Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 50 references

Chaos in large genus surfaces

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey reports the proof that random large-genus hyperbolic surfaces have spectral gap approaching the optimal value of 1/4.

desk verdict A solid expository survey of Anantharaman–Monk's optimal spectral gap theorem, but §7.2's proof sketch has a real algebraic inconsistency that should be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05897 v1 pith:WIWQR3GO submitted 2026-08-06 math.DS math.SP

Francisco Arana-Herrera This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.SP MSC 37D4058J5032G15
keywords hyperbolicsurfacesspectralgapLaplace–BeltramioperatorgeodesicflowexponentialmixingWeil–PeterssonmeasureSelbergtraceformulaFriedman–Ramanujanfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey explains a recent proof that, under the Weil–Petersson probability measure on the moduli space of closed hyperbolic surfaces of genus $g$, the first non-zero eigenvalue $\lambda_1(X)$ of the Laplace–Beltrami operator satisfies $P_g^{WP}(-\lambda_1(X) \leq \frac14 - \epsilon) \to 0$ as $g \to \infty$, for every fixed $\epsilon > 0$. The spectral gap, namely $-\lambda_1(X)$, controls the rate at which the geodesic flow mixes, so the result says a typical large-genus surface is exponentially mixing at essentially the fastest rate the geometry permits. The paper walks through the chain of ideas—exponential mixing, the Selberg trace formula, Weil–Petersson random surfaces, and the volume-function estimates—so that a nonspecialist can see where the optimal gap comes from.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a chain of three linked tools. First, the Selberg trace formula converts a hypothetical eigenvalue below $\frac14$ into an exponentially large contribution on the spectral side when tested against carefully chosen functions; the proof then works to show the geometric side is subexponential in expectation. Second, integration formulas over the Weil–Petersson moduli space reduce the needed averages to integrals of volume functions for closed geodesics grouped by local topological type, and a key new step expands those volume functions in inverse powers of the genus and shows the expansion terms are Friedman–Ramanujan functions, a class defined by cancellations against the $\sinh(\ell/2)$ factors in the trace formula. Third, surfaces containing tangles—very short pants or one-holed tori—are shown to be rare, and a Möbius inversion formula is used to exclude them cleanly, so that only polynomially many local types remain at the chosen length scale. An alternative trace scheme applies the operator $D^m = (\frac14 - \frac{d^2}{d\ell^2})^m$ to the test functions to suppress the trivial eigenvalue, at the cost of sign changes that the tangle removal step must handle.

What would settle it

Compute, for a fixed $\epsilon > 0$, the Weil–Petersson volume of the locus of surfaces in $\mathcal{M}_g$ with $-\lambda_1(X) \leq \frac14 - \epsilon$, and compare it with the total volume; the theorem predicts the ratio tends to zero, so any lower bound that stays positive along a sequence of genera would disprove it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central statement, Theorem 7.1 quoted from the works [AM23, AM24b, AM25], is that for every $\epsilon > 0$, $\lim_{g \to \infty} P_g^{WP}(-\lambda_1(X) \leq \frac14 - \epsilon) = 0$. A classical bound already forces $\lambda_1(X) \geq -\frac14 + \epsilon(g)$ with $\epsilon(g) \to 0$, so no genus-two surface can exceed the $\frac14$ threshold; the theorem shows that random surfaces get arbitrarily close to that threshold with probability tending to one. The survey's aim is to present this proof as an architecture rather than a black box, emphasizing where each ingredient enters and what had to be invented, such as the Friedman–Ramanujan expansion of volume functions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the technical heart of the cited proof—the expansion of volume functions and the Möbius inversion formula—is correct and complete, since the survey quotes these steps rather than re-deriving them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every fixed $\epsilon > 0$, the Weil–Petersson volume of the set of genus-$g$ surfaces with spectral gap at most $\frac14 - \epsilon$ is a vanishing fraction of the total volume as $g$ grows.
  • A typical large-genus surface has geodesic flow mixing at an exponential rate arbitrarily close to the best rate allowed by the fact that the universal spectral bound is $\frac14$.
  • The result is the hyperbolic-surface counterpart of the random-regular-graph theorem: random objects of growing size have optimal spectral expansion with high probability.
  • The survey makes the proof route explicit—trace formula averages, Friedman–Ramanujan cancellations, tangle exclusion—so that the technical steps can be checked and extended by other researchers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the theorem is correct, an immediate but unstated consequence is that optimal spectral gaps are common rather than exceptional: there is an abundant supply of surfaces whose first eigenvalue sits arbitrarily close to the universal ceiling.
  • The Friedman–Ramanujan expansion is a transferable technique: any random geometric model equipped with a trace formula and an integration formula could be attacked by the same route, so the method may outlive the particular theorem.
  • A natural testable extension is the full low-energy spectrum: the same machinery may determine the joint distribution of the first $k$ eigenvalues rather than only ruling out eigenvalues below $\frac14 - \epsilon$.
  • The tangle-free and Möbius inversion step suggests a general recipe for probabilistic statements about moduli spaces: identify rare bad patterns, prove they are rare, and remove them by inclusion–exclusion before applying trace-formula bounds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is an expository survey, not an original research contribution. It states Anantharaman and Monk's theorem that, under the Weil–Petersson measure on the moduli space of closed hyperbolic surfaces of genus g, the probability that the spectral gap −λ1(X) is at most 1/4 − ε tends to zero as g→∞ (Theorem 7.1). The survey builds up the necessary background: hyperbolic geometry, exponential mixing of the geodesic flow, the Laplace–Beltrami operator as the rate-controlling object, Selberg's trace formula, the Weil–Petersson model and Mirzakhani's integration formulas, and then sketches the Anantharaman–Monk proof via Friedman–Ramanujan functions, tangle-free surfaces, and a Möbius inversion formula. All substantial results are quoted from the literature; the survey's own contribution is organization and exposition.

Significance. The surveyed result is a major recent advance, and a careful survey is valuable. The author correctly attributes the main theorem and the key quantitative inputs, and the introduction of the trace-formula/WP-integration strategy is pedagogically useful. The paper does not prove new theorems, and there is no circularity: the author's own work is cited only as background. The main caveat is that the proof sketch in §7.2 contains an internal inconsistency in the averaging of the simple-closed-geodesic contribution, which undermines the reliability of the survey's explanation of even the 3/16 precursor; this is correctable but should be addressed before publication.

major comments (1)
  1. [§7.2, Theorem 6.6] The displayed estimate for the simple-closed-geodesic contribution does not follow from the quoted results. Combining Theorem 6.4 with Theorem 6.6 and taking F(ℓ)=ℓH_L(ℓ)/(2sinh(ℓ/2)) gives E[Σ_{γ∈G_s(X)} ℓ(γ)H_L(ℓ(γ))/(2sinh(ℓ(γ)/2))] = ∫_0^∞ 2H_L(ℓ)/sinh^3(ℓ/2)dℓ + O((1+L^c e^{L/2})/g), not the claimed 2∫_0^∞ H_L(ℓ)cosh(ℓ/2)dℓ + O((1+L^c e^{L/2})/g). The two leading terms have incompatible large-L growth (roughly e^{-3L/2} versus e^{L/2}), so the advertised cancellation with the λ0 spectral term (7.1) is not obtained as written. Since this cancellation is the step that passes the problem to the non-simple geodesic estimate (7.2), the proof sketch in §7.2 is not self-consistent. In addition, the leading term 4/(ℓsinh^2(ℓ/2)) displayed in Theorem 6.6 has a non-integrable singularity at ℓ=0, which is incompatible with the assertion that it holds uniformly for all ℓ>0 and with V_g^s(ℓ) being a polynomial; at least one of Theorem 6.6 and the §7.2 estimate must be corrected.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2] The determinant condition defining SL(2,R) is written as ab−cd=1; it should be ad−bc=1.
  2. [§7.2] In the lower bound for cH_L(r_j), the integration variable is reused inconsistently after the rescaling; the exponent should be |r_j|Lℓ (with ℓ∈[0,1]), so that the displayed inequality leading to e^{|r_j|L/2} is justified.
  3. [§7.2] In the final displayed limit of the 3/16 argument, the denominator is written as C_{α,ε}e^{(α+ε)}; it should be C_{α,ε}e^{(α+ε)L(g)}, otherwise the limit does not follow from the preceding bound.
  4. [Theorem 7.8] The displayed statement 'lim_{g→∞} P_g^WP(TF_g)' has no right-hand side; as written it is an incomplete phrase rather than a quantitative statement.
  5. [Definition 7.5] The parameter n in the bound c_1(n+1)^{c_2}e^{L/2} defining the class R_w is never introduced; it should either be defined or removed.
  6. [§7.3.5, Eq. (7.3)] The notation N^j in the inclusion-exclusion identity is confusing: it is described as counting ordered families of j geometric patterns, so it is not the ordinary j-th power of N; using N_j or (N)_j would avoid a false reading of the formula.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's central claim is attributed to external works, and no self-referential reduction appears.

full rationale

The paper is an expository survey, not an original derivation. Its central claim (Theorem 7.1) is explicitly attributed to Anantharaman and Monk, and every load-bearing ingredient is quoted from external sources: Selberg's trace formula (Theorem 5.1), Mirzakhani's integration formula and the Mirzakhani-Petri estimate (Theorems 6.4 and 6.6), the Anantharaman-Monk expansion and Friedman-Ramanujan theorem (Theorems 7.3, 7.4, 7.6), tangle-free estimates (Theorem 7.8), and tangle counting (Theorem 7.9). None of these is defined in terms of the target result, and no parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction. The author's own cited work [AH25] appears only as a historical pointer in Remark 6.8 and is not load-bearing. Remark 7.7 explicitly notes that a weaker version of Theorem 7.6 is stated, and Section 7.3.5 refers to [AM24a] for Möbius inversion; these are acknowledged expositional omissions, not circular dependencies. The possible inconsistency in Section 7.2 between the stated Theorem 6.6 and the claimed 2cosh(ell/2) cancellation is a correctness concern, not a circularity, because the claimed reduction would fail rather than reduce to its own input. Thus the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a survey, so its ledger lists cited theorems rather than new postulates. No parameters are fitted and no entities are invented.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Selberg trace formula (Theorem 5.1) relates spectral data to sums over closed geodesics.
    The survey uses it as the starting point for the proof sketch.
  • standard math Wolpert's theorem (Theorem 6.2) gives the Weil-Petersson measure locally as Lebesgue measure in Fenchel-Nielsen coordinates.
    Defines the random surface model.
  • standard math Mirzakhani's integration formulas (Theorem 6.4) reduce expected simple-geodesic sums to integrals against explicit volume polynomials.
    Used to compute the leading terms in the expected trace formula.
  • standard math Mirzakhani-Petri estimate (Theorem 6.6) gives the asymptotic form of the simple-geodesic volume polynomials.
    Used to identify the matching leading term in Section 7.2.
  • domain assumption Anantharaman-Monk integration over local topological types (Theorem 7.3).
    Taken from [AM23]; the survey does not prove it.
  • domain assumption Anantharaman-Monk asymptotic expansion and Friedman-Ramanujan property of volume functions (Theorems 7.4 and 7.6).
    Most technical load-bearing input, from [AM23, AM25].
  • domain assumption Tangle-freeness with high probability and the polynomial bound on local topological types, plus the Möbius inversion formula (Theorems 7.8, 7.9, Section 7.3.5).
    From [Mir13, MT22, AM24a]; essential for discarding pathological surfaces.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chaos in large genus surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WIWQR3GO

@misc{pith2026260805897,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chaos in large genus surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WIWQR3GO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05897}
}
read the original abstract

Geodesic flows on closed hyperbolic surfaces are a quintessential example of chaotic dynamics, i.e., systems whose long term behavior is very sensitive to initial conditions. The speed of such chaos is controlled by the spectral gap of the Laplace-Beltrami operator of the underlying hyperbolic surface. In this paper we give an overview of recent breakthroughs of Anantharaman and Monk showing that large genus closed hyperbolic surfaces have optimal spectral gap in a probabilistic sense. On the way we introduce and discuss the foundational works of many authors, from Selberg to Mirzakhani, that play a crucial role in the tour de force proof of Anantharaman and Monk.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tohoku Math

    Kobayashi, Shoshichi , TITLE =. Tohoku Math. J. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1956 , PAGES =. doi:10.2748/tmj/1178245006 , URL =

    arXiv 1956

  2. [2]

    Woodhouse, N. M. J. , TITLE =. 1992 , PAGES =

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    Green, L. W. , TITLE =. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , VOLUME =. 1961 , PAGES =

    work page 1961

  4. [4]

    and Green, L

    Auslander, L. and Green, L. and Hahn, F. , TITLE =. 1963 , PAGES =

    work page 1963

  5. [5]

    Faure, Fr\'ed\'eric and Gou\"ezel, S\'ebastien and Lanneau, Erwan , TITLE =. J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , PAGES =. doi:10.5802/jep.107 , URL =

    work page doi:10.5802/jep.107 2019

  6. [6]

    Faure, Fr\'ed\'eric and Nonnenmacher, St\'ephane and De Bi\`evre, Stephan , TITLE =. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2003 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0888-3 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0888-3 2003

  7. [7]

    Lindenstrauss, Elon , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2006.163.165 , URL =

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2006.163.165 2006

  8. [8]

    , TITLE =

    Veech, William A. , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1982 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1971391 , URL =

    doi:10.2307/1971391 1982

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Furstenberg , journal =

    H. Furstenberg , journal =. Strict Ergodicity and Transformation of the Torus , urldate =

  2. [10]

    1988 , publisher =

    Beals, Richard and Greiner, Peter , title =. 1988 , publisher =. doi:10.1515/9781400882397 , keywords =

    1988 doi

  3. [11]

    Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , author=

    Twisted cohomological equations for translation flows , volume=. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , author=. 2022 , pages=. doi:10.1017/etds.2021.120 , number=

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    preprint, arXiv:2410.11117 , pages =

    Weak mixing in rational billiards , author=. preprint, arXiv:2410.11117 , pages =

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    , title =

    Hall, Brian C. , title =. 2013 , publisher =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5 , keywords =

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    Prequantum chaos: resonsances of the prequantum cat map , fjournal =

    Faure, Fr. Prequantum chaos: resonsances of the prequantum cat map , fjournal =. J. Mod. Dyn. , issn =. 2007 , language =. doi:10.3934/jmd.2007.1.255 , keywords =

    2007 doi

  7. [15]

    Prequantum transfer operator for symplectic

    Faure, Fr. Prequantum transfer operator for symplectic. 2015 , publisher =

    2015

  8. [16]

    and FORNI, G

    FAYAD, B. and FORNI, G. and KANIGOWSKI, A. , year=. Lebesgue spectrum of countable multiplicity for conservative flows on the torus , volume=. doi:https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/970 , journal=

    doi

  9. [17]

    Time-changes of horocycle flows , journal =

    Giovanni Forni and Corinna Ulcigrai , keywords =. Time-changes of horocycle flows , journal =. 2012 , issn =. doi:10.3934/jmd.2012.6.251 , url =

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Viana, Marcelo , TITLE =. Rev. Mat. Complut. , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , NUMBER =. doi:10.5209/rev\_REMA.2006.v19.n1.16621 , URL =

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Marcus, Brian , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1977 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1971026 , URL =

    1977 doi

  12. [20]

    , TITLE =

    Moore, Calvin C. , TITLE =. Group representations, ergodic theory, operator algebras, and mathematical physics (. 1987 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4722-7\_6 , URL =

    1987 doi

  13. [21]

    Dolgopyat, Dmitry , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1998 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/121012 , URL =

    1998 doi

  14. [22]

    Kontorovich, Alex and Oh, Hee , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2011 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-2011-00691-7 , URL =

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2304.02678 , archivePrefix =

    Friedman-Ramanujan functions in random hyperbolic geometry and application to spectral gaps , journal =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2304.02678 , archivePrefix =. 2304.02678 , primaryClass =

    doi

  16. [24]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Friedman-Ramanujan functions in random hyperbolic geometry and application to spectral gaps. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.12268 , archivePrefix =. 2502.12268 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    McKean, H. P. , TITLE =. J. Differential Geometry , FJOURNAL =. 1970 , PAGES =

    1970

  18. [26]

    2010 , PAGES =

    Buser, Peter , TITLE =. 2010 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4992-0 , URL =

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Ratner, Marina , TITLE =. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1017/S0143385700004004 , URL =

    1987 doi

  20. [28]

    Selberg, Atle , TITLE =. Proc. 1965 , MRCLASS =

    1965

  21. [29]

    , TITLE =

    Selberg, A. , TITLE =. J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) , FJOURNAL =. 1956 , PAGES =

    1956

  22. [30]

    Hyperbolic geometry and applications in quantum chaos and cosmology , SERIES =

    Marklof, Jens , TITLE =. Hyperbolic geometry and applications in quantum chaos and cosmology , SERIES =. 2012 , ISBN =

    2012

  23. [31]

    Hide, Will and Magee, Michael , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2023.198.2.6 , URL =

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Wolpert, Scott , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1983 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/2007075 , URL =

    1983 doi

  25. [33]

    , TITLE =

    Wolpert, Scott A. , TITLE =. Moduli spaces of. 2013 , ISBN =. doi:10.1090/pcms/020/08 , URL =

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    Mirzakhani, Maryam , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2008.168.97 , URL =

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    Mirzakhani, Maryam and Petri, Bram , TITLE =. Comment. Math. Helv. , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4171/cmh/477 , URL =

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Huber, Heinz , TITLE =. Comment. Math. Helv. , FJOURNAL =. 1986 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02621901 , URL =

    1986 doi

  29. [37]

    Cheng, Shiu Yuen , TITLE =. Math. Z. , FJOURNAL =. 1975 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01214381 , URL =

    1975 doi

  30. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Spectral gap of random hyperbolic surfaces. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.12576 , archivePrefix =. 2403.12576 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    , TITLE =

    Alon, N. , TITLE =. Combinatorica , FJOURNAL =. 1986 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02579166 , URL =

    1986 doi

  32. [40]

    Friedman, Joel , TITLE =. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/memo/0910 , URL =

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    Wu, Yunhui and Xue, Yuhao , TITLE =. Geom. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00039-022-00595-7 , URL =

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Lipnowski, Michael and Wright, Alex , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/23-aop1657 , URL =

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    INTERMITTENCY AND ROUTE TO CHAOS IN THERMOACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING THESIS CERTIFICATE , doi =

    Kabiraj, Lipika and Sujith, Raman , year =. INTERMITTENCY AND ROUTE TO CHAOS IN THERMOACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING THESIS CERTIFICATE , doi =

  36. [45]

    Anantharaman, Nalini and Monk, Laura , TITLE =. J. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1063/5.0039385 , URL =

    2022 doi

  37. [46]

    Ergodic Theory Dynam

    Arana-Herrera, Francisco , TITLE =. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1017/etds.2024.76 , URL =

    2025 doi

  38. [47]

    Mirzakhani, Maryam , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2013 , NUMBER =

    2013

  39. [48]

    Monk, Laura and Thomas, Joe , TITLE =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab160 , URL =

    2022 doi

  40. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2401.01601 , archivePrefix =. 2401.01601 , primaryClass =

    doi

  41. [50]

    Mirzakhani, Maryam and Zograf, Peter , TITLE =. Geom. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00039-015-0336-5 , URL =

    2015 doi

  42. [51]

    Avila, Artur and Gou\"ezel, S\'ebastien and Yoccoz, Jean-Christophe , TITLE =. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/s10240-006-0001-5 , URL =

    2006 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.