To Deconvolve, or Not to Deconvolve: Inferences of Neuronal Activities using Calcium Imaging Data

With the increasing popularity of calcium imaging data in neuroscience research, methods for analyzing calcium trace data are critical to address various questions. The observed calcium traces are either analyzed directly or deconvolved to spike trains to infer neuronal activities. When both approaches are applicable, it is unclear whether deconvolving calcium traces is a necessary step. In this article, we compare the performance of using calcium traces or their deconvolved spike trains for three common analyses: clustering, principal component analysis (PCA), and population decoding. Our simulations and applications to real data suggest that the estimated spike data outperform calcium trace data for both clustering and PCA. Although calcium trace data show higher predictability than spike data at each time point, spike history or cumulative spike counts is comparable to or better than calcium traces in population decoding.