Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Prompt Injection: Parameterization of Fixed Inputs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.11349 v2 pith:WALCXLIA submitted 2022-05-31 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords promptsfixedinputpromptattachingconditioningduringefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent works have shown that attaching prompts to the input is effective at conditioning Language Models (LM) to perform specific tasks. However, prompts are always included in the input text during inference, thus incurring substantial computational and memory overhead. Also, there is currently no straightforward method of utilizing prompts that are longer than the maximum input length of the LMs without incurring additional costs during inference. We propose Prompt Injection (PI), a novel formulation of injecting the prompt into the parameters of an LM to be an efficient alternative to attaching fixed prompts to the input. We show that in scenarios with long fixed prompts, PI can be up to 280 times more efficient in terms of total FLOPs than previous approaches. We further explore methodologies for PI and show promising results in persona-dependent conversation, semantic parsing, and zero-shot learning with task instructions. Through these explorations, we show that PI can be a promising direction for conditioning language models, especially in scenarios with long and fixed prompts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Gradient Descent Simulate Prompting?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A MAML-style meta-training objective makes a single gradient step on new text recover part of the performance that prompting achieves, on reversal-curse and passage-QA tasks.

  2. Instruction-Conditioned Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Self-Distillation to an Unconditioned Policy

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training with appended behavioral instructions plus correctness-filtered self-distillation improves held-out math pass@1 over DAPO for a 1.7B model, but not for 4B at 4K context.

  3. Do Modules Stay in Their Lane? Role Drift in Compound LLM Systems

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RL-trained compound LLM systems can gain accuracy by having modules silently abandon their assigned roles, and a prompt-contrast regularizer can measure and limit that drift.

Pith tools