Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

UAV-ON: A Benchmark for Open-World Object Goal Navigation with Aerial Agents

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces UAV-ON, a benchmark that asks aerial agents to find target objects from high-level semantic goals rather than step-by-step instructions, and reports that all tested baselines struggle at the task.

desk verdict New aerial ObjectNav benchmark with a plausible design, but the abstract doesn't yet support the claim that the task is hard for all baselines. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00288 v5 pith:VBTPNGOC submitted 2025-08-01 cs.RO cs.CV

Jianqiang Xiao , Yuexuan Sun , Yixin Shao , Boxi Gan , Rongqiang Liu , Yanjin Wu , Weili Guan , Xiang Deng This is my paper
classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords aerialobjectgoalnavigationUAVbenchmarkopen-worldsemanticgroundingUnrealEnginesimulationembodiedAIlong-horizonexploration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces UAV-ON, a benchmark for object-goal navigation by aerial agents in large open-world environments. Its aim is to measure whether autonomous drones can locate a specified target object when given only a high-level semantic goal, without the sequential linguistic commands used in vision-and-language navigation. The benchmark comprises 14 high-fidelity virtual environments spanning urban, natural, and mixed-use settings, with 1270 annotated target objects, each described by category, physical footprint, and visual descriptors. The authors implement a modular baseline, the Aerial ObjectNav Agent, and report that all evaluated methods perform poorly, arguing that the setting compounds the difficulties of aerial navigation with those of semantic goal grounding.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the UAV-ON benchmark itself, and within it the instance-level goal instruction: each target object is encoded with its category, physical footprint, and visual descriptors, turning the navigation task into a grounded reasoning problem rather than a following-instructions problem. The Aerial ObjectNav Agent serves as the evaluation instrument, a modular policy intended to integrate instruction semantics with egocentric observations for long-horizon exploration.

What would settle it

The central claim would be called into question if a baseline trained on UAV-ON succeeded at a comparable rate on real outdoor drone flights searching for objects described only by category, footprint, and visual descriptors; for example, finding ten real-world objects across several urban and natural areas.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that UAV-ON captures a real capability gap in embodied intelligence: aerial agents operating in large-scale open-world environments cannot yet reliably complete object-goal navigation when the goal is a semantic description rather than a route instruction. The benchmark's 14 Unreal Engine environments and 1270 instance-level goal annotations are designed to force agents to reason about what an object looks like, where it is likely to be, and how to navigate over long horizons. The authors' own baseline, Aerial ObjectNav Agent, combines instruction semantics with egocentric observations, and its failure alongside the other baselines is presented as evidence that the compounded challenges of aerial navigation and semantic goal grounding remain unsolved.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 14 Unreal Engine environments with their annotated objects faithfully represent large-scale open-world aerial conditions, so that the measured difficulty transfers to real UAV operations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Aerial object-goal navigation can be studied as a standalone problem, separate from the sequential-instruction paradigm of vision-and-language navigation.
  • Semantic goal descriptions of the kind UAV-ON defines could become a practical interface for tasking autonomous drones in real operations.
  • Future methods can be compared against the reported baseline failures, giving the community a concrete measure of progress in long-horizon aerial exploration.
  • The difficulty of the current baselines points research toward combining language grounding with spatial exploration and planning in a single policy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The instance-level goal annotations could be reused as a testbed for zero-shot sim-to-real transfer, since they encode visual descriptors that a real deployment would also need to ground.
  • An implicit consequence is that the same benchmark design could be applied to ground robots, allowing researchers to isolate the aerial-specific difficulty by comparing against existing ground-based object navigation results.
  • Because every tested baseline struggles, the benchmark currently offers a ceiling measurement rather than a meaningful ranking; adding easier sub-tasks or progressive goal complexity would improve its diagnostic value.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces UAV-ON, a benchmark for open-world Object Goal Navigation (ObjectNav) by aerial agents, built on 14 Unreal Engine environments covering urban, natural, and mixed-use settings. The benchmark provides 1270 annotated target objects, each with an instance-level semantic instruction encoding category, physical footprint, and visual descriptors, intended to create realistic ambiguity and grounding challenges. The authors implement several baselines, including Aerial ObjectNav Agent (AOA), a modular policy, and report in the abstract that all baselines struggle in this setting. The paper argues that this difficulty gap demonstrates the compounded challenges of aerial navigation and semantic goal grounding.

Significance. If the benchmark is valid and its difficulty gap is genuinely attributable to task features rather than baseline weakness, UAV-ON would fill a meaningful gap in aerial embodied navigation research, moving beyond language-conditioned VLN paradigms. The concrete contributions listed in the abstract—14 high-fidelity environments, 1270 annotated objects, and instance-level semantic instructions—are potentially reusable resources for the community. The work does not appear to derive new theory, but benchmark construction and baseline evaluation are empirically valuable. However, the abstract alone does not support the central empirical claim, and the external validity of the simulated environments to real UAV operations is asserted rather than demonstrated. The paper's utility will depend critically on the full text providing quantitative results, reproducible protocols, and fidelity evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central empirical claim—'all baselines struggle in this setting'—is stated without any quantitative support. No success rates, SPL, distance-to-goal metrics, error bars, or statistical comparisons are reported. Because the benchmark's discriminating power rests on this claim, the abstract is insufficient to establish that the difficulty is due to task complexity rather than undertuned baselines. The full text must report per-baseline performance, model capacities, training budgets, and hyperparameters.
  2. [Abstract] The 14 Unreal Engine environments are described as 'high-fidelity,' but no fidelity metrics, domain-randomization protocols, or sim-to-real transfer evidence are provided. The claim that UAV-ON reflects large-scale open-world aerial conditions therefore rests on an unverified assertion. The paper should include at least basic quantitative characterizations of the environments (e.g., semantic label accuracy, visual diversity measures) or a discussion of known limitations for real-world transfer.
  3. [Abstract] The evaluation protocol is not specified. The abstract does not state the number of episodes per object/environment, the success criteria, episode length limits, or random-seed handling. Without this information, the benchmark's reproducibility and comparability cannot be assessed. The full text must define a concrete evaluation protocol and report aggregated results across multiple runs if stochasticity is involved.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'ObjectNav' is used without definition, though it is common in the field; a brief expansion would improve accessibility for readers outside embodied AI.
  2. [Abstract] The acronym 'UAV-ON' is not expanded at first use; consider stating 'Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Object Navigation' or similar to clarify its meaning.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'diverse semantic regions and complex spatial layouts' is qualitative; the paper would benefit from concrete statistics, such as the number of rooms, typical floorspace, or distribution of object categories across environments.
  4. [Abstract] The paper should state the intended availability of the benchmark, the Unreal Engine assets, and the baseline implementations to support community adoption and verification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the benchmark's difficulty claim is an empirical observation about baselines, not a reduction to its inputs.

full rationale

The available material is an abstract-only benchmark description. UAV-ON introduces a new ObjectGoal navigation benchmark with 14 Unreal Engine environments, 1270 annotated target objects, and several baseline implementations including the modular AOA policy. The central claim that 'all baselines struggle in this setting' is an empirical statement about the measured performance of those implementations. No equation, fitted parameter, or derived quantity is presented that would make this result true by construction. The absence of baseline capacity details, training budgets, or sim-to-real fidelity validation is a substantive validation concern, but it is not circularity: undertuned baselines would weaken the strength of the empirical claim, yet the claim would remain an external measurement rather than an equivalence with its inputs. No load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggled via citation appears in the reviewed text. Therefore the circularity burden is not met.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The listed assumptions are the domain-level premises that the abstract relies on. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract. The benchmark is a dataset, not a theoretical derivation, so the axiom ledger is short.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 14 Unreal Engine environments faithfully represent large-scale open-world settings for aerial navigation.
    The abstract states the benchmark covers urban, natural, and mixed-use settings, but provides no fidelity validation against real UAV environments.
  • domain assumption Instance-level instructions that encode category, physical footprint, and visual descriptors produce realistic ambiguity and reasoning challenges.
    The abstract asserts this design choice creates realistic ambiguity, but no user study or grounded experiment verifies that this ambiguity matches real deployment conditions.
  • domain assumption All baselines are implemented at comparable quality, so their failure reflects benchmark difficulty rather than under-tuning.
    The claim that all baselines struggle is only meaningful if the baselines are representative; the abstract does not report tuning budgets or training details.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UAV-ON: A Benchmark for Open-World Object Goal Navigation with Aerial Agents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBTPNGOC

@misc{pith2026250800288,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UAV-ON: A Benchmark for Open-World Object Goal Navigation with Aerial Agents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBTPNGOC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00288}
}
read the original abstract

Aerial navigation is a fundamental yet underexplored capability in embodied intelligence, enabling agents to operate in large-scale, unstructured environments where traditional navigation paradigms fall short. However, most existing research follows the Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) paradigm, which heavily depends on sequential linguistic instructions, limiting its scalability and autonomy. To address this gap, we introduce UAV-ON, a benchmark for large-scale Object Goal Navigation (ObjectNav) by aerial agents in open-world environments, where agents operate based on high-level semantic goals without relying on detailed instructional guidance as in VLN. UAV-ON comprises 14 high-fidelity Unreal Engine environments with diverse semantic regions and complex spatial layouts, covering urban, natural, and mixed-use settings. It defines 1270 annotated target objects, each characterized by an instance-level instruction that encodes category, physical footprint, and visual descriptors, allowing grounded reasoning. These instructions serve as semantic goals, introducing realistic ambiguity and complex reasoning challenges for aerial agents. To evaluate the benchmark, we implement several baseline methods, including Aerial ObjectNav Agent (AOA), a modular policy that integrates instruction semantics with egocentric observations for long-horizon, goal-directed exploration. Empirical results show that all baselines struggle in this setting, highlighting the compounded challenges of aerial navigation and semantic goal grounding. UAV-ON aims to advance research on scalable UAV autonomy driven by semantic goal descriptions in complex real-world environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Last-Meter Precision Navigation for UAVs: A Diffusion-Refined Aerial Visual Servoing Approach

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A coarse trigonometric pose regressor plus diffusion-based visual imagination improves single-step image-goal aerial navigation on a new 4.8M-pair PairUAV benchmark, though residual errors remain large.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Uav path planning using optimization approaches: A survey

    Amylia Ait Saadi, Assia Soukane, Yassine Meraihi, Asma Benmessaoud Gabis, Seyedali Mirjalili, and Amar Ramdane-Cherif. Uav path planning using optimization approaches: A survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29 0 (6): 0 4233--4284, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    On evaluation of embodied navigation agents

    Peter Anderson, Angel Chang, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Saurabh Gupta, Vladlen Koltun, Jana Kosecka, Jitendra Malik, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Manolis Savva, et al. On evaluation of embodied navigation agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757, 2018

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Uav-based remote sensing for the petroleum industry and environmental monitoring: State-of-the-art and perspectives

    Saeid Asadzadeh, Wilson José de Oliveira, and Carlos Roberto de Souza Filho. Uav-based remote sensing for the petroleum industry and environmental monitoring: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208: 0 109633, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Barmpounakis, Eleni I

    Emmanouil N. Barmpounakis, Eleni I. Vlahogianni, and John C. Golias. Unmanned aerial aircraft systems for transportation engineering: Current practice and future challenges. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 5 0 (3): 0 111--122, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Advances in intelligent and autonomous navigation systems for small uas

    Suraj Bijjahalli, Roberto Sabatini, and Alessandro Gardi. Advances in intelligent and autonomous navigation systems for small uas. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 115: 0 100617, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100617

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Online learning of reusable abstract models for object goal navigation

    Tommaso Campari, Leonardo Lamanna, Paolo Traverso, Luciano Serafini, and Lamberto Ballan. Online learning of reusable abstract models for object goal navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14870--14879, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Object goal navigation using goal-oriented semantic exploration

    Devendra Singh Chaplot, Dhiraj Prakashchand Gandhi, Abhinav Gupta, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Object goal navigation using goal-oriented semantic exploration. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33: 0 4247--4258, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Vela, and Danfei Xu

    Hongyi Chen, Ruinian Xu, Shuo Cheng, Patricio A. Vela, and Danfei Xu. Zero-shot object searching using large-scale object relationship prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06228, 2023

    arXiv 2023

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Towards natural language-guided drones: Geotext-1652 benchmark with spatial relation matching

    Meng Chu, Zhedong Zheng, Wei Ji, Tingyu Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. Towards natural language-guided drones: Geotext-1652 benchmark with spatial relation matching. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 213--231. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Robothor: An open simulation-to-real embodied ai platform

    Matt Deitke, Winson Han, Alvaro Herrasti, Aniruddha Kembhavi, et al. Robothor: An open simulation-to-real embodied ai platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3164--3174, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Unreal engine

    Epic Games . Unreal engine. URL https://www.unrealengine.com

  4. [12]

    Aerial vision-and-language navigation via semantic-topo-metric representation guided llm reasoning

    Yunpeng Gao, Zhigang Wang, Pengfei Han, Linglin Jing, et al. Aerial vision-and-language navigation via semantic-topo-metric representation guided llm reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08500, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Openfly: A versatile toolchain and large-scale benchmark for aerial vision-language navigation

    Yunpeng Gao, Chenhui Li, Zhongrui You, Junli Liu, et al. Openfly: A versatile toolchain and large-scale benchmark for aerial vision-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18041, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Intelligent and fuzzy uav transportation applications in aviation 4.0

    Mahmoud Golabi and Mazyar Ghadiri Nejad. Intelligent and fuzzy uav transportation applications in aviation 4.0. In Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Aviation 4.0, volume 372 of Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, pages 431--458. Springer, Cham, 2022. doi:10.1007/978-3-...

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Hart, Nils J

    Peter E. Hart, Nils J. Nilsson, and Bertram Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics , 4 0 (2): 0 100--107, 1968. doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/tssc.1968.300136

    1968

  8. [16]

    General scene adaptation for vision-and-language navigation

    Haodong Hong, Yanyuan Qiao, Sen Wang, Jiajun Liu, and Qi Wu. General scene adaptation for vision-and-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17403, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Path-planning for unmanned aerial vehicles with environment complexity considerations: A survey

    Michael Jones, Soufiene Djahel, and Kristopher Welsh. Path-planning for unmanned aerial vehicles with environment complexity considerations: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55 0 (11): 0 1--39, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai

    Eric Kolve, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Winson Han, et al. Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Citynav: Language-goal aerial navigation dataset with geographic information

    Jungdae Lee, Taiki Miyanishi, Shuhei Kurita, Koya Sakamoto, et al. Citynav: Language-goal aerial navigation dataset with geographic information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14240, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Uav trajectory optimization for time-constrained data collection in uav-enabled environmental monitoring systems

    Kai Liu and Jun Zheng. Uav trajectory optimization for time-constrained data collection in uav-enabled environmental monitoring systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9 0 (23): 0 24300--24314, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Aerialvln: Vision-and-language navigation for uavs

    Shubo Liu, Hongsheng Zhang, Yuankai Qi, Peng Wang, Yanning Zhang, and Qi Wu. Aerialvln: Vision-and-language navigation for uavs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15384--15394, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Navagent: Multi-scale urban street view fusion for uav embodied vision-and-language navigation

    Youzhi Liu, Fanglong Yao, Yuanchang Yue, Guangluan Xu, et al. Navagent: Multi-scale urban street view fusion for uav embodied vision-and-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08579, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A survey on vision-based uav navigation

    Yuncheng Lu, Zhucun Xue, Gui-Song Xia, and Liangpei Zhang. A survey on vision-based uav navigation. Geo-spatial Information Science, 21 0 (1): 0 21--32, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Stubborn: A strong baseline for indoor object navigation

    Haokuan Luo, Albert Yue, Zhang-Wei Hong, and Pulkit Agrawal. Stubborn: A strong baseline for indoor object navigation. In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 3287--3293. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities

    Nader Mohamed, Jameela Al-Jaroodi, Imad Jawhar, Ferial Mohamed, and Sameh Mahmoud. Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153: 0 119293, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119293

    2020

  18. [26]

    Gpt-4 technical report

    OpenAI, Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Advances in low-altitude airspace management for uncrewed aircraft and advanced air mobility

    Nichakorn Pongsakornsathien, Nour El-Din Safwat, Yibing Xie, Alessandro Gardi, and Roberto Sabatini. Advances in low-altitude airspace management for uncrewed aircraft and advanced air mobility. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, page 101085, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. pages 8748--8763. PmLR, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Ramakrishnan, Aaron Gokaslan, Erik Wijmans, Oleksandr Maksymets, et al

    Santhosh K. Ramakrishnan, Aaron Gokaslan, Erik Wijmans, Oleksandr Maksymets, et al. Habitat-matterport 3d dataset (hm3d): 1000 large-scale 3d environments for embodied ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08238, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Pirlnav: Pretraining with imitation and rl finetuning for objectnav

    Ram Ramrakhya, Dhruv Batra, Erik Wijmans, and Abhishek Das. Pirlnav: Pretraining with imitation and rl finetuning for objectnav. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17896--17906, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Learning from demonstration

    Stefan Schaal. Learning from demonstration. Advances in neural information processing systems, 9, 1996

    1996

  24. [32]

    Scherer, S

    J. Scherer, S. Yahyanejad, S. Hayat, et al. An autonomous multi-uav system for search and rescue. In Proceedings of the first workshop on micro aerial vehicle networks, systems, and applications for civilian use, pages 33--38, 2015

    2015

  25. [33]

    Airsim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles

    Shital Shah, Debadeepta Dey, Chris Lovett, and Ashish Kapoor. Airsim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles. In Field and Service Robotics: Results of the 11th International Conference, pages 621--635. Springer, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Sutton and Andrew G

    Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto. Reinforcement learning: An introduction, volume 1. MIT press Cambridge, 1998

    1998

  27. [35]

    Uav environmental perception and autonomous obstacle avoidance: A deep learning and depth camera combined solution

    Dashuai Wang, Wei Li, Xiaoguang Liu, Nan Li, and Chunlong Zhang. Uav environmental perception and autonomous obstacle avoidance: A deep learning and depth camera combined solution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 175: 0 105523, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105523

    2020

  28. [36]

    Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model's perception of the world at any resolution

    Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shijie Wang, et al. Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model's perception of the world at any resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024 a

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Towards realistic uav vision-language navigation: Platform, benchmark, and methodology

    Xiangyu Wang, Donglin Yang, Ziqin Wang, Hohin Kwan, et al. Towards realistic uav vision-language navigation: Platform, benchmark, and methodology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07087, 2024 b

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Zamir, Zhiyang He, Alexander Sax, et al

    Fei Xia, Amir R. Zamir, Zhiyang He, Alexander Sax, et al. Gibson env: Real-world perception for embodied agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9068--9079, 2018

    2018

  31. [39]

    Geonav: Empowering mllms with explicit geospatial reasoning abilities for language-goal aerial navigation

    Haotian Xu, Yue Hu, Chen Gao, Zhengqiu Zhu, et al. Geonav: Empowering mllms with explicit geospatial reasoning abilities for language-goal aerial navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09587, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Auxiliary tasks and exploration enable objectgoal navigation

    Joel Ye, Dhruv Batra, Abhishek Das, and Erik Wijmans. Auxiliary tasks and exploration enable objectgoal navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 16117--16126, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Efficient robotic object search via hiem: Hierarchical policy learning with intrinsic-extrinsic modeling

    Xin Ye and Yezhou Yang. Efficient robotic object search via hiem: Hierarchical policy learning with intrinsic-extrinsic modeling. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6 0 (3): 0 4425--4432, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Safe-vln: Collision avoidance for vision-and-language navigation of autonomous robots operating in continuous environments

    Lu Yue, Dongliang Zhou, Liang Xie, Feitian Zhang, et al. Safe-vln: Collision avoidance for vision-and-language navigation of autonomous robots operating in continuous environments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Aerial vision-and-language navigation with grid-based view selection and map construction

    Ganlong Zhao, Guanbin Li, Jia Pan, and Yizhou Yu. Aerial vision-and-language navigation with grid-based view selection and map construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11091, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Zero-shot object goal visual navigation

    Qianfan Zhao, Lu Zhang, Bin He, Hong Qiao, and Zhiyong Liu. Zero-shot object goal visual navigation. 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Semantic policy network for zero-shot object goal visual navigation

    Qianfan Zhao, Lu Zhang, Bin He, and Zhiyong Liu. Semantic policy network for zero-shot object goal visual navigation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8 0 (11): 0 7655--7662, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Joint optimization of loading, mission abort and rescue site selection policies for uav

    Xian Zhao, Xinlei Wang, Ying Dai, and Qingan Qiu. Joint optimization of loading, mission abort and rescue site selection policies for uav. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 244: 0 109955, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.109955

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.