Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Enhancing Pre-trained ASR System Fine-tuning for Dysarthric Speech Recognition using Adversarial Data Augmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.00662 v1 pith:WZFBGGSR submitted 2024-01-01 cs.SD eess.AS

classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords dataspeechdysarthricaugmentationperturbationadversarialfine-tuninggan-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic recognition of dysarthric speech remains a highly challenging task to date. Neuro-motor conditions and co-occurring physical disabilities create difficulty in large-scale data collection for ASR system development. Adapting SSL pre-trained ASR models to limited dysarthric speech via data-intensive parameter fine-tuning leads to poor generalization. To this end, this paper presents an extensive comparative study of various data augmentation approaches to improve the robustness of pre-trained ASR model fine-tuning to dysarthric speech. These include: a) conventional speaker-independent perturbation of impaired speech; b) speaker-dependent speed perturbation, or GAN-based adversarial perturbation of normal, control speech based on their time alignment against parallel dysarthric speech; c) novel Spectral basis GAN-based adversarial data augmentation operating on non-parallel data. Experiments conducted on the UASpeech corpus suggest GAN-based data augmentation consistently outperforms fine-tuned Wav2vec2.0 and HuBERT models using no data augmentation and speed perturbation across different data expansion operating points by statistically significant word error rate (WER) reductions up to 2.01% and 0.96% absolute (9.03% and 4.63% relative) respectively on the UASpeech test set of 16 dysarthric speakers. After cross-system outputs rescoring, the best system produced the lowest published WER of 16.53% (46.47% on very low intelligibility) on UASpeech.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools