Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Lost in Sequence: Do Large Language Models Understand Sequential Recommendation?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13909 v4 pith:X73MWLMF submitted 2025-02-19 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords modelssequentialllmsrecommendationllm-srecinformationllm4rectraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as promising tools for recommendation thanks to their advanced textual understanding ability and context-awareness. Despite the current practice of training and evaluating LLM-based recommendation (LLM4Rec) models under a sequential recommendation scenario, we found that whether these models understand the sequential information inherent in users' item interaction sequences has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we first demonstrate through a series of experiments that existing LLM4Rec models do not fully capture sequential information both during training and inference. Then, we propose a simple yet effective LLM-based sequential recommender, called LLM-SRec, a method that enhances the integration of sequential information into LLMs by distilling the user representations extracted from a pre-trained CF-SRec model into LLMs. Our extensive experiments show that LLM-SRec enhances LLMs' ability to understand users' item interaction sequences, ultimately leading to improved recommendation performance. Furthermore, unlike existing LLM4Rec models that require fine-tuning of LLMs, LLM-SRec achieves state-of-the-art performance by training only a few lightweight MLPs, highlighting its practicality in real-world applications. Our code is available at https://github.com/Sein-Kim/LLM-SRec.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Not Just What, But When: Integrating Irregular Intervals to LLM for Sequential Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IntervalLLM integrates irregular time intervals into an LLM recommender via interval embeddings and interval-infused attention, improving next-item Hit Rate@1 on three benchmarks and adding a new interval-perspective ...

  2. Enhancing Temporal Sensitivity of Large Language Model for Recommendation with Counterfactual Tuning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CETRec improves LLM-based sequential recommendation by adding item-level temporal embeddings and a counterfactual tuning loss that rewards different predictions when temporal order is erased.

  3. Bidirectional Knowledge Distillation for Enhancing Sequential Recommendation with Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An alternating distillation loop between a conventional recommender and an LLM recommender improves top-K accuracy on four datasets without adding inference-time parameters.

Pith tools