Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learning Branching Heuristics for Propositional Model Counting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.03204 v2 pith:XFPZGQCT submitted 2020-07-07 cs.LG cs.AIcs.LOstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.LOstat.ML
keywords instancesmodelproblemproblemscountingdifferentsolversachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Propositional model counting, or #SAT, is the problem of computing the number of satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula. Many problems from different application areas, including many discrete probabilistic inference problems, can be translated into model counting problems to be solved by #SAT solvers. Exact #SAT solvers, however, are often not scalable to industrial size instances. In this paper, we present Neuro#, an approach for learning branching heuristics to improve the performance of exact #SAT solvers on instances from a given family of problems. We experimentally show that our method reduces the step count on similarly distributed held-out instances and generalizes to much larger instances from the same problem family. It is able to achieve these results on a number of different problem families having very different structures. In addition to step count improvements, Neuro# can also achieve orders of magnitude wall-clock speedups over the vanilla solver on larger instances in some problem families, despite the runtime overhead of querying the model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools