Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GLIDER: Grading LLM Interactions and Decisions using Explainable Ranking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.14140 v2 pith:WWJPFWHS submitted 2024-12-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords gliderevaluationcriteriahumanllmsmodelswhileachieving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The LLM-as-judge paradigm is increasingly being adopted for automated evaluation of model outputs. While LLM judges have shown promise on constrained evaluation tasks, closed source LLMs display critical shortcomings when deployed in real world applications due to challenges of fine grained metrics and explainability, while task specific evaluation models lack cross-domain generalization. We introduce GLIDER, a powerful 3B evaluator LLM that can score any text input and associated context on arbitrary user defined criteria. GLIDER shows higher Pearson's correlation than GPT-4o on FLASK and greatly outperforms prior evaluation models, achieving comparable performance to LLMs 17x its size. GLIDER supports fine-grained scoring, multilingual reasoning, span highlighting and was trained on 685 domains and 183 criteria. Extensive qualitative analysis shows that GLIDER scores are highly correlated with human judgments, with 91.3% human agreement. We have open-sourced GLIDER to facilitate future research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Domain Explainability of Preferences

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A concept-discovery plus hierarchical regression pipeline explains human, LLM-judge, and reward-model preferences at local and global levels across eight domains.

  2. FRED: Financial Retrieval-Enhanced Detection and Editing of Hallucinations in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning small language models on synthetic financial errors yields high detection and editing scores, but the evaluation is limited to synthetic data from the same pipeline.

Pith tools