Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Stories Help LLMs Reason? Curating Information Space Through Narrative

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19221 v1 pith:WP2TWFFX submitted 2024-10-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords informationllmsnarrativeproblemapproachcomplexcomprehensionnarratives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Narratives are widely recognized as a powerful tool for structuring information and facilitating comprehension of complex ideas in various domains such as science communication. This paper investigates whether incorporating narrative elements can assist Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving complex problems more effectively. We propose a novel approach, Story of Thought (SoT), integrating narrative structures into prompting techniques for problem-solving. This approach involves constructing narratives around problem statements and creating a framework to identify and organize relevant information. Our experiments show that using various LLMs with SoT consistently surpasses using them with other techniques on physics, chemistry, math, and biology questions in both the GPQA and JEEBench datasets. The narrative-based information curation process in SoT enhances problem comprehension by contextualizing critical in-domain information and highlighting causal relationships within the problem space.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding LLM Scientific Reasoning through Promptings and Model's Explanation on the Answers

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On the GPQA benchmark, GPT-4o's highest accuracy came from self-consistency prompting, about 53 percent correct, but its explanations were least similar to the reference solutions, while direct answer and chain-of-tho...

Pith tools