Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

No LLM is Free From Bias: A Comprehensive Study of Bias Evaluation in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.11985 v2 pith:XXZ5SFDO submitted 2025-03-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords biasdifferentllmsevaluationlanguageacrossapproachesbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have increased the performance of different natural language understanding as well as generation tasks. Although LLMs have breached the state-of-the-art performance in various tasks, they often reflect different forms of bias present in the training data. In the light of this perceived limitation, we provide a unified evaluation of benchmarks using a set of representative small and medium-sized LLMs that cover different forms of biases starting from physical characteristics to socio-economic categories. Moreover, we propose five prompting approaches to carry out the bias detection task across different aspects of bias. Further, we formulate three research questions to gain valuable insight in detecting biases in LLMs using different approaches and evaluation metrics across benchmarks. The results indicate that each of the selected LLMs suffer from one or the other form of bias with the Phi-3.5B model being the least biased. Finally, we conclude the paper with the identification of key challenges and possible future directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. BavGround: A Benchmark for Regional Cultural Grounding and Dialect Competence in Bavarian

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new tri-lingual Bavarian culture benchmark shows open-weight LLMs underperform on Bavarian and source-grounded items, and that evaluation protocol materially changes accuracy and rankings.

Pith tools