Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05506 v2 pith:W7TL6IAW submitted 2025-04-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords chartqaprochartchartslvlmsmodelsquestionsansweringbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Charts are ubiquitous, as people often use them to analyze data, answer questions, and discover critical insights. However, performing complex analytical tasks with charts requires significant perceptual and cognitive effort. Chart Question Answering (CQA) systems automate this process by enabling models to interpret and reason with visual representations of data. However, existing benchmarks like ChartQA lack real-world diversity and have recently shown performance saturation with modern large vision-language models (LVLMs). To address these limitations, we introduce ChartQAPro, a new benchmark that includes 1,341 charts from 157 diverse sources, spanning various chart types, including infographics and dashboards, and featuring 1,948 questions in various types, such as multiple-choice, conversational, hypothetical, and unanswerable questions, to better reflect real-world challenges. Our evaluations with 21 models show a substantial performance drop for LVLMs on ChartQAPro; e.g., Claude Sonnet 3.5 scores 90.5% on ChartQA but only 55.81% on ChartQAPro, underscoring the complexity of chart reasoning. We complement our findings with detailed error analyses and ablation studies, identifying key challenges and opportunities for advancing LVLMs in chart understanding and reasoning. We release ChartQAPro at https://github.com/vis-nlp/ChartQAPro.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trace: A Taxonomy-Guided Environment for Multidomain Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RLVR training on 64,000 procedurally generated Trace instances improves Qwen2.5-VL macro-average on 24 external visual reasoning benchmarks by 3.51 points at 3B and 4.06 points at 7B.

  2. Mage-VL: An Efficient Codec-Native Streaming Multimodal Foundation Model

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Codec-guided sparse patch selection plus a lightweight speak/silent gate yields a 4B streaming VLM that is competitive on static tasks, stronger on video/spatial benchmarks, and much cheaper at inference.

  3. ChartReasoner: Code-Driven Modality Bridging for Long-Chain Reasoning in Chart Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ChartReasoner converts charts into executable ECharts code, distills long-chain reasoning traces from that code, and trains a 7B multimodal model with SFT and GRPO to improve chart question answering.

  4. Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DAM-QA aggregates answers from full-image and sliding-window views of the Describe Anything Model with a weighted vote, improving text-rich VQA on some benchmarks but not all.

Pith tools