REVIEW 2 cited by
Latent diffusion models for generative precipitation nowcasting with accurate uncertainty quantification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Diffusion models have been widely adopted in image generation, producing higher-quality and more diverse samples than generative adversarial networks (GANs). We introduce a latent diffusion model (LDM) for precipitation nowcasting - short-term forecasting based on the latest observational data. The LDM is more stable and requires less computation to train than GANs, albeit with more computationally expensive generation. We benchmark it against the GAN-based Deep Generative Models of Rainfall (DGMR) and a statistical model, PySTEPS. The LDM produces more accurate precipitation predictions, while the comparisons are more mixed when predicting whether the precipitation exceeds predefined thresholds. The clearest advantage of the LDM is that it generates more diverse predictions than DGMR or PySTEPS. Rank distribution tests indicate that the distribution of samples from the LDM accurately reflects the uncertainty of the predictions. Thus, LDMs are promising for any applications where uncertainty quantification is important, such as weather and climate.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Guided Unconditional and Conditional Generative Models for Super-Resolution and Inference of Quasi-Geostrophic Turbulence
Conditional diffusion models outperform guided unconditional models for super-resolving quasi-geostrophic turbulence, especially from sparse and gappy observations.
-
LaDCast: A Latent Diffusion Model for Medium-Range Ensemble Weather Forecasting
A latent diffusion model generates medium-range global weather ensembles at 1.5 degrees that match ECMWF IFS-ENS deterministic skill at lower compute, with weaker probabilistic spread and anecdotal cyclone advantages.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.