Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.05040 v1 pith:XSTF6SAD submitted 2024-08-09 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments

classification cs.LG math.OCstat.ML
keywords bofirebayesianchemistryexperimentsimplementationsopen-sourceoptimizationother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our open-source Python package BoFire combines Bayesian Optimization (BO) with other design of experiments (DoE) strategies focusing on developing and optimizing new chemistry. Previous BO implementations, for example as they exist in the literature or software, require substantial adaptation for effective real-world deployment in chemical industry. BoFire provides a rich feature-set with extensive configurability and realizes our vision of fast-tracking research contributions into industrial use via maintainable open-source software. Owing to quality-of-life features like JSON-serializability of problem formulations, BoFire enables seamless integration of BO into RESTful APIs, a common architecture component for both self-driving laboratories and human-in-the-loop setups. This paper discusses the differences between BoFire and other BO implementations and outlines ways that BO research needs to be adapted for real-world use in a chemistry setting.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CARE: Controlling LLM-Generated Policies through Auditable Review of Evidence in Scientific Experimentation

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CARE improves final-best performance on two HTE benchmarks by using an evidence gate to control LLM policy revisions while defaulting to a standard optimizer.

  2. CARE: Controlling LLM-Generated Policies through Auditable Review of Evidence in Scientific Experimentation

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CARE introduces an evidence-gated auditable controller for LLM-generated ranking policies in high-throughput experimentation, reporting performance gains on Minerva/Olympus (80.0 to 88.5) and ChemLex (83.9 to 92.1) be...