REVIEW 2 cited by
CoEvol: Constructing Better Responses for Instruction Finetuning through Multi-Agent Cooperation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In recent years, instruction fine-tuning (IFT) on large language models (LLMs) has garnered considerable attention to enhance model performance on unseen tasks. Attempts have been made on automatic construction and effective selection for IFT data. However, we posit that previous methods have not fully harnessed the potential of LLMs for enhancing data quality. The responses within IFT data could be further enhanced by leveraging the capabilities of LLMs themselves. In this paper, we propose CoEvol, an LLM-based multi-agent cooperation framework for the improvement of responses to instructions. To effectively refine the responses, we develop an iterative framework following a debate-advise-edit-judge paradigm. A two-stage multi-agent debate strategy is further devised to ensure the diversity and reliability of editing suggestions within the framework. Empirically, models equipped with CoEvol outperform competitive baselines evaluated by MT-Bench and AlpacaEval, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing instruction-following capabilities for LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Survey on LLM-based Multi-Agent System: Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Application
This survey organizes recent LLM-based multi-agent research into task-solving, simulation, and agent-evaluation applications, and identifies efficiency and evaluation gaps as key open problems.
-
Generalist Virtual Agents: A Survey on Autonomous Agents Across Digital Platforms
A survey that proposes the Generalist Virtual Agent concept and taxonomies for agent environments, tasks, perceptions, actions, models, and evaluation, concluding that real-world-like environments favor human-like int...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.