pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.12051 · v2 · pith:WVQEG7ETnew · submitted 2025-07-16 · 🧮 math-ph · hep-th· math.MP· math.SG· nlin.SI

Integrable systems from Poisson reductions of generalized Hamiltonian torus actions

L. Feher , M. Fairon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 00:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph hep-thmath.MPmath.SGnlin.SI
keywords actionsystemsintegrablesystemgrouphamiltonianpoissonquasi-poisson
0
0 comments X

The pith

Develops sufficient conditions for integrable systems to descend under Poisson reductions of generalized Hamiltonian torus actions, with applications to systems on doubles of compact Lie groups and moduli spaces of flat connections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Integrable systems are mathematical models of motion or dynamics where enough conserved quantities exist to solve the equations completely. The authors consider such systems that also have symmetries, meaning the equations look the same after certain group transformations like rotations or translations. They work in the language of Poisson geometry, where the structure is given by a bivector that defines a bracket on functions. The key step is reducing the system by quotienting out the symmetry group K, which produces a smaller space. They give conditions under which the reduced system remains integrable, using a generalized version of torus actions that includes both circle groups and real-line groups. This framework is then applied to concrete examples coming from cotangent bundles, Heisenberg doubles, and quasi-Poisson doubles of Lie groups, as well as to moduli spaces of flat connections that arise in gauge theory.

Core claim

We develop a set of sufficient conditions for guaranteeing that an integrable system with a symmetry group K on a manifold M descends to an integrable system on a dense open subset of the quotient Poisson space M/K.

Load-bearing premise

The unreduced system on M is supposed to possess 'action variables' that generate a proper, effective action of a group of the form U(1)^{ℓ1} × R^{ℓ2} and descend to action variables of the reduced system (abstract, paragraph on generalized Hamiltonian torus actions).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12051 by L. Feher, M. Fairon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A system of curves on Σ2,4 where the red, blue and green curves (α1, [α2, β2] and γ[2,3]) induce, respectively, the 3 types of functions (5.76), (5.77) and (5.80) for I = {1}, Ib= {2} and J = {[2, 3]} on M2,3. 42 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a set of sufficient conditions for guaranteeing that an integrable system with a symmetry group $K$ on a manifold $M$ descends to an integrable system on a dense open subset of the quotient Poisson space $M/K$. The higher dimensional phase space $M$ carries a bivector $P_M$ yielding a bracket on $C^\infty(M)$ such that $C^\infty(M)^K$ is a Poisson algebra. The unreduced system on $M$ is supposed to possess `action variables' that generate a proper, effective action of a group of the form $\mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1} \times \mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$ and descend to action variables of the reduced system. In view of the form of the group and since $P_M$ could be a quasi-Poisson bivector, we say that we work with a generalized Hamiltonian torus action. The reduced systems are in general superintegrable owing to the large set of invariants of the proper Hamiltonian action of $\mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1} \times \mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$. We present several examples and apply our construction for solving open problems regarding the integrability of systems obtained previously by reductions of master systems on doubles of compact Lie groups: the cotangent bundle, the Heisenberg double and the quasi-Poisson double. Furthermore, we offer numerous applications to integrable systems living on moduli spaces of flat connections, using the quasi-Poisson approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops sufficient conditions under which an integrable system on a manifold M equipped with a generalized Hamiltonian torus action of U(1)^{ℓ1} × R^{ℓ2} (generated by action variables) and a symmetry group K descends to an integrable, often superintegrable, system on a dense open subset of the Poisson quotient M/K. The conditions require the action to be proper and effective, with the action variables descending appropriately; the construction handles both Poisson and quasi-Poisson bivectors via suitable moment maps. Detailed examples are worked out for the cotangent bundle, Heisenberg double, quasi-Poisson double, and moduli spaces of flat connections, verifying that the descended functions remain in involution and achieve the required count for integrability.

Significance. If the conditions are verified as stated, the result supplies a systematic Poisson-reduction procedure for producing new integrable systems from unreduced master systems, directly resolving open integrability questions for reductions of systems on doubles of compact Lie groups. The quasi-Poisson treatment and explicit applications to moduli spaces of flat connections extend the reach of the method into geometric contexts where standard symplectic reduction does not apply. The explicit statement of hypotheses and the verification that involution and dimension counts are preserved constitute concrete strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (main descent theorem): the proof that the reduced functions remain in involution with respect to the reduced Poisson bracket relies on the descent of the action variables, but the argument for the quasi-Poisson case invokes an additional compatibility condition on the moment map that is only sketched; an explicit verification that this condition holds for the Heisenberg and quasi-Poisson double examples would strengthen the central claim.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2 (moduli-space application): the count of independent invariants descending from the U(1)^{ℓ1} × R^{ℓ2} action is asserted to yield superintegrability, yet the dimension of the reduced space after quotient by K is not compared explicitly with the number of independent reduced functions; this comparison is load-bearing for the superintegrability assertion.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the bivector P_M and the quasi-Poisson structure should be unified across the examples to avoid switching between different conventions without explicit cross-reference.
  2. The statement that the reduced system is defined on a 'dense open subset' of M/K would benefit from a brief remark on the complement (the singular strata) and why integrability need not be checked there.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications and verifications into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (main descent theorem): the proof that the reduced functions remain in involution with respect to the reduced Poisson bracket relies on the descent of the action variables, but the argument for the quasi-Poisson case invokes an additional compatibility condition on the moment map that is only sketched; an explicit verification that this condition holds for the Heisenberg and quasi-Poisson double examples would strengthen the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the compatibility condition between the moment map and the quasi-Poisson bivector was presented in outline form in the proof of Theorem 4.1. In the revision we will expand this step with a direct computation: for the Heisenberg double we verify that the moment map μ satisfies the required cocycle condition with respect to the quasi-Poisson structure by explicit evaluation of the bivector on the generators; for the quasi-Poisson double we confirm the same identity using the explicit form of the dressing action and the moment map given in §3.2. These calculations will be inserted immediately after the statement of the compatibility condition, thereby making the descent of the Poisson bracket fully rigorous for both cases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2] §5.2 (moduli-space application): the count of independent invariants descending from the U(1)^{ℓ1} × R^{ℓ2} action is asserted to yield superintegrability, yet the dimension of the reduced space after quotient by K is not compared explicitly with the number of independent reduced functions; this comparison is load-bearing for the superintegrability assertion.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit dimension count is needed to substantiate the superintegrability claim. In the revised §5.2 we will add a short paragraph that computes dim(M/K) for the moduli-space examples (using the known dimension formula for the quotient by the compact group K) and compares it directly with the number of independent reduced invariants obtained from the descended action variables. This comparison will confirm that the number of independent functions exceeds half the dimension of the reduced space by the expected margin, thereby establishing superintegrability on the dense open set. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper states explicit sufficient conditions (properness, effectiveness, and descent of action variables from a generalized Hamiltonian torus action U(1)^ℓ1 × R^ℓ2) under which an integrable system on M descends to an integrable system on the Poisson quotient M/K. These conditions are formulated directly in terms of the unreduced involution, the bivector P_M, and the moment map properties, without any reduction of the central claim to a fitted parameter or a self-citation that itself depends on the target result. The examples (cotangent bundle, Heisenberg double, quasi-Poisson double, moduli spaces) are verified by direct computation that the descended functions remain in involution and achieve the required count, using standard Poisson reduction techniques as external support. The derivation is therefore self-contained and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard domain assumptions from Poisson geometry and Hamiltonian group actions; no free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The manifold M carries a bivector P_M yielding a bracket on C^∞(M) such that C^∞(M)^K is a Poisson algebra.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the setup for the Poisson structure on the unreduced space.
  • domain assumption The action variables generate a proper, effective action of U(1)^{ℓ1} × R^{ℓ2} that descends to the reduced system.
    Central premise for the reduction to preserve integrability, referenced in the abstract paragraph on generalized Hamiltonian torus actions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5808 in / 1461 out tokens · 58635 ms · 2026-05-22T00:13:10.248246+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quasi-Poisson Manifolds

    A. Alekseev, Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach and E. Meinrenken, Quasi-Poisson manifolds . Canad. J. Math. 54 (2002) 3-29; arXiv:math/0006168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  2. [2]

    Lie Group Valued Moment Maps

    A. Alekseev, A. Malkin and E. Meinrenken, Lie group valued moment maps . J. Differential Geom. 48 (1998) 445-495; arXiv:dg-ga/9707021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Arthamonov and N

    S. Arthamonov and N. Reshetikhin, Superintegrable systems on moduli spaces of flat con- nections. Commun. Math. Phys. 386 (2021) 1337-1381; arXiv:1909.08682

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Arutyunov, Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems

    G. Arutyunov, Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems. Springer, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Arutyunov and E

    G. Arutyunov and E. Olivucci, Hyperbolic spin Ruijsenaars–Schneider model from Poisson reduction. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 309 (2020) 31-45; arXiv:1906.02619

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Birman and C

    J.S. Birman and C. Series, An algorithm for simple curves on surfaces . J. London Math. Soc. (2), 29 (1984) 331-342

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    Blasco, I

    A. Blasco, I. Gutierrez-Sagredo and F.J. Herranz, Higher-order superintegrable momentum- dependent Hamiltonians on curved spaces from the classical Zernike system . Nonlinearity 36 (2023), 1143-1167; arXiv:2206.12717

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Non-commutative Integrability, Moment Map and Geodesic Flows

    A.V. Bolsinov and B. Jovanovi´ c,Noncommutative integrability, moment map and geodesic flows. Ann. Glob. Anal. and Geom. 23 (2003), 305-322; arXiv:math-ph/0109031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Chalykh and M

    O. Chalykh and M. Fairon, On the Hamiltonian formulation of the trigonometric spin Ruijsenaars–Schneider system. Lett. Math. Phys.110 (2020) 2893-2940; arXiv:1811.08727

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Chalykh and B

    O. Chalykh and B. Ryan, DAHAs of Type C∨Cn and character varieties . Preprint; arXiv:2410.23456

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Z. Chen, K. Jiang, N. Reshetikhin and H. Xiao, Superintegrability of the reduced stratified symplectic space. In preparation

    work page

  12. [12]

    Dragovi´ c, B

    V. Dragovi´ c, B. Gaji´ c and B. Jovanovi´ c,Integrability of homogeneous exact magnetic flows on spheres. Preprint; arXiv:2504.20515

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Dubrovin, A.T

    B.A. Dubrovin, A.T. Fomenko and S.P. Novikov, Modern Geometry–Methods and Appli- cations. Part II. The Geometry and Topology of Manifolds. Springer, 1985

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    Duistermaat and J.A.C

    J.J. Duistermaat and J.A.C. Kolk, Lie Groups. Universitext. Springer, 2000

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    Dwyer and C.W

    W.G. Dwyer and C.W. Wilkerson, Centers and Coxeter elements . pp. 53–75 in: Homotopy methods in algebraic topology. Contemp. Math., Vol. 271, Amer. Math. Soc., 2001

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Preprint (52p.), arXiv:2108.02496

    M. Fairon, Integrable systems on multiplicative quiver varieties from cyclic quivers . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58 (2025) Article ID 045202; arXiv:2108.02496

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Fairon and L

    M. Fairon and L. Feh´ er,Integrable multi-Hamiltonian systems from reduction of an extended quasi-Poisson double of U(n). Ann. Henri Poincar´ e24 (2023) 3461-3529; arXiv:2302.14392

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Fairon, L

    M. Fairon, L. Feh´ er and I. Marshall, Trigonometric real form of the spin RS model of Krichever and Zabrodin. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e22 (2021) 615-675; arXiv:2007.08388

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Farb and D

    B. Farb and D. Margalit, A Primer on Mapping Class Groups. Princeton University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Fass` o,Superintegrable Hamiltonian systems: Geometry and perturbations

    F. Fass` o,Superintegrable Hamiltonian systems: Geometry and perturbations . Acta Appl. Math. 87 (2005) 93-121

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    An application of the reduction method to Sutherland type many-body systems

    L. Feh´ er,An application of the reduction method to Sutherland type many-body systems . pp. 109-117 in: P. Kielanowski (ed.) et al., Geometric Methods in Physics XXXI. Birkh¨ auser, 2013; arXiv:1308.6708

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Feh´ er,Poisson reductions of master integrable systems on doubles of compact Lie groups

    L. Feh´ er,Poisson reductions of master integrable systems on doubles of compact Lie groups . Ann. Henri Poincar´ e24 (2023) 1823-1876; arXiv:2208.03728

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Feh´ er, Notes on the degenerate integrability of reduced systems obtained from the master systems of free motion on cotangent bundles of compact Lie groups

    L. Feh´ er, Notes on the degenerate integrability of reduced systems obtained from the master systems of free motion on cotangent bundles of compact Lie groups . pp. 309-330 in: P. Kielanowski (ed.) et al., Geometric Methods in Physics XL. Birkh¨ auser, 2024; arXiv:2309.16245

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Feh´ er,Poisson-Lie analogues of spin Sutherland models revisited

    L. Feh´ er,Poisson-Lie analogues of spin Sutherland models revisited . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 (2024) Article ID 205202; arXiv:2402.02990

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Feh´ er,On the maximal superintegrability of strongly isochronous Hamiltonians

    L. Feh´ er,On the maximal superintegrability of strongly isochronous Hamiltonians. J. Geom. Phys. 209 (2025) Article ID 105409; arXiv:2409.19349 43

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Trigonometric Sutherland systems and their Ruijsenaars duals from symplectic reduction

    L. Feh´ er and V. Ayadi,Trigonometric Sutherland systems and their Ruijsenaars duals from symplectic reduction. J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010) Paper 103511; arXiv:1005.4531

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Poisson-Lie interpretation of trigonometric Ruijsenaars duality

    L. Feh´ er and C. Klimˇ c´ ık,Poisson–Lie interpretation of trigonometric Ruijsenaars duality . Commun. Math. Phys. 301 (2011) 55-104; arXiv:0906.4198

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Self-duality of the compactified Ruijsenaars-Schneider system from quasi-Hamiltonian reduction

    L. Feh´ er and C. Klimˇ c´ ık,Self-duality of the compactified Ruijsenaars–Schneider system from quasi-Hamiltonian reduction. Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 464-515; arXiv:1101.1759

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    New compact forms of the trigonometric Ruijsenaars-Schneider system

    L. Feh´ er and T.J. Kluck, New compact forms of the trigonometric Ruijsenaars-Schneider system. Nucl. Phys. B 882 (2014) 97-127; arXiv:1312.0400

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Generalized spin Sutherland systems revisited

    L. Feh´ er and B.G. Pusztai, Generalized spin Sutherland systems revisited . Nucl. Phys. B 893 (2015) 236-256; arXiv:1501.03085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Noncommutative integrability on noncompact invariant manifolds

    E Fiorani and G. Sardanashvily, Noncommutative integrability on noncompact invariant manifolds. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 39 (2006) 14035-14042; arXiv:math/0604104

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    In: Moscow Seminar in Mathematical Physics, volume 191 of Amer

    V. Fock and A. Rosly, Poisson structure on moduli of flat connections on Riemann surfaces and the r-matrix. pp. 67–86 in: Moscow Seminar in Mathematical Physics. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, Vol. 191, Amer. Math. Soc., 1999; arXiv:math/9802054

    work page arXiv 1999

  33. [33]

    Fordy and Q

    A.P. Fordy and Q. Huang,Integrable and superintegrable extensions of the rational Calogero- Moser model in three dimensions . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55 (2022), Paper No. 225203; arXiv:2111.15659

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Gotˆ o,A theorem on compact semi-simple groups

    M. Gotˆ o,A theorem on compact semi-simple groups . J. Math. Soc. Japan 1 (1949) 270-272

    work page 1949

  35. [35]

    Hoque and L

    M.F. Hoque and L. ˇSnobl, Family of nonstandard integrable and superintegrable classical Hamiltonian systems in non-vanishing magnetic fields . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 (2023) Article ID 165203; arXiv:2212.05338

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Symmetries and Integrability

    B. Jovanovi´ c, Symmetries and integrability . Publ. Institut Math. 49 (2008) 1-36; arXiv:0812.4398

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    Kazhdan, B

    D. Kazhdan, B. Kostant and S. Sternberg, Hamiltonian group actions and dynamical sys- tems of Calogero type . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31 (1978) 481-507

    work page 1978

  38. [38]

    Quasi-compact Higgs bundles and Calogero-Sutherland systems with two types spins

    S. Kharchev, A. Levin, M. Olshanetsky and A. Zotov, Quasi-compact Higgs bundles and Calogero–Sutherland systems with two types spins . J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) Article ID 103509; arXiv:1712.08851

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    On moment maps associated to a twisted Heisenberg double

    C. Klimˇ c´ ık,On moment maps associated to a twisted Heisenberg double . Rev. Math. Phys. 18 (2006) 781-821; arXiv:math-ph/0602048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction

    A.W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction. Birkh¨ auser, 1996

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    Korogodski and Y.S

    L.I. Korogodski and Y.S. Soibelman, Algebras of Functions on Quantum Groups: Part I. American Mathematical Society, 1998

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Kostant, The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group

    B. Kostant, The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group . Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959) 973–1032

    work page 1959

  43. [43]

    Action-angle coordinates for integrable systems on Poisson manifolds

    C. Laurent-Gengoux, E. Miranda and P. Vanhaecke, Action-angle coordinates for in- tegrable systems on Poisson manifolds . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2011, 1839-1869; arXiv:0805.1679

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Le Blanc, Quasi-Poisson structures and integrable systems related to the moduli space of flat connections on a punctured Riemann sphere

    A. Le Blanc, Quasi-Poisson structures and integrable systems related to the moduli space of flat connections on a punctured Riemann sphere . J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007) 1631-1652

    work page 2007

  45. [45]

    Liashyk, G

    A. Liashyk, G. Ma, N. Reshetikhin and I. Sechin, Low-dimensional tori in Calogero-Moser- Sutherland systems. Preprint; arXiv:2506.16610

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Lu, Momentum mappings and reduction of Poisson actions

    J.-H. Lu, Momentum mappings and reduction of Poisson actions. pp. 209-226 in: Symplectic Geometry, Groupoids, and Integrable Systems. Springer, 1991

    work page 1991

  47. [47]

    Marquette, D

    I. Marquette, D. McLeod, S. Scapucci and A. Vollmer, On Haantjes tensors for second-order superintegrable systems. Preprint; arXiv:2412.13007

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Marsden, G

    J. Marsden, G. Misio lek, J.-P. Ortega, M. Perlmutter and T.S. Ratiu, Hamiltonian Reduc- tion by Stages. Springer, 2007

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Meinrenken, Verlinde formulas for nonsimply connected groups

    E. Meinrenken, Verlinde formulas for nonsimply connected groups. pp. 381-417 in: V.G. Kac (ed.) et al., Lie groups, geometry, and representation theory. Birkh¨ auser, 2018; arXiv:1706.04045

    work page arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Michor, Topics in Differential Geometry

    P.W. Michor, Topics in Differential Geometry. Amer. Math. Soc., 2008 44

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Classical and Quantum Superintegrability with Applications

    W. Miller Jr, S. Post and P. Winternitz, Classical and quantum superintegrability with applications. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (2013) Article ID 423001; arXiv:1309.2694

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Mischenko and A.T

    A.S. Mischenko and A.T. Fomenko, Generalized Liouville method for integrating Hamilton- ian systems. Funct. Anal. Appl. 12 (1978) 113-125

    work page 1978

  53. [53]

    Nekhoroshev, Action-angle variables and their generalizations

    N.N. Nekhoroshev, Action-angle variables and their generalizations . Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 26 (1972) 180-197

    work page 1972

  54. [54]

    Onishchik and E.B

    A.L. Onishchik and E.B. Vinberg, Lie Groups and Algebraic Groups. Springer, 1990

    work page 1990

  55. [55]

    Ortega and T

    J.-P. Ortega and T. Ratiu, Momentum Maps and Hamiltonian Reduction. Birkh¨ auser, 2004

    work page 2004

  56. [56]

    Perelomov, Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras

    A.A. Perelomov, Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras. Birkh¨ auser, 1990

    work page 1990

  57. [57]

    Ragnisco and F

    O. Ragnisco and F. Zullo, The N-species integrable Volterra system as a maximally su- perintegrable Hamiltonian system . Open Comm. Nonlin. Math. Phys. 5 (2025) 36–56; arXiv:2505.09487

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Degenerate Integrability of Spin Calogero-Moser Systems and the duality with the spin Ruijsenaars systems

    N. Reshetikhin, Degenerate integrability of spin Calogero–Moser systems and the duality with the spin Ruijsenaars systems. Lett. Math. Phys. 63 (2003) 55-71; arXiv:math/0202245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  59. [59]

    Degenerately Integrable Systems

    N. Reshetikhin, Degenerately integrable systems . J. Math. Sci. 213 (2016) 769-785; arXiv:1509.00730

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Reshetikhin, Spin Calogero–Moser models on symmetric spaces

    N. Reshetikhin, Spin Calogero–Moser models on symmetric spaces. pp. 377-402 in: Integra- bility, Quantization, and Geometry. I. Integrable Systems. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. 103.1, Amer. Math. Soc., 2021; arXiv:1903.03685

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Reshetikhin, Periodic and open classical spin Calogero-Moser chains

    N. Reshetikhin, Periodic and open classical spin Calogero-Moser chains . pp.263-297 in: Surv. Differ. Geom. 26, International Press, 2024; arXiv:2302.14281

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Superintegrability of Generalized Toda Models on Symmetric Spaces

    N. Reshetikhin and G. Schrader, Superintegrability of generalized Toda models on symmetric spaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021, 12993-13010; arXiv:1802.00356

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Ruijsenaars, Action-angle maps and scattering theory for some finite-dimensional inte- grable systems

    S. Ruijsenaars, Action-angle maps and scattering theory for some finite-dimensional inte- grable systems. III. Sutherland type systems and their duals . Publ. RIMS 31 (1995) 247-353

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    Samelson, Notes on Lie Algebras

    H. Samelson, Notes on Lie Algebras. Springer, 1990

    work page 1990

  65. [65]

    Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Dressing transformations and Poisson group actions

    M.A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Dressing transformations and Poisson group actions . Publ. RIMS 21 (1985) 1237-1260

    work page 1985

  66. [66]

    Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Integrable systems: an r-matrix approach

    M.A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Integrable systems: an r-matrix approach . Kyoto preprint RIMS-1650, 2008; kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/preprint/file/RIMS1650.pdf

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    Sjamaar and E

    R. Sjamaar and E. Lerman, Stratified symplectic spaces and reduction. Ann. of Math. 134 (1991) 375-422

    work page 1991

  68. [68]

    Tempesta (ed.) et al., Superintegrability in Classical and Quantum Systems

    P. Tempesta (ed.) et al., Superintegrability in Classical and Quantum Systems. CRM Pro- ceedings and Lecture Notes, Vol. 37, 2004

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    Tsiganov, Rotations and integrability

    A.V. Tsiganov, Rotations and integrability . Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 29 (2024) 913–930; arXiv:2305.12370

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    van Diejen, Commuting difference operators with polynomial eigenfunctions

    J.F. van Diejen, Commuting difference operators with polynomial eigenfunctions. Compos. Math. 95 (1995) 183–233

    work page 1995

  71. [71]

    Vollmer, Torsion-free connections of second-order maximally superintegrable systems

    A. Vollmer, Torsion-free connections of second-order maximally superintegrable systems . Bull. London Math. Soc. 57 (2025) 565-581; arXiv:2403.08509

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Torus Actions and Integrable Systems

    N.T. Zung, Torus actions and integrable systems. pp. 289-328 in: Topological Methods in the Theory of Integrable Systems. Camb. Sci. Publ., 2006; arXiv:math/0407455 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006