Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Systematic Review of Robustness in Deep Learning for Computer Vision: Mind the gap?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.00639 v2 pith:VIFPZW6P submitted 2021-12-01 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords robustnesslearningmodeladversarialcomputerdatadeepnon-adversarial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks for computer vision are deployed in increasingly safety-critical and socially-impactful applications, motivating the need to close the gap in model performance under varied, naturally occurring imaging conditions. Robustness, ambiguously used in multiple contexts including adversarial machine learning, refers here to preserving model performance under naturally-induced image corruptions or alterations. We perform a systematic review to identify, analyze, and summarize current definitions and progress towards non-adversarial robustness in deep learning for computer vision. We find this area of research has received disproportionately less attention relative to adversarial machine learning, yet a significant robustness gap exists that manifests in performance degradation similar in magnitude to adversarial conditions. Toward developing a more transparent definition of robustness, we provide a conceptual framework based on a structural causal model of the data generating process and interpret non-adversarial robustness as pertaining to a model's behavior on corrupted images corresponding to low-probability samples from the unaltered data distribution. We identify key architecture-, data augmentation-, and optimization tactics for improving neural network robustness. This robustness perspective reveals that common practices in the literature correspond to causal concepts. We offer perspectives on how future research may mind this evident and significant non-adversarial robustness gap.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stress-Testing Neural Network Verifiers with Provably Robust Instances

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A reusable framework generates verification instances with provably known robustness labels, revealing numeric tolerance issues and bugs in five verifiers while introducing difficulty profiles to diagnose failure modes.

  2. Same Compression Principle, Different Geometry: Rate-Distortion Signatures Dissociate Biological and Artificial Visual Systems

    cs.LG 2026-03 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RD geometry derived from confusion matrices separates humans from deep vision models, but the signatures are properties of a fitted cost matrix rather than measured trade-offs.

  3. SegSTRONG-C: Segmenting Surgical Tools Robustly On Non-adversarial Generated Corruptions -- An EndoVis'24 Challenge

    cs.CV 2024-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    SegSTRONG-C provides a new benchmark where top models reach 0.9394 DSC and 0.9301 NSD on corrupted surgical tool segmentation tests, showing conventional techniques help but calling for more innovative robustness methods.

  4. Advancing Trustworthy AI in Healthcare Through Meta-Research: Results of an Interdisciplinary Design-Thinking Workshop

    cs.CY 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An interdisciplinary workshop produced a catalog of ideas and a roadmap showing how meta-research can tackle challenges like reproducibility, transparency, and ethical implementation in trustworthy AI for healthcare.

Pith tools