Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Out of Order: How Important Is The Sequential Order of Words in a Sentence in Natural Language Understanding Tasks?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.15180 v2 pith:VWYSACG4 submitted 2020-12-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords tasksorderwordgluelanguagenaturalbert-basedclassifiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Do state-of-the-art natural language understanding models care about word order - one of the most important characteristics of a sequence? Not always! We found 75% to 90% of the correct predictions of BERT-based classifiers, trained on many GLUE tasks, remain constant after input words are randomly shuffled. Despite BERT embeddings are famously contextual, the contribution of each individual word to downstream tasks is almost unchanged even after the word's context is shuffled. BERT-based models are able to exploit superficial cues (e.g. the sentiment of keywords in sentiment analysis; or the word-wise similarity between sequence-pair inputs in natural language inference) to make correct decisions when tokens are arranged in random orders. Encouraging classifiers to capture word order information improves the performance on most GLUE tasks, SQuAD 2.0 and out-of-samples. Our work suggests that many GLUE tasks are not challenging machines to understand the meaning of a sentence.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools