Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NeuRecover: Regression-Controlled Repair of Deep Neural Networks with Training History

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.00191 v2 pith:XYN4Q7I2 submitted 2022-03-01 cs.LG cs.NEcs.SE

classification cs.LGcs.NEcs.SE
keywords methodregressionsrepaircasesdnnsbehaviorchallengecontrollability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Systematic techniques to improve quality of deep neural networks (DNNs) are critical given the increasing demand for practical applications including safety-critical ones. The key challenge comes from the little controllability in updating DNNs. Retraining to fix some behavior often has a destructive impact on other behavior, causing regressions, i.e., the updated DNN fails with inputs correctly handled by the original one. This problem is crucial when engineers are required to investigate failures in intensive assurance activities for safety or trust. Search-based repair techniques for DNNs have potentials to tackle this challenge by enabling localized updates only on "responsible parameters" inside the DNN. However, the potentials have not been explored to realize sufficient controllability to suppress regressions in DNN repair tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel DNN repair method that makes use of the training history for judging which DNN parameters should be changed or not to suppress regressions. We implemented the method into a tool called NeuRecover and evaluated it with three datasets. Our method outperformed the existing method by achieving often less than a quarter, even a tenth in some cases, number of regressions. Our method is especially effective when the repair requirements are tight to fix specific failure types. In such cases, our method showed stably low rates (<2%) of regressions, which were in many cases a tenth of regressions caused by retraining.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fault Localisation and Repair for DL Systems: An Empirical Study with LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs, especially GPT-4, outperform existing fault localisation and repair tools for deep learning models in accuracy, speed, and stability.

Pith tools