Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 180 references

LLM-Powered Agentic AI for 5G/6G Networks: A Tutorial and Survey on Architectures, Protocols, and Standardization

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read LLM-powered agentic AI is positioned as a first-class architectural paradigm for 5G/6G networks, supported by the first unified survey of its concepts, protocols, evaluation, and standardization.

desk verdict Solid, genuinely useful survey of agentic AI for 5G/6G, but the 'first comprehensive' claim is softer than it looks and Table 4's latency numbers need sources. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16066 v1 pith:XHGVCCKA submitted 2026-07-17 cs.NI cs.AI

Mazene Ameur , Abdelkader Mekrache , Bouziane Brik , Adlen Ksentini This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NIcs.AI
keywords agenticAIlargelanguagemodels5G/6Gnetworksintent-basednetworkingzero-touchnetworkandservicemanagementprotocolsstandardizationtelecombenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that existing research treats large language models and telecom networks in isolation, and that no previous work jointly addresses LLM agents, their protocols, evaluation, benchmarks, network integration, and standardization for next-generation networks. To close that gap, it offers a two-part tutorial-and-survey: the first part formalizes the control, management, and AI-native planes of 5G/6G and explains agentic foundations such as memory, planning, tool use, and multi-agent coordination; the second maps those capabilities onto network surfaces, reviews five agentic protocols, telecom benchmarks, and standardization efforts, and lists open challenges. A sympathetic reader would care because a unified cross-domain reference could align AI research with telecom constraints and give standardization bodies a shared vocabulary.

What carries the argument

The central organizing device is the three-plane abstraction: the control plane (RAN, transport, core, edge/cloud), the management plane (Intent-Based Networking and Zero-touch Service Management), and a vertical AI-native plane (data operations, AI operations, explainability) that cuts across both. The paper also formalizes an agent as a tuple A=⟨S,O,Ac,M,T,πθ,G⟩—state space, observations, actions, memory, tools, LLM policy, and goal—and uses it to structure a taxonomy of agentic capabilities. These constructs do the work of mapping five agentic protocols to specific 6G integration points and of organizing the surveyed literature into a coherent framework.

What would settle it

A reproducible literature search with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria that surfaces a comparable prior survey would falsify the 'first comprehensive survey' claim. Separately, re-measuring the protocol overheads in Table 4 on a defined testbed (e.g., an MCP tool chain on a loaded edge node) would show whether the reported 50–200 ms latencies hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that agentic AI is not an overlay on 6G but a first-class architectural component: a vertical AI-native plane intersecting the control and management planes. It argues that no prior work jointly and systematically covers LLMs, agentic concepts, agentic protocols, evaluation methods, benchmarks, telecom integration, and standardization, and it positions the paper as the first comprehensive tutorial-style study of that intersection. The paper substantiates the claim by synthesizing the three-plane abstraction, comparing five agentic protocols (MCP, A2A, ANP, ACP, AP2) against 6G integration points, cataloging telecom-oriented benchmarks, and mappi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the literature selection behind 'no prior work' is comprehensive and unbiased; if a prior unified survey was missed, the central claim of being the first collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the survey's framework is adopted, researchers get a shared vocabulary for agentic network intelligence, making results comparable across control, management, and AI-native planes.
  • Standardization bodies gain a concrete map of where agentic protocols fit: MCP at the non-RT RIC and management plane, A2A across non-RT and near-RT tiers, ANP in core/edge orchestration, ACP as a legacy bridge, AP2 in business-layer transactions.
  • The paper's synthesis formulates a central design constraint with concrete consequences: LLM reasoning cannot fit sub-10 ms control loops, so agentic 6G designs must be hierarchical, with LLM strategic planning on slower horizons and lightweight policies on fast loops.
  • The identified gaps—ephemeral agent identity, missing wire-level serialization between protocols, and absent cross-SDO benchmarks—become specific, testable work items for 3GPP, ETSI, TM Forum, and IETF.
  • Telecom-specific benchmarks (TeleQnA, TeleTables, TelAgentBench, MMTelCo, TeleMath, TSpec-LLM, TeleYAML, and α3-Bench) form a starting point for standardized evaluation that the paper argues is currently fragmented.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: The overhead figures in Table 4 (e.g., MCP at 50–200 ms per tool chain, AP2 signing at 1–2 ms per mandate) are presented without sources; any downstream engineering decision that relies on these numbers should treat them as provisional until reproduced in a defined testbed.
  • My inference: If the 'first comprehensive survey' claim is to hold, the literature selection process needs to be made reproducible; this suggests a natural testable extension: a formal systematic review with explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria and a documented search trail.
  • My inference: The strong latency numbers imply that LLM-based agents will, for the foreseeable future, be confined to non-real-time and management planes; RAN-tier agentic control will depend on either much smaller models or hardware that drastically cuts inference latency, a testable prediction.
  • My inference: The three-plane abstraction could generalize beyond telecom to other real-time cyber-physical systems that need to layer generative intelligence over existing control loops, such as power grids or industrial automation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a two-part tutorial-plus-survey that positions LLM-powered agentic AI as a first-class architectural paradigm for 5G/6G networks. Part I covers NGN control, management, and AI-native planes and agentic AI foundations (LLM adaptation, memory, tools, planning, architecture patterns, protocols, evaluation). Part II surveys applications across RAN/transport/core/edge, the management plane (IBN/ZSM), and the AI-native plane, then maps standardization (3GPP, ETSI, TM Forum, O-RAN, IETF, GSMA) and 6G research projects. The central claim, stated in Section 1.2, is that no prior work jointly and systematically addresses LLMs, agentic concepts/protocols, evaluation/benchmarks, telecom integration, and standardization, making this 'the first comprehensive and tutorial-style study' of the intersection.

Significance. If the gap claim holds, this is a timely cross-disciplinary reference for both AI and telecommunications researchers and for standards bodies. The paper's value lies in its synthesis: the seven-dimension comparison in Table 1, the protocol-to-6G mapping in Table 4, the management-plane comparison in Table 6, and the SDO/project tables (Tables 8 and 9) provide structured entry points to a very recent literature. The tutorial sections (Sections 2–3) are accessible and cover relevant fundamentals. The paper does not introduce new algorithms or datasets, but as a survey that explicitly aims to be comprehensive, its utility depends on the reliability and verifiability of its selection process and of the quantitative protocol figures it reports.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1.2 (Selection Process)] The 'first comprehensive' claim and the Table 1 comparison rest on the literature-selection procedure, but the description is non-reproducible. The text reports only that Google Scholar searches and a 'rigorous pre-selection process' were used, without inclusion/exclusion criteria, exact search strings, date ranges, screening logs, or a list of excluded candidates. Table 1 lists only 15 comparator surveys, and the checkmark assignments have no coding rubric. A single missed survey that jointly covers the seven dimensions would falsify the headline contribution. Please provide a PRISMA-style flow diagram, a full search protocol (databases, queries, date), and a coding rule for the 'addressed/partially/not addressed' levels.
  2. [Table 4 / Section 3.5.6] Quantitative protocol metrics are presented without sources, measurement protocols, or uncertainty ranges: MCP '50–200 ms per tool chain on loaded edge', AP2 'Signing latency (1–2 ms/mandate)', ANP 'identity resolution latency', and 'JSON serialization overhead of 0.5–several Kilobyte'. These numbers are load-bearing for the discussion of 6G integration timescales. Either remove them, explicitly label them as author estimates, or cite empirical benchmarks/measurements. As written, downstream readers may propagate unsourced figures.
  3. [Section 4.1 (Synthesis and Takeaway Lessons)] The synthesis states as fact that 'LLM-based reasoning cannot satisfy sub-10 ms control-loop requirements' and that hierarchical decomposition introduces 'insufficiently quantified E2/A1/O1 signaling overhead' without citation to any measurement. Such statements are acceptable as author assessments in a tutorial-style survey only if explicitly flagged as such. Please qualify them as the authors' synthesis, or support them with measured or cited evidence, to avoid appearing as established quantitative results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.5.3 (ANP)] 'Built on Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs), Verifiable and Credentials' — the phrase appears garbled; it should likely be 'Verifiable Credentials'.
  2. [Table 1 legend] The legend uses the symbol 'G #' to mean 'Partially Addressed', which looks like a rendering artifact. Replace it with a Unicode half-filled circle or a textual marker (e.g., '◐' or 'Partial').
  3. [Figure 1] The survey-structure diagram contains many small text labels; at print resolution some are difficult to read. Consider simplifying the figure or enlarging the font.
  4. [Section 6.4] The statistic '82.4% of evaluated models are compromised through inter-agent communication' is cited to [177]; please verify that the percentages exactly match the cited source, since the cited paper's title focuses on agent-based attacks rather than a comparative vulnerability study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's 'first comprehensive' claim is an empirical gap claim; selection-process and unsourced latency figures are evidence-quality concerns, not self-referential derivation.

full rationale

This paper is a tutorial-and-survey, not a derivation: it contains no fitted parameters, no predictions, and no first-principles result that could be equivalent to its own inputs. Its central claim (Section 1.2) is an explicitly hedged gap claim: 'To the best of our knowledge, no prior work jointly and systematically addresses LLMs, agentic concepts, agentic protocols, evaluation methodologies, benchmarks, telecom network integration, and standardization initiatives in a unified study.' That claim is supported by Table 1's comparison of 23 surveys, and the comparison depends on the Section 1.2 'Selection Process' (Google Scholar searches plus a 'pre-selection process' with no inclusion/exclusion criteria) and on the unsourced Table 4 latency figures (e.g., '50–200 ms per tool chain on loaded edge' for MCP). These are reproducibility and evidence-rigor weaknesses that could affect the 'first comprehensive survey' novelty claim, but they are not circularity: the checkmarks in Table 1 are not derived from the paper's own conclusions, and the gap claim is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. Self-citations (e.g., [8, 53, 73, 77, 121–123, 140]) appear throughout Sections 3 and 4, but they are descriptive citations to prior work by the same authors; none is invoked as a load-bearing authority defining or proving the survey's novelty, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. No specific circular step can be quoted, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a survey, there are no fitted parameters or invented entities. The load-bearing premises are the completeness/accuracy of the cited literature, the existence and content of the cited standards, and the reliability of unsourced quantitative protocol-overhead figures.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The related-work set (23 surveys in Table 1) is representative and complete enough to substantiate the 'no prior work' claim.
    Section 1.2's selection process uses Google Scholar with unstated inclusion/exclusion criteria; the central gap claim depends on this coverage.
  • domain assumption Cited agentic protocol and standards documents (MCP, A2A, ANP, ACP, AP2; ETSI GS 059, 3GPP TR 22.870, etc.) exist and contain what the survey describes.
    The survey's protocol and standards tables in Sections 3.5 and 5.1 are not independently verified; their accuracy is assumed from the cited references.
  • domain assumption The quantitative latency and overhead figures in Table 4 (e.g., MCP 50-200 ms per tool chain, AP2 1-2 ms/mandate) are accurate.
    These figures are presented as facts without citation, derivation, or measurement protocol, yet they support the protocol-to-6G integration mapping.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LLM-Powered Agentic AI for 5G/6G Networks: A Tutorial and Survey on Architectures, Protocols, and Standardization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHGVCCKA

@misc{pith2026260716066,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LLM-Powered Agentic AI for 5G/6G Networks: A Tutorial and Survey on Architectures, Protocols, and Standardization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHGVCCKA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16066}
}
read the original abstract

Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabled by Large Language Models, marks a shift from rule-based automation toward autonomous, goal-driven control of Next-Generation Networks (NGNs). Existing surveys treat the two domains in isolation, leaving protocol integration, evaluation, and standardization alignment underexplored. To address this gap, a two-part tutorial-and-survey is presented. Part I formalises the control, management, and AI-native planes of 5G and 6G. It then covers the foundations of agentic systems: reasoning, planning, tool use, multi-agent coordination, and evaluation. Part II maps agentic capabilities onto 5G/6G control surfaces, standardization, and major 6G initiatives. Finally, it identifies open challenges shaping autonomous telecommunications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16066 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Survey Structure. 2.1 Control plane In next-generation networks, the control plane is decomposed across multiple technological domains, namely the Radio Access Network (RAN), Transport Network (TN), Core Network (CN), and Edge/Cloud infrastructure. Each of these domains adopts the principle of Control and User Plane Separation (CUPS), enabling independent scaling, modularization, and programmable control of Network … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of AI-native 6G technologies. The TN adopts Software-Defined Networking (SDN) to centralize routing decisions in a controller that maintains a global topology view, enabling dynamic path computation, slicing, and load balancing [30]. Mainstream controllers such as ONOS4 , OpenDaylight5 , and the 6G-oriented TeraFlowSDN6 expose northbound APIs through which AI agents can inject routing intents or trigger rec… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. LLM-based Agentic AI paradigm Evolution. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Telecom-oriented Agentic AI Framework Overview. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andrews, Stefano Buzzi, Wan Choi, Stephen V

    Jeffrey G. Andrews, Stefano Buzzi, Wan Choi, Stephen V. Hanly, Angel Lozano, Anthony C. K. Soong, and Jianzhong Charlie Zhang. What will 5g be?IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6):1065–1082, 2014. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2014.2328098

    arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    A vision of 6g wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems.IEEE Network, 34(3):134–142, 2020

    Walid Saad, Mehdi Bennis, and Mingzhe Chen. A vision of 6g wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems.IEEE Network, 34(3):134–142, 2020. doi: 10.1109/MNET.001.1900287

    doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900287 2020

  3. [3]

    Dual self-attention is what you need for model drift detection in 6g networks

    Mazene Ameur, Bouziane Brik, and Adlen Ksentini. Dual self-attention is what you need for model drift detection in 6g networks. IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking, 3:690–709, 2025. doi: 10.1109/TMLCN.2025.3576727

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Ameur, B

    M. Ameur, B. Brik, and A. Ksentini. Adapt but do not forget: Towards enhancing drift handling in 6g networks. InProceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning for Communication and Networking (ICMLCN), pages 1–6, Barcelona, Spain,

    2025

  5. [5]

    A speculative study on 6g.IEEE Wireless Communications, 27(4):118–125, August 2020

    Faisal Tariq et al. A speculative study on 6g.IEEE Wireless Communications, 27(4):118–125, August 2020. doi: 10.1109/MWC.001.1900334

    work page doi:10.1109/mwc.001.1900334 2020

  6. [6]

    A survey on intent-based networking.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1):625–655,

    Aris Leivadeas and Matthias Falkner. A survey on intent-based networking.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1):625–655,

  7. [7]

    ETSI GR ZSM 009-3 V1.1.1: Closed-loop automation (part 3)

    ETSI. ETSI GR ZSM 009-3 V1.1.1: Closed-loop automation (part 3). Technical report, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), August 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Mekrache, A

    A. Mekrache, A. Ksentini, and C. Verikoukis. Intent-based management of next-generation networks: An llm-centric approach.IEEE Network, 38(5):29–36, 2024

    2024

Show all 180 references
  1. [9]

    The rise of agentic AI: Implications, concerns, and the path forward.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40(2):8–14, March 2025

    San Murugesan. The rise of agentic AI: Implications, concerns, and the path forward.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40(2):8–14, March 2025. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2025.3544940

    2025

  2. [10]

    A. K. Pati. Agentic AI: A comprehensive survey of technologies, applications, and societal implications.IEEE Access, 13:151824–151837, 2025. 30•Mazene et al

    2025

  3. [11]

    Z. Chen, Q. Sun, N. Li, X. Li, Y. Wang, and I. Chih-Lin. Enabling mobile AI agent in 6g era: Architecture and key technologies.IEEE Network, 38(5):66–75, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Jiang et al

    F. Jiang et al. A comprehensive survey of large AI models for future communications: Foundations, applications and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.IT, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Kong et al

    D. Kong et al. A survey of LLM-driven AI agent communication: Protocols, security risks, and defense countermeasures.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CR, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Long et al

    S. Long et al. A survey on intelligent network operations and performance optimization based on large language models.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 27(6):3915–3949, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Saad et al

    W. Saad et al. Artificial general intelligence (AGI)-native wireless systems: A journey beyond 6g.Proceedings of the IEEE, PP(99):1–39, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Abdulkadir Celik and Ahmed M. Eltawil. At the dawn of generative AI era: A tutorial-cum-survey on new frontiers in 6g wireless intelligence.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 5:2433–2489, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Zhao et al

    C. Zhao et al. Edge general intelligence through world models and agentic AI: Fundamentals, solutions, and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.LG, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Mohammadi, Y

    M. Mohammadi, Y. Li, J. Lo, and W. Yip. Evaluation and benchmarking of LLM agents: A survey. InProceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, volume 2, pages 6129–6139, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Zhu et al

    J. Zhu et al. Evolutionary perspectives on the evaluation of LLM-based AI agents: A comprehensive survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CL, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Jiang, C

    F. Jiang, C. Pan, L. Dong, K. Wang, O. A. Dobre, and M. Debbah. From large AI models to agentic AI: A tutorial on future intelligent communications.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.AI, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Masterman, S

    T. Masterman, S. Besen, M. Sawtell, and A. Chao. The landscape of emerging AI agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.AI, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Sapkota, K

    R. Sapkota, K. I. Roumeliotis, and M. Karkee. AI agents vs. agentic AI: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges.Information Fusion, 126:103599, 2026

    2026

  15. [23]

    M. A. Ferrag, N. Tihanyi, and M. Debbah. From LLM reasoning to autonomous AI agents: A comprehensive review.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.AI, 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Zhang et al

    R. Zhang et al. Toward edge general intelligence with agentic AI and agentification: Concepts, technologies, and future directions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2026. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2026.3651702

    2026

  17. [25]

    Toward 6g networks: Use cases and technologies.IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(3):55–61, 2020

    Marco Giordani, Michele Polese, Marco Mezzavilla, Sundeep Rangan, and Michele Zorzi. Toward 6g networks: Use cases and technologies.IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(3):55–61, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Majid Butt, Istvan Z

    Muhammad Kamran Shehzad, Luc Rose, M. Majid Butt, Istvan Z. Kovacs, Mohamad Assaad, and Mohsen Guizani. Artificial intelligence for 6g networks: Technology advancement and standardization.IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 17(3):16–25, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    RAN-CN converged control-plane for 6g cellular networks

    Junyoung Choi et al. RAN-CN converged control-plane for 6g cellular networks. InProceedings of GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 1253–1258, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    A survey on open radio access networks: Challenges, research directions, and open source approaches.Sensors, 24 (3):1038, 2024

    Wuri Azariah et al. A survey on open radio access networks: Challenges, research directions, and open source approaches.Sensors, 24 (3):1038, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    A survey of 5g network: Architecture and emerging technologies.IEEE Access, 3:1206–1232, 2015

    Ankur Gupta and Rakesh Kumar Jha. A survey of 5g network: Architecture and emerging technologies.IEEE Access, 3:1206–1232, 2015

    2015

  22. [30]

    Software defined 5g and 6g networks: A survey.Mobile Networks and Applications, 27(5):1792–1812, 2022

    Qiang Long, Yunfei Chen, Haijun Zhang, and Xianfu Lei. Software defined 5g and 6g networks: A survey.Mobile Networks and Applications, 27(5):1792–1812, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Prabha, A

    C. Prabha, A. Goel, and J. Singh. A survey on SDN controller evolution: A brief review. InProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), pages 569–575, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    3GPP 5g core network: An overview and future directions.Array, 2022

    Syed Husain, Andreas Kunz, and Jaeseung Song. 3GPP 5g core network: An overview and future directions.Array, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    An in-kernel solution based on XDP for 5g UPF: Design, prototype and performance evaluation

    Tiago Alfredo Nascimento do Amaral, Raphael Vicente Rosa, Daniel Fernandes Campos Moura, and Christian Esteve Rothenberg. An in-kernel solution based on XDP for 5g UPF: Design, prototype and performance evaluation. InProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Network ...

    2021

  26. [34]

    Mekrache, K

    A. Mekrache, K. Boutiba, and A. Ksentini. Combining network data analytics function and machine learning for abnormal traffic detection in beyond 5g. InProceedings of GLOBECOM 2023 - 2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 1204–1209, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    When mlops meets nwdaf to enable autonomous next generation network analytics

    Mazene Ameur, Bouziane Brik, and Adlen Ksentini. When mlops meets nwdaf to enable autonomous next generation network analytics. InICMLCN 2026, IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking, 2026

    2026

  28. [36]

    NEFSim: An open experimentation framework utilizing 3GPP’s exposure services

    Dimitris Fragkos, George Makropoulos, Athanasios Gogos, Harilaos Koumaras, and Alexandros Kaloxylos. NEFSim: An open experimentation framework utilizing 3GPP’s exposure services. InProceedings of the 2022 Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit (Eu...

    2022

  29. [37]

    A comprehensive analysis of cloud service models: IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS in the context of emerging technologies and trend

    Raed Younis et al. A comprehensive analysis of cloud service models: IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS in the context of emerging technologies and trend. InProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Electrical, Communication and Computer Engineering (ICECCE), pages 1–6, 2024. LLM-...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Overview of research trends and challenges in 6g mobile networks and the computing continuum.Scientific and Practical Cyber Security Journal (SPCSJ), 8(4):54–65, 2024

    Slavko Kitanov et al. Overview of research trends and challenges in 6g mobile networks and the computing continuum.Scientific and Practical Cyber Security Journal (SPCSJ), 8(4):54–65, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Zero touch management: A survey of network automation solutions for 5g and 6g networks.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(4):2535–2578, 2022

    Estefania Coronado et al. Zero touch management: A survey of network automation solutions for 5g and 6g networks.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(4):2535–2578, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Zero-touch network and service management (ZSM); intent-driven autonomous networks

    ETSI ISG ZSM. Zero-touch network and service management (ZSM); intent-driven autonomous networks. Technical Report GR ZSM 011 V2.1.1, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Explainable AI (XAI): Core ideas, techniques, and solutions.ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9):1–33, 2023

    Rudresh Dwivedi et al. Explainable AI (XAI): Core ideas, techniques, and solutions.ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9):1–33, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Toward native artificial intelligence in 6g networks: System design, architectures, and paradigms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.02823, 2021

    Jing Wu et al. Toward native artificial intelligence in 6g networks: System design, architectures, and paradigms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.02823, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Chochliouros et al

    Ioannis P. Chochliouros et al. Developing a 6g data and ML operations automation via an end-to-end AI framework: The 6G-DALI context. InProceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, pages 129–144, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Santos et al

    João F. Santos et al. Managing O-RAN networks: xapp development from zero to hero.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    In-band network telemetry: A survey.Computer Networks, 186:107763, 2021

    Liang Tan et al. In-band network telemetry: A survey.Computer Networks, 186:107763, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Ksentini et al

    A. Ksentini et al. Lightweight resource exposure framework for efficient service and resource orchestration in the cloud-edge continuum. InProceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pages 2081–2087, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    MLOps as a service for AI-native 6g networks

    Slawomir Kukliński, Robert Kołakowski, and Bartosz Mastej. MLOps as a service for AI-native 6g networks. InProceedings of the 2025 IEEE 11th International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), pages 61–66, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Vincent Poor, and Shuguang Cui

    Zhaohui Yang, Mingzhe Chen, Kai-Kit Wong, H. Vincent Poor, and Shuguang Cui. Federated learning for 6g: Applications, challenges, and opportunities.Engineering, 8:33–41, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Ameur, A

    M. Ameur, A. Bradai, and N. Lagraa. Exploring teacher-student learning with multi-agent DRL for QoS routing in SDN. InProceedings of ICC 2025 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 5933–5938, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ICC52391. 2025.11161544

    2025

  42. [50]

    Knowledge distillation and dataset distillation of large language models: Emerging trends, challenges, and future directions.Artificial Intelligence Review, 59(1):17, 2026

    Lei Fang et al. Knowledge distillation and dataset distillation of large language models: Emerging trends, challenges, and future directions.Artificial Intelligence Review, 59(1):17, 2026

    2026

  43. [51]

    Explaining anomalies detected by autoencoders using shapley additive explanations.Expert Systems with Applications, 186:115736, 2021

    Liat Antwarg, Ronald Meir Miller, Bracha Shapira, and Lior Rokach. Explaining anomalies detected by autoencoders using shapley additive explanations.Expert Systems with Applications, 186:115736, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Deterministic local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for stable explainability

    Muhammad Rehman Zafar and Naimul Khan. Deterministic local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for stable explainability. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 3(3):525–541, 2021

    2021

  45. [53]

    Mekrache et al

    A. Mekrache et al. On combining xai and llms for trustworthy zero-touch network and service management in 6g.IEEE Communications Magazine, 2025

    2025

  46. [54]

    A survey on in-context learning

    Qingxiu Dong et al. A survey on in-context learning. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1107–1128, Miami, Florida, USA, 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics

    2024

  47. [55]

    How abilities in large language models are affected by supervised fine-tuning data composition

    Guanting Dong et al. How abilities in large language models are affected by supervised fine-tuning data composition. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 177–198, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Jane Qin, Xiaohui Tao, and Fu Lee Wang

    Liang Xu, Haoran Xie, S.-Z. Jane Qin, Xiaohui Tao, and Fu Lee Wang. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods for pretrained language models: A critical review and assessment.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CL, 2023

    2023

  49. [57]

    LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in LLMs via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CL, 2026

    DeepSeek-AI et al. DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in LLMs via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CL, 2026

    2026

  51. [59]

    A survey on knowledge distillation of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13116, 2024

    Xiaohan Xu et al. A survey on knowledge distillation of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13116, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    ReFT: Representation finetuning for language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CL, 2024

    Zhengxuan Wu et al. ReFT: Representation finetuning for language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.CL, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Large language models are zero-shot reasoners

    Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 22199–22213, 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    The unreliability of explanations in few-shot prompting for textual reasoning

    Xi Ye and Greg Durrett. The unreliability of explanations in few-shot prompting for textual reasoning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 30378–30392, 2022

    2022

  55. [63]

    Reasoning for translation: Comparative analysis of chain-of-thought and tree-of-thought prompting for LLM translation

    Lan Nguyen and Yue Xu. Reasoning for translation: Comparative analysis of chain-of-thought and tree-of-thought prompting for LLM translation. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 259–275, 2025

    2025

  56. [64]

    Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks

    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. InAdvances in Neural ...

    2020

  57. [65]

    API-Bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08244, 2023

    Minghao Li et al. API-Bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08244, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Venkata Bharat Parthasarathy, Ahsan Zafar, Asif Khan, and Arslan Shahid. The ultimate guide to fine-tuning LLMs from basics to breakthroughs: An exhaustive review of technologies, research, best practices, applied research challenges and opportunities.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.L...

    2024

  59. [67]

    A practical guide to building agents

    OpenAI. A practical guide to building agents. https://cdn.openai.com/business-guides-and-resources/a-practical-guide-to-building- agents.pdf, 2026. Accessed: 20 January 2026

    2026

  60. [68]

    Building effective AI agents

    Anthropic. Building effective AI agents. https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-effective-agents, 2026. Accessed: 20 January 2026

    2026

  61. [69]

    Tool learning with foundation models

    Libo Qin et al. Tool learning with foundation models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, pages 6215–6230, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    The evolution of agentic AI: Architecture and workflows for autonomous systems.Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5:418–427, 2025

    Manish Jaggavarapu. The evolution of agentic AI: Architecture and workflows for autonomous systems.Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5:418–427, 2025

    2025

  63. [71]

    ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InProceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023

    2023

  64. [72]

    AutoGPT: Autonomous GPT for complex task solving.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442, 2023

    Siru Qian, Hao Wang, and Chuan Shi. AutoGPT: Autonomous GPT for complex task solving.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ameur, B

    M. Ameur, B. Brik, and A. Ksentini. EUROCOMPLY: Enabling zero-touch AI compliance auditing via LLM-based agentic AI.IEEE Communications Magazine, 2025. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2500366

    2025 doi

  66. [74]

    Multi-agent collaboration: Harnessing the power of LLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11598, 2023

    Ankit Gupta, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ranjay Krishna, and Christopher Manning. Multi-agent collaboration: Harnessing the power of LLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11598, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    A survey of agent interoperability protocols: Model context protocol (MCP), agent communication protocol (ACP), agent-to-agent protocol (A2A), and agent network protocol (ANP)

    Aamir Ehtesham, Abhishek Singh, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, and Saurabh Kumar. A survey of agent interoperability protocols: Model context protocol (MCP), agent communication protocol (ACP), agent-to-agent protocol (A2A), and agent network protocol (ANP). arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.AI, 2025

    2025

  68. [76]

    E. Li, H. Du, and K. Huang. Netmcp: Network-aware model context protocol platform for llm capability extension, 2025

    2025

  69. [77]

    Ameur, B

    M. Ameur, B. Brik, and A. Ksentini. Agentic-nwdaf: Enabling intent-driven agentic intelligence for autonomous 6g network analytics. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 2026

    2026

  70. [78]

    Agent network protocol (ANP)

    Agent Network Protocol Contributors. Agent network protocol (ANP). https://github.com/agent-network-protocol/ AgentNetworkProtocol, 2024. Accessed: 30 April 2025

    2024

  71. [79]

    Introduction to agent communication protocol (ACP)

    IBM BeeAI. Introduction to agent communication protocol (ACP). https://docs.beeai.dev/acp/alpha/introduction, 2024. Accessed: April 2025

    2024

  72. [80]

    Announcing agent payments protocol (AP2)

    Siddharth Parikh and Rohan Surapaneni. Announcing agent payments protocol (AP2). Google Cloud Blog, September 2025

    2025

  73. [81]

    AI-native network APIs: A telco framework for the agent economy.SSRN, (5223311), 2025

    Sergio Barros. AI-native network APIs: A telco framework for the agent economy.SSRN, (5223311), 2025

    2025

  74. [82]

    The rise of agentic AI: A review of definitions, frameworks, architectures, applications, evaluation metrics, and challenges.Future Internet, 17(9):404, 2025

    Akshay Bandi, Bhavana Kongari, Ramesh Naguru, Swetha Pasnoor, and Sai Venkata Vilipala. The rise of agentic AI: A review of definitions, frameworks, architectures, applications, evaluation metrics, and challenges.Future Internet, 17(9):404, 2025

    2025

  75. [83]

    Vasilakos, and Christos Emmanouilidis

    Adnan Farooq, Syed Raza, Nabeel Karim, Hamid Iqbal, Athanasios V. Vasilakos, and Christos Emmanouilidis. Evaluating and regulating agentic AI: A study of benchmarks, metrics, and regulation.TechRxiv, 2025

    2025

  76. [84]

    Elkael et al

    M. Elkael et al. AgentRAN: An agentic AI architecture for autonomous control of open 6g networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17778, 2025

    2025

  77. [85]

    Liang Bao, Sangwon Yun, Joohyun Lee, and Tony Q. S. Quek. LLM-hRIC: LLM-empowered hierarchical RAN intelligent control for O-RAN.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18062, 2025

    2025

  78. [86]

    Salan et al

    O. Salan et al. RAG-empowered LLM-driven dynamic radio resource management in open 6g RAN.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22933, 2025

    2025

  79. [87]

    Kamatani et al

    O. Kamatani et al. LLM-5GMAC: Performance optimization in O-RAN split 7.2 using LLM-based MAC-layer log analysis. InProceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Open and AI RAN, 2025

    2025

  80. [88]

    Towards 6g native-AI edge networks: A semantic-aware and agentic intelligence paradigm.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04405, 2025

    Chenyuan Feng et al. Towards 6g native-AI edge networks: A semantic-aware and agentic intelligence paradigm.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04405, 2025

    2025

  81. [89]

    Agentic AI for 6g: A new paradigm for autonomous RAN security compliance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12400, 2025

    Sotirios Chatzimiltis, Mahdi Boloursaz Mashhadi, Mohammad Shojafar, Mérouane Debbah, and Rahim Tafazolli. Agentic AI for 6g: A new paradigm for autonomous RAN security compliance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12400, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Abdalla, Prashant Khanal, and Vuk Marojevic

    James Moore, Abdulrahman S. Abdalla, Prashant Khanal, and Vuk Marojevic. Integrated LLM-based intrusion detection with secure slicing xapp for securing O-RAN-enabled wireless network deployments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00341, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  83. [91]

    6G-xSec: Explainable edge security for emerging OpenRAN architectures

    Haotian Wen et al. 6G-xSec: Explainable edge security for emerging OpenRAN architectures. InProceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, pages 77–85, 2024

    2024

  84. [92]

    Chatzistefanidis et al

    I. Chatzistefanidis et al. MX-AI: Agentic observability and control platform for open and AI-RAN.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.NI, 2025

    2025

  85. [93]

    Towards xapp conflict evaluation with explainable machine learning and causal inference in O-RAN.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13031, 2025

    Prabhu Sharma, Shuyu Sun, Sameer Deshpande, Angelos Stavrou, and Haining Wang. Towards xapp conflict evaluation with explainable machine learning and causal inference in O-RAN.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13031, 2025

    2025

  86. [94]

    Maxenti et al

    S. Maxenti et al. AutoRAN: Automated and zero-touch open RAN systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11233, 2025

    2025

  87. [95]

    The LLM as a network operator: A vision for generative AI in the 6g radio access network.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.NI, 2025

    Oluwasegun Giwa, Muritala Adewole, Tobi Awodumila, and Peter Aderinto. The LLM as a network operator: A vision for generative AI in the 6g radio access network.arXiv preprint arXiv:cs.NI, 2025

    2025

  88. [96]

    GenOnet: Generative open xg network simulation with multi-agent LLM and ns-3

    Fatemeh Rezazadeh et al. GenOnet: Generative open xg network simulation with multi-agent LLM and ns-3. InProceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on 6G Networking (6GNet), pages 69–71, 2024. LLM-Powered Agentic AI for 5G/6G Networks: A Tutorial and Survey on Archit...

    2024

  89. [97]

    Hu et al

    Y. Hu et al. Reflection-driven self-optimization 6g agentic AI RAN via simulation-in-the-loop workflows.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20640, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Symbiotic agents: A novel paradigm for trustworthy AGI-driven networks.Computer Networks, page 111749, 2025

    Ioannis Chatzistefanidis and Navid Nikaein. Symbiotic agents: A novel paradigm for trustworthy AGI-driven networks.Computer Networks, page 111749, 2025

    2025

  91. [99]

    SafeServe: Scalable tooling for release safety and push testing in multi-app monetization platforms

    Yue Zhang. SafeServe: Scalable tooling for release safety and push testing in multi-app monetization platforms. InProceedings of the 2025 7th International Conference on Next-Generation Data-Driven Networks (NGDN), pages 56–59, Shenyang, China, 2025. doi: 10.1109/NGDN66208.202...

    2025

  92. [100]

    LLM-enabled full-stack configuration automation of SDM transport network

    Chenkai Wang, Yuichi Wakayama, Noboru Yoshikane, and Takehiro Tsuritani. LLM-enabled full-stack configuration automation of SDM transport network. InProceedings of ECOC 2024; 50th European Conference on Optical Communication, pages 1599–1602, 2024

    2024

  93. [101]

    NetPrompt: LLM-driven programmable network policy management and optimization

    Kshitiz Neupane et al. NetPrompt: LLM-driven programmable network policy management and optimization. InProceedings of the 2025 34th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pages 1–9, 2025

    2025

  94. [102]

    Swileh and Shuhui Zhang

    Mohammed N. Swileh and Shuhui Zhang. Proactive DDoS detection and mitigation in decentralized software-defined networking via port-level monitoring and zero-training large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00460, 2025

    2025

  95. [103]

    Lightweight fine-tuning of LLMs for explainable intrusion detection in SDN

    Soumyadeep Lodh, Ibrahim Obaidat, Furqan Rustam, and Anca Delia Jurcut. Lightweight fine-tuning of LLMs for explainable intrusion detection in SDN. InProceedings of the 2025 21st International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), ...

    2025

  96. [104]

    Large language model in SD-WAN intelligent operations and maintenance.Research Briefs on Information and Communication Technology Evolution, 9:178–188, 2023

    Yue Zhang et al. Large language model in SD-WAN intelligent operations and maintenance.Research Briefs on Information and Communication Technology Evolution, 9:178–188, 2023

    2023

  97. [105]

    AI agent in software-defined network: Agent-based network service prediction and wireless resource scheduling optimization.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7):5816–5826, 2019

    Yu Cao, Ruibin Wang, Chen Min, and Ahmed Barnawi. AI agent in software-defined network: Agent-based network service prediction and wireless resource scheduling optimization.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7):5816–5826, 2019

    2019

  98. [106]

    Load balancing for LLM traffic via flow block

    Xiao Li, Yi Zhang, Shengli Lyu, and Wei Wang. Load balancing for LLM traffic via flow block. InProceedings of the 2025 IEEE 50th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), pages 1–9, 2025

    2025

  99. [107]

    Large language model (LLM)-enabled graphs in dynamic networking.IEEE Network, 2024

    Guanghao Sun et al. Large language model (LLM)-enabled graphs in dynamic networking.IEEE Network, 2024

    2024

  100. [108]

    Manias, Abdallah Chouman, and Abdallah Shami

    Danny M. Manias, Abdallah Chouman, and Abdallah Shami. Semantic routing for enhanced performance of LLM-assisted intent-based 5g core network management and orchestration. InProceedings of GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 2924–2929, 2024

    2024

  101. [109]

    D. M. Manias, A. Chouman, and A. Shami. Towards intent-based network management: Large language models for intent extraction in 5g core networks. InProceedings of the 2024 20th International Conference on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN), pages 1–6, 2024

    2024

  102. [110]

    Leveraging LLM for evolving and declarative trace analytics towards next-generation mobile core networks

    Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas, Dongwook Lee, and Kyunghan Kim. Leveraging LLM for evolving and declarative trace analytics towards next-generation mobile core networks. InProceedings of the 2024 IEEE Future Networks World Forum (FNWF), pages 783–790, 2024

    2024

  103. [111]

    Mobile-LLaMA: Instruction fine-tuning open-source LLM for network analysis in 5g networks.IEEE Network, 38(5):76–83, 2024

    Kyung Bok Kan, Hyobin Mun, Gang Cao, and Younghan Lee. Mobile-LLaMA: Instruction fine-tuning open-source LLM for network analysis in 5g networks.IEEE Network, 38(5):76–83, 2024

    2024

  104. [112]

    A-Core: A novel framework of agentic AI in the 6g core network

    Wei Tong et al. A-Core: A novel framework of agentic AI in the 6g core network. InProceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pages 1104–1109, 2025

    2025

  105. [113]

    The agentic-AI core: An AI-empowered, mission-oriented core network for next-generation mobile telecommunications

    Xiang Li et al. The agentic-AI core: An AI-empowered, mission-oriented core network for next-generation mobile telecommunications. Engineering, 2025

    2025

  106. [114]

    AI agent based autonomous cognitive architecture for 6g core network

    Ming Yu, Yue Xing, Xueming Xia, and Jie Jia. AI agent based autonomous cognitive architecture for 6g core network. InProceedings of the 2025 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), 2025

    2025

  107. [115]

    LLM-Slice: Dedicated wireless network slicing for large language models

    Bowen Liu, Jialong Tong, and Jiliang Zhang. LLM-Slice: Dedicated wireless network slicing for large language models. InProceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 853–854, 2024

    2024

  108. [116]

    Ameur, B

    M. Ameur, B. Brik, and A. Ksentini. Leveraging llms to explain drl decisions for transparent 6g network slicing. InProceedings of the 2024 IEEE 10th International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), pages 204–212, Saint Louis, MO, USA, 2024. doi: 10.1109/NetSoft609...

    2024

  109. [117]

    Tang et al

    Y. Tang et al. End-to-end edge AI service provisioning framework in 6g O-RAN.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11933, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Qian et al

    K. Qian et al. Alibaba hpn: A data center network for large language model training. InProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference, pages 691–706, 2024

    2024

  111. [119]

    Kalafatidis et al

    S. Kalafatidis et al. Llm-enhanced intrusion detection for containerized applications: A two-tier strategy for sdn and kubernetes environments. InProceedings of the International Conference on A vailability, Reliability and Security, pages 55–73, 2025

    2025

  112. [120]

    Rigaki, C

    M. Rigaki, C. Catania, and S. Garcia. Hackphyr: A local fine-tuned llm agent for network security environments, 2024

    2024

  113. [121]

    Mekrache and A

    A. Mekrache and A. Ksentini. Llm-enabled intent-driven service configuration for next generation networks. InProceedings of the 2024 IEEE 10th International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), pages 253–257, 2024

    2024

  114. [122]

    Mekrache, A

    A. Mekrache, A. Ksentini, and C. Verikoukis. OSS-GPT: An llm-powered intent-driven operations support system for 6g networks. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE 11th International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), pages 155–163, 2025. 34•Mazene et al

    2025

  115. [123]

    Mekrache, A

    A. Mekrache, A. Ksentini, and C. Verikoukis. Dmo-gpt: An intent-driven framework for distributed 6g management and orchestration. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2025

    2025

  116. [124]

    Kamrul Hossain and Walid Aljoby

    Md. Kamrul Hossain and Walid Aljoby. Netintent: Leveraging large language models for end-to-end intent-based sdn automation, 2025

    2025

  117. [125]

    A. Angi, A. Sacco, and G. Marchetto. Llnet: An intent-driven approach to instructing softwarized network devices using a small language model.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2025

    2025

  118. [126]

    O. G. Lira, O. M. Caicedo, and N. L. da Fonseca. Large language models for zero touch network configuration management.IEEE Communications Magazine, 2024

    2024

  119. [127]

    Ifland et al

    B. Ifland et al. Genet: A multimodal llm-based co-pilot for network topology and configuration, 2024

    2024

  120. [128]

    AI-native O-RAN architectures for 6g: Towards real-time adaptation, conflict resolution, and efficient resource management.Authorea Preprints, 2025

    Soufiane El Salmi et al. AI-native O-RAN architectures for 6g: Towards real-time adaptation, conflict resolution, and efficient resource management.Authorea Preprints, 2025

    2025

  121. [129]

    A. S. Ali, D. M. Manias, A. Shami, and S. Muhaidat. Leveraging large language models for drl-based anti-jamming strategies in zero touch networks, 2023

    2023

  122. [130]

    Tang et al

    F. Tang et al. Large language model (llm) assisted end-to-end network health management based on multi-scale semanticization, 2024

    2024

  123. [131]

    Abbas et al

    K. Abbas et al. Ibn-ztsa: Ai-ibn for zero touch service automation of b5g terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks.IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2025

    2025

  124. [132]

    Qayyum et al

    A. Qayyum et al. Llm-driven multi-agent architectures for intelligent self-organizing networks.IEEE Network, 2025

    2025

  125. [133]

    Qu et al

    Z. Qu et al. Llm enabled multi-agent system for 6g networks: Framework and method of dual-loop edge-terminal collaboration, 2025

    2025

  126. [134]

    Gemayel and A

    J. Gemayel and A. Mokh. Network function orchestration with llm based multi-agent system. InProceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pages 262–267, 2025

    2025

  127. [135]

    Shah and Cong Shen

    Vijay K. Shah and Cong Shen. Tele-LLM-hub: Building context-aware multi-agent LLM systems for telecom networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09087, 2025

    2025

  128. [136]

    Quadrini, C

    M. Quadrini, C. Roseti, F. Zampognaro, and L. Serranti. Data collection using nwdaf network function in a 5g core network with real traffic. In2023 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), pages 1–7, 2023. doi: 10.1109/ISNCC58260.2023.10323894

    2023

  129. [137]

    Wu et al

    D. Wu et al. Netllm: Adapting large language models for networking. InProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference, pages 661–678, 2024

    2024

  130. [138]

    A. I. Ait Said et al. 5g instruct forge: an advanced data engineering pipeline for making llms learn 5g.IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2024

    2024

  131. [139]

    Boutouchent et al

    A. Boutouchent et al. 6g-intense: Intent-driven native artificial intelligence architecture supporting network-compute abstraction and sensing at the deep edge.IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2025

    2025

  132. [140]

    Mekrache, A

    A. Mekrache, A. Ksentini, and C. Verikoukis. Drl-enabled slo-aware task scheduling for large language models in 6g networks. In Proceedings of ICC 2025 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 813–818, 2025

    2025

  133. [141]

    Y. He, J. Fang, F. R. Yu, and V. C. Leung. Large language models (llms) inference offloading and resource allocation in cloud- edge computing: An active inference approach.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 23(12):11253–11264, December 2024. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2024.3415661

    2024

  134. [142]

    Maatouk, F

    A. Maatouk, F. Ayed, N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, M. Debbah, and Z.-Q. Luo. Teleqna: A benchmark dataset to assess large language models telecommunications knowledge.IEEE Network, 2025

    2025

  135. [143]

    G. R. Gupta, A. Kumar, M. Rai, A. Chakraborty, A. Modi, A. Chaoub, et al. Mm-telco: Benchmarks and multimodal large language models for telecom applications, 2025

    2025

  136. [144]

    Colle, M

    V. Colle, M. Sana, N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, F. Ayed, and M. Debbah. Telemath: A benchmark for large language models in telecom mathematical problem solving, 2025

    2025

  137. [145]

    M. A. Ferrag, A. Lakas, and M. Debbah. 𝛼 3-bench: A unified benchmark of safety, robustness, and efficiency for llm-based uav agents over 6g networks, 2026

    2026

  138. [146]

    Nikbakht, M

    R. Nikbakht, M. Benzaghta, and G. Geraci. Tspec-llm: An open-source dataset for llm understanding of 3gpp specifications, 2024

    2024

  139. [147]

    K. Wu, Q. Yu, M. Mei, R. Liu, J. Wang, K. Zhang, and Y. Bao. Tn-autorca: Benchmark construction and agentic framework for self-improving alarm-based root cause analysis in telecommunication networks, 2025

    2025

  140. [148]

    LLM-xApp: A large language model empowered radio resource management xapp for 5g O-RAN

    Xuemei Wu, Junaid Farooq, Yi Wang, and Jingwen Chen. LLM-xApp: A large language model empowered radio resource management xapp for 5g O-RAN. InProceedings of the Symposium on Networks and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS), FutureG Workshop, 2025

    2025

  141. [149]

    Salama et al

    A. Salama et al. Poster: Agentic AI meets neural architecture search: Proactive traffic prediction for AI-RAN. InProceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Open and AI RAN, pages 59–61, 2025

    2025

  142. [150]

    D. Kwon, S. Kang, and S. Choi. Trafficnetqa: Question answering datasets for evaluating llm performance on traffic network files. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 1142–1145, 2025

    2025

  143. [151]

    Gsma open-telco llm benchmarks 2.0: The first dedicated llm evaluation for telecoms

    GSMA. Gsma open-telco llm benchmarks 2.0: The first dedicated llm evaluation for telecoms. https://huggingface.co/blog/otellm/gsma- benchmarks-02, 2026. Accessed: 2026-01-15. LLM-Powered Agentic AI for 5G/6G Networks: A Tutorial and Survey on Architectures, Protocols, and Stan...

    2026

  144. [152]

    TR 22.870: Study on 6g use cases and service requirements

    3GPP. TR 22.870: Study on 6g use cases and service requirements. Technical Report Release 20, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Services and System Aspects Group SA1, 2024

    2024

  145. [153]

    System architecture evolution for AI-native and intent-based 6g networks

    3GPP TSG SA WG2. System architecture evolution for AI-native and intent-based 6g networks. Technical report, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), 2024. SA2 Contributions on 6G Architecture

    2024

  146. [154]

    AI for good standards session: Multi-agent LLM frameworks for telecom

    ITU. AI for good standards session: Multi-agent LLM frameworks for telecom. ITU AI for Good, 2025

    2025

  147. [155]

    AI and ML in 5g and beyond challenges

    ITU. AI and ML in 5g and beyond challenges. ITU AI for Good Initiative, 2025

    2025

  148. [156]

    ETSI GR ENI 051 V4.1.1: Study on AI agents based next-generation network slicing

    ETSI. ETSI GR ENI 051 V4.1.1: Study on AI agents based next-generation network slicing. Technical report, European Telecommunica- tions Standards Institute (ETSI), February 2025

    2025

  149. [157]

    ETSI GR ENI 055 V4.1.1: Use cases and requirements for AI agents based core network

    ETSI. ETSI GR ENI 055 V4.1.1: Use cases and requirements for AI agents based core network. Technical report, European Telecommu- nications Standards Institute (ETSI), October 2025

    2025

  150. [158]

    IG1251D: Autonomous networks agent architecture

    TM Forum. IG1251D: Autonomous networks agent architecture. Technical Report v1.0.0, TM Forum, May 2025

    2025

  151. [159]

    Project ONE architecture overview

    TM Forum. Project ONE architecture overview. Technical report, TM Forum Innovation Hub, 2025

    2025

  152. [160]

    Generative AI toolkit for network and service management

    TM Forum Catalyst Project. Generative AI toolkit for network and service management. Technical report, TM Forum, 2024

    2024

  153. [161]

    RR-2025-02: Generative AI use cases and requirements on 6g networks

    O-RAN Alliance. RR-2025-02: Generative AI use cases and requirements on 6g networks. Technical report, O-RAN Alliance, February 2025

    2025

  154. [162]

    Distributed GenAI agents for real-time RAN control

    O-RAN Alliance. Distributed GenAI agents for real-time RAN control. Technical report, O-RAN Alliance, nGRG Research Contributions, 2025

    2025

  155. [163]

    O-RAN architecture description

    O-RAN Alliance. O-RAN architecture description. Technical report, O-RAN Alliance. Release for 5G RAN

  156. [164]

    Agentic ai standards

    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Agentic ai standards. https://www.ietf.org/blog/agentic-ai-standards/, 2024. Accessed: 2026-04-17

    2024

  157. [165]

    Ai protocol use cases

    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Ai protocol use cases. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-scrm-aiproto-usecases-02.html,

  158. [166]

    OTELLM benchmark technical report

    GSMA and Hugging Face. OTELLM benchmark technical report. Technical report, GSMA, 2025

    2025

  159. [167]

    TelecomGPT initiative announcement

    GSMA Foundry and Khalifa University. TelecomGPT initiative announcement. GSMA Foundry, 2025

    2025

  160. [168]

    AI telco troubleshooting challenge

    GSMA et al. AI telco troubleshooting challenge. GSMA, 2025

    2025

  161. [169]

    SUNRISE-6G: Sustainable federation of research infrastructures for scaling-up experimentation in 6g

    SUNRISE-6G Consortium. SUNRISE-6G: Sustainable federation of research infrastructures for scaling-up experimentation in 6g. https://sunrise6g.eu/, 2024. Accessed: 11 December 2025

    2024

  162. [170]

    6G-INTENSE: Intent-driven native AI architecture supporting compute-network abstraction and sensing at the deep edge

    6G-INTENSE Consortium. 6G-INTENSE: Intent-driven native AI architecture supporting compute-network abstraction and sensing at the deep edge. https://6g-intense.eu/, 2021. Accessed: 11 December 2025

    2021

  163. [171]

    6G-DALI: 6g data and ML operations automation via an end-to-end AI framework

    6G-DALI Consortium. 6G-DALI: 6g data and ML operations automation via an end-to-end AI framework. https://6gdali.eu/. Accessed: 11 December 2025

    2025

  164. [172]

    FLECON-6G: Flexible open architecture and AI-driven enabling technologies for a novel 6g connectivity platform

    FLECON-6G Consortium. FLECON-6G: Flexible open architecture and AI-driven enabling technologies for a novel 6g connectivity platform. https://flecon6g.eu/, 2024. Accessed: 11 December 2025

    2024

  165. [173]

    Open6G OTIC

    Open6G OTIC. Open6G OTIC. https://www.open6g.us/. Accessed: 11 December 2025

    2025

  166. [174]

    A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions

    Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, Weihong Zhong, Zhangyin Feng, Haotian Wang, Qianglong Chen, Weihua Peng, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., ...

    2025 doi

  167. [175]

    Kanagaraj

    Devyansh Jain, Archit Agarwal, Subhanshu Baliyan, and R. Kanagaraj. The carbon footprint of intelligence: The environment cost of llms. In2025 9th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), pages 2069–2075, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ICECA...

  168. [176]

    Agentic ai for mobile network ran management and optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02532, 2025

    Jorge Pellejero, Luis A Hernández Gómez, Luis Mendo Tomás, and Zoraida Frias Barroso. Agentic ai for mobile network ran management and optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02532, 2025

    2025

  169. [177]

    The dark side of llms: Agent-based attacks for complete computer takeover.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06850, 2025

    Matteo Lupinacci, Francesco Aurelio Pironti, Francesco Blefari, Francesco Romeo, Luigi Arena, and Angelo Furfaro. The dark side of llms: Agent-based attacks for complete computer takeover.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06850, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  170. [2023]

    doi: 10.1109/COMST.2022.3215919

    2022

  171. [2024]

    Accessed: 2026-04-17

    Work in progress. Accessed: 2026-04-17

    2026

  172. [2025]

    doi: 10.1109/ICMLCN64995.2025.11140130

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.