Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

GKAN: Graph Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.06470 v1 pith:VGFY7NJV submitted 2024-06-10 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords gkanaccuracyarchitecturegraphfeaturesfunctionslearnablenetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Graph Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (GKAN), an innovative neural network architecture that extends the principles of the recently proposed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) to graph-structured data. By adopting the unique characteristics of KANs, notably the use of learnable univariate functions instead of fixed linear weights, we develop a powerful model for graph-based learning tasks. Unlike traditional Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) that rely on a fixed convolutional architecture, GKANs implement learnable spline-based functions between layers, transforming the way information is processed across the graph structure. We present two different ways to incorporate KAN layers into GKAN: architecture 1 -- where the learnable functions are applied to input features after aggregation and architecture 2 -- where the learnable functions are applied to input features before aggregation. We evaluate GKAN empirically using a semi-supervised graph learning task on a real-world dataset (Cora). We find that architecture generally performs better. We find that GKANs achieve higher accuracy in semi-supervised learning tasks on graphs compared to the traditional GCN model. For example, when considering 100 features, GCN provides an accuracy of 53.5 while a GKAN with a comparable number of parameters gives an accuracy of 61.76; with 200 features, GCN provides an accuracy of 61.24 while a GKAN with a comparable number of parameters gives an accuracy of 67.66. We also present results on the impact of various parameters such as the number of hidden nodes, grid-size, and the polynomial-degree of the spline on the performance of GKAN.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KAN-SAs: Efficient Acceleration of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks on Systolic Arrays

    cs.AR 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A systolic-array accelerator that tabulates B-splines and exploits B-spline local support achieves ~100% PE utilization and a 2x cycle reduction for KAN inference compared with a conventional systolic array.

  2. A Kolmogorov-Arnold Surrogate Model for Chemical Equilibria: Application to Solid Solutions

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Kolmogorov-Arnold networks trained on GEM-Selektor output accurately approximate chemical equilibria for cement and radium-sulfate solid-solution systems, outperforming MLPs on the cement benchmark and cutting evaluat...

  3. Khan-GCL: Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Based Graph Contrastive Learning with Hard Negatives

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Khan-GCL combines KAN encoders with coefficient-based critical feature identification to generate hard negatives and reports state-of-the-art graph classification results.

  4. On the Rate of Convergence of Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Regression Estimators

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims spline-parameterized KAN least-squares estimators achieve the minimax univariate regression rate O(n^{-2r/(2r+1)}) for additive and multiplicative KAN structures, independent of dimension.

  5. Leveraging KANs for Expedient Training of Multichannel MLPs via Preconditioning and Geometric Refinement

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training in a B-spline KAN basis is equivalent to preconditioned gradient descent on a multichannel ReLU MLP, and geometric refinement plus trainable knots accelerate and improve training.

Pith tools