Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Component Diagnosability of General Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.11895 v2 pith:VHXXOGWV submitted 2021-05-25 cs.DC cs.DM

classification cs.DCcs.DM
keywords networkscomponentdiagnosabilitycubicfaultgeneralgraphshierarchical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The processor failures in a multiprocessor system have a negative impact on its distributed computing efficiency. Because of the rapid expansion of multiprocessor systems, the importance of fault diagnosis is becoming increasingly prominent. The $h$-component diagnosability of $G$, denoted by $ct_{h}(G)$, is the maximum number of nodes of the faulty set $F$ that is correctly identified in a system, and the number of components in $G-F$ is at least $h$. In this paper, we determine the $(h+1)$-component diagnosability of general networks under the PMC model and MM$^{*}$ model. As applications, the component diagnosability is explored for some well-known networks, including complete cubic networks, hierarchical cubic networks, generalized exchanged hypercubes, dual-cube-like networks, hierarchical hypercubes, Cayley graphs generated by transposition trees (except star graphs), and DQcube as well. Furthermore, we provide some comparison results between the component diagnosability and other fault diagnosabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools