Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.15638 v3 pith:W4DYHNOD submitted 2024-03-22 cs.CR cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.CLcs.LG
keywords privacymodelpmixeddp-sgdllmsnext-tokenpredictionprivate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Ensuring the privacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) is becoming increasingly important. The most widely adopted technique to accomplish this is DP-SGD, which trains a model to guarantee Differential Privacy (DP). However, DP-SGD overestimates an adversary's capabilities in having white box access to the model and, as a result, causes longer training times and larger memory usage than SGD. On the other hand, commercial LLM deployments are predominantly cloud-based; hence, adversarial access to LLMs is black-box. Motivated by these observations, we present Private Mixing of Ensemble Distributions (PMixED): a private prediction protocol for next-token prediction that utilizes the inherent stochasticity of next-token sampling and a public model to achieve Differential Privacy. We formalize this by introducing RD-mollifers which project each of the model's output distribution from an ensemble of fine-tuned LLMs onto a set around a public LLM's output distribution, then average the projected distributions and sample from it. Unlike DP-SGD which needs to consider the model architecture during training, PMixED is model agnostic, which makes PMixED a very appealing solution for current deployments. Our results show that PMixED achieves a stronger privacy guarantee than sample-level privacy and outperforms DP-SGD for privacy $\epsilon = 8$ on large-scale datasets. Thus, PMixED offers a practical alternative to DP training methods for achieving strong generative utility without compromising privacy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Balancing Utility and Privacy: Dynamically Private SGD with Random Projection

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    D2P2-SGD combines time-decreasing privacy noise with random projection to improve the accuracy of differentially private SGD, with convergence rates matching ordinary SGD.

  2. Differentially Private In-context Learning via Sampling Few-shot Mixed with Zero-shot Outputs

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DPS-MOZO samples each generated token from the product of per-example distributions mixed with the zero-shot distribution to make in-context learning differentially private without additive noise.

  3. Public Data Assisted Differentially Private In-Context Learning

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A private ICL algorithm that aggregates LLM responses with DPM clustering and uses public data representatives achieves near-non-private utility at epsilon=1.

Pith tools