REVIEW 2 cited by
Executing Instructions in Situated Collaborative Interactions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study a collaborative scenario where a user not only instructs a system to complete tasks, but also acts alongside it. This allows the user to adapt to the system abilities by changing their language or deciding to simply accomplish some tasks themselves, and requires the system to effectively recover from errors as the user strategically assigns it new goals. We build a game environment to study this scenario, and learn to map user instructions to system actions. We introduce a learning approach focused on recovery from cascading errors between instructions, and modeling methods to explicitly reason about instructions with multiple goals. We evaluate with a new evaluation protocol using recorded interactions and online games with human users, and observe how users adapt to the system abilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MDC-R: The Minecraft Dialogue Corpus with Reference
MDC-R adds expert annotations of anaphoric and deictic reference, with block-level IDs and bounding boxes, to 101 Minecraft building dialogues, and shows that current referring-expression models struggle on this dynam...
-
AmbiK: Dataset of Ambiguous Tasks in Kitchen Environment
AmbiK is a human-validated, text-only benchmark of 1000 ambiguous kitchen tasks paired with unambiguous counterparts, on which current ambiguity detection methods perform poorly.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.