Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02569 v2 pith:W3TK2GW3 submitted 2024-11-04 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnessproblemalgorithmicdesiderataintersectionalitychallengesgroupspotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A yet unmet challenge in algorithmic fairness is the problem of intersectionality, that is, achieving fairness across the intersection of multiple groups -- and verifying that such fairness has been attained. Because intersectional groups tend to be small, verifying whether a model is fair raises statistical as well as moral-methodological challenges. This paper (1) elucidates the problem of intersectionality in algorithmic fairness, (2) develops desiderata to clarify the challenges underlying the problem and guide the search for potential solutions, (3) illustrates the desiderata and potential solutions by sketching a proposal using simple hypothesis testing, and (4) evaluates, partly empirically, this proposal against the proposed desiderata.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Fair Representation to Just Recognition in Generative AI

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative AI representations should be judged by whether they undermine equal participation in society, not by whether they are descriptively accurate.

Pith tools