Uniform measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded thin domain

Dingshi Li; Ran Li; Tianhao Zeng

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Uniform measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded thin domain

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For each small thickness, a McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equation on an unbounded thin domain has a unique uniform measure attractor, and these attractors converge upper-semicontinuously to the limiting equation on R^n as…

desk verdict First thin-domain uniform measure attractor theorem, but the main theorem's continuity hypothesis is not met; referee it and ask for a repair. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19428 v1 pith:W7YNIV7W submitted 2024-12-27 math.PR math.DS

Tianhao Zeng , Ran Li , Dingshi Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.DS MSC 35B4137L3037L5535B40

keywords McKean-Vlasovequationuniformmeasureattractorcompletesolutionunboundedthindomainstochasticreaction-diffusionuppersemicontinuitytailestimatesalmostperiodicexternalterm

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a family of non-autonomous McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on an unbounded thin domain — a strip-like region $O_\varepsilon$ in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ that flattens to $\mathbb{R}^n$ as thickness $\varepsilon\to0$ — has a unique uniform measure attractor for each small $\varepsilon$, and that these attractors vary upper semicontinuously under the collapse. The equations are distribution-dependent: the nonlinearity and noise depend on the law of the solution, so the usual duality between transition semigroups and their adjoints breaks down, and the paper instead proves joint continuity of the law-evolution process on bounded subsets of $\mathcal{P}_4(L^2(O))$ using regularity and the Vitali theorem. Why this matters: the result identifies the long-time statistical behavior of a genuinely distribution-dependent stochastic PDE on a non-compact, geometrically degenerating domain, and shows it is stable as the geometry degenerates. The proofs rely on uniform tail estimates to overcome the failure of compact Sobolev embedding on unbounded domains.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a chain of objects. A change of variables $T_\varepsilon$ transplants the thin domain $O_\varepsilon$ into the fixed cylinder $O=\mathbb{R}^n\times(0,1)$, turning the Laplacian into the weighted operator $A_\varepsilon$ and the limit equation on $\mathbb{R}^n$ into $A_0=-\rho^{-1}\sum_i(\rho u_{y_i})_{y_i}$; the average operator $M\phi(y_*)=\int_0^1\phi(y_*,y_{n+1})dy_{n+1}$ and the injection $I$ compare the two geometries. The uniform tail estimates (Lemma 4.6) control the mass of solutions outside large balls uniformly in $\varepsilon$ and in the forcing $g$, which restores the compactness that the unbounded domain removes from Sobolev embedding. The existence criterion is an imported theorem (Theorem 2.2) asserting that joint continuity of the law processes, a uniform absorbing set, and uniform asymptotic compactness yield a unique uniform measure attractor; the paper verifies these inputs for $\{U^{g,\varepsilon}\}$ in $\mathcal{P}_4(L^2(O))$.

What would settle it

A concrete observation that would settle the central claim is a sequence of initial laws $\mu_n$ in $\mathcal{P}_4(L^2(O))$ with uniformly bounded fourth moments and forcings $g_n\to g$ in $H(g_0)$ whose solution laws at times $t_n\to\infty$ admit no weakly convergent subsequence; that would falsify uniform asymptotic compactness and with it Theorem 5.1. Alternatively, a sequence $\varepsilon_k\to0$ and $\mu_k\in A_{\varepsilon_k}$ whose laws do not converge along any subsequence to an element of $A_0\circ I^{-1}$ would falsify the upper-semicontinuity claim of Theorem 6.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central result is Theorem 5.1 and Theorem 6.1. For each $0<\varepsilon<\varepsilon_0$, the family of processes $\{U^{g,\varepsilon}(t,\tau)\}_{g\in H(g_0)}$ generated by the transformed equation (3.21) on the fixed domain $O$ possesses a unique uniform measure attractor $A_\varepsilon$ in $\mathcal{P}_4(L^2(O))$, equal to the union over the hull $H(g_0)$ of the kernel sections $K^{g,\varepsilon}(0)$. As $\varepsilon\to 0$, these attractors are upper semicontinuous at the collapsed domain: $\lim_{\varepsilon\to0} d_{\mathcal{P}(L^2(O))}(A_\varepsilon, A_0\circ I^{-1})=0$, where $A_0$ is the uniform measure attractor of the limit equation (3.22) on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and $I$ embeds $\mathbb{R}^n$ functions as functions constant in the vertical coordinate. In words: every probability law that is selected by the long-time dynamics on the thin domain approaches, as the domain flattens, a law selected by the long-time dynamics of the limiting equation.

Load-bearing premise

The existence proof applies Theorem 2.2, whose hypotheses require joint continuity of the process family on the whole space $\mathcal{P}_4(L^2(O))\times H(g_0)$, but the paper proves continuity only on bounded subsets of that space; the unproved full-space continuity is the load-bearing premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every small $\varepsilon$, the long-time statistical behavior is concentrated on a compact family of probability laws, so empirical or numerical ensembles of solutions converge uniformly over all translations of the almost-periodic forcing.
The attractor decomposes as a union of kernel sections; consequently each long-time limit can be embedded in a complete bounded trajectory of the law-evolution process.
As $\varepsilon\to 0$, no part of the thin-domain attractor escapes to infinity in law space: every weak limit point of $A_\varepsilon$ lies in the embedded limit attractor $A_0\circ I^{-1}$.
Uniform tail estimates are strong enough to make the absorbing set and attractor independent of the forcing translation in $H(g_0)$, so the result is genuinely uniform in the non-autonomous symbol.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper, if the bounded-set continuity proved in Lemma 5.1 can be upgraded to full joint continuity, the same proof scheme would apply to other distribution-dependent parabolic SPDEs with fourth-moment bounds, such as distribution-dependent fractional reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains.
Beyond the paper, the upper-semicontinuity statement does not by itself give convergence of individual attractor elements; a natural companion question is whether $A_\varepsilon$ also lower-semicontinuously approximates $A_0$, which would require a stronger approximation of solutions than the second-moment estimate in Lemma 6.2.
Beyond the paper, because the metric used is the weak metric $d_{\mathcal{P}(L^2(O))}$ rather than a Wasserstein distance, the result carries no rate in $\varepsilon$; quantifying a rate would presumably need stronger Lipschitz conditions on $f$ and $\varrho_k$ and an explicit version of the Gronwall argument.
Beyond the paper, the proof's reliance on the strict gap condition (3.28)-(3.29) suggests a boundary-of-parameters test: at equality in (3.28) the absorbing-set estimate and possibly the attractor convergence should fail, giving a sharp threshold for the phenomenon.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my read. This is the first paper to build uniform measure attractors for McKean-Vlasov reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded thin domains, and to prove upper semicontinuity as ε→0; that is a genuine, publishable-in-principle result in stochastic dynamics on thin domains. The uniform tail estimates and fourth-moment bounds are substantial and mostly carefully derived. The paper also earns credit for admitting in the introduction that its continuity proof is restricted to bounded subsets of P4(L2(O))×H(g0) rather than the whole space.

Where it breaks down: Theorem 5.1 as stated does not follow. Theorem 2.2 (and Definition 2.1) require joint continuity on Pp(X)×H(g0). Lemma 5.1 only proves continuity under a uniform 4th-moment bound on the initial laws. The proof then says 'bounded continuity plus Lemmas 5.1–5.3 and Theorem 2.2 yields the attractor,' but no argument bridges bounded to full continuity. This is load-bearing. The stress-test example (μ_n=(1−1/n)δ_0+(1/n)δ_n) shows why: the one-step map can genuinely fail to be continuous at a measure whose 4th moment is finite but approximating measures have huge moments. One can likely repair the paper by replacing Theorem 2.2 with a version whose continuity hypothesis is 'joint continuity on the absorbing set' or by proving full weak continuity, but that has to be written.

Two smaller things. The closedness of K=BP4(L2(O))(G1^{1/4}) in the weak topology is asserted and used in Lemma 5.3; that is false as stated. The conclusion ν∈P4 still follows from liminf/Fatou since all approximating laws have bounded 4th moments, so this is fixable. And the main existence result is imported from the authors' own submitted paper [28]; that is acceptable when the theorem is stated fully, but referees need access to [28] to verify the criterion's hypotheses, and the mismatch above is exactly where that matters.

Bottom line: the paper deserves a serious referee. Not because it is flawless—it is not—but because the result is new, the technical machinery is substantial, and the gaps are addressable. My recommendation: send to peer review and require a major revision that either proves the missing continuity or restates and proves a modified criterion.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies non-autonomous McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded thin domains O_epsilon that collapse to R^n as epsilon goes to 0. The authors reformulate the equation on a fixed domain, establish uniform a priori estimates including fourth-moment bounds and uniform tail estimates, and introduce a family of processes on the space P_4(L^2(O)) of probability measures with finite fourth moment. The main results are Theorem 5.1, asserting existence and uniqueness of a uniform measure attractor A_epsilon for each epsilon, and Theorem 6.1, asserting upper semicontinuity of these attractors toward the collapsed attractor A_0. The argument relies on a general criterion (Theorem 2.2) imported from a submitted companion paper by the same authors, on joint continuity of the process proved only on bounded subsets, and on asymptotic compactness obtained from uniform tail estimates.

Significance. If the gaps identified below are repaired, the paper would be a useful contribution to the theory of measure attractors for distribution-dependent stochastic PDEs on unbounded domains. Its main positive content is a substantial set of uniform-in-epsilon and uniform-in-symbol estimates, including the fourth-moment and tail estimates that overcome non-compactness of the usual Sobolev embedding on unbounded thin domains. The paper also correctly identifies why the standard dual-semigroup/Feller argument for continuity of the law-evolution process fails for McKean-Vlasov equations. The upper-semicontinuity strategy is natural and plausible, provided the existence theorem is made rigorous. At present, however, the central existence theorem is not proved from the stated hypotheses, so the significance is conditional.

major comments (3)

[Section 5, Theorem 5.1 and Lemma 5.1] Theorem 5.1 applies Theorem 2.2, whose hypothesis is joint continuity on P_p(X) x H(g0) with no boundedness restriction (Definition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2). Lemma 5.1 proves continuity only on bounded subsets of P_4(L^2(O)) x H(g0): it requires the uniform fourth-moment bounds E||xi^n||^4 <= R and E||xi||^4 <= R. The proof of Theorem 5.1 does not bridge this gap, and the introduction explicitly states that continuity is proved only on the restricted domain (B_{P_4}(r), d_P) x H(g0). To make Theorem 5.1 follow, the authors must either prove full joint continuity on P_4(L^2(O)) x H(g0) or state and prove a modified criterion in which continuity on bounded sets, together with a uniform absorbing set and asymptotic compactness, is sufficient. This issue is load-bearing because Theorem 2.2 is the mechanism that produces the attractor A_epsilon.
[Section 2, Theorem 2.2] Theorem 2.2, the abstract existence-uniqueness criterion for uniform measure attractors, is quoted without proof from reference [28], a submitted paper by the same three authors. The present manuscript's Theorems 5.1 and 5.2 rest entirely on this external criterion. Since the reader cannot verify the hypotheses or the proof of the criterion, the manuscript is not self-contained at its central point. Please provide a complete proof of Theorem 2.2 in this paper or replace the reference with a published or otherwise publicly verifiable source, and state precisely which topology on P_p(X) is used.
[Section 6, Theorem 6.1, Eq. (6.16)] The proof of Theorem 6.1 asserts, with 'By Lemma 4.5', that every mu in A_epsilon satisfies the uniform H^1_epsilon-bound (6.16). Lemma 4.5 gives such a bound only for time-evolved measures U^{g,epsilon}(t,tau)mu with t-tau large; it does not directly transfer to weak limits in A_epsilon. One must argue through complete solutions chi with chi(s)=U^{g,epsilon}(s,tau_n)chi(tau_n) and pass to the limit, using the uniform fourth-moment bound to justify the passage. This argument is absent. Without (6.16), the application of Corollary 6.1 to the full attractor A_epsilon is not justified, so the upper-semicontinuity proof has a gap.

minor comments (4)

[Lemma 5.3, proof around (5.24)-(5.25)] A concern that the absorbing set K = B_{P_4}(r) is not closed in the weak topology does not land: for mu_n in K with mu_n -> mu weakly, Fatou's lemma applied to the nonnegative continuous function ||x||^4 gives E_mu||x||^4 <= liminf E_{mu_n}||x||^4 <= r^4, so K is closed in (P(L^2(O)), d_P). The step nu in K in Lemma 5.3 is therefore sound.
[Section 5, Lemma 5.2 and Eq. (5.10)] The absorbing radius G_1 = M_7/rho_1 appears inconsistent with the norm used in P_4(L^2(O)). Lemma 4.7 gives E||u_epsilon||^4_{H_rho} <= M_7, and since ||u||^2_{L^2} <= (1/rho_1)||u||^2_{H_rho}, the corresponding L^2 fourth-moment bound is M_7/rho_1^2. If rho_1 < 1, the set K defined in (5.9) with G_1 = M_7/rho_1 may not contain the time-evolved measures guaranteed by Lemma 4.7; please correct the constant or clarify the norm convention.
[Section 4, proof of Lemma 4.5] The sentence 'which in conjunction with Lemmas 4.1 and 4.1, completes the proof' should refer to Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2.
[Section 6, proof of Theorem 6.1] In the line 'Given nu_epsilon in A_epsilon, since A_epsilon in K', the notation should be A_epsilon subset K rather than A_epsilon in K. Also, Theorem 6.1 states assumptions (A1)-(A3) and (6.1)-(6.2) but omits (3.28), although Lemma 4.5 and Corollary 6.1 rely on it; please add (3.28) to the hypotheses of Theorem 6.1.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Theorem 5.1's attractor existence is inherited from the same-authors' submitted criterion [28], while the continuity actually proved is only on bounded subsets, making the central existence claim self-citation load-bearing.

self citation load bearing [Section 5, Theorem 5.1 (proof); Theorem 2.2 stated from reference [28]]
"According to Lemma 5.1, the family of processes {U g,ε(t,τ )}g∈H(g0) possesses joint continuity over bounded of P4(L2(O)) and H(g0). Leveraging Lemmas 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3, Theorem 2.2 subsequently yields the existence and uniqueness of the uniform m easure attractors for the aforementioned family of processes {U g,ε(t,τ )}g∈H(g0)."

Theorem 2.2 is not proved in this paper; it is introduced with the words 'In accordance with the aforementioned notation from reference [28], the following criterion is established', and reference [28] is a submitted paper by D. Li, R. Li and T. Zeng, the same three authors. The criterion's 'jointly continuous' hypothesis is full-space continuity on Pp(X) × H(g0) (Definition 2.1), but Lemma 5.1 and the introduction prove continuity only on bounded subsets (BP4(L2(O)), dP(L2(O))) × H(g0). The proof of Lemma 5.1 needs uniform 4th-moment bounds to apply Vitali's theorem, and weakly convergent sequences in P4 need not have bounded 4th moments, so the restricted statement is strictly weaker.

full rationale

The paper contains substantial independent content: the uniform moment estimates (Lemmas 4.1, 4.5, 4.7), the tail estimates (Lemma 4.6), the absorbing set construction (Lemma 5.2), the asymptotic compactness proof (Lemma 5.3), and the convergence comparison (Lemma 6.2 and Theorem 6.1) are all new estimates and are not circular in themselves. However, the central existence theorem Theorem 5.1 is not derived from these estimates alone: it applies Theorem 2.2, which is explicitly imported from reference [28], a submitted paper by the same three authors. The paper itself admits in the introduction that it proves continuity only on the restricted domain (BP4(L2(O)), dP(L2(O))) × H(g0), 'rather than endeavoring to prove it across the entire space (P4(L2(O)), dP(L2(O))) × H(g0)'. Theorem 2.2, however, requires joint continuity in the full space, and the proof of Lemma 5.1 requires uniform 4th-moment bounds to upgrade almost-sure convergence to L2 convergence via Vitali's theorem; weakly convergent measures in P4 need not have bounded 4th moments. So the application of Theorem 2.2 is not a routine verification of independent hypotheses: the load-bearing existence and uniqueness statement is inherited from an unverified same-author criterion. This is heavier than incidental self-citation but is not a definitional reduction, because the uniform estimates, tail estimates, and upper-semicontinuity comparison are independent mathematical content. The score is therefore set to 5, reflecting a partially circular, partially self-contained derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data-fitting parameters. The constants M1...M7 are derived bounds, and ε0 is a small-thickness threshold, not fitted. Condition (3.28) selects a sufficiently large λ but is an assumption, not a fitted value. No new physical entities, particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. The only new mathematical object is the uniform measure attractor, which was already defined in [28]. The principal external dependencies are the black-box well-posedness theorem from [9] and the attractor existence criterion from the authors' own submitted paper [28].

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Well-posedness of (3.21) under (A1)-(A3) holds as in [9].
Used in Section 3 to define the solution and the law process; if the solution theory fails, the attractors have no basis.
domain assumption Theorem 2.2 of [28] (same authors, submitted) is a valid criterion for uniform measure attractor existence.
Imported and used as a black box in Theorem 5.1; not proved here.
standard math The almost periodic function g0 has precompact translation hull H(g0) and the translation identity (2.1) holds for the processes.
Standard Bochner criterion and construction, Section 2.
domain assumption Coefficient assumptions (A1)-(A3), the large-dissipation condition (3.28), and the convergence hypotheses (6.1)-(6.2) hold.
These are the standing hypotheses of Theorems 5.1, 5.2 and 6.1.
standard math Lemma 6.1 averaging estimate ||u - Mu|| <= e1 ε ||u||_{H1ε(O)} from Hale-Raugel is valid.
Used in Lemma 6.2 and Theorem 6.1 for the collapse limit.
standard math Classical probabilistic and analytic tools (Itô formula, Gronwall, Fatou, Skorokhod representation, Prohorov tightness, Vitali convergence) are applied correctly.
These tools underlie the estimates in Sections 4-6.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniform measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded thin domain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W7YNIV7W

@misc{pith2026241219428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniform measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded thin domain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W7YNIV7W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19428}
}

abstract

This article addresses the issue of uniform measure attractors for non-autonomous McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations defined on unbounded thin domains. Initially, the concept of uniform measure attractors is recalled, and thereafter, the existence and uniqueness of such attractors are demonstrated. Uniform tail estimates are employed to establish the asymptotic compactness of the processes, thereby overcoming the non-compactness issue inherent in the usual Sobolev embedding on unbounded thin domains. Finally, we demonstrate that the upper semi-continuity of uniform measure attractors defined on $(n + 1)$-dimensional unbounded thin domains collapsing into the space $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[28]

D. Li, R. Li and T. Zeng, Uniform measure attractors for n on-autonomous stochastic evolution systems, (2024), submitted

work page 2024
[1]

Arrieta, A.N

J.M. Arrieta, A.N. Carvalho and A. German, Dynamics in du mbbell domains I. Continuity of the set of equilibria, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 231, (2006), 551–597

work page 2006
[2]

Ahmed and X

N.U. Ahmed and X. Ding, A semilinear Mckean-Vlasov stoch astic in Hilbert space, Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 60 (1995), 65–85

work page 1995
[3]

Bao and X

J. Bao and X. Huang, Approximations of McKean-Vlasov sto chastic diﬀerential equations with irregular coeﬃ- cients. J. Theoret. Probab. , 35 (2022) 1187–1215

work page 2022
[4]

J. Bao, M. Scheutzow and C. Yuan, Existence of invariant p robability measures for functional McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Electron. J. Probab. , 27 (2022), 1–14

work page 2022
[5]

Chepyzhov and M

V. Chepyzhov and M. Vishik, Attractors of nonautonomous dynamical-systems and their dimension, J. Math. Pure. Appl. , 73 (1994), 279–333

work page 1994
[6]

Chepyzhov and M

V. Chepyzhov and M. Vishik, Non-autonomous 2D Navier-St okes system with a simple global attractor and some averaging problems, Esaim Contr Optim Ca. , 8 (2002), 467–487

work page 2002
[7]

Caraballo, J

T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Upper semico ntinuity of attractors for small random perturbations of dynamical systems, Comm. Partial. Diﬀerential. Equations. , 23 (1998), 1557–1581

work page 1998

Show all 48 references

[8]

Chen and B

Z. Chen and B. Wang, Existence, exponential mixing and co nvergence of periodic measures of fractional stochastic delay reaction-diﬀusion equations on Rn. J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 336 (2022), 505–564

2022
[9]

Chen and B

Z. Chen and B. Wang, Well-posedness and large deviations of fractional McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction- diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains, (2024), arXiv:24 06.10694

2024
[10]

Cui and J

H. Cui and J. A. Langa, Uniform attractors for non-auton omous random dynamical systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 263 (2017), 1225–1268

2017
[11]

Crauel and P

H. Crauel and P. E. Kloeden, Nonautonomous and random at tractors,Jahresber. Deutsch. Math. , 117 (2015), 173–206

2015
[12]

Dawson and J

D. Dawson and J. Vaillancourt, Stochastic Mckean-Vlas ov equations, Nonlinear Diﬀer. Equat. Appl. , 2 (1995), 199–229

1995
[13]

Fournier and A

N. Fournier and A. Guillin, On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure, Probab. Theory Related Fields. , 162 (2015), 707–738

2015
[14]

X. Fan, X. Huang, Y. Suo and C. Yuan, Distribution depend ent SDEs driven by fractional Brownian motions, Stoch. Process. Appl. , 151 (2022), 23–67

2022
[15]

Hale and G

J.K. Hale and G. Raugel, A damped hyperbolic equation on thin domains, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. , 329 (1992), 185–219

1992
[16]

Hale and G

J.K. Hale and G. Raugel, Reaction-diﬀusion equation on thin domains, J. Math. Pures Appl. , 71 (1992), 33–95

1992
[17]

Hale and G

J.K. Hale and G. Raugel, A reaction-diﬀusion equation o n a thin L-shaped domain, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A. 125 (1995), 283–327

1995
[18]

J. K. Hale, Asymptotic behavior of dissipative systems , Am. Math. Soc. , 1988

1988
[19]

X. Han, B. Usman and P. E. Kloeden, Long term behavior of a random Hopﬁeld neural lattice model, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. , 18, (2019) 809–824

2019
[20]

Han and P

X. Han and P. E. Kloeden, Dynamics of a random hopﬁeld neu ral lattice model with adaptive synapses and delayed hebbian learning, Ukr Math J. , 75, (2024) 1883–1899

2024
[21]

Hammersley, S

W. Hammersley, S. David and L. Szpruch, Weak existence a nd uniqueness for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with common noise, Ann. Probab., 49 (2021), 527–555

2021
[22]

Huang and F

X. Huang and F. Wang, Regularities and exponential ergo dicity in entropy for SDEs driven by distribution dependent noise, Bernoulli., 30 (2024), 3303–3323

2024
[23]

Johnson, M

R. Johnson, M. Kamenskii and P. Nistri, Existence of per iodic solutions of an autonomous damped wave equation in thin domains, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. , 10 (1998), 409–424

1998
[24]

Y. Li, T. Caraballo and F. Wang, Cardinality and IOD-typ e continuity of pullback attractors for random nonlocal equations on unbounded domains, Math. Ann. , 2024

2024
[25]

Li, Uniform random attractors for 2 D non-autonomous stochastic Navier-Stokes equations

X. Li, Uniform random attractors for 2 D non-autonomous stochastic Navier-Stokes equations. J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 276 (2021), 1–42

2021
[26]

B. M. Levitan and V. Zhikov, Almost periodic functions a nd diﬀerential equations, Cambridge University Press Archive, 1983

1983
[27]

D. Li, B. Wang and X. Wang, Limiting behavior of non-auto nomous stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on thin domains, J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 26 (2017), 1575–1602

2017
[29]

D. Li, K. Lu, B. Wang and X. Wang, Limiting behavior of dyn amics for stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations with additive noise on thin domains, Discrete. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A. , 38 (2018), 187–208. UNIFORM MEASURE ATTRACTORS OF MCKEAN-VLASOV STOCHASTIC RE ACTION-DIFFUSI...

2018
[30]

D. Li, B. Wang, and X. Wang, Periodic measures of stochas tic delay lattice systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 272 (2021), 74–104

2021
[31]

Li and B

D. Li and B. Wang, Pullback measure attractors for non-a utonomous stochastic reaction diﬀusion equations on thin domains, J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 397 (2024), 232–261

2024
[32]

D. Li, K. Lu, B. Wang and X. Wang, Limiting dynamics for no n-autonomous stochastic retarded reaction-diﬀusion equations on thin domains, Discrete. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A. , 39 (2019), 3717–3747

2019
[33]

H. P. Mckean, A class of markov processes associated wit h nonlinear parabolic equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. , 56 (1967), 1907–1911

1967
[34]

Marek and N.J

C. Marek and N.J. Cutland, Measure attractors for stoch astic Navier-Stokes equations, Electron. J. Probab. , 8 (1998), 1–15

1998
[35]

Morimoto, Attractors of probability measures for se milinear stochastic evolution equations, Stoch

H. Morimoto, Attractors of probability measures for se milinear stochastic evolution equations, Stoch. Anal. Appl. , 10 (1992), 205–212

1992
[36]

Prizzi and K

M. Prizzi and K. Rybakowski, Inertial manifolds on sque ezed domains, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. , 15 (2003), 1–48

2003
[37]

Prizzi and K.P

M. Prizzi and K.P. Rybakowski, The eﬀect of domain squee zing upon the dynamics of reaction-diﬀusion equations, J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 173 (2001), 271–320

2001
[38]

Schmalfuß, Long-time behaviour of the stochastic Na vier-Stokes equation, Math

B. Schmalfuß, Long-time behaviour of the stochastic Na vier-Stokes equation, Math. Nachr. 152 (1991), 7–20

1991
[39]

Schmalfuß, Qualitative properties for the stochast ic Navier-Stokes equation, Nonlinear Anal: Theory Methods Appl

B. Schmalfuß, Qualitative properties for the stochast ic Navier-Stokes equation, Nonlinear Anal: Theory Methods Appl. 28 (1997), 1545–1563

1997
[40]

L. Shi, R. Wang, K. Lu and B. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of stochastic Fitzhugh-Nagumo systems on unbounded thin domains. J. Diﬀer. Equ. 267 (2019), 4373–4409

2019
[41]

L. Shi, D. Li, X. Li and X. Wang, Dynamics of stochastic Fi tzHugh-Nagumo systems with additive noise on unbounded thin domains. Stoch. Dyn. 20 (2020) 2050018

2020
[42]

L. Shi, J. Shen, K. Lu and B. Wang, Invariant measures, pe riodic measures and pullback measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains. (2024), arXiv:2409.17548v1

2024 arXiv
[43]

Temam, Inﬁnite-dimensional dynamical systems in me chanics and physics, Springer, 2012

R. Temam, Inﬁnite-dimensional dynamical systems in me chanics and physics, Springer, 2012

2012
[44]

G. R. Sell and Y. You, Dynamics of evolutionary equation s, Springer, 2002

2002
[45]

A. A. Vlasov, The vibrational properties of an electron gas, Ssov. Phys. , 10 (1968), 721–733

1968
[46]

Wang, Suﬃcient and necessary criteria for existence of pullback attractors for non-compact random dynamical systems, J

B. Wang, Suﬃcient and necessary criteria for existence of pullback attractors for non-compact random dynamical systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 253 (2012), 1544–1583

2012
[47]

Wang, Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type eq uations, Stoch

F. Wang, Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type eq uations, Stoch. Process. Appl. , 128 (2018), 595–621

2018
[48]

Zhang, Existence and non-uniqueness of stationary d istributions for distribution dependent SDEs, Electron

S. Zhang, Existence and non-uniqueness of stationary d istributions for distribution dependent SDEs, Electron. J. Probab., 28 (2023), 1–34. (Tianhao Zeng) School of Mathematics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Che ngdu 610031, China Email address, T. Zeng: zengtianhao123@my.swj...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [28]

D. Li, R. Li and T. Zeng, Uniform measure attractors for n on-autonomous stochastic evolution systems, (2024), submitted

work page 2024

[2] [1]

Arrieta, A.N

J.M. Arrieta, A.N. Carvalho and A. German, Dynamics in du mbbell domains I. Continuity of the set of equilibria, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 231, (2006), 551–597

work page 2006

[3] [2]

Ahmed and X

N.U. Ahmed and X. Ding, A semilinear Mckean-Vlasov stoch astic in Hilbert space, Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 60 (1995), 65–85

work page 1995

[4] [3]

Bao and X

J. Bao and X. Huang, Approximations of McKean-Vlasov sto chastic diﬀerential equations with irregular coeﬃ- cients. J. Theoret. Probab. , 35 (2022) 1187–1215

work page 2022

[5] [4]

J. Bao, M. Scheutzow and C. Yuan, Existence of invariant p robability measures for functional McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Electron. J. Probab. , 27 (2022), 1–14

work page 2022

[6] [5]

Chepyzhov and M

V. Chepyzhov and M. Vishik, Attractors of nonautonomous dynamical-systems and their dimension, J. Math. Pure. Appl. , 73 (1994), 279–333

work page 1994

[7] [6]

Chepyzhov and M

V. Chepyzhov and M. Vishik, Non-autonomous 2D Navier-St okes system with a simple global attractor and some averaging problems, Esaim Contr Optim Ca. , 8 (2002), 467–487

work page 2002

[8] [7]

Caraballo, J

T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Upper semico ntinuity of attractors for small random perturbations of dynamical systems, Comm. Partial. Diﬀerential. Equations. , 23 (1998), 1557–1581

work page 1998