Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.11941 v3 pith:VDPT4JTT submitted 2023-01-27 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords errorsystematicpost-newtoniancurrentdatagravitationalmodelsparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The post-Newtonian formalism plays an integral role in the models used to extract information from gravitational wave data, but models that incorporate this formalism are inherently approximations. Disagreement between an approximate model and nature will produce mismodeling biases in the parameters inferred from data, introducing systematic error. We here carry out a proof-of-principle study of such systematic error by considering signals produced by quasi-circular, inspiraling black hole binaries through an injection and recovery campaign. In particular, we study how unknown, but calibrated, higher-order post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational wave phase impact systematic error in recovered parameters. As a first study, we produce injected data of non-spinning binaries as detected by a current, second-generation network of ground-based observatories and recover them with models of varying PN order in the phase. We find that the truncation of higher order (>3.5) post-Newtonian corrections to the phase can produce significant systematic error even at signal-to-noise ratios of current detector networks. We propose a method to mitigate systematic error by marginalizing over our ignorance in the waveform through the inclusion of higher-order post-Newtonian coefficients as new model parameters. We show that this method can reduce systematic error greatly at the cost of increasing statistical error.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A pseudo-Hamiltonian reformulation of 1PA self-force dynamics yields local, invariant action-angle evolution equations and an embedded conservative Hamiltonian whose on-shell energy equals the first-law binding energy.

  2. Dissecting environmental effects with eccentric gravitational wave sources

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Resonances between oscillating environmental forces and the epicyclic motion of eccentric binaries can dominate gravitational wave dephasing over orbit-averaged drag for eccentricities above about 0.05.

  3. Fast, accurate, and differentiable: a neural-network surrogate for NRSur7dq4 precessing binary black hole waveforms

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A piecewise MLP surrogate emulates NRSur7dq4 over its full domain at NR-faithful accuracy with ~1 ms GPU latency and a fully differentiable JAX likelihood pipeline.

  4. Impact of numerical-relativity waveform calibration on parametrized post-Einsteinian tests

    gr-qc 2026-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    NR late-inspiral calibration systematics in IMRPhenomD produce false ppE GR violations at O5 SNRs ≳60; an uncertainty-aware baseline restores consistency with GR up to SNR 330.

  5. Systematic biases in parameter estimation on LISA binaries. II. The effect of excluding higher harmonics for spin-aligned, high-mass binaries

    gr-qc 2026-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Omitting higher-order waveform harmonics can cause severe, spin-dependent parameter biases for massive LISA black-hole binaries, including confident localization in the wrong sky region.

  6. Environmental effects in stellar mass gravitational wave sources II: Enhanced detectability of phase shifts in eccentric sub-populations

    astro-ph.HE 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Eccentricity boosts the detectability of environmental dephasing in gravitational-wave signals by up to ℓ_max^{1-n}, potentially making environmental effects ubiquitous in future detectors' eccentric sources.

  7. A comprehensive look into the accuracy of SpEC binary black hole waveforms

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulated black-hole merger waveforms accumulate numerical error over time, but the merger stage is not intrinsically less accurate once aligned on its own, and resolution-exchanged differences show no systematic bias...

  8. The fault in our sirens: Hierarchical diagnosis of waveform systematics in Hubble-Lema\^itre constant measurements

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 5% subpopulation of high-mass, spin-precessing black hole binaries, poorly modeled by current waveforms, makes future dark-siren Hubble constant measurements unreliable, and a hierarchical variance diagnostic can de...

  9. Inspiral tests of general relativity and waveform geometry

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The power of ppE-style GR tests comes from waveform geometry: GR parameter biases absorb most of any smooth phase deviation, and SVD finds the few orthogonal directions that remain.

  10. When vacuum breaks: a self-consistency test for astrophysical environments in extreme mass ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A duration-scan self-consistency test on vacuum EMRI parameter posteriors flags unmodeled environmental effects without adding environmental parameters.

Pith tools