Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explain and Improve: LRP-Inference Fine-Tuning for Image Captioning Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.01037 v5 pith:VVBAPBK5 submitted 2020-01-04 cs.CV cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CLcs.LG
keywords attentionimagecaptioningexplanationexplanationsmethodsmodelsmechanisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper analyzes the predictions of image captioning models with attention mechanisms beyond visualizing the attention itself. We develop variants of layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) and gradient-based explanation methods, tailored to image captioning models with attention mechanisms. We compare the interpretability of attention heatmaps systematically against the explanations provided by explanation methods such as LRP, Grad-CAM, and Guided Grad-CAM. We show that explanation methods provide simultaneously pixel-wise image explanations (supporting and opposing pixels of the input image) and linguistic explanations (supporting and opposing words of the preceding sequence) for each word in the predicted captions. We demonstrate with extensive experiments that explanation methods 1) can reveal additional evidence used by the model to make decisions compared to attention; 2) correlate to object locations with high precision; 3) are helpful to "debug" the model, e.g. by analyzing the reasons for hallucinated object words. With the observed properties of explanations, we further design an LRP-inference fine-tuning strategy that reduces the issue of object hallucination in image captioning models, and meanwhile, maintains the sentence fluency. We conduct experiments with two widely used attention mechanisms: the adaptive attention mechanism calculated with the additive attention and the multi-head attention mechanism calculated with the scaled dot product.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Explaining Visual Captioning with Hybrid Markov Logic Networks

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid Markov logic network selects training examples that plausibly biased a captioning model's output for a test image, and user studies rate those selections as interpretable.

Pith tools