Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating the Relationship Between Debiasing and Artifact Removal using Saliency Maps

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.00234 v3 pith:XM3EHHNR submitted 2025-02-28 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords debiasingfairnessartifactartifactsattributesmapsmodelprotected
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread adoption of machine learning systems has raised critical concerns about fairness and bias, making mitigating harmful biases essential for AI development. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between debiasing and removing artifacts in neural networks for computer vision tasks. First, we introduce a set of novel XAI-based metrics that analyze saliency maps to assess shifts in a model's decision-making process. Then, we demonstrate that successful debiasing methods systematically redirect model focus away from protected attributes. Finally, we show that techniques originally developed for artifact removal can be effectively repurposed for improving fairness. These findings provide evidence for the existence of a bidirectional connection between ensuring fairness and removing artifacts corresponding to protected attributes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper reviewing why evaluating AI explanations is difficult, illustrated by the author's bias-detection and human-survey case studies and by concept-drift explanation methods.

Pith tools