pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10561 · v1 · pith:VLQW37WZnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

MeV-GeV Gamma-Ray Astrophysics in the Multimessenger Era

Alessandro De Angelis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 10:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords gamma-ray astrophysicsMeV gapmultimessenger astronomynucleosynthesispositron annihilationdark mattergravitational wavesneutrino counterparts
0
0 comments X

The pith

The MeV gap leaves gamma-ray astrophysics sensitivity-limited across nucleosynthesis, dark matter, and multimessenger signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how gamma-ray observations have grown from early sub-MeV detections to cover nine orders of magnitude up to PeV energies, yet the interval from a few hundred keV to a few GeV stays the chief sensitivity bottleneck. It identifies this gap as the factor limiting progress on explosive nucleosynthesis, positron annihilation, transient sources, dark-matter searches, and electromagnetic counterparts to neutrinos and gravitational waves. The survey covers the scientific motivations, the historical milestones in space- and ground-based detection, and ongoing programmatic efforts aimed at closing the gap. A reader would care because the listed topics sit at the intersection of nuclear astrophysics, particle physics, and the emerging multimessenger network.

Core claim

The energy range from a few hundred keV to a few GeV remains sensitivity-limited, constraining progress on nucleosynthesis, positron annihilation, transient physics, dark-matter signatures, and electromagnetic counterparts to high-energy neutrinos and gravitational waves.

What carries the argument

The MeV gap, defined as the sensitivity-limited photon energy interval from a few hundred keV to a few GeV.

If this is right

  • Improved MeV sensitivity would directly enable new measurements of radioactive isotopes from supernovae and novae.
  • Higher sensitivity in the gap would allow clearer mapping of the 511 keV positron annihilation line and its origin.
  • Closing the gap would provide electromagnetic counterparts to high-energy neutrino and gravitational-wave events.
  • Better coverage would tighten constraints on dark-matter annihilation or decay channels in the MeV-GeV band.
  • Programmatic investment in new detectors would extend the multimessenger network into the previously inaccessible window.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's emphasis on the gap implies that coordinated planning across space agencies for a dedicated MeV mission would yield higher returns than incremental improvements at higher or lower energies.
  • If the gap is closed, cross-checks between gamma-ray data and neutrino or gravitational-wave alerts could resolve ambiguities in transient classification that single-messenger observations leave open.
  • The historical narrative suggests that past sensitivity jumps at other energies produced unexpected discoveries, so analogous surprises could appear once the MeV window opens.

Load-bearing premise

That the main obstacle to progress on the listed science topics is insufficient instrumental sensitivity rather than source modeling or background issues.

What would settle it

A published analysis or new observation demonstrating that existing MeV-range data already suffice to answer the nucleosynthesis, dark-matter, or multimessenger questions without further sensitivity gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10561 by Alessandro de Angelis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Differential sensitivity for current and past X-ray and gamma-ray missions shows the limited performance achieved in the MeV regime. The reduced sensitivity in the range from 100 keV to about 3 GeV is referred to as the “MeV gap”. The dashed grey line representing the Crab flux is calculated from Naima [17]. The figure is taken from [18], in which the details of the calculations of sensitivities are explai… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measurements of the total extragalactic γ-ray intensity from 1 keV to 820 GeV [32], with schematic model components [33–36]; the MeV contribution of blazars remains poorly constrained. The translucent band marks the energy range where a next-generation MeV–GeV observatory could transform our knowledge. An orange rectangle evidences the “MeV gap”. Finally, a telescope sensitive to the MeV–GeV region could u… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: How a next-generation MeV–GeV mission could reshape our view of the high-energy sky. Top: 1–30 MeV all-sky map from CGRO/COMPTEL in the 1990s (right) versus a simulated 1–30 MeV view of the Cygnus region (left). Bottom: Cygnus as seen by Fermi-LAT after 8 yr (left) compared with the performance expected from a MeV–GeV detector after 1 yr between 400 and 800 MeV (right). The simulation is based on the perfo… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the 847 keV line from 56Co decay in SN 2014J. INTEGRAL measurements (red; adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Photon total interaction cross sections as a function of energy in carbon and lead, showing the contributions of different dominant processes: σp.e. = Photoelectric effect (electron ejection, photon absorption); σCompton = Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering off an electron); σp.p. = Pair production. The open circles show experimental points for the total cross section. The figure is taken from [117]… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Overview of the e-ASTROGAM payload showing the silicon Tracker, the Calorimeter and the Anticoinci￾dence system. Interactions of photons with matter in the ASTROGAM energy range are dominated by Compton scattering from (below) 0.2 MeV up to about 15 MeV in silicon, and by e +e − pair production in the field of a target nucleus at higher energies. ASTROGAM maximizes its efficiency for imaging and spectrosco… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representative topologies for a Compton event (left) and for a pair event (right). Photon tracks are shown in pale blue, dashed, and electron and/or positron tracks in red, solid. From [118]. Detecting gamma rays by Compton scattering is more complicated than for pair production, because the scattered photon carries a significant amount of the information about the incident photon and thus it needs to be d… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Left panel)—e-ASTROGAM on-axis angular resolution compared to that of COMPTEL and Fermi/LAT. In the Compton domain, the presented performance of e-ASTROGAM and COMPTEL is the FWHM of the angular resolution measure. In the pair domain, the point spread function (PSF) is the 68% containment radius for a 30◦ point source. (Right panel)—1σ energy resolution of COMPTEL and e-ASTROGAM in the Compton domain. 5.1… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: COSI instrument: cutaway view of the detector. In the nominal configuration, COSI covers 0.2–5 MeV with a spectral resolution of ∼6 keV (FWHM) at 511 keV and ∼9 keV at 1.157 MeV, and an angular resolution improving from ∼4 ◦ at 511 keV to ∼2 ◦ at 1.809 MeV [124]. The instantaneous FoV is >25% of the sky, enabling wide-field monitoring and efficient all-sky surveys [124]. Polarimetric sensitivity arises nat… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gamma-ray astrophysics probes the most extreme particle accelerators and explosive transients in the Universe. From pioneering theoretical predictions in the 1950s and the first space-borne detections in the 1960s, mostly exploring the sub-MeV region, the field has evolved into a mature, multi-decade enterprise that spans nine orders of magnitude in photon energy up to PeV energies and interfaces naturally with neutrino and gravitational-wave astronomy. Yet the energy range from a few hundred keV to a few GeV -- the "MeV gap", constraining progress on nucleosynthesis, positron annihilation, transient physics, dark-matter signatures, and electromagnetic counterparts to high-energy neutrinos and gravitational waves - remains sensitivity-limited. In this paper, we survey the scientific motivations for gamma-ray astrophysics, sketch a concise history from the first ideas to key milestones in space- and ground- based gamma-ray astronomy, and discuss programmatic attempts to close the MeV gap.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a descriptive survey of gamma-ray astrophysics that reviews scientific motivations for studying the MeV-GeV band, sketches the historical development from 1950s theoretical predictions and 1960s detections through later milestones in space- and ground-based observations, and outlines programmatic efforts to address the sensitivity-limited 'MeV gap' (a few hundred keV to a few GeV). The central claim, drawn from existing literature, is that this gap constrains progress on nucleosynthesis, positron annihilation, transient physics, dark-matter signatures, and electromagnetic counterparts to high-energy neutrinos and gravitational waves.

Significance. As a literature survey synthesizing motivations, history, and programmatic context in the multimessenger era, the paper could provide a useful reference for highlighting the importance of the MeV band. Its value lies in compilation rather than new derivations or data; the absence of free parameters, axioms, or invented entities is appropriate for this format.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the statement that early work 'mostly explor[ed] the sub-MeV region' would benefit from one or two concrete early instrument examples to anchor the historical sketch.
  2. The survey presents the sensitivity limitation as the prevailing view but does not explicitly contrast it with other potential barriers (e.g., background modeling) in a dedicated subsection; a short clarifying paragraph would strengthen the central claim without altering its descriptive nature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and positive assessment of our manuscript as a literature survey synthesizing motivations, history, and programmatic context for MeV-GeV gamma-ray astrophysics. The recommendation of minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we address the overall evaluation below.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely descriptive literature survey

full rationale

The paper is a review article that surveys scientific motivations, historical milestones, and programmatic efforts in gamma-ray astrophysics without presenting any derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or novel predictions. Its central claim that the MeV gap remains sensitivity-limited is explicitly framed as the prevailing view drawn from existing literature rather than a result derived internally. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to self-definitions, self-citations, or ansatzes; the text contains no formal arguments that could exhibit circularity under the enumerated patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper with no central derivation, no fitted parameters, no new axioms, and no invented entities. All content draws from established astrophysics without introducing new free parameters or postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5682 in / 1042 out tokens · 27172 ms · 2026-06-27T10:42:09.054557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Telescope Concepts in Gamma-Ray Astronomy

    Siegert, T.; Horan, D.; Kanbach, G. Telescope Concepts in Gamma-Ray Astronomy. InHandbook of X-Ray and Gamma- Ray Astrophysics; Singapore: Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Propagation of the Cosmic Radiation through Interstellar Space.Prog

    Hayakawa, S. Propagation of the Cosmic Radiation through Interstellar Space.Prog. Theor . Phys.1952,8, 571

    1952

  3. [3]

    On gamma-ray astronomy.Il Nuovo Cimento1958,7, 858–865

    Morrison, P. On gamma-ray astronomy.Il Nuovo Cimento1958,7, 858–865

  4. [4]

    Available online: https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/missions/explorer11.html (accessed on 2 December 2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Clark, G.; Garmire, G.; Kraushaar, W.ApJL1968,153, L203

  6. [6]

    The Small Astronomy Satellite 2 (SAS-2)

    NASA/HEASARC. The Small Astronomy Satellite 2 (SAS-2). Available online: https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sas2/sas2.html (accessed on 2 December 2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Cos-B overview

    ESA. Cos-B overview. Available online: https://www.esa.int/ScienceExploration/Space Science/Cos-B overview2 (ac- cessed on 2 December 2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Weekes, T.C.; Cawley, M.F.; Fegan, D.J.;et al.Observation of TeV gamma rays from the Crab nebula using the atmospheric Cerenkov imaging technique.ApJ1989,342, 379

  9. [9]

    Abeysekara, A.U.; Albert, A.; Alfaro, R.;et al.The 2HWC HAWC Observatory Gamma-Ray Catalog.ApJ2017,843, 40

  10. [10]

    Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.;et al.Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 petaelectronvolts from 12 γ-ray Galactic sources.Nature2021,594, 33–36

  11. [11]

    Available online: https://www.ctao.org/ (accessed on 2 December 2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Available online: https://www.swgo.org/ (accessed on 2 December 2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    CGRO SSC: About the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (BATSE/OSSE/COMPTEL/EGRET)

    NASA/HEASARC. CGRO SSC: About the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (BATSE/OSSE/COMPTEL/EGRET). Available online: https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/cgro/cgro/ (accessed on 2 December 2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Winkler, C.; Courvoisier, T.-J.-L.; Di Cocco, G.;et al.The INTEGRAL mission.A&A2003,411, L1–L6

  15. [15]

    Tavani, M.; Barbiellini, G.; Argan, A.;et al.The AGILE mission.A&A2009,502, 995–1013

  16. [16]

    Atwood, W.B.; Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.;et al.The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission.ApJ2009,697, 1071–1102

  17. [17]

    nnaima: A Python package for inference of relativistic particle energy distributions from observed nonthermal spectra

    Zabalza, V . nnaima: A Python package for inference of relativistic particle energy distributions from observed nonthermal spectra. In Proceedings of the International Cosmic Ray Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, 30 July–6 August 2015; p. 922

    2015

  18. [18]

    Compton Telescopes for Gamma-Ray Astrophysics

    Kierans, C.; Takahashi, T.; Kanbach, G. Compton Telescopes for Gamma-Ray Astrophysics. InHandbook of X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Astrophysics; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Astron.2017,44, 25–82

    De Angelis, A.; Tatischeff, V .; Tavani, M.;et al.The e-ASTROGAM mission: Exploring the extreme Universe with gamma rays in the MeV–GeV range.Exp. Astron.2017,44, 25–82

    2017

  20. [20]

    De Angelis, A.; Tatischeff, V .; Tavani, M.;et al.Science with e-ASTROGAM: A space mission for MeV–GeV gamma-ray astrophysics.Journal of High Energy Astrophysics2018,19, 1

  21. [21]

    Tatischeff, V .; De Angelis, A.; Gouiff`es, C.;et al.The e-ASTROGAM mission: a major step forward for gamma-ray polarimetry.JATIS2018,4, 011003

  22. [22]

    Lang, R.G.; Mart ´ınez-Huerta, H.; de Souza, V .;et al.Improved limits on Lorentz invariance violation from astrophysical gamma-ray sources.Phys. Rev. D2019,99, 043015

  23. [23]

    Cosmic rays in galaxy clusters and their nonthermal emission.Int

    Brunetti, G.; Jones, T.W. Cosmic rays in galaxy clusters and their nonthermal emission.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D2014,23, 1430007

  24. [24]

    Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert.Science2018,361, 147

    IceCube Collaboration. Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert.Science2018,361, 147

  25. [25]

    IceCube Collaboration; Fermi-LAT Collaboration; MAGIC Collaboration;et al.Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A.Science2018,361, eaat1378

  26. [26]

    Abbott, B.P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.;et al.Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger.ApJL2017, 848, L12

  27. [27]

    Pian, E.; D’Avanzo, P.; Benetti, S.;et al.Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger.Nature2017,551, 67

  28. [28]

    Hotokezaka, K.; Wanajo, S.; Tanaka, M.;et al.Radioactive decay products in neutron star merger ejecta: heating efficiency andγ-ray emission.MNRAS2016,459, 35

  29. [29]

    Radioactiveγ-Ray Emissions from Neutron Star Mergers.ApJ2019,872, 19

    Li, L.-X. Radioactiveγ-Ray Emissions from Neutron Star Mergers.ApJ2019,872, 19

  30. [30]

    Della Valle, M.; Guetta, D.; Cappellaro, E.;et al.GW170817: implications for the local kilonova rate and for surveys from ground-based facilities.MNRAS2018,481, 4355

  31. [31]

    Science2000,290, 953

    Amati, L.; Frontera, F.; Vietri, M.;et al.Discovery of a transient absorption edge in the X-ray spectrum of GRB 990705. Science2000,290, 953

  32. [32]

    Ackermann, M.; Buehler, R.; Ajello, M.;et al.The spectrum of isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission between 100 MeV and 820 GeV .ApJ2015,799, 86

  33. [33]

    A&A2007,463, 79–96

    Gilli, R.; Comastri, A.; Hasinger, G.; The synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era. A&A2007,463, 79–96

  34. [34]

    Padovani, P.; Giommi, P.; A simplified view of blazars: the very high energy gamma-ray vision.MNRAS: Letters2015, 446, L41–L45

  35. [35]

    C.; Horiuchi, S.; Beacom, J

    Lacki, B. C.; Horiuchi, S.; Beacom, J. F.; The Star-Forming Galaxy Contribution to the Cosmic MeV and GeV Gamma-Ray 18 Background.ApJ2014,786, 40

  36. [36]

    Inoue, Y .; Contribution of the Gamma-ray Loud Radio Galaxies’ Core Emissions to the Cosmic MeV and GeV Gamma-Ray Background Radiation.ApJ2011,733, 66

  37. [37]

    Cosmic separation of phases.Phys

    Witten, E. Cosmic separation of phases.Phys. Rev. D1984,30, 272

  38. [38]

    Short GRBs and dark matter seeding in neutron stars.ApJ2013,768, 145

    P ´erez-Garc´ıa, M.A.; Daigne, F.; Silk, J. Short GRBs and dark matter seeding in neutron stars.ApJ2013,768, 145

  39. [39]

    The origin of galactic cosmic rays.A&ARv2013,21, 70

    Blasi, P. The origin of galactic cosmic rays.A&ARv2013,21, 70

  40. [40]

    Giuliani, A.; Cardillo, M.; Tavani, M.;et al.Neutral pion emission from accelerated protons in the supernova remnant W44.ApJ2011,742, 30

  41. [41]

    Science2013,339, 807

    Ackermann, M.; Ajello, M.; Allafort, A.;et al.Detection of the characteristic pion-decay signature in supernova remnants. Science2013,339, 807

  42. [42]

    Cardillo, M.; Tavani, M.; Giuliani, A.;et al.The supernova remnant W44: confirmations and challenges for cosmic-ray acceleration.A&A2014,565, A74

  43. [43]

    Revealing W51C as a cosmic-ray source using Fermi-LAT data.ApJ2016,816, 100

    Jogler, T.; Funk, S. Revealing W51C as a cosmic-ray source using Fermi-LAT data.ApJ2016,816, 100

  44. [44]

    Mechanism for spectral break in cosmic ray proton spectrum from supernova remnant W44.Nat

    Malkov, M.A.; Diamond, P.H.; Sagdeev, R.Z. Mechanism for spectral break in cosmic ray proton spectrum from supernova remnant W44.Nat. Commun.2011,2, 194

    2011

  45. [45]

    Supernova remnants at high energy.ARA&A2008,46, 89

    Reynolds, S.P. Supernova remnants at high energy.ARA&A2008,46, 89

  46. [46]

    Ackermann, M.; Ajello, A.; Allafort, A.;et al.A cocoon of freshly accelerated cosmic rays detected by Fermi in the Cygnus superbubble.Science2011,334, 1103

  47. [47]

    Nonthermal particles and photons in starburst regions and superbubbles.A&ARv2014,22, 77

    Bykov, A.M. Nonthermal particles and photons in starburst regions and superbubbles.A&ARv2014,22, 77

  48. [48]

    The nine lives of cosmic rays in galaxies.ARA&A2015,53, 199

    Grenier, I.A.; Black, J.H.; Strong, A.W. The nine lives of cosmic rays in galaxies.ARA&A2015,53, 199

  49. [49]

    Fermi acceleration along the orbit ofηCarinae.A&A2017,603, A111

    Balbo, M.; Walter, R. Fermi acceleration along the orbit ofηCarinae.A&A2017,603, A111

  50. [50]

    Giant gamma-ray bubbles from Fermi-LAT: active galactic nucleus activity or bipolar galactic wind?ApJ2010,724, 1044

    Su, M.; Slatyer, T.R.; Finkbeiner, D.P. Giant gamma-ray bubbles from Fermi-LAT: active galactic nucleus activity or bipolar galactic wind?ApJ2010,724, 1044

  51. [51]

    Ackermann, M.; Albert, A.; Atwood, W.B.;et al.The spectrum and morphology of the Fermi bubbles.ApJ2014,793, 64

  52. [52]

    Pakmor, R.; Pfrommer, C.; Simpson, C.M.;et al.Galactic winds driven by isotropic and anisotropic cosmic-ray diffusion in disk galaxies.ApJ2016,824, L30

  53. [53]

    Benhabiles-Mezhoud, H.; Kiener, J.; Tatischeff, V .;et al.De-excitation nuclear gamma-ray line emission from low-energy cosmic rays in the inner Galaxy.ApJ2013,763, 98

  54. [54]

    Nava, L.; Benyamin, D.; Piran, T.;et al.Reconciling the diffuse Galactic γ-ray and the cosmic ray spectra.MNRAS2017, 466, 3674

  55. [55]

    Planck intermediate results

    Planck Collaboration. Planck intermediate results. XXVIII. Interstellar gas and dust in the Chamaeleon clouds as seen by Fermi LAT and Planck.A&A2015,582, A31

  56. [56]

    Riess, A.G.; Filippenko, A.V .; Challis, P.;et al.Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant.AJ1998,116, 1009

  57. [57]

    Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.;et al.Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae.ApJ1999, 517, 565

  58. [58]

    Alignment with DESI BAO and signs of a non-accelerating universe.MNRAS2025,544, 975

    Son, J.; Lee, Y .-W.; Chung, C.;et al.Strong progenitor age bias in supernova cosmology – II. Alignment with DESI BAO and signs of a non-accelerating universe.MNRAS2025,544, 975

  59. [59]

    Type Ia supernova explosion models.ARA&A2000,38, 191

    Hillebrandt, W.; Niemeyer, J.C. Type Ia supernova explosion models.ARA&A2000,38, 191

  60. [60]

    Phys.2013,8, 116

    Hillebrandt, W.; Kromer, M.; R ¨opke, F.;et al.Towards an understanding of Type Ia supernovae from a theoretical perspective.Front. Phys.2013,8, 116

    2013

  61. [61]

    The physics of core-collapse supernovae.Nat

    Woosley, S.; Janka, T. The physics of core-collapse supernovae.Nat. Phys.2005,1, 147

    2005

  62. [62]

    Explosion mechanisms of core-collapse supernovae.Ann

    Janka, H.-T. Explosion mechanisms of core-collapse supernovae.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.2012,62, 407

    2012

  63. [63]

    Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory.Rev

    Burrows, A. Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory.Rev. Mod. Phys.2013,85, 245

    2013

  64. [64]

    Isern, J.; Jean, P.; Bravo, E.;et al.Gamma-ray emission from SN2014J near maximum optical light.A&A2016,588, A67

  65. [65]

    Astronomy with gamma-ray lines.Lect

    Diehl, R.; Hartmann, D.H.; Prantzos, N. Astronomy with gamma-ray lines.Lect. Notes Phys.2011,812

    2011

  66. [66]

    Diehl, R.; Halloin, H.; Kretschmer, K.;et al.Radioactive 26Al from massive stars in the Galaxy.Nature2006,439, 45

  67. [67]

    New insights from cosmic gamma rays.J

    Diehl, R. New insights from cosmic gamma rays.J. Phys. Conf. Ser .2016,703, 012001

    2016

  68. [68]

    26Al kinematics: superbubbles following the spiral arms?A&A2015,578, A113

    Krause, M.G.H.; Diehl, R.; Bagetakos, Y .;et al. 26Al kinematics: superbubbles following the spiral arms?A&A2015,578, A113

  69. [69]

    The absolute magnitudes of Type Ia supernovae.ApJ1993,413, L105

    Phillips, M.M. The absolute magnitudes of Type Ia supernovae.ApJ1993,413, L105

  70. [70]

    Churazov, E.; Sunyaev, R.; Isern, J.;et al.Cobalt-56 γ-ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J.Nature2014, 512, 406

  71. [71]

    Churazov, E.; Sunyaev, R.; Grebenev, S.A.;et al.Gamma-rays from Type Ia supernova SN2014J.ApJ2015,812, 62

  72. [72]

    Diehl, R.; Siegert, T.; Hillebrandt, W.;et al.SN2014J gamma rays from the 56Ni decay chain.A&A2015,574, A72

  73. [73]

    Mahoney, W.A.; Varnell, L.S.; Jacobson, A.S.et al.Gamma-ray observations of 56Co in SN 1987A.ApJ1988,334, L81

  74. [74]

    Tueller, J.; Barthelmy, S.; Gehrels, N.et al.Observations of gamma-ray line profiles from SN 1987A.ApJ1990,351, L41

  75. [75]

    A.; Boggs, S

    Grefenstette, B.W.; Harrison, F. A.; Boggs, S. E.et al.Asymmetries in core-collapse supernovae from 44Ti in Cassiopeia A.Nature2014,506, 339

  76. [76]

    Grefenstette, B.W.; Fryer, C.L.; Harrison, F.A.et al.The distribution of radioactive 44Ti in Cassiopeia A.ApJ2017,834, 19

  77. [77]

    Siegert, T.; Diehl, R.; Khachatryan, G.et al.Gamma-ray spectroscopy of positron annihilation in the Milky Way.A&A 2016,586, A84. 19

    2016

  78. [78]

    The spectrum of low-energy gamma radiation from the galactic-center region

    Johnson, W.N.; Harnden, F.R.; Haymes, R.C. The spectrum of low-energy gamma radiation from the galactic-center region. ApJ1972,172, L1

  79. [79]

    Detection of 511 keV positron annihilation radiation from the galactic center direction.ApJ1978,225, L11

    Leventhal, M.; MacCallum, C.J.; Stang, P.D. Detection of 511 keV positron annihilation radiation from the galactic center direction.ApJ1978,225, L11

  80. [80]

    The all-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission.A&A2005, 441, 513

    Kn¨odlseder, J.; Jean, P.; Lonjou, V . The all-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission.A&A2005, 441, 513

Showing first 80 references.