Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

PuzzleBench: A Fully Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Multimodal Models on Puzzle Solving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.10885 v1 pith:Y4KIXWG4 submitted 2025-04-15 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords evaluationpuzzlemultimodalovpgbenchmarkscapabilitiesdynamiclmms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of multimodal tasks, achieving ever-increasing performance on various evaluation benchmarks. However, existing benchmarks are typically static and often overlap with pre-training datasets, leading to fixed complexity constraints and substantial data contamination issues. Meanwhile, manually annotated datasets are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to human bias and inconsistency, leading to reliability and reproducibility issues. To address these problems, we propose a fully dynamic multimodal evaluation framework, named Open-ended Visual Puzzle Generation (OVPG), which aims to generate fresh, diverse, and verifiable evaluation data automatically in puzzle-solving tasks. Specifically, the OVPG pipeline consists of a raw material sampling module, a visual content generation module, and a puzzle rule design module, which ensures that each evaluation instance is primitive, highly randomized, and uniquely solvable, enabling continual adaptation to the evolving capabilities of LMMs. Built upon OVPG, we construct PuzzleBench, a dynamic and scalable benchmark comprising 11,840 VQA samples. It features six carefully designed puzzle tasks targeting three core LMM competencies, visual recognition, logical reasoning, and context understanding. PuzzleBench differs from static benchmarks that quickly become outdated. It enables ongoing dataset refreshing through OVPG and a rich set of open-ended puzzle designs, allowing seamless adaptation to the evolving capabilities of LMMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problems

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new physics benchmark with static and dynamically varied numeric problems shows top LLMs solve at most 43 percent of the static set and drop sharply when problem constants change.

  2. VisualSphinx: Large-Scale Synthetic Vision Logic Puzzles for RL

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-derived rules, genetic expansion, and program-drawn images produce 660K visual logic puzzles; GRPO training on them lifts a VLM's accuracy on those puzzles and modestly on MathVista.

  3. MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 1,188-question multimodal benchmark covering deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning shows that leading MLLMs score around 60% and are especially weak at abductive reasoning.

Pith tools