Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

The centimeter emission from planet-forming disks in Taurus

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Centimeter observations of 21 Taurus disks show the dust spectral index rising from about 2.3 at millimeter wavelengths to about 2.8 in the centimeter regime, implying that the inner 40 au of these disks is optically thick at ALMA…

desk verdict A solid, honest sample-level VLA study of ordinary Taurus disks at 1-2 cm; the two-power-law SED decomposition is the main soft spot and the paper says so itself, but it deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11686 v1 pith:XRQ6T6RK submitted 2025-01-20 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Antonio Garufi , Carlos Carrasco-Gonzalez , Enrique Macias , Leonardo Testi , Pietro Curone , Luca Ricci , Stefano Facchini , Feng Long
show 11 more authors
Carlo F. Manara Ilaria Pascucci Giovanni Rosotti Francesco Zagaria Cathie Clarke Gregory J. Herczeg Andrea Isella Alessia Rota Karina Mauco Nienke van der Marel Marco Tazzari
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords protoplanetarydiskscentimeteremissionfree-freedustspectralindexopticaldepthTaurusstar-formingregionaccretionrateverylargearray
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using new VLA observations of 21 ordinary planet-forming disks in Taurus, the paper establishes two things. First, the dust spectral index jumps from a median of about 2.3 at millimeter wavelengths to about 2.8 between 3 mm and 1 cm, after subtracting a ubiquitous free-free component; this change implies that the inner disk, up to 40 au, is optically thick at ALMA wavelengths and becomes optically thin only beyond 3 mm. Second, the inferred free-free emission correlates with mass accretion rate (r = 0.66 ± 0.17) and is unaffected by outer disk morphology, tying the ionized gas to inner-disk accretion and outflow processes. The results matter because they show that common disks hide their inner solid reservoir at millimeter wavelengths, and that centimeter observations offer a way to measure dust and gas components separately.

What carries the argument

The central tool is a two-component spectral energy distribution fit: $S_{\nu}^{\mathrm{total}} = S_0^{\mathrm{gas}}(\nu/15\,\mathrm{GHz})^{\alpha_{\mathrm{gas}}} + S_0^{\mathrm{dust}}(\nu/225\,\mathrm{GHz})^{\alpha_{\mathrm{dust}}}$. The fit separates the unresolved 0.85 mm–6 cm photometry into a flat free-free power law ($\alpha_{\mathrm{gas}}\in[-1,2]$) and a steep dust power law ($\alpha_{\mathrm{dust}}\in[2,4]$). Subtracting the gas component yields dust spectral indices at 3 mm–1 cm and 1–2 cm, which are then compared with ALMA disk radii to locate the optically thick region.

What would settle it

Resolve a few of these disks at 1 cm and 2 cm with ngVLA and map the free-free component directly; if the true dust spectral index between 3 mm and 1 cm is close to the millimeter value of about 2.3 rather than 2.8, the evidence for a 40 au optically thick inner region would disappear, and if the free-free/accretion correlation vanishes when free-free is measured from resolved images rather than from the model, the proposed accretion link would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper finds that the dust spectral index of planet-forming disks in Taurus changes sharply from a median of about 2.3 at millimeter wavelengths to about 2.8 between 3 mm and 1 cm, after subtracting a free-free component inferred from a two-power-law fit to photometry spanning 0.85 mm to 6 cm. The authors interpret this change as evidence that a large portion of the inner disk, up to 40 au, is optically thick at ALMA wavelengths and becomes optically thin only beyond 3 mm. They also find that the inferred free-free emission correlates with mass accretion rate (r = 0.66 ± 0.17) and is independent of outer disk morphology, suggesting that the ionized gas is tied to accretion and outflow activity in the inner disk rather than to large-scale disk structure.

Load-bearing premise

The two-power-law decomposition assumes a single power-law dust spectrum from 0.85 mm to 2 cm and a flat gas power law; if the dust spectrum steepens between 1 and 2 cm, the model will underestimate free-free emission and overestimate dust emission, biasing both the free-free/accretion correlation and the centimeter dust indices.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the inner 40 au of typical disks is optically thick at ALMA wavelengths, dust masses derived from millimeter fluxes are systematically underestimated, especially for compact disks where this region dominates the emission.
  • The centimeter index being uniform across disks of different sizes and morphologies implies that the grain population emitting at 1–2 cm is similar even when the outer disk structure differs greatly.
  • Because the free-free emission tracks accretion and ignores outer disk morphology, centimeter observations can serve as a clean probe of inner-disk accretion and outflow activity, independent of the millimeter structure.
  • The finding that the dust emission is still appreciable at 2 cm means that future arrays like ngVLA and SKA-mid can realistically resolve the centimeter dust component and directly measure grain growth in ordinary disks.
  • Mass estimates from centimeter fluxes are dominated by the choice of dust opacity for grains of at least millimeter size, so centimeter mass measurements will require better laboratory opacities rather than longer integrations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Implicitly, the correlation between free-free emission and accretion rate suggests that centimeter continuum could become a straightforward accretion diagnostic for Class II disks, independent of the usual UV and optical veiling assumptions.
  • If the centimeter dust index is indeed about 2.8 everywhere, the grain population responsible for the emission may be strikingly uniform, hinting at a common growth ceiling; resolved imaging will test whether the emission actually originates in the same radial zone.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same two-power-law decomposition to VLA observations of another star-forming region, such as Lupus or Chamaeleon, to see whether the 40 au optically thick scale and the accretion correlation persist outside Taurus.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents new VLA photometry at 7 mm to 6 cm for 21 Taurus disks selected from the ALMA surveys of Long et al. (2018, 2019), merged with archival ALMA, CARMA, IRAM, SCUBA, and CSO data into SEDs spanning 0.85 mm to 6 cm. Each SED is fit in Sec. 3.2 (Eq. 1) with a two-power-law model: a dust component (S_dust0 at 225 GHz, alpha_dust in [2,4]) plus an ionized-gas component (S_gas0 at 15 GHz, alpha_gas in [-1,2]). From this decomposition the paper claims (i) ubiquitous free-free emission whose 2 cm flux correlates with the mass accretion rate (Pearson r = 0.66 +/- 0.17) and is independent of ALMA outer-disk morphology; (ii) dust spectral indices that change from a median of about 2.3 at 0.89-3 mm to about 2.8 at 3 mm-1 cm and 2.7 at 1-2 cm, interpreted as the optically thick-to-thin transition and implying an optically thick inner region up to 40 au; (iii) similar 1.3 mm-2 cm flux ratios between compact and sub-structured disks once a 40 au aperture is used; and (iv) an opacity-dominated uncertainty on centimeter-wavelength disk masses. HP Tau is excluded from the SED fitting, and DQ Tau requires fixing alpha_gas to 0.6.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial observational step: it provides the largest homogeneous sample of ordinary Class II disks in Taurus with 1-2 cm photometry, extends the free-free/accretion connection reported by Rota et al. (2024) for transition disks to the typical disk population, and yields a statistical set of centimeter dust spectral indices in a regime previously dominated by individual-object studies. The paper's strengths are its new VLA dataset with documented self-calibration, the complete per-source photometry and fit tables (Tables A.1, A.2), the transparent flagging of non-standard cases (HP Tau, DQ Tau), the model-free robustness check of the accretion correlation against the total 2 cm flux, and the explicit statement that the central claims are falsifiable with resolved cm observations (ngVLA, SKA-mid, ALMA Band 1). The principal weakness is that the two-power-law decomposition underpinning both headline results is not quantitatively validated against plausible curvature in the dust SED, a limitation the authors themselves acknowledge in Sec. 4.2; this is fixable within the manuscript's scope.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2 (Eq. 1); §4.2] The decomposition in Eq. (1) is the load-bearing step for both headline results, and its central assumption conflicts with the paper's main conclusion. The model assumes a single dust power law from 0.85 mm to 2 cm, while the paper claims that the dust spectrum changes from alpha ≈ 2.3 to ≈ 2.8 across exactly this range. A single power law cannot represent both regimes, and the authors concede in §4.2 that if the intrinsic dust spectrum is steepening, the procedure underestimates free-free and overestimates dust emission between 1 and 2 cm. Because the Fig. 2 free-free fluxes and the Fig. 3 free-free-subtracted cm indices both come from this same fit, this is not a local caveat. Note that the bias is not uniformly unfavorable: overestimated dust at 1-2 cm would make the inferred 3 mm-1 cm index a lower limit, so the claimed break would be strengthened rather than weakened by curvature; however, the effect on the free-free normalization, and hence on Fig. 2, is unquantified and could vary source by source. I request: (i) per-source residuals and a goodness-of-fit statistic for the current fits; (ii) an explicit validation of the decomposition, e.g., an injection-recovery test in which synthetic SEDs containing a 2.3-to-2.8 dust break are fitted with Eq. (1), reporting the resulting bias in S_gas0 and in the derived cm indices, or, alternatively, a fit with a broken power law for the dust; and (iii) a statement of how the two summary conclusions shift under that bias. Without (ii), the r = 0.66 correlation and the alpha_cm = 2.8 values remain products of the assumed model.
  2. [§3.4, Fig. 3] The 'pronounced change' from millimeter to centimeter indices is not tested as a paired difference. The errors quoted in Fig. 3 (±0.3, ±0.4) are sample dispersions, not errors on the mean; with 19-21 objects the mean error is roughly an order of magnitude smaller, but the same objects contribute to alpha(1.3-3 mm) and alpha(3 mm-1 cm), so an unpaired comparison can inflate apparent significance. Please report the per-source difference Δα = α_cm - α_mm and its distribution with a paired test (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank or a bootstrap on the mean difference), and state how many sources enter each average (not all 21 have 3 mm photometry, per §2.3). In addition, the alpha_2cm average of 2.7 ± 0.4 is computed after excluding six sources whose index error exceeds 1.0; please state how many sources remain and verify that the exclusion does not bias the mean (e.g., whether the excluded sources are preferentially the faintest at 2 cm). Finally, Fig. 3 should visually distinguish which indices are direct photometric ratios (alpha at 0.8-1.3 mm and 1.3-3 mm) from those requiring the model subtraction (3 mm-1 cm and 1-2 cm), since the two classes have different systematic sensitivities.
  3. [§3.3, Fig. 2] Three issues affect the support for the free-free/accretion correlation. First, r = 0.66 ± 0.17 is a Pearson coefficient computed on model-inferred free-free fluxes whose uncertainties are large and asymmetric (Table A.1); given N = 20-21 and the modest dynamic range, a rank-based coefficient (Spearman) or an error-aware regression with bootstrap should also be reported. Second, the most extreme point of the correlation, DQ Tau, is also the one that required a manual intervention: alpha_gas is fixed to 0.6 (Table A.1) because the unconstrained fit places an unphysical 35% of the 1.33 mm emission into free-free (Appendix A). DQ Tau is a high-leverage point, so the correlation should be quoted with and without it, and the unconstrained fit should be shown. Third, the weakest free-free values are marginal detections at best (CIDA 9: S_gas0 = 0.02 +0.01/-0.02 mJy, with the posterior piling up at the zero boundary; V409 Tau: 0.02 +0.02/-0.01 mJy), so the wording 'ubiquitous presence of free-free emission' in the Abstract, §3.3, and §5 overstates these cases; the average 65% free-free fraction at 2 cm may still be robust, but per-source detections should be flagged with their significance and the 'presence in all sources' claim softened.
  4. [§3.5, Figs. 4-5; §4.1] The estimate that the optically thick region extends to roughly 40 au is presented without a quantitative uncertainty. The 40 au scale is inferred from the change in the millimeter index at R_ALMA ≈ 40 au in Fig. 4, where only five disks lie below 40 au, and from the aperture experiment in Fig. 5. The flux-ratio differences (73% at 1.3 mm versus 54% at 3 mm-2 cm and 59% at the 40 au aperture) are shown without error bars, and no test establishes that they are mutually inconsistent; with 8-11 objects per morphology class the bootstrap spread could be substantial. Please add uncertainties to the ratios, report a significance test (e.g., bootstrap or permutation), and present the 40 au value as a range rather than a sharp radius, given that the unresolved VLA photometry cannot directly locate the transition.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§2.3] The description of the CARMA 3 mm data is confusing: the text mentions 'unpublished CARMA data of 7 sources' but then says the observations cover the entire sample except CIDA 9, UZ Tau, and V409 Tau; please clarify how many of the 21 sources actually contribute the 3 mm photometry used in §3.2 and §3.4, and tabulate the IRAM and CARMA contributions separately.
  2. [§3.2] The fitting description omits the prior parameterization (flat in which variable?) and the implementation of the constraints (S_gas0 cannot exceed the total 2 cm flux, etc.); given that several posteriors in Table A.1 pile up at the zero boundary, the priors and basic MCMC convergence diagnostics (e.g., chain length, acceptance rate, or R-hat) should be reported.
  3. [§3.1, Table A.2] The C-band upper limits used to argue against gyro-synchrotron emission are listed but are not incorporated into the SED fits; please state explicitly how the non-detections at 6 cm enter the analysis, since the identification of the radio excess as free-free rests on the positive alpha_gas values whose individual uncertainties in Table A.1 are large.
  4. [Fig. 3] The red 'ISM' reference line at alpha ≈ 2.8 (i.e., an opacity index beta ≈ 0.8) needs a citation; common sub-millimeter ISM opacity indices (beta ≈ 1.5-1.7) correspond to alpha ≈ 3.5-3.7, so the provenance of this line should be specified, or the comparison drawn against the adopted value instead of an implied absolute one.
  5. [§3.5] The sentence 'This does indicate what is net loss of 1.3-mm flux in these disks but it does qualitatively suggest that is very high even for extended disks...' is garbled and should be reworded to convey the intended meaning (likely 'does not indicate a net loss' and 'that this is very high').
  6. [§4.3, Appendix A] For DQ Tau, the conclusion that the K-band flare lasted less than a few hours rests on a single same-day Ka-band measurement; please state whether any additional epochs from the 21B-267 data support this, and add a sentence to §2.2 or Table A.2 noting the epoch spread across the assembled SEDs (SCUBA 2005, CARMA 2009-2012, ALMA 2017-2019, VLA 2020-2021), since free-free variability is itself flagged as important in §4.2.
  7. [§4.3, §5] Minor wording: 'the grain population responsible for these indices are analogous' should read 'is analogous'; also, the Summary would benefit from explicitly listing the number of sources entering each analysis (SED fits, Fig. 2, and each index in Fig. 3), since HP Tau is excluded from the fits and the correlation, and DQ Tau enters with a constrained parameter.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The centimeter dust spectral indices are outputs of the same two-power-law fit that supplies the free-free subtraction, so the headline mm-to-cm index change is partly model-imposed, although the direct millimeter indices, the total-2 cm accretion check, and the resolved ALMA comparisons give the analysis substantive independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sect. 3.4 (Dust spectral indices), with Eq. (1), Table A.1, and Sect. 3.3]
    "A first hint of higher values of α comes from the αdust values of our model (see Sect. 3.2) shown in Table A.1. Their average is 2.7 with a low dispersion ( σ = 0.2). Thus, we extract the individual indices from the observed 1-cm and 2-cm photometry after removing the free-free contribution described in Sect. 3.3."

    The free-free contribution removed in Sect. 3.3 is the gas power-law term G(ν)=S_gas0(ν/15 GHz)^αgas fitted simultaneously with the dust term D(ν)=S_dust0(ν/225 GHz)^αdust in Eq. (1). Because the paper states that all SEDs are well fitted, the observed photometry at the fitted 1-cm and 2-cm points satisfies S_obs ≈ G + D, so the ‘free-free-subtracted’ fluxes used to compute the centimeter dust indices are, up to fit residuals, just the model dust power law. Consequently the reported values α(3 mm–1 cm) ≈ 2.8 and α(1–2 cm) ≈ 2.7 are largely a restatement of the fitted αdust rather than an independent spectral-slope measurement. The paper itself concedes in Sect.

full rationale

Most of the paper rests on genuinely external or independent data: the ALMA disk radii and morphologies come from Long et al. (2019), the millimeter photometry from literature surveys, and the VLA/CARMA fluxes are new observations. The free-free/accretion correlation is model-dependent because the free-free amplitude S_gas0 is a fit parameter, but the paper also checks it against the total observed 2-cm flux and uses the non-detections at 6 cm as supporting evidence, so this correlation is not forced by definition. The main circular element is confined to the centimeter dust indices: the same Eq. (1) fit supplies both the dust power law and the free-free component subtracted before computing the indices, so the claimed change between millimeter (2.3) and centimeter (2.8) indices is partly an output of the assumed single-power-law dust model rather than a direct measurement of a spectral break. The authors explicitly acknowledge the associated bias. Because the direct millimeter indices, the total-2 cm correlation check, and the ALMA extent comparisons provide independent anchoring, the circularity is partial rather than total; no load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness argument is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a two-power-law decomposition with four free parameters per source, plus assumptions about spectral curvature, free-free identification, and the optically thin nature of centimeter emission. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • S_gas0 (free-free flux at 2 cm) = 0.02-0.26 mJy per source (Table A.1)
    The ionized gas normalization in Eq. (1), fitted by MCMC; central to the free-free/accretion correlation.
  • alpha_gas (ionized gas spectral index) = 0.3-1.1, DQ Tau fixed to 0.6
    Fitted within [-1,2]; the resulting slope is used to classify the emission as free-free.
  • S_dust0 (dust flux at 1.3 mm) = 2.1-217.0 mJy per source (Table A.1)
    Dust normalization in Eq. (1), fitted against ALMA and literature photometry.
  • alpha_dust (dust spectral index) = 2.2-3.0 per source; average 2.7
    Fitted within [2,4]; used together with free-free-subtracted photometry to infer the optical depth regime.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Observed SED is the sum of two power laws: gas plus dust (Eq. 1).
    Used for all SED fits; assumes no additional spectral components or curvature.
  • domain assumption Dust spectrum is a single power law from 0.85 mm to 2 cm; no steepening or turnover.
    Admitted in Section 4.2 that steepening could bias the decomposition; load-bearing for the dust-index claims.
  • domain assumption Non-detection at 6 cm and positive alpha_gas imply the extra emission is free-free, not gyro-synchrotron or stellar flares.
    Given in Section 3.2; supported by literature but not directly verified per source.
  • domain assumption Unresolved cm emission traces the same disk region as resolved ALMA emission; the 40 au optically thick region is inferred by combining unresolved spectra with ALMA radii.
    Sections 3.4 and 4.1; no resolved centimeter images are used.
  • domain assumption Optically thin emission at wavelengths longer than 3 mm.
    Used to convert dust spectral index to opacity index and to discuss disk masses; could be violated if residual optical depth remains.
  • domain assumption Dust temperature fixed at 20 K for mass estimates.
    Section 4.2; not central to the detection claims but affects the mass comparison in Fig. 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The centimeter emission from planet-forming disks in Taurus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XRQ6T6RK

@misc{pith2026250111686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The centimeter emission from planet-forming disks in Taurus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XRQ6T6RK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11686}
}
read the original abstract

The last decade has witnessed remarkable advances in the characterization of the (sub-)millimeter emission from planet-forming disks. Instead, the study of the (sub-)centimeter emission has made more limited progress, to the point that only a few exceptional disk-bearing objects have been characterized in the centimeter regime. This work takes a broad view of the centimeter emission from a large sample with VLA observations that is selected from previous ALMA surveys of more representative disks in brightness and extent. We report on the detection and characterization of flux at centimeter wavelengths from 21 sources in the Taurus star-forming region. Complemented by literature and archival data, the entire photometry from 0.85 mm to 6 cm is fitted by a two-component model that determines the ubiquitous presence of free-free emission entangled with the dust emission. The flux density of the free-free emission is found to scale with the accretion rate but is independent of the outer disk morphology depicted by ALMA. The dust emission at 2 cm is still appreciable, and offers the possibility to extract an unprecedented large set of dust spectral indices in the centimeter regime. A pronounced change between the median millimeter indices (2.3) and centimeter indices (2.8) suggests that a large portion of the disk emission is optically thick up to 3 mm. The comparison of both indices and fluxes with the ALMA disk extent indicates that this portion can be as large as 40 au, and suggests that the grain population within this disk region that emits the observed centimeter emission is similar in disks with different size and morphology. All these results await confirmation and dedicated dust modeling once facilities like ngVLA or SKA-mid are able to resolve the centimeter emission from planet-forming disks and disentangle the various components.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11686 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Free-free emission vs mass accretion rate. The free-free emission at 2 cm constrained by our model (see Sect. 3.2) for the entire sample is scaled to 140 pc and compared with the mass accretion rates shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Millimeter and centimeter dust spectral indices. The individual α at four different spectral ranges are shown in semi-transparency. These are obtained removing the free-free emission from our photometry and comparing with literature values (see text). The big foreground symbols are the average values for the entire sample. The error bars of the in￾dividual sources are inherited from the uncertainty on the photometry… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Dust spectral indices versus disk extent. All available α of our sample obtained after removing the free-free emission are compared with the disk extent from the ALMA continuum emission at 1.3 mm listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average dust mass at different wavelengths and with different opacities. The average disk dust mass from our sample is calculated from 1.3-mm, 3-mm, 1-cm, and 2-cm fluxes assuming optically thin emission and with different sets of opacity (Beckwith et al. 1990; Zubko e…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A correlation between accretion and outflow rates for Class II Young Stellar Objects with full and transition disks

    astro-ph.EP 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Centimeter free-free emission in Class II disks correlates with accretion rate, and the authors infer it traces MHD winds or jets in both full and transition disks.

  2. A JWST, ALMA and VLA survey of the Ophiuchus-A star-forming region: Unveiling hidden dust mass and connecting infrared outflows to their radio origins

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-wavelength survey of 20 Ophiuchus protostars finds dust masses tens to hundreds of times larger than millimetre-only estimates, if the adopted dust-opacity model is correct.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L., P \'e rez , L

    ALMA Partnership , Brogan , C. L., P \'e rez , L. M., et al. 2015, , 808, L3

    2015

  2. [2]

    M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L

    Andrews , S. M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L. M., et al. 2018, , 869, L41

    2018

  3. [3]

    M., Rosenfeld , K

    Andrews , S. M., Rosenfeld , K. A., Kraus , A. L., & Wilner , D. J. 2013, , 771, 129

    2013

  4. [4]

    Andrews , S. M. & Williams , J. P. 2005, , 631, 1134

    2005

  5. [5]

    M., Wilner , D

    Andrews , S. M., Wilner , D. J., Espaillat , C., et al. 2011, , 732, 42

    2011

  6. [6]

    F., & Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C

    Anglada , G., Rodr \' guez , L. F., & Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C. 2018, , 26, 3

    2018

  7. [7]

    P., van der Marel , N., et al

    Ansdell , M., Williams , J. P., van der Marel , N., et al. 2016, , 828, 46

    2016

  8. [8]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bae , J., Isella , A., Zhu , Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 423

    2023

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    S., Benz , A

    Bastian , T. S., Benz , A. O., & Gary , D. E. 1998, , 36, 131

    1998

  2. [10]

    Beckwith , S. V. W. & Sargent , A. I. 1991, , 381, 250

    1991

  3. [11]

    Beckwith , S. V. W., Sargent , A. I., Chini , R. S., & Guesten , R. 1990, , 99, 924

    1990

  4. [12]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Benisty , M., Dominik , C., Follette , K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 605

    2023

  5. [13]

    P., Zhu , Z., et al

    Birnstiel , T., Dullemond , C. P., Zhu , Z., et al. 2018, , 869, L45

    2018

  6. [14]

    2020, , 637, L5

    Boccaletti , A., Di Folco , E., Pantin , E., et al. 2020, , 637, L5

    2020

  7. [15]

    M., Blake , G

    Brown , J. M., Blake , G. A., Qi , C., et al. 2009, , 704, 496

    2009

  8. [16]

    M., Ricci , L., & Isella , A

    Carpenter , J. M., Ricci , L., & Isella , A. 2014, , 787, 42

    2014

  9. [17]

    J., et al

    Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Henning , T., Chand ler , C. J., et al. 2016, , 821, L16

    2016

  10. [18]

    2019, , 883, 71

    Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Sierra , A., Flock , M., et al. 2019, , 883, 71

    2019

  11. [19]

    2019, , 483, 3278

    Casassus , S., Marino , S., Lyra , W., et al. 2019, , 483, 3278

    2019

  12. [20]

    , S., Jord \'a n , A., et al

    Casassus , S., Perez M. , S., Jord \'a n , A., et al. 2012, , 754, L31

    2012

  13. [21]

    M., Marino , S., et al

    Casassus , S., Wright , C. M., Marino , S., et al. 2015, , 812, 126

    2015

  14. [22]

    M., Gurwell , M

    Chung , C.-Y., Andrews , S. M., Gurwell , M. A., et al. 2024, , 273, 29

    2024

  15. [23]

    A., Ru \' z-Rodr \' guez , D., Hales , A., et al

    Cieza , L. A., Ru \' z-Rodr \' guez , D., Hales , A., et al. 2019, , 482, 698

    2019

  16. [24]

    2006, , 181, 587

    Crida , A., Morbidelli , A., & Masset , F. 2006, , 181, 587

    2006

  17. [25]

    2023, , 677, A118

    Curone , P., Testi , L., Mac \' as , E., et al. 2023, , 677, A118

    2023

  18. [26]

    M., Torres , G., et al

    Czekala , I., Andrews , S. M., Torres , G., et al. 2016, , 818, 156

    2016

  19. [27]

    2001, , 553, 321

    D'Alessio , P., Calvet , N., & Hartmann , L. 2001, , 553, 321

    2001

  20. [28]

    Dulk , G. A. & Marsh , K. A. 1982, , 259, 350

    1982

  21. [29]

    Dullemond , C. P. & Dominik , C. 2004, , 417, 159

    2004

  22. [30]

    1996, , 309, 493

    Dutrey , A., Guilloteau , S., Duvert , G., et al. 1996, , 309, 493

    1996

  23. [31]

    1994, , 286, 149

    Dutrey , A., Guilloteau , S., & Simon , M. 1994, , 286, 149

    1994

  24. [32]

    A., Loinard , L., Mioduszewski , A

    Dzib , S. A., Loinard , L., Mioduszewski , A. J., et al. 2013, , 775, 63

    2013

  25. [33]

    Esplin , T. L. & Luhman , K. L. 2019, , 158, 54

    2019

  26. [34]

    2006, , 636, L153

    Fukagawa , M., Tamura , M., Itoh , Y., et al. 2006, , 636, L153

    2006

  27. [35]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1

    2023

  28. [36]

    Galli , P. A. B., Loinard , L., Ortiz-L \'e on , G. N., et al. 2018, , 859, 33

    2018

  29. [37]

    B., Manara , C

    Galv \'a n-Madrid , R., Liu , H. B., Manara , C. F., et al. 2014, , 570, L9

    2014

  30. [38]

    2022, , 667, A124

    Gangi , M., Antoniucci , S., Biazzo , K., et al. 2022, , 667, A124

    2022

  31. [39]

    2020, , 633, A82

    Garufi , A., Avenhaus , H., P \'e rez , S., et al. 2020, , 633, A82

    2020

  32. [40]

    2018, , 620, A94

    Garufi , A., Benisty , M., Pinilla , P., et al. 2018, , 620, A94

    2018

  33. [41]

    2022, , 658, A137

    Garufi , A., Dominik , C., Ginski , C., et al. 2022, , 658, A137

    2022

  34. [42]

    G., et al

    Garufi , A., Ginski , C., van Holstein , R. G., et al. 2024, , 685, A53

    2024

  35. [43]

    2017, , 603, A21

    Garufi , A., Meeus , G., Benisty , M., et al. 2017, , 603, A21

    2017

  36. [44]

    M., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Mac \' as , E., et al

    Guerra-Alvarado , O. M., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Mac \' as , E., et al. 2024, , 686, A298

    2024

  37. [45]

    2022, , 664, A137

    Guidi , G., Isella , A., Testi , L., et al. 2022, , 664, A137

    2022

  38. [46]

    V., \"O berg , K

    Guzm \'a n , V. V., \"O berg , K. I., Carpenter , J., et al. 2018, , 864, 170

    2018

  39. [47]

    2024, , 961, 28

    Harsono , D., Long , F., Pinilla , P., et al. 2024, , 961, 28

    2024

  40. [48]

    2022, , 930, 171

    Huang , J., Ginski , C., Benisty , M., et al. 2022, , 930, 171

    2022

  41. [49]

    J., Carpenter , J

    Isella , A., Chandler , C. J., Carpenter , J. M., P \'e rez , L. M., & Ricci , L. 2014, , 788, 129

    2014

  42. [50]

    M., et al

    Isella , A., Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., et al. 2018, , 869, L49

    2018

  43. [51]

    J., G \'o mez , M., & Whitney , B

    Kenyon , S. J., G \'o mez , M., & Whitney , B. A. 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I, ed. B. Reipurth , Vol. 4, 405

    2008

  44. [52]

    1999, , 303, 696

    Kley , W. 1999, , 303, 696

    1999

  45. [53]

    Lada , C. J. 1987, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 115, Star Forming Regions, ed. M. Peimbert & J. Jugaku , 1--17

    1987

  46. [54]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Lesur , G., Flock , M., Ercolano , B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 465

    2023

  47. [55]

    2023, , 166, 82

    Lin , C.-L., Ip , W.-H., Hsiao , Y., et al. 2023, , 166, 82

    2023

  48. [56]

    B., Muto , T., Konishi , M., et al

    Liu , H. B., Muto , T., Konishi , M., et al. 2024, , 685, A18

    2024

  49. [57]

    T., Wright , C

    Lommen , D., Maddison , S. T., Wright , C. M., et al. 2009, , 495, 869

    2009

  50. [58]

    J., Harsono , D., et al

    Long , F., Herczeg , G. J., Harsono , D., et al. 2019, , 882, 49

    2019

  51. [59]

    J., et al

    Long , F., Pinilla , P., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2018, , 869, 17

    2018

  52. [60]

    2016, , 829, 1

    Mac \' as , E., Anglada , G., Osorio , M., et al. 2016, , 829, 1

    2016

  53. [61]

    2017, , 838, 97

    Mac \' as , E., Anglada , G., Osorio , M., et al. 2017, , 838, 97

    2017

  54. [62]

    C., Ribas , \'A ., et al

    Mac \' as , E., Espaillat , C. C., Ribas , \'A ., et al. 2018, , 865, 37

    2018

  55. [63]

    2021, , 648, A33

    Mac \' as , E., Guerra-Alvarado , O., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., et al. 2021, , 648, A33

    2021

  56. [64]

    F., Morbidelli , A., & Guillot , T

    Manara , C. F., Morbidelli , A., & Guillot , T. 2018, , 618, L3

    2018

  57. [65]

    F., Rosotti , G., Testi , L., et al

    Manara , C. F., Rosotti , G., Testi , L., et al. 2016, , 591, L3

    2016

  58. [66]

    F., Tazzari , M., Long , F., et al

    Manara , C. F., Tazzari , M., Long , F., et al. 2019, , 628, A95

    2019

  59. [67]

    2015, , 813, 76

    Marino , S., Casassus , S., Perez , S., et al. 2015, , 813, 76

    2015

  60. [68]

    2022, , 658, A63

    Mesa , D., Ginski , C., Gratton , R., et al. 2022, , 658, A63

    2022

  61. [69]

    C., & Kataoka , A

    Miotello , A., Kamp , I., Birnstiel , T., Cleeves , L. C., & Kataoka , A. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 501

    2023

  62. [70]

    D., Pascucci , I., Ciesla , F

    Mulders , G. D., Pascucci , I., Ciesla , F. J., & Fernandes , R. B. 2021, , 920, 66

    2021

  63. [71]

    R., Andrews , S

    Najita , J. R., Andrews , S. M., & Muzerolle , J. 2015, , 450, 3559

    2015

  64. [72]

    R., Strom , S

    Najita , J. R., Strom , S. E., & Muzerolle , J. 2007, , 378, 369

    2007

  65. [73]

    J., Maddison , S

    Norfolk , B. J., Maddison , S. T., Pinte , C., et al. 2021, , 502, 5779

    2021

  66. [74]

    & Felli , M

    Panagia , N. & Felli , M. 1975, , 39, 1

    1975

  67. [75]

    2012, , 751, L42

    Pascucci , I., Gorti , U., & Hollenbach , D. 2012, , 751, L42

    2012

  68. [76]

    J., et al

    Pascucci , I., Testi , L., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2016, , 831, 125

    2016

  69. [77]

    M., Chandler , C

    P \'e rez , L. M., Chandler , C. J., Isella , A., et al. 2015, , 813, 41

    2015

  70. [78]

    2014, , 564, A51

    Pinilla , P., Benisty , M., Birnstiel , T., et al. 2014, , 564, A51

    2014

  71. [79]

    2012, , 538, A114

    Pinilla , P., Birnstiel , T., Ricci , L., et al. 2012, , 538, A114

    2012

  72. [80]

    B., Hubickyj , O., Bodenheimer , P., et al

    Pollack , J. B., Hubickyj , O., Bodenheimer , P., et al. 1996, , 124, 62

    1996

  73. [81]

    Reynolds , S. P. 1986, , 304, 713

    1986

  74. [82]

    C., Mac \' as , E., & Sarro , L

    Ribas , \'A ., Espaillat , C. C., Mac \' as , E., & Sarro , L. M. 2020, , 642, A171

    2020

  75. [83]

    2017, , 846, 19

    Ricci , L., Rome , H., Pinilla , P., et al. 2017, , 846, 19

    2017

  76. [84]

    Ricci , L., Testi , L., Natta , A., & Brooks , K. J. 2010, , 521, A66

    2010

  77. [85]

    F., Anglada , G., & Curiel , S

    Rodr \' guez , L. F., Anglada , G., & Curiel , S. 1999, , 125, 427

    1999

  78. [86]

    A., Meijerhof , J

    Rota , A. A., Meijerhof , J. D., van der Marel , N., et al. 2024, , 684, A134

    2024

  79. [87]

    M., K \'o sp \'a l , \'A ., Getman , K

    Salter , D. M., K \'o sp \'a l , \'A ., Getman , K. V., et al. 2010, , 521, A32

    2010

  80. [88]

    D., & Guerra-Alvarado , O

    Sanchez , M., van der Marel , N., Lambrechts , M., Mulders , G. D., & Guerra-Alvarado , O. M. 2024, , 689, A236

    2024

  81. [89]

    J., Prieto , J

    Shappee , B. J., Prieto , J. L., Grupe , D., et al. 2014, , 788, 48

    2014

  82. [90]

    & Lizano , S

    Sierra , A. & Lizano , S. 2020, , 892, 136

    2020

  83. [91]

    2000, , 545, 1034

    Simon , M., Dutrey , A., & Guilloteau , S. 2000, , 545, 1034

    2000

  84. [92]

    J., Testi , L., et al

    Tazzari , M., Clarke , C. J., Testi , L., et al. 2021 a , , 506, 2804

    2021

  85. [93]

    2021 b , , 506, 5117

    Tazzari , M., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al. 2021 b , , 506, 5117

    2021

  86. [94]

    2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 339

    Testi , L., Birnstiel , T., Ricci , L., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 339

    2014

  87. [95]

    M., Mathieu , R

    Tofflemire , B. M., Mathieu , R. D., Ardila , D. R., et al. 2017, , 835, 8

    2017

  88. [96]

    M., Birnstiel , T., & Wilner , D

    Tripathi , A., Andrews , S. M., Birnstiel , T., & Wilner , D. J. 2017, , 845, 44

    2017

  89. [97]

    T., Wright , C

    Ubach , C., Maddison , S. T., Wright , C. M., et al. 2012, , 425, 3137

    2012

  90. [98]

    T., Wright , C

    Ubach , C., Maddison , S. T., Wright , C. M., et al. 2017, , 466, 4083

    2017

  91. [99]

    2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 225

    van der Marel , N. 2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 225

    2023

  92. [100]

    & Mulders , G

    van der Marel , N. & Mulders , G. D. 2021, , 162, 28

    2021

  93. [101]

    & Pinilla , P

    van der Marel , N. & Pinilla , P. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.09077

    2023 arXiv

  94. [102]

    F., Bruderer , S., et al

    van der Marel , N., van Dishoeck , E. F., Bruderer , S., et al. 2013, Science, 340, 1199

    2013

  95. [103]

    J., Booth , R

    Winter , A. J., Booth , R. A., & Clarke , C. J. 2018, , 479, 5522

    2018

  96. [104]

    M., Maddison , S

    Wright , C. M., Maddison , S. T., Wilner , D. J., et al. 2015, , 453, 414

    2015

  97. [105]

    C., Rilinger , A

    Xin , Z., Espaillat , C. C., Rilinger , A. M., Ribas , \'A ., & Mac \' as , E. 2023, , 942, 4

    2023

  98. [106]

    2019, , 877, L18

    Zhu , Z., Zhang , S., Jiang , Y.-F., et al. 2019, , 877, L18

    2019

  99. [107]

    G., Mennella , V., Colangeli , L., & Bussoletti , E

    Zubko , V. G., Mennella , V., Colangeli , L., & Bussoletti , E. 1996, , 282, 1321

    1996

  100. [108]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  101. [109]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.