REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring Predictive Uncertainty and Calibration in NLP: A Study on the Impact of Method & Data Scarcity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate the problem of determining the predictive confidence (or, conversely, uncertainty) of a neural classifier through the lens of low-resource languages. By training models on sub-sampled datasets in three different languages, we assess the quality of estimates from a wide array of approaches and their dependence on the amount of available data. We find that while approaches based on pre-trained models and ensembles achieve the best results overall, the quality of uncertainty estimates can surprisingly suffer with more data. We also perform a qualitative analysis of uncertainties on sequences, discovering that a model's total uncertainty seems to be influenced to a large degree by its data uncertainty, not model uncertainty. All model implementations are open-sourced in a software package.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantifying the Uncertainty of Foundation Models with Singular Value Ensembles
Training only per-member singular values of pretrained weight matrices, while freezing singular vectors, produces an implicit ensemble with calibration near deep ensembles at <1% parameter overhead.
-
The Capabilities and Limitations of Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Generalization and Calibration
The paper derives generalization and calibration bounds for weak-to-strong generalization and extends a known regression result from squared loss to KL divergence.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.