The central claims of the paper—reconstruction precision of cosmic-string tension, BOS/VOS distinguishability, SNR thresholds—are stated only in the abstract. The supplied body begins with 'Random lasers (RLs) have gained attention...' and contains no mention of cosmic strings, LISA, GWBackFinder, gravitational wave backgrounds, noise modeling, simulation, or parameter inference. There is no derivation, no equations, no tables, and no results that could substantiate the numbers (e.g., '≲10% for Gμ ≳ 5·10^-15'). This is not a presentation issue; it is the absence of the entire technical content needed to evaluate the central claims. The manuscript as submitted is internally inconsistent and cannot be verified.
[Abstract (methodological support)] Even setting aside the body mismatch, the abstract makes no reference to a specific noise model for LISA, a signal injection procedure, or a statistical criterion for 'confident' distinguishability. The claim that BOS and VOS are 'distinguishable confidently' requires a defined decision rule (e.g., Bayes factor or posterior overlap threshold). None is given. Without these definitions, the quoted thresholds are not reproducible. A complete paper must describe the template catalog, the SBI algorithm, the likelihood and noise model, and the model-comparison procedure.
[Abstract (foreground limitation)] The abstract's final sentence defers 'quality reconstruction studies of cosmic-string GWBs, superimposed over leading astrophysical foregrounds' to future papers. This is an honest limitation, but it is load-bearing for the quoted error bars: the 10%/2–3% tension errors and the BOS/VOS threshold are obtained in a foreground-free setting. If unresolved astrophysical backgrounds overlap the cosmic-string signal in the LISA band, those numbers could change materially. A reader cannot currently evaluate whether the quoted precision would survive a realistic foreground environment.

minor comments (3)

[Title/Keywords] The keywords ('RGB, white lasing, random lasing, electrospinning') and the title/abstract describe entirely different subjects. If this is a submission error, the authors should resubmit the correct manuscript; if not, the mismatch itself is a fatal presentation flaw.
[References] The body references non-existent entries (e.g., '1–3', '4–8') for random-laser literature, with no bibliography. None of the cosmic-string or LISA literature cited in the abstract is present in the body.
[Notation] The abstract introduces 'BOS' and 'VOS' without definition, and the body provides no glossary. These abbreviations are presumably loop distribution models, but the reader cannot confirm from the supplied text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular step identifiable; supplied full text does not contain the claimed derivation.

full rationale

The abstract claims a catalog of cosmic-string GWB templates and reconstruction precision using the SBI package GWBackFinder, with quantitative statements about Gμ reconstruction errors and BOS/VOS distinguishability. However, the supplied full text is an unrelated introduction to random lasers (it begins 'Random lasers (RLs) have gained attention...'). There are no equations, no template definitions, no simulation or inference details, and no model-comparison results. Treating all manuscript text as in-scope evidence, there is no derivation chain to walk. Circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction—e.g., an equation equal by construction, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. No such reduction can be quoted because none appears in the supplied text. The abstract/body mismatch is a serious verifiability and correctness issue, but it is not a circularity pattern enumerated in the rubric. Therefore the honest circularity score is 0, with no steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract offers a template survey and forecast, so the load-bearing inputs are the assumed physical picture (cosmic-string networks emitting a GWB), the assumed LISA sensitivity, and the foreground-free setting. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced; the beyond-conventional string families are borrowed from prior literature per the abstract's own description. Parameters such as Gμ are scanned rather than fitted, and the beyond-conventional modifiers are not enumerated in the abstract.

free parameters (2)

Cosmic-string tension Gμ
Scanned over the range used for the quoted thresholds (roughly 10^-15 to above 10^-12). It is a physical model parameter of the templates, not a constant fitted to data, but the forecasts are presented as functions of it.
Beyond-conventional model parameters (loop number density, expansion history, loop properties)
The abstract says reconstruction precision is quantified by 'scanning over their parameter space' for LRS, super, metastable, current-carrying strings and modified cosmologies; the individual parameters are not listed in the abstract.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Cosmic-string networks exist and emit stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds described by the adopted template families.
The entire catalog and forecast presuppose the standard cosmic-string GWB emission picture; the abstract classifies templates 'based on relevant models proposed in the literature' without re-deriving or validating the network dynamics.
domain assumption LISA will operate at the nominal sensitivity implied by the 'LISA window.'
All reconstruction-error and distinguishability thresholds are computed against the mission's assumed sensitivity; deviations in noise performance change the quoted numbers.
domain assumption Signals are treated in isolation from astrophysical foregrounds in this first paper.
The final abstract sentence defers foreground-superposed studies to upcoming papers, so the quoted errors describe an idealized observation; this is load-bearing for the strongest claim.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VASAQD3Z

@misc{pith2026250805395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VASAQD3Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05395}
}

abstract

We present a catalog of gravitational wave background (GWB) signal templates from cosmic-string networks, based on relevant models proposed in the literature. We classify templates as conventional, based on standard cosmology and Nambu-Goto results (VOS and BOS), and beyond conventional, based on modifications of a) the loop number density (LRS, super, metastable, current-carrying strings), b) the expansion history (non-standard cosmologies, extra degrees of freedom, either thermal or secluded), or c) the loop properties (birth length, power emission). Using the SBI package $\texttt{GWBackFinder}$, we quantify the reconstruction precision of each signal by LISA, scanning over their parameter space, and performing model comparisons. For conventional signals, LISA reconstructs the tension $G\mu$ with an error $\lesssim 10\%$ for $G\mu \gtrsim 5\cdot 10^{-15}$, which decreases down to $2-3\%$ for $G\mu \gtrsim 10^{-12}$. BOS and VOS modelings become distinguishable confidently for $G\mu \gtrsim 5\cdot 10^{-13}$. For beyond-conventional signals, we identify SNR and error-threshold intervals for each parameter, and determine (for few examples) the regions where they can be distinguished from conventional signals. Analogous quality reconstruction studies of cosmic-string GWBs, superimposed over leading astrophysical foregrounds in the LISA window, will be presented in a series of upcoming papers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

New gravitational-wave templates for metastable cosmic strings: Loop breaking versus network collapse
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Metastable cosmic strings produce a gravitational wave background that is best modeled with three parameters (string tension Gμ plus independent time scales t_LB and t_NC), yielding a compact analytical spectrum when ...
LISA Reconstruction Landscape for Metastable Cosmic Strings
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

LISA can reconstruct metastable cosmic-string tension and lifetime when it samples the tail-to-plateau transition, with residual κ_CS sensitivity possible even in high-SNR plateau-like spectra.
Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: II. Reconstruction of conventional signals over astrophysical foregrounds
astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

When realistic astrophysical foregrounds are included, LISA can reconstruct the cosmic-string tension to 10% precision only for Gμ ≳ 10^{-11}, 10^5 times larger than foreground-free forecasts.
Fire at the Tip of the Throat: Hagedorn Phase after brane-antibrane inflation?
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

In perturbatively moduli-stabilized brane-antibrane inflation, a modest fraction of annihilation energy into visible open strings can trigger a Hagedorn phase that suppresses ΔN_eff when the SM throat string scale is ...
On the Reliability of Sampling Strategies in Offline Recommender Evaluation
cs.IR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Simulated exposure conditions on fully observed preference data show that the reliability of offline recommender evaluation depends jointly on the logging exposure model and the sampling strategy, and the paper maps w...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

278 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

[1]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04855 1606.04855 ]

arXiv 2016
[2]

LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 221101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01812 1706.01812 ]

arXiv 2017
[3]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c Astrophys. J. Lett. 851 (2017) L35 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05578 1711.05578 ]

arXiv
[4]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL collaboration, Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 (2017) L13 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05834 1710.05834 ]

arXiv
[5]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 141101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09660 1709.09660 ]

arXiv 2017
[6]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05832 1710.05832 ]

arXiv 2017
[7]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031040 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12907 1811.12907 ]

arXiv 2019
[8]

LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 022001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01045 2108.01045 ]

arXiv 2024

Show all 278 references

[9]

KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific collaboration, GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 041039 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03606 2111.03606 ]

2023 arXiv
[10]

NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L8 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16213 2306.16213 ]

arXiv
[11]

Search for gravitational wave signals , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 Astron

EPTA, InPTA: collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16214 2306.16214 ]

2023 arXiv
[12]

D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L6 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16215 2306.16215 ]

arXiv
[13]

Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 Res

H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023) 075024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16216 2306.16216 ]

2023 arXiv
[14]

Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 Class

S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0908 1012.0908 ]

2011 arXiv
[15]

Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 Class

M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

2010 doi
[16]

Abac et al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12263 2503.12263

A. Abac et al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12263 2503.12263

arXiv
[17]

LIGO Scientific collaboration, Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa51f4 Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 044001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08697 1607.08697 ]

2017 arXiv
[18]

Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 035 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04833 1907.04833 ]

2019 arXiv
[19]

LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786 1702.00786

arXiv
[20]

LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-023-00045-2 Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 5 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05434 2204.05434 ]

2023 arXiv
[21]

L. P. Grishchuk, Amplification of gravitational waves in an istropic universe , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67 (1974) 825

1974
[22]

A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe , JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682

1979
[23]

V. A. Rubakov, M. V. Sazhin and A. V. Veryaskin, Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90641-4 Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 189

1982 doi
[24]

Fabbri and M

R. Fabbri and M. d. Pollock, The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 445

1983 doi
[25]

M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, N-flationary magnetic fields , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/10/018 JCAP 10 (2006) 018 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0606534 astro-ph/0606534 ]

2006 arXiv
[26]

L. Sorbo, Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/06/003 JCAP 06 (2011) 003 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1525 1101.1525 ]

2011 arXiv
[27]

Pajer and M

E. Pajer and M. Peloso, A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214002 Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3557 1305.3557 ]

2013 arXiv
[28]

Adshead, E

P. Adshead, E. Martinec and M. Wyman, Gauge fields and inflation: Chiral gravitational waves, fluctuations, and the Lyth bound , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.021302 Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 021302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.2598 1301.2598 ]

2013 arXiv
[29]

Adshead, E

P. Adshead, E. Martinec and M. Wyman, Perturbations in Chromo-Natural Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)087 JHEP 09 (2013) 087 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2930 1305.2930 ]

2013 arXiv
[30]

A. Maleknejad, Axion Inflation with an SU(2) Gauge Field: Detectable Chiral Gravity Waves , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2016)104 JHEP 07 (2016) 104 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03327 1604.03327 ]

2016 arXiv
[31]

Dimastrogiovanni, M

E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello and T. Fujita, Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/019 JCAP 01 (2017) 019 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04216 1608.04216 ]

2017 arXiv
[32]

Namba, M

R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo and C. Unal, Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/041 JCAP 01 (2016) 041 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07521 1509.07521 ]

2016 arXiv
[33]

R. Z. Ferreira, J. Ganc, J. Nore\ na and M. S. Sloth, On the validity of the perturbative description of axions during inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/039 JCAP 04 (2016) 039 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06116 1512.06116 ]

2016 arXiv
[34]

Peloso, L

M. Peloso, L. Sorbo and C. Unal, Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/001 JCAP 09 (2016) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00459 1606.00459 ]

2016 arXiv
[35]

Domcke, M

V. Domcke, M. Pieroni and P. Bin\'etruy, Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/031 JCAP 06 (2016) 031 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01287 1603.01287 ]

2016 arXiv
[36]

R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, Axion Gauge Field Inflation and Gravitational Leptogenesis: A Lower Bound on B Modes from the Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023532 Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023532 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.037...

2018 arXiv
[37]

M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori and S. Matarrese, Gravitational waves from inflation , https://doi.org/10.1393/ncr/i2016-10127-1 Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39 (2016) 399 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01615 1605.01615 ]

2016 arXiv
[38]

Bartolo et al., Science with the space-based interferometer LISA

N. Bartolo et al., Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/026 JCAP 12 (2016) 026 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06481 1610.06481 ]

2016 arXiv
[39]

D'Amico, N

G. D'Amico, N. Kaloper and A. Westphal, General double monodromy inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103527 Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 103527 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13861 2112.13861 ]

2022 arXiv
[40]

D'Amico, N

G. D'Amico, N. Kaloper and A. Westphal, Double Monodromy Inflation: A Gravity Waves Factory for CMB-S4, LiteBIRD and LISA , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L081302 Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L081302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05861 2101.05861 ]

2021 arXiv
[41]

Fumagalli, S

J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel and L. T. Witkowski, Oscillations in the stochastic gravitational wave background from sharp features and particle production during inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/030 JCAP 08 (2021) 030 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02761 20...

2021 arXiv
[42]

Fumagalli, G

J. Fumagalli, G. A. Palma, S. Renaux-Petel, S. Sypsas, L. T. Witkowski and C. Zenteno, Primordial gravitational waves from excited states , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)196 JHEP 03 (2022) 196 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14664 2111.14664 ]

2022 arXiv
[43]

Easther and E

R. Easther and E. A. Lim, Stochastic gravitational wave production after inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/04/010 JCAP 04 (2006) 010 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601617 astro-ph/0601617 ]

2006 arXiv
[44]

Garcia-Bellido and D

J. Garcia-Bellido and D. G. Figueroa, A stochastic background of gravitational waves from hybrid preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.061302 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 061302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701014 astro-ph/0701014 ]

2007 arXiv
[45]

Garcia-Bellido, D

J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa and A. Sastre, A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043517 Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 043517 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0839 0707.0839 ]

2008 arXiv
[46]

J. F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and J.-P. Uzan, Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.123517 Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 123517 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0875 0707.0875 ]

2007 arXiv
[47]

Dufaux, G

J.-F. Dufaux, G. Felder, L. Kofman and O. Navros, Gravity Waves from Tachyonic Preheating after Hybrid Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/03/001 JCAP 03 (2009) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2917 0812.2917 ]

2009 arXiv
[48]

Dufaux, D

J.-F. Dufaux, D. G. Figueroa and J. Garcia-Bellido, Gravitational Waves from Abelian Gauge Fields and Cosmic Strings at Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083518 Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083518 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0217 1006.0217 ]

2010 arXiv
[49]

Bethke, D

L. Bethke, D. G. Figueroa and A. Rajantie, Anisotropies in the Gravitational Wave Background from Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.011301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 011301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2657 1304.2657 ]

2013 arXiv
[50]

Bethke, D

L. Bethke, D. G. Figueroa and A. Rajantie, On the Anisotropy of the Gravitational Wave Background from Massless Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/047 JCAP 06 (2014) 047 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1148 1309.1148 ]

2014 arXiv
[51]

D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, Gravitational wave production from preheating: parameter dependence , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/057 JCAP 10 (2017) 057 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04533 1707.04533 ]

2017 arXiv
[52]

Adshead, J

P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin and Z. J. Weiner, Gravitational waves from gauge preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043525 Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043525 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04550 1805.04550 ]

2018 arXiv
[53]

Adshead, J

P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z. J. Weiner, Constraining axion inflation with gravitational waves from preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083534 Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083534 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12842 1909.12842 ]

2020 arXiv
[54]

Adshead, J

P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z. J. Weiner, Constraining Axion Inflation with Gravitational Waves across 29 Decades in Frequency , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.171301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 171301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12843 1909.12843 ]

2020 arXiv
[55]

Giovannini, Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083504 Phys

M. Giovannini, Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083504 Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9806329 hep-ph/9806329 ]

1998 arXiv
[56]

Giovannini, Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123511 Phys

M. Giovannini, Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123511 Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 123511 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9903004 astro-ph/9903004 ]

1999 arXiv
[57]

L. A. Boyle and A. Buonanno, Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043531 Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 043531 [ https://arx...

2008 arXiv
[58]

B. Li, P. R. Shapiro and T. Rindler-Daller, Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter and the gravitational wave background from inflation: new cosmological constraints and its detectability by LIGO , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.063505 Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063...

2017 arXiv
[59]

Li and P

B. Li and P. R. Shapiro, Precision cosmology and the stiff-amplified gravitational-wave background from inflation: NANOGrav, Advanced LIGO-Virgo and the Hubble tension , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/024 JCAP 10 (2021) 024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12229 2107.12229 ]

2021 arXiv
[60]

D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, Inconsistency of an inflationary sector coupled only to Einstein gravity , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/050 JCAP 10 (2019) 050 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04093 1811.04093 ]

2019 arXiv
[61]

D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, Ability of LIGO and LISA to probe the equation of state of the early Universe , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/011 JCAP 08 (2019) 011 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11960 1905.11960 ]

2019 arXiv
[62]

Gouttenoire, G

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion , https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10328 2108.10328

arXiv
[63]

R. T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya et al., Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)116 JHEP 09 (2022) 116 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09299 2108.09299 ]

2022 arXiv
[64]

Gouttenoire, G

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures , https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.01150 2111.01150

arXiv
[65]

V. K. Oikonomou, Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 observation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043516 Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043516 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17351 2306.17351 ]

2023 arXiv
[66]

Ghiglieri and M

J. Ghiglieri and M. Laine, Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: Qualitative features , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/022 JCAP 07 (2015) 022 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02569 1504.02569 ]

2015 arXiv
[67]

Ghiglieri, G

J. Ghiglieri, G. Jackson, M. Laine and Y. Zhu, Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: Complete leading order , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)092 JHEP 07 (2020) 092 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11392 2004.11392 ]

2020 arXiv
[68]

Ringwald, J

A. Ringwald, J. Sch\"utte-Engel and C. Tamarit, Gravitational Waves as a Big Bang Thermometer , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/054 JCAP 03 (2021) 054 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04731 2011.04731 ]

2021 arXiv
[69]

Ghiglieri, J

J. Ghiglieri, J. Sch\"utte-Engel and E. Speranza, Freezing-in gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023538 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023538 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16513 2211.16513 ]

2024 arXiv
[70]

S.-Y. Zhou, E. J. Copeland, R. Easther, H. Finkel, Z.-G. Mou and P. M. Saffin, Gravitational Waves from Oscillon Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)026 JHEP 10 (2013) 026 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6094 1304.6094 ]

2013 arXiv
[71]

Antusch, F

S. Antusch, F. Cefala and S. Orani, Gravitational waves from oscillons after inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.011303 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011303 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01314 1607.01314 ]

2017 arXiv
[72]

Antusch, F

S. Antusch, F. Cefala and S. Orani, What can we learn from the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by oscillons? , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/032 JCAP 03 (2018) 032 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03231 1712.03231 ]

2018 arXiv
[73]

Liu, Z.-K

J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and G. Shiu, Gravitational Waves from Oscillons with Cuspy Potentials , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.031301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 031301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09841 1707.09841 ]

2018 arXiv
[74]

M. A. Amin, J. Braden, E. J. Copeland, J. T. Giblin, C. Solorio, Z. J. Weiner et al., Gravitational waves from asymmetric oscillon dynamics? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024040 Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 024040 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08047 1803.08047 ]

2018 arXiv
[75]

Kamionkowski, A

M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2837 Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2837 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9310044 astro-ph/9310044 ]

1994 arXiv
[76]

Caprini, R

C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant, Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.124015 Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 124015 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2593 0711.2593 ]

2008 arXiv
[77]

S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin, Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/09/022 JCAP 09 (2008) 022 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1828 0806.1828 ]

2008 arXiv
[78]

Hindmarsh, S

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.041301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2433 1304.2433 ]

2014 arXiv
[79]

Hindmarsh, S

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123009 Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123009 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03291 1504.03291 ]

2015 arXiv
[80]

Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/001 JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06239 1512.06239 ]

2016 arXiv
[81]

Hindmarsh, S

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir, Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103520 Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103520 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05871 1704.05871 ]

2017 arXiv
[82]

Cutting, M

D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from vacuum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123513 Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123513 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05712 1802.05712 ]

2018 arXiv
[83]

Cutting, M

D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh and D. J. Weir, Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravitational wave production in strong first order phase transitions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.021302 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 021302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00480 1906.00480 ]

2020 arXiv
[84]

Roper Pol, S

A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky, Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083512 Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 083512 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08585 1903.08585 ]

2020 arXiv
[85]

C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/024 JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13125 1910.13125 ]

2020 arXiv
[86]

Cutting, E

D. Cutting, E. G. Escartin, M. Hindmarsh and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023531 Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 023531 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13537 2005.13537 ]

2021 arXiv
[87]

Han, K.-P

C. Han, K.-P. Xie, J. M. Yang and M. Zhang, Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.115025 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 115025 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16966 2306.16966 ]

2024 arXiv
[88]

Ashoorioon, K

A. Ashoorioon, K. Rezazadeh and A. Rostami, NANOGrav signal from the end of inflation and the LIGO mass and heavier primordial black holes , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137542 Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022) 137542 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01131 2202.01131 ]

2022
[89]

Athron, A

P. Athron, A. Fowlie, C.-T. Lu, L. Morris, L. Wu, Y. Wu et al., Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.221001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 221001 [ https://arxiv.org...

2024 arXiv
[90]

Y.-Y. Li, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, M.-Y. Cui, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Q. Yuan et al., Primordial magnetic field as a common solution of nanohertz gravitational waves and the Hubble tension , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043538 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043538 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/23...

2024 arXiv
[91]

Vachaspati and A

T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.3052 Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3052

1985 doi
[92]

Sakellariadou, Gravitational waves emitted from infinite strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.354 Phys

M. Sakellariadou, Gravitational waves emitted from infinite strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.354 Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 354

1990 doi
[93]

Damour and A

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3761 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3761 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0004075 gr-qc/0004075 ]

2000 arXiv
[94]

Damour and A

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.064008 Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064008 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0104026 gr-qc/0104026 ]

2001 arXiv
[95]

Damour and A

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063510 Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063510 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0410222 hep-th/0410222 ]

2005 arXiv
[96]

E. Fenu, D. G. Figueroa, R. Durrer and J. Garcia-Bellido, Gravitational waves from self-ordering scalar fields , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/005 JCAP 10 (2009) 005 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0425 0908.0425 ]

2009 arXiv
[97]

D. G. Figueroa, M. Hindmarsh and J. Urrestilla, Exact Scale-Invariant Background of Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Defects , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.101302 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 101302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5458 1212.5458 ]

2013 arXiv
[98]

Hiramatsu, M

T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki and K. Saikawa, On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/031 JCAP 02 (2014) 031 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.5001 1309.5001 ]

2014 arXiv
[99]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104046 Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 104046 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02693 1709.02693 ]

2017 arXiv
[100]

P. Auclair et al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/034 JCAP 04 (2020) 034 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00819 1909.00819 ]

2020 arXiv
[101]

Gouttenoire, G

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/032 JCAP 07 (2020) 032 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02569 1912.02569 ]

2020 arXiv
[102]

D. G. Figueroa, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga and J. Urrestilla, Irreducible background of gravitational waves from a cosmic defect network: update and comparison of numerical techniques , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103516 Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 103516 [ https://arxiv....

2020 arXiv
[103]

Gorghetto, E

M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy and H. Nicolaescu, Observing invisible axions with gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/034 JCAP 06 (2021) 034 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11007 2101.11007 ]

2021 arXiv
[104]

Chang and Y

C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings and cosmic archaeology , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)114 JHEP 03 (2022) 114 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09746 2106.09746 ]

2022 arXiv
[105]

Yamada and K

M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Cosmic F- and D-strings from pure Yang Mills theory , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137724 Phys. Lett. B 838 (2023) 137724 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13125 2204.13125 ]

2023
[106]

Yamada and K

M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Cosmic strings from pure Yang Mills theory , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.123515 Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 123515 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13123 2204.13123 ]

2022 arXiv
[107]

Kitajima, J

N. Kitajima, J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Gravitational waves from domain wall collapse, and application to nanohertz signals with QCD-coupled axions , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138586 Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138586 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.171...

2024
[108]

Matarrese, O

S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. Saez, A General relativistic approach to the nonlinear evolution of collisionless matter , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1311 Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 1311

1993 doi
[109]

Matarrese, O

S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. Saez, General relativistic dynamics of irrotational dust: Cosmological implications , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.320 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 320 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9310036 astro-ph/9310036 ]

1994 arXiv
[110]

Matarrese, S

S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach and M. Bruni, Second order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter universe , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.043504 Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 043504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9707278 astro-ph/9707278 ]

1998 arXiv
[111]

Nakamura, Second-order gauge invariant cosmological perturbation theory: Einstein equations in terms of gauge invariant variables , https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.117.17 Prog

K. Nakamura, Second-order gauge invariant cosmological perturbation theory: Einstein equations in terms of gauge invariant variables , https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.117.17 Prog. Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) 17 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0605108 gr-qc/0605108 ]

2007 arXiv
[112]

K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands, The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.123518 Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 123518 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0612013 gr-qc/0612013 ]

2007 arXiv
[113]

Baumann, P

D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki, Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084019 Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 084019 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0703290 hep-th/0703290 ]

2007 arXiv
[114]

Dom\`enech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7110398 Universe 7 (2021) 398 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01398 2109.01398 ]

G. Dom\`enech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7110398 Universe 7 (2021) 398 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01398 2109.01398 ]

2021 arXiv
[115]

Dandoy, V

V. Dandoy, V. Domcke and F. Rompineve, Search for scalar induced gravitational waves in the international pulsar timing array data release 2 and NANOgrav 12.5 years datasets , https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.3.060 SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) 060 [ https://arxiv.org/...

2023 arXiv
[116]

Caprini and D

C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aac608 Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 163001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04268 1801.04268 ]

2018 arXiv
[117]

L. Z. Kelley, L. Blecha, L. Hernquist, A. Sesana and S. R. Taylor, The Gravitational Wave Background from Massive Black Hole Binaries in Illustris: spectral features and time to detection with pulsar timing arrays , https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1638 Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. ...

2017 arXiv
[118]

NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ace18b Astrophys. J. Lett. 952 (2023) L37 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16220 2306.16220 ]

arXiv
[119]

Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347433 Astron

EPTA, InPTA collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347433 Astron. Astrophys. 685 (2024) A94 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306...

2024 arXiv
[120]

NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdc91 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16219 2306.16219 ]

arXiv
[121]

D. G. Figueroa, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone and P. Simakachorn, Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.171002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 171002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02399 2307.02399 ]

2024 arXiv
[122]

T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387

1976 doi
[123]

M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001 Rept. Prog. Phys. 58 (1995) 477 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9411342 hep-ph/9411342 ]

1995 arXiv
[124]

Vilenkin and E

A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects . Cambridge University Press, 7, 2000

2000
[125]

Jeannerot, J

R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher and M. Sakellariadou, How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.103514 Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 103514 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0308134 hep-ph/0308134 ]

2003 arXiv
[126]

Dvali and A

G. Dvali and A. Vilenkin, Formation and evolution of cosmic D strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2004/03/010 JCAP 03 (2004) 010 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0312007 hep-th/0312007 ]

2004 arXiv
[127]

E. J. Copeland, R. C. Myers and J. Polchinski, Cosmic F and D strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/06/013 JHEP 06 (2004) 013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0312067 hep-th/0312067 ]

2004 arXiv
[128]

Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)91144-8 Phys

A. Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)91144-8 Phys. Lett. B 107 (1981) 47

1981 doi
[129]

C. J. Hogan and M. J. Rees, Gravitational interactions of cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1038/311109a0 Nature 311 (1984) 109

1984 doi
[130]

Sousa and P

L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background generated by Cosmic String Networks: Velocity-Dependent One-Scale model versus Scale-Invariant Evolution , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.023516 Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 023516 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304...

2013 arXiv
[131]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum and X. Siemens, New limits on cosmic strings from gravitational wave observation , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.050 Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 392 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02434 1709.02434 ]

2018 arXiv
[132]

Sousa, P

L. Sousa, P. P. Avelino and G. S. F. Guedes, Full analytical approximation to the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103508 Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 103508 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01079 2002.01079 ]

2020 arXiv
[133]

Chang and Y

C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Global Cosmic Strings , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2020.100604 Phys. Dark Univ. 29 (2020) 100604 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04781 1910.04781 ]

2020
[134]

Servant and P

G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Constraining postinflationary axions with pulsar timing arrays , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123516 Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123516 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03121 2307.03121 ]

2023 arXiv
[135]

Servant and P

G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Ultrahigh frequency primordial gravitational waves beyond the kHz: The case of cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103538 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 103538 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09281 2312.09281 ]

2024 arXiv
[136]

LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation , https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03740 2405.03740

arXiv
[137]

J. M. Wachter, K. D. Olum and J. J. Blanco-Pillado, More accurate gravitational wave backgrounds from cosmic strings , https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16590 2411.16590
[138]

Schmitz and T

K. Schmitz and T. Schr\"oder, Gravitational waves from cosmic strings for pedestrians , https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20907 2412.20907
[139]

Avgoustidis, E

A. Avgoustidis, E. J. Copeland, A. Moss and J. Raidal, The stochastic gravitational wave background from cosmic superstrings , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10361 2503.10361

arXiv
[140]

Hindmarsh, J

M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, J. Urrestilla, D. Daverio and M. Kunz, Scaling from gauge and scalar radiation in Abelian Higgs string networks , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023525 Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023525 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06696 1703.06696 ]

2017 arXiv
[141]

Matsunami, L

D. Matsunami, L. Pogosian, A. Saurabh and T. Vachaspati, Decay of Cosmic String Loops Due to Particle Radiation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.201301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 201301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05102 1903.05102 ]

2019 arXiv
[142]

Auclair, D

P. Auclair, D. A. Steer and T. Vachaspati, Particle emission and gravitational radiation from cosmic strings: observational constraints , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083511 Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083511 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12066 1911.12066 ]

2020 arXiv
[143]

Saurabh, T

A. Saurabh, T. Vachaspati and L. Pogosian, Decay of Cosmic Global String Loops , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083522 Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083522 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01030 2001.01030 ]

2020 arXiv
[144]

Hindmarsh, J

M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla, Loop decay in Abelian-Higgs string networks , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043519 Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 043519 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.16248 2103.16248 ]

2021 arXiv
[145]

Auclair, K

P. Auclair, K. Leyde and D. A. Steer, A window for cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/005 JCAP 04 (2023) 005 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11093 2112.11093 ]

2023 arXiv
[146]

Baeza-Ballesteros, E

J. Baeza-Ballesteros, E. J. Copeland, D. G. Figueroa and J. Lizarraga, Gravitational wave emission from a cosmic string loop: Global case , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043522 Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 043522 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08456 2308.08456 ]

2024 arXiv
[147]

Baeza-Ballesteros, E

J. Baeza-Ballesteros, E. J. Copeland, D. G. Figueroa and J. Lizarraga, Gravitational Wave Emission from Cosmic String Loops, II: Local Case , https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02364 2408.02364

arXiv
[148]

Garcia-Bellido, R

J. Garcia-Bellido, R. Durrer, E. Fenu, D. G. Figueroa and M. Kunz, The local B-polarization of the CMB: a very sensitive probe of cosmic defects , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.031 Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 26 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0299 1003.0299 ]

2010 arXiv
[149]

E. Fenu, D. G. Figueroa, R. Durrer, J. Garcia-Bellido and M. Kunz, Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and polarization anisotropies from the large-N limit of global defects , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083512 Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 083512 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/...

2014 arXiv
[150]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2013 results. XXV. Searches for cosmic strings and other topological defects , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321621 Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A25 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5085 1303.5085 ]

2013 arXiv
[151]

Durrer, D

R. Durrer, D. G. Figueroa and M. Kunz, Can Self-Ordering Scalar Fields explain the BICEP2 B-mode signal? , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/029 JCAP 08 (2014) 029 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3855 1404.3855 ]

2014 arXiv
[152]

Lizarraga, J

J. Lizarraga, J. Urrestilla, D. Daverio, M. Hindmarsh, M. Kunz and A. R. Liddle, Constraining topological defects with temperature and polarization anisotropies , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.103504 Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 103504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4126 1408.4126 ]

2014 arXiv
[153]

Charnock, A

T. Charnock, A. Avgoustidis, E. J. Copeland and A. Moss, CMB constraints on cosmic strings and superstrings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123503 Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 123503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01275 1603.01275 ]

2016 arXiv
[154]

Lizarraga, J

J. Lizarraga, J. Urrestilla, D. Daverio, M. Hindmarsh and M. Kunz, New CMB constraints for Abelian Higgs cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/042 JCAP 10 (2016) 042 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03386 1609.03386 ]

2016 arXiv
[155]

Lopez-Eiguren, J

A. Lopez-Eiguren, J. Lizarraga, M. Hindmarsh and J. Urrestilla, Cosmic Microwave Background constraints for global strings and global monopoles , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/026 JCAP 07 (2017) 026 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04154 1705.04154 ]

2017 arXiv
[156]

D. G. Figueroa, R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Non-Gaussianity from Self-Ordering Scalar Fields , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123504 Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 123504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0672 1003.0672 ]

2010 arXiv
[157]

Ringeval, Cosmic strings and their induced non-Gaussianities in the cosmic microwave background , https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/380507 Adv

C. Ringeval, Cosmic strings and their induced non-Gaussianities in the cosmic microwave background , https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/380507 Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 380507 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4842 1005.4842 ]

2010 arXiv
[158]

Regan and M

D. Regan and M. Hindmarsh, The bispectrum of matter perturbations from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/008 JCAP 03 (2015) 008 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2641 1411.2641 ]

2015 arXiv
[159]

Kume and M

J. Kume and M. Hindmarsh, Revised bounds on local cosmic strings from NANOGrav observations , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/001 JCAP 12 (2024) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02705 2404.02705 ]

2024 arXiv
[160]

Thrane and J

E. Thrane and J. D. Romano, Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.124032 Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 124032 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.5300 1310.5300 ]

2013 arXiv
[161]

Karnesis, M

N. Karnesis, M. Lilley and A. Petiteau, Assessing the detectability of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA, using an excess of power approach , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abb637 Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 215017 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09027 190...

2020 arXiv
[162]

Caprini, D

C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, R. Flauger, G. Nardini, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni et al., Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/017 JCAP 11 (2019) 017 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09244 190...

2019 arXiv
[163]

Flauger, N

R. Flauger, N. Karnesis, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone and J. Torrado, Improved reconstruction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/059 JCAP 01 (2021) 059 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11845 2009.11845 ]

2021 arXiv
[164]

Baghi, N

Q. Baghi, N. Karnesis, J.-B. Bayle, M. Besan c on and H. Inchausp\'e, Uncovering gravitational-wave backgrounds from noises of unknown shape with LISA , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/066 JCAP 04 (2023) 066 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12573 2302.12573 ]

2023 arXiv
[165]

Pozzoli, R

F. Pozzoli, R. Buscicchio, C. J. Moore, F. Haardt and A. Sesana, Weakly parametric approach to stochastic background inference in LISA , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083029 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 083029 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12111 2311.12111 ]

2024 arXiv
[166]

Dimitriou, D

A. Dimitriou, D. G. Figueroa and B. Zaldivar, Fast likelihood-free reconstruction of gravitational wave backgrounds , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/032 JCAP 09 (2024) 032 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08430 2309.08430 ]

2024 arXiv
[167]

Alvey, U

J. Alvey, U. Bhardwaj, V. Domcke, M. Pieroni and C. Weniger, Simulation-based inference for stochastic gravitational wave background data analysis , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083008 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 083008 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07954 2309.07954 ]

2024 arXiv
[168]

C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, String evolution with friction , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.R575 Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 575 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9507335 hep-ph/9507335 ]

1996 arXiv
[169]

C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Quantitative string evolution , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2535 Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2535 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9602271 hep-ph/9602271 ]

1996 arXiv
[170]

C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.043514 Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 043514 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0003298 hep-ph/0003298 ]

2002 arXiv
[171]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum and B. Shlaer, The number of cosmic string loops , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023512 Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 023512 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.6637 1309.6637 ]

2014 arXiv
[172]

Lorenz, C

L. Lorenz, C. Ringeval and M. Sakellariadou, Cosmic string loop distribution on all length scales and at any redshift , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/003 JCAP 10 (2010) 003 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0931 1006.0931 ]

2010 arXiv
[173]

Leblond, B

L. Leblond, B. Shlaer and X. Siemens, Gravitational Waves from Broken Cosmic Strings: The Bursts and the Beads , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.123519 Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 123519 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.4686 0903.4686 ]

2009 arXiv
[174]

Buchmuller, V

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke and K. Schmitz, Stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/006 JCAP 12 (2021) 006 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04578 2107.04578 ]

2021 arXiv
[175]

Auclair, S

P. Auclair, S. Blasi, V. Brdar and K. Schmitz, Gravitational waves from current-carrying cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/009 JCAP 04 (2023) 009 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03510 2207.03510 ]

2023 arXiv
[176]

Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey and J. D. Wells, Cosmic Archaeology with Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123505 Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123505 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03104 1711.03104 ]

2018 arXiv
[177]

Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey and J. D. Wells, Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2019)081 JHEP 01 (2019) 081 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08968 1808.08968 ]

2019 arXiv
[178]

Sousa and P

L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, Stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks: The small-loop regime , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083503 Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 083503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2621 1403.2621 ]

2014 arXiv
[179]

Staelens and G

S. Staelens and G. Nelemans, Likelihood of white dwarf binaries to dominate the astrophysical gravitational wave background in the mHz band , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348429 Astron. Astrophys. 683 (2024) A139 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19448 2310.19448 ]

2024 arXiv
[180]

Hofman and G

S. Hofman and G. Nelemans, Uncertainty of the white dwarf astrophysical gravitational wave background , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451510 Astron. Astrophys. 691 (2024) A261 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10642 2407.10642 ]

2024 arXiv
[181]

Vachaspati, The Structure of wiggly cosmic string wakes , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3487 Phys

T. Vachaspati, The Structure of wiggly cosmic string wakes , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3487 Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 3487

1992 doi
[182]

Camargo Neves da Cunha, C

D. Camargo Neves da Cunha, C. Ringeval and F. R. Bouchet, Stochastic gravitational waves from long cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/078 JCAP 09 (2022) 078 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.04349 2205.04349 ]

2022 arXiv
[183]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209 1807.06209 ]

2018 arXiv
[184]

Husdal, On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe , https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies4040078 Galaxies 4 (2016) 78 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04979 1609.04979 ]

L. Husdal, On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe , https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies4040078 Galaxies 4 (2016) 78 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04979 1609.04979 ]

2016 arXiv
[185]

Saikawa and S

K. Saikawa and S. Shirai, Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/035 JCAP 05 (2018) 035 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01038 1803.01038 ]

2018 arXiv
[186]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum and B. Shlaer, Large parallel cosmic string simulations: New results on loop production , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.083514 Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083514 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5173 1101.5173 ]

2011 arXiv
[187]

European Pulsar Timing Array, EPTA collaboration, Practical approaches to analyzing PTA data: Cosmic strings with six pulsars , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123527 Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123527 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12234 2306.12234 ]

2023 arXiv
[188]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. Franciolini, G. H\"utsi, A. Iovino, M. Lewicki et al., What is the source of the PTA GW signal? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023522 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023522 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08546 2308.08546 ]

2024 arXiv
[189]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum and J. M. Wachter, Gravitational backreaction simulations of simple cosmic string loops , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023535 Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 023535 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.06079 1903.06079 ]

2019 arXiv
[190]

J. M. Wachter, K. D. Olum, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, V. R. Gade and K. Sivakumar, Numerical gravitational backreaction on cosmic string loops from simulation , https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10366 2411.10366
[191]

Ringeval, M

C. Ringeval, M. Sakellariadou and F. Bouchet, Cosmological evolution of cosmic string loops , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/023 JCAP 02 (2007) 023 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0511646 astro-ph/0511646 ]

2007 arXiv
[192]

Polchinski and J

J. Polchinski and J. V. Rocha, Analytic study of small scale structure on cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083504 Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 083504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606205 hep-ph/0606205 ]

2006 arXiv
[193]

Polchinski and J

J. Polchinski and J. V. Rocha, Cosmic string structure at the gravitational radiation scale , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.123503 Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 123503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0702055 gr-qc/0702055 ]

2007 arXiv
[194]

Dubath, J

F. Dubath, J. Polchinski and J. V. Rocha, Cosmic String Loops, Large and Small , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123528 Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 123528 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0994 0711.0994 ]

2008 arXiv
[195]

Auclair, C

P. Auclair, C. Ringeval, M. Sakellariadou and D. Steer, Cosmic string loop production functions , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/015 JCAP 06 (2019) 015 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.06685 1903.06685 ]

2019 arXiv
[196]

P. G. Auclair, Impact of the small-scale structure on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/050 JCAP 11 (2020) 050 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00334 2009.00334 ]

2020 arXiv
[197]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA collaboration, Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO Virgo Observing Run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.241102 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 241102 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12248 2101.12248 ]

2021
[198]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum and J. M. Wachter, Energy-conservation constraints on cosmic string loop production and distribution functions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123526 Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123526 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09373 1907.09373 ]

2019 arXiv
[199]

J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Direct determination of cosmic string loop density from simulations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103018 Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 103018 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.10017 1912.10017 ]

2020 arXiv
[200]

M. G. Jackson, N. T. Jones and J. Polchinski, Collisions of cosmic F and D-strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/013 JHEP 10 (2005) 013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405229 hep-th/0405229 ]

2005 arXiv
[201]

E. J. Copeland, T. W. B. Kibble and D. A. Steer, Constraints on string networks with junctions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.065024 Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 065024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611243 hep-th/0611243 ]

2007 arXiv
[202]

Binetruy, A

P. Binetruy, A. Bohe, T. Hertog and D. A. Steer, Proliferation of sharp kinks on cosmic (super-)string loops with junctions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083524 Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083524 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2426 1005.2426 ]

2010 arXiv
[203]

Avgoustidis, E

A. Avgoustidis, E. J. Copeland, A. Moss, L. Pogosian, A. Pourtsidou and D. A. Steer, Constraints on the fundamental string coupling from B-mode experiments , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.121301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 121301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.6198 1105.6198 ]

2011 arXiv
[204]

Sousa and P

L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, Probing Cosmic Superstrings with Gravitational Waves , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063529 Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 063529 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05585 1606.05585 ]

2016 arXiv
[205]

Avgoustidis and E

A. Avgoustidis and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic string evolution in higher dimensions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.123513 Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 123513 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0410349 hep-ph/0410349 ]

2005 arXiv
[206]

Avgoustidis and E

A. Avgoustidis and E. P. S. Shellard, Effect of reconnection probability on cosmic (super)string network density , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.041301 Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 041301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0512582 astro-ph/0512582 ]

2006 arXiv
[207]

M. Sakellariadou, A Note on the evolution of cosmic string/superstring networks , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2005/04/003 JCAP 04 (2005) 003 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0410234 hep-th/0410234 ]

2005 arXiv
[208]

Lazarides, Q

G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and T. F. Walsh, Cosmic Strings and Domains in Unified Theories , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90052-9 Nucl. Phys. B 195 (1982) 157

1982 doi
[209]

Vilenkin, COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF MONOPOLES CONNECTED BY STRINGS , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90037-2 Nucl

A. Vilenkin, COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF MONOPOLES CONNECTED BY STRINGS , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90037-2 Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 240

1982 doi
[210]

T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Strings in SO(10) , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90829-2 Phys. Lett. B 113 (1982) 237

1982 doi
[211]

Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X Phys

A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X Phys. Rept. 121 (1985) 263

1985 doi
[212]

Chitose, M

A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Shirai and Y. Wen, Cosmic Strings in Multi-Step Symmetry Breaking , https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15194 2506.15194

arXiv
[213]

Buchmuller, V

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, H. Murayama and K. Schmitz, Probing the scale of grand unification with gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135764 Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135764 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03695 1912.03695 ]

2020
[214]

Buchmuller, V

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke and K. Schmitz, From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135914 Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135914 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10649 2009.10649 ]

2020
[215]

Buchmuller, V

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke and K. Schmitz, Metastable cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/020 JCAP 11 (2023) 020 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04691 2307.04691 ]

2023 arXiv
[216]

Chitose, M

A. Chitose, M. Ibe, Y. Nakayama, S. Shirai and K. Watanabe, Revisiting metastable cosmic string breaking , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2024)068 JHEP 04 (2024) 068 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15662 2312.15662 ]

2024 arXiv
[217]

A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347 Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

1981 doi
[218]

Martin and A

X. Martin and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from monopoles connected by strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6054 Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6054 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9612008 gr-qc/9612008 ]

1997 arXiv
[219]

Chitose, M

A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Neda and S. Shirai, Do Cosmic String Segments Emit Gravitational Waves? , https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12386 2507.12386

arXiv
[220]

Witten, Superconducting Strings , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90022-7 Nucl

E. Witten, Superconducting Strings , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90022-7 Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 557

1985 doi
[221]

Davis and S

A.-C. Davis and S. C. Davis, Microphysics of SO(10) cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1879 Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 1879 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9608206 hep-ph/9608206 ]

1997 arXiv
[222]

Chavez and L

H. Chavez and L. Masperi, A Possible origin of superconducting currents in cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/365 New J. Phys. 4 (2002) 65 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0206275 hep-ph/0206275 ]

2002 arXiv
[223]

C. J. A. P. Martins, P. Peter, I. Y. Rybak and E. P. S. Shellard, Generalized velocity-dependent one-scale model for current-carrying strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043538 Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 043538 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09700 2011.09700 ]

2021 arXiv
[224]

I. Y. Rybak and L. Sousa, Emission of gravitational waves by superconducting cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/024 JCAP 11 (2022) 024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01068 2209.01068 ]

2022 arXiv
[225]

I. Y. Rybak and L. Sousa, Stochastic gravitational wave background from chiral superconducting cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083502 Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 083502 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17154 2412.17154 ]

2025 arXiv
[226]

Auclair, P

P. Auclair, P. Peter, C. Ringeval and D. Steer, Irreducible cosmic production of relic vortons , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/098 JCAP 03 (2021) 098 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04620 2010.04620 ]

2021 arXiv
[227]

Sousa, Cosmic strings and gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-024-03293-x Gen

L. Sousa, Cosmic strings and gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-024-03293-x Gen. Rel. Grav. 56 (2024) 105

2024 doi
[228]

Allahverdi et al., The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe , https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16182 2006.16182

R. Allahverdi et al., The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe , https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16182 2006.16182

2006 arXiv
[229]

Simakachorn, Charting Cosmological History and New Particle Physics with Primordial Gravitational Waves , Ph.D

P. Simakachorn, Charting Cosmological History and New Particle Physics with Primordial Gravitational Waves , Ph.D. thesis, U. Hamburg (main), Hamburg U., 2022

2022
[230]

M. S. Turner, Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.1243 Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 1243

1983 doi
[231]

K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Equation of State and Duration to Radiation Domination after Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.061301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 061301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01213 1608.01213 ]

2017 arXiv
[232]

Antusch, D

S. Antusch, D. G. Figueroa, K. Marschall and F. Torrenti, Energy distribution and equation of state of the early Universe: matching the end of inflation and the onset of radiation domination , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135888 Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135888 [ htt...

2020
[233]

Antusch, D

S. Antusch, D. G. Figueroa, K. Marschall and F. Torrenti, Characterizing the postinflationary reheating history: Single daughter field with quadratic-quadratic interaction , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043532 Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 043532 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2112...

2022 arXiv
[234]

Antusch, K

S. Antusch, K. Marschall and F. Torrenti, Characterizing the post-inflationary reheating history. Part II. Multiple interacting daughter fields , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/019 JCAP 02 (2023) 019 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06319 2206.06319 ]

2023 arXiv
[235]

D. G. Figueroa and N. Loayza, Geometric reheating of the Universe , https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02689 2406.02689

arXiv
[236]

D. G. Figueroa and C. T. Byrnes, The Standard Model Higgs as the origin of the hot Big Bang , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.059 Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 272 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03905 1604.03905 ]

2017 arXiv
[237]

Opferkuch, P

T. Opferkuch, P. Schwaller and B. A. Stefanek, Ricci Reheating , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/016 JCAP 07 (2019) 016 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06823 1905.06823 ]

2019 arXiv
[238]

Dimopoulos and T

K. Dimopoulos and T. Markkanen, Non-minimal gravitational reheating during kination , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/021 JCAP 06 (2018) 021 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07399 1803.07399 ]

2018 arXiv
[239]

Bettoni, A

D. Bettoni, A. Lopez-Eiguren and J. Rubio, Hubble-induced phase transitions on the lattice with applications to Ricci reheating , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/002 JCAP 01 (2022) 002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.09671 2107.09671 ]

2022 arXiv
[240]

Laverda and J

G. Laverda and J. Rubio, Ricci reheating reloaded , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/03/033 JCAP 03 (2024) 033 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03774 2307.03774 ]

2024 arXiv
[241]

D. G. Figueroa, T. Opferkuch and B. A. Stefanek, Ricci Reheating on the Lattice , https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17654 2404.17654

arXiv
[242]

R. T. Co and K. Harigaya, Axiogenesis , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.111602 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 111602 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.02080 1910.02080 ]

2020 arXiv
[243]

R. T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Lepto-Axiogenesis , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)017 JHEP 03 (2021) 017 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05687 2006.05687 ]

2021 arXiv
[244]

Duval, S

H. Duval, S. Kuroyanagi, A. Mariotti, A. Romero-Rodr\' guez and M. Sakellariadou, Investigating cosmic histories with a stiff era through gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103503 Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10201 2405.10201 ]

2024 arXiv
[245]

Servant and P

G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Particle Spectroscopy beyond the Standard Model with Primordial Gravitational Waves. [work in progress]
[246]

ATLAS collaboration, Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the Standard Model , https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09292 2403.09292

arXiv
[247]

CMS collaboration, Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment , https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13778 2405.13778

arXiv
[248]

E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe , vol. 69. Taylor and Francis, 5, 2019, 10.1201/9780429492860 https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429492860

2019 doi
[249]

Mangano and P

G. Mangano and P. D. Serpico, A robust upper limit on N_ eff from BBN, circa 2011 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.075 Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 296 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1261 1103.1261 ]

2011 arXiv
[250]

Peimbert, M

A. Peimbert, M. Peimbert and V. Luridiana, The primordial helium abundance and the number of neutrino families , Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. 52 (2016) 419 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02062 1608.02062 ]

2016 arXiv
[251]

Vincent, N

G. Vincent, N. D. Antunes and M. Hindmarsh, Numerical simulations of string networks in the Abelian Higgs model , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2277 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2277 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9708427 hep-ph/9708427 ]

1998 arXiv
[252]

J. N. Moore, E. P. S. Shellard and C. J. A. P. Martins, On the evolution of Abelian-Higgs string networks , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.023503 Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 023503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0107171 hep-ph/0107171 ]

2002 arXiv
[253]

Bevis, M

N. Bevis, M. Hindmarsh, M. Kunz and J. Urrestilla, CMB power spectrum contribution from cosmic strings using field-evolution simulations of the Abelian Higgs model , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.065015 Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 065015 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/06050...

2007 arXiv
[254]

Bevis, M

N. Bevis, M. Hindmarsh, M. Kunz and J. Urrestilla, CMB power spectra from cosmic strings: predictions for the Planck satellite and beyond , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.065004 Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 065004 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2663 1005.2663 ]

2010 arXiv
[255]

Daverio, M

D. Daverio, M. Hindmarsh, M. Kunz, J. Lizarraga and J. Urrestilla, Energy-momentum correlations for Abelian Higgs cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.049903 Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085014 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05006 1510.05006 ]

2016 arXiv
[256]

J. R. C. C. C. Correia and C. J. A. P. Martins, Extending and Calibrating the Velocity dependent One-Scale model for Cosmic Strings with One Thousand Field Theory Simulations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103517 Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 103517 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1...

2019 arXiv
[257]

J. R. C. C. C. Correia and C. J. A. P. Martins, Quantifying the effect of cooled initial conditions on cosmic string network evolution , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043503 Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 043503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.12008 2007.12008 ]

2020 arXiv
[258]

J. R. C. C. C. Correia and C. J. A. P. Martins, Abelian Higgs cosmic string evolution with multiple GPUs , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100438 Astron. Comput. 34 (2021) 100438 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14454 2005.14454 ]

2020
[259]

K. D. Olum and J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Field theory simulation of Abelian Higgs cosmic string cusps , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.023503 Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 023503 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9812040 gr-qc/9812040 ]

1999 arXiv
[260]

J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment , https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1 Living Rev. Rel. 20 (2017) 2 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06889 1608.06889 ]

2017 arXiv
[261]

Brzeminski, A

D. Brzeminski, A. Hook and G. Marques-Tavares, Precision early universe cosmology from stochastic gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2022)061 JHEP 11 (2022) 061 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13842 2203.13842 ]

2022 arXiv
[262]

Foreman-Mackey, D

D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman, emcee: The mcmc hammer, https://doi.org/10.1086/670067 Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125 (2013) 306

2013 doi
[263]

Yagi and N

K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044011 Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 044011 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3940 1101.3940 ]

2011 arXiv
[264]

Gouttenoire, G

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, BSM with Cosmic Strings: Heavy, up to EeV mass, Unstable Particles , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/016 JCAP 07 (2020) 016 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03245 1912.03245 ]

2020 arXiv
[265]

Ghoshal, Y

A. Ghoshal, Y. Gouttenoire, L. Heurtier and P. Simakachorn, Primordial black hole archaeology with gravitational waves from cosmic strings , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)196 JHEP 08 (2023) 196 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04793 2304.04793 ]

2023 arXiv
[266]

Tinto and S

M. Tinto and S. V. Dhurandhar, Time-delay interferometry , https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-020-00029-6 Living Rev. Rel. 24 (2021) 1

2021 doi
[267]

Babak and A

S. Babak and A. Petiteau, Lisa data challenge manual, Tech. Rep. LISA-LCST-SGS-MAN-002, APC Paris, 7, 2020

2020
[268]

https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/678316/1700384/SciRD.pdf
[269]

LISA collaboration, LISA Definition Study Report , https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07571 2402.07571

arXiv
[270]

C. J. Hogan and P. L. Bender, Estimating stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with Sagnac calibration , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.062002 Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 062002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104266 astro-ph/0104266 ]

2001 arXiv
[271]

M. R. Adams and N. J. Cornish, Discriminating between a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background and Instrument Noise , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.022002 Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 022002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.1291 1002.1291 ]

2010 arXiv
[272]

Robson, N

T. Robson, N. J. Cornish and C. Liu, The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab1101 Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 105011 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01944 1803.01944 ]

2019 arXiv
[273]

Giese, T

F. Giese, T. Konstandin and J. van de Vis, Finding sound shells in LISA mock data using likelihood sampling , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/002 JCAP 11 (2021) 002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06275 2107.06275 ]

2021 arXiv
[274]

Verde, H

L. Verde, H. V. Peiris, D. N. Spergel, M. R. Nolta, C. L. Bennett, M. Halpern et al., First-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap)* observations: Parameter estimation methodology, https://doi.org/10.1086/377335 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 148 (2003) 195

2003 doi
[275]

Papamakarios , D

G. Papamakarios , D. C. Sterratt and I. Murray , Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flows , arXiv e-prints (2018) arXiv:1805.07226 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.07226 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.07226 1805.07226 ]

2018 doi arXiv
[276]

C. M. Bishop and N. M. Nasrabadi, Pattern recognition and machine learning, vol. 4. Springer, 2006

2006
[277]

Jeffreys, The Theory of Probability , Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences

H. Jeffreys, The Theory of Probability , Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences. 1939

1939
[278]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04855 1606.04855 ]

arXiv 2016

[2] [2]

LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 221101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01812 1706.01812 ]

arXiv 2017

[3] [3]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c Astrophys. J. Lett. 851 (2017) L35 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05578 1711.05578 ]

arXiv

[4] [4]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL collaboration, Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 (2017) L13 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05834 1710.05834 ]

arXiv

[5] [5]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 141101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09660 1709.09660 ]

arXiv 2017

[6] [6]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05832 1710.05832 ]

arXiv 2017

[7] [7]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031040 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12907 1811.12907 ]

arXiv 2019

[8] [8]

LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 022001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01045 2108.01045 ]

arXiv 2024