Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SAT: Improving Adversarial Training via Curriculum-Based Loss Smoothing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.09347 v3 pith:WOB5BESL submitted 2020-03-18 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords trainingaccuracyadversarialcleancompareddifficultylossrobust
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial training (AT) has become a popular choice for training robust networks. However, it tends to sacrifice clean accuracy heavily in favor of robustness and suffers from a large generalization error. To address these concerns, we propose Smooth Adversarial Training (SAT), guided by our analysis on the eigenspectrum of the loss Hessian. We find that curriculum learning, a scheme that emphasizes on starting "easy" and gradually ramping up on the "difficulty" of training, smooths the adversarial loss landscape for a suitably chosen difficulty metric. We present a general formulation for curriculum learning in the adversarial setting and propose two difficulty metrics based on the maximal Hessian eigenvalue (H-SAT) and the softmax probability (P-SA). We demonstrate that SAT stabilizes network training even for a large perturbation norm and allows the network to operate at a better clean accuracy versus robustness trade-off curve compared to AT. This leads to a significant improvement in both clean accuracy and robustness compared to AT, TRADES, and other baselines. To highlight a few results, our best model improves normal and robust accuracy by 6% and 1% on CIFAR-100 compared to AT, respectively. On Imagenette, a ten-class subset of ImageNet, our model outperforms AT by 23% and 3% on normal and robust accuracy respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Does the Smoothness Approximation Method Facilitate Generalization for Federated Adversarial Learning?

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generalization bounds are derived for federated adversarial learning under three smoothing methods, with randomized smoothing claimed best and the SFAL reweighting claimed to improve generalization.

  2. Theoretical Analysis of Relative Errors in Gradient Computations for Adversarial Attacks with CE Loss

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    T-MIFPE adaptively rescales logits with a theoretically motivated t* per attack phase to reduce floating-point gradient errors, edging out MIFPE in PGD robustness evaluation.

Pith tools